Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?

We present a comparative study of stellar winds in classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries (SgXBs) and supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) based on the analysis of publicly available out-of-eclipse observations performed with Suzaku and XMM-Newton. Our data set includes 55 observations of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2018-02, Vol.610, p.A50
Hauptverfasser: Pradhan, P., Bozzo, E., Paul, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page A50
container_title Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)
container_volume 610
creator Pradhan, P.
Bozzo, E.
Paul, B.
description We present a comparative study of stellar winds in classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries (SgXBs) and supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) based on the analysis of publicly available out-of-eclipse observations performed with Suzaku and XMM-Newton. Our data set includes 55 observations of classical SgXBs and 21 observations of SFXTs. We found that classical SgXBs are characterized by a systematically higher absorption and luminosity compared to the SFXTs, confirming the results of previous works in the literature. Additionally, we show that the equivalent width of the fluorescence Kα iron line in the classical SgXBs is significantly larger than that of the SFXTs (outside X-ray eclipses). Based on our current understanding of the physics of accretion in these systems, we conclude that the most likely explanation of these differences is ascribed to the presence of mechanisms inhibiting accretion most of the time in SFXTs, thereby leading to a much less efficient photoionization of the stellar wind compared to classical SgXBs. We do not find evidence for the previously reported anticorrelation between the equivalent width of the fluorescence iron line and the luminosity of SgXBs.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/0004-6361/201731487
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2055690619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2055690619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-bc5e168cc90955c395c1ed65e857741f031f915b888a490dcc6a8bb17f16e14a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9O4zAQhy3EShSWJ-BiiXPAE8eOwwUh_ktFu1pAVFwsx51QQ-sUTwrLA_DepFvUPY1m5vfNSB9jeyAOQCg4FEIUmZYaDnMBpYTClBtsAIXMM1EWepMN1okttk303Lc5GDlgn7eLOaan4GLHG0cdH2XJffAuuUgBY0f8DRMtiPupIwreTTn9JybhacJn_eIbq0N0KSAd8bMWiXcT5OPQNJgweuTTgDzEf1PfzuYuhjby9xDHxz_Zj8ZNCXe_6w67vzi_O73Khr8ur09Phpkvct1ltVcI2nhfiUopLyvlAcdaoVFlWUAjJDQVqNoY44pKjL3XztQ1lA1ohMLJHba_ujtP7esCqbPP7SLF_qXNhVK6EhqqPiVXKZ9aooSNnacwc-nDgrBL33Zp0y5t2rXvnspWVKAO_64Rl16sLmWprBEP1lSj349gbuwf-QUUIoMN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2055690619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?</title><source>Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX</source><source>EDP Sciences</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pradhan, P. ; Bozzo, E. ; Paul, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, P. ; Bozzo, E. ; Paul, B.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a comparative study of stellar winds in classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries (SgXBs) and supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) based on the analysis of publicly available out-of-eclipse observations performed with Suzaku and XMM-Newton. Our data set includes 55 observations of classical SgXBs and 21 observations of SFXTs. We found that classical SgXBs are characterized by a systematically higher absorption and luminosity compared to the SFXTs, confirming the results of previous works in the literature. Additionally, we show that the equivalent width of the fluorescence Kα iron line in the classical SgXBs is significantly larger than that of the SFXTs (outside X-ray eclipses). Based on our current understanding of the physics of accretion in these systems, we conclude that the most likely explanation of these differences is ascribed to the presence of mechanisms inhibiting accretion most of the time in SFXTs, thereby leading to a much less efficient photoionization of the stellar wind compared to classical SgXBs. We do not find evidence for the previously reported anticorrelation between the equivalent width of the fluorescence iron line and the luminosity of SgXBs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Binary stars ; Companion stars ; Deposition ; Equivalence ; Fluorescence ; Iron ; Luminosity ; Photoionization ; Stellar winds ; X ray binaries ; X ray stars ; X-rays: binaries ; XMM (spacecraft)</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2018-02, Vol.610, p.A50</ispartof><rights>Copyright EDP Sciences Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-bc5e168cc90955c395c1ed65e857741f031f915b888a490dcc6a8bb17f16e14a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-bc5e168cc90955c395c1ed65e857741f031f915b888a490dcc6a8bb17f16e14a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozzo, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>We present a comparative study of stellar winds in classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries (SgXBs) and supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) based on the analysis of publicly available out-of-eclipse observations performed with Suzaku and XMM-Newton. Our data set includes 55 observations of classical SgXBs and 21 observations of SFXTs. We found that classical SgXBs are characterized by a systematically higher absorption and luminosity compared to the SFXTs, confirming the results of previous works in the literature. Additionally, we show that the equivalent width of the fluorescence Kα iron line in the classical SgXBs is significantly larger than that of the SFXTs (outside X-ray eclipses). Based on our current understanding of the physics of accretion in these systems, we conclude that the most likely explanation of these differences is ascribed to the presence of mechanisms inhibiting accretion most of the time in SFXTs, thereby leading to a much less efficient photoionization of the stellar wind compared to classical SgXBs. We do not find evidence for the previously reported anticorrelation between the equivalent width of the fluorescence iron line and the luminosity of SgXBs.</description><subject>Binary stars</subject><subject>Companion stars</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Luminosity</subject><subject>Photoionization</subject><subject>Stellar winds</subject><subject>X ray binaries</subject><subject>X ray stars</subject><subject>X-rays: binaries</subject><subject>XMM (spacecraft)</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM9O4zAQhy3EShSWJ-BiiXPAE8eOwwUh_ktFu1pAVFwsx51QQ-sUTwrLA_DepFvUPY1m5vfNSB9jeyAOQCg4FEIUmZYaDnMBpYTClBtsAIXMM1EWepMN1okttk303Lc5GDlgn7eLOaan4GLHG0cdH2XJffAuuUgBY0f8DRMtiPupIwreTTn9JybhacJn_eIbq0N0KSAd8bMWiXcT5OPQNJgweuTTgDzEf1PfzuYuhjby9xDHxz_Zj8ZNCXe_6w67vzi_O73Khr8ur09Phpkvct1ltVcI2nhfiUopLyvlAcdaoVFlWUAjJDQVqNoY44pKjL3XztQ1lA1ohMLJHba_ujtP7esCqbPP7SLF_qXNhVK6EhqqPiVXKZ9aooSNnacwc-nDgrBL33Zp0y5t2rXvnspWVKAO_64Rl16sLmWprBEP1lSj349gbuwf-QUUIoMN</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Pradhan, P.</creator><creator>Bozzo, E.</creator><creator>Paul, B.</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?</title><author>Pradhan, P. ; Bozzo, E. ; Paul, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-bc5e168cc90955c395c1ed65e857741f031f915b888a490dcc6a8bb17f16e14a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Binary stars</topic><topic>Companion stars</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Luminosity</topic><topic>Photoionization</topic><topic>Stellar winds</topic><topic>X ray binaries</topic><topic>X ray stars</topic><topic>X-rays: binaries</topic><topic>XMM (spacecraft)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozzo, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pradhan, P.</au><au>Bozzo, E.</au><au>Paul, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>610</volume><spage>A50</spage><pages>A50-</pages><issn>0004-6361</issn><eissn>1432-0746</eissn><abstract>We present a comparative study of stellar winds in classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries (SgXBs) and supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) based on the analysis of publicly available out-of-eclipse observations performed with Suzaku and XMM-Newton. Our data set includes 55 observations of classical SgXBs and 21 observations of SFXTs. We found that classical SgXBs are characterized by a systematically higher absorption and luminosity compared to the SFXTs, confirming the results of previous works in the literature. Additionally, we show that the equivalent width of the fluorescence Kα iron line in the classical SgXBs is significantly larger than that of the SFXTs (outside X-ray eclipses). Based on our current understanding of the physics of accretion in these systems, we conclude that the most likely explanation of these differences is ascribed to the presence of mechanisms inhibiting accretion most of the time in SFXTs, thereby leading to a much less efficient photoionization of the stellar wind compared to classical SgXBs. We do not find evidence for the previously reported anticorrelation between the equivalent width of the fluorescence iron line and the luminosity of SgXBs.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/201731487</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-6361
ispartof Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2018-02, Vol.610, p.A50
issn 0004-6361
1432-0746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2055690619
source Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX; EDP Sciences; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Binary stars
Companion stars
Deposition
Equivalence
Fluorescence
Iron
Luminosity
Photoionization
Stellar winds
X ray binaries
X ray stars
X-rays: binaries
XMM (spacecraft)
title Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supergiant%20fast%20X-ray%20transients%20versus%20classical%20supergiant%20high%20mass%20X-ray%20binaries:%20Does%20the%20difference%20lie%20in%20the%20companion%20wind?&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Pradhan,%20P.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=610&rft.spage=A50&rft.pages=A50-&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/201731487&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2055690619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2055690619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true