Development and Cross-Cultural Validity of a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation
Separation from parents is a key aspect of adolescent development and has been linked to a variety of important mental and behavioral health outcomes. Separation-individuation measures were developed in the United States and have been used in Asian contexts. However, no cross-cultural studies have d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of child and family studies 2018-09, Vol.27 (9), p.2797-2810 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2810 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2797 |
container_title | Journal of child and family studies |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Chen, C. C. Richardson, G. B. Lai, M. H. C. Dai, C. L. Hays, D. G. |
description | Separation from parents is a key aspect of adolescent development and has been linked to a variety of important mental and behavioral health outcomes. Separation-individuation measures were developed in the United States and have been used in Asian contexts. However, no cross-cultural studies have demonstrated that measures of separation-individuation tap the same domains across Asian and American adolescents. This article describes two studies conducted to develop and initially validate a scale for measuring adolescent separation-individuation. Study 1 (
n
=
300) developed a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation (BMSI) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. The result was a 32-item BMSI that provided comparable test information to the original 148-item measure. Study 2 examined the BMSI for measurement invariance and convergent validity across U.S. and Taiwanese samples (
ns
= 231 and 323). Findings suggest that functional independence, attitudinal independence, and emotional independence may be culturally invariant separation-individuation constructs. However, conflictual independence seems to be more culturally dependent in that its items were only partially scalar invariant and it was only loosely related to the other separation-individuation factors. Findings are consistent with previous research that recommended against using total scores for the PSI (i.e., scoring a single separation-individuation dimension). This study suggests the BMSI holds promise as a brief measure of separation-individuation that can be used in cross-cultural research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10826-018-1140-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2055364843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2055364843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cf410b957c44807727fc8c7334c2deb02492fe731cc746eb03bcc75ef7310b4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPE2bB-JE6OEF6VijgAvVqOY6NUaRLspFL_HocgceK0s6OZfQxClxSuKYC8CRQylhKgGaFUAGFHaEETyQnLBD-OGFJGKDBxis5C2AJAnrF8gTb3dm-brt_ZdsC6rXDhuxBIMTbD6HWDN7qpq3o44M5hje98bR1-sTqM3k7Um-2110PdtWTVVvW-rsaf7hydON0Ee_Fbl-jj8eG9eCbr16dVcbsmhtN0IMYJCmWeSCNEBlIy6UxmJOfCsMqW8dycOSs5NUaKNBK8jCixLlJQioov0dU8t_fd12jDoLbd6Nu4UjFIEp6K-H5U0Vllpue8dar39U77g6KgpvjUHJ-K8akpPsWih82eELXtp_V_k_83fQOiRHIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2055364843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Cross-Cultural Validity of a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chen, C. C. ; Richardson, G. B. ; Lai, M. H. C. ; Dai, C. L. ; Hays, D. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, C. C. ; Richardson, G. B. ; Lai, M. H. C. ; Dai, C. L. ; Hays, D. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Separation from parents is a key aspect of adolescent development and has been linked to a variety of important mental and behavioral health outcomes. Separation-individuation measures were developed in the United States and have been used in Asian contexts. However, no cross-cultural studies have demonstrated that measures of separation-individuation tap the same domains across Asian and American adolescents. This article describes two studies conducted to develop and initially validate a scale for measuring adolescent separation-individuation. Study 1 (
n
=
300) developed a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation (BMSI) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. The result was a 32-item BMSI that provided comparable test information to the original 148-item measure. Study 2 examined the BMSI for measurement invariance and convergent validity across U.S. and Taiwanese samples (
ns
= 231 and 323). Findings suggest that functional independence, attitudinal independence, and emotional independence may be culturally invariant separation-individuation constructs. However, conflictual independence seems to be more culturally dependent in that its items were only partially scalar invariant and it was only loosely related to the other separation-individuation factors. Findings are consistent with previous research that recommended against using total scores for the PSI (i.e., scoring a single separation-individuation dimension). This study suggests the BMSI holds promise as a brief measure of separation-individuation that can be used in cross-cultural research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-1024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10826-018-1140-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent Development ; Adolescents ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Child development ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Convergent validity ; Cross cultural studies ; Cultural studies ; Factor Analysis ; Health behavior ; Health status ; Identity formation ; Item Response Theory ; Measurement ; Mental health ; Metadata ; Original Paper ; Parents & parenting ; Personal names ; Psychology ; Separation-Individuation ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of child and family studies, 2018-09, Vol.27 (9), p.2797-2810</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018. Corrected publication June 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Child and Family Studies is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cf410b957c44807727fc8c7334c2deb02492fe731cc746eb03bcc75ef7310b4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cf410b957c44807727fc8c7334c2deb02492fe731cc746eb03bcc75ef7310b4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8929-0934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10826-018-1140-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10826-018-1140-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27924,27925,30999,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, G. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, M. H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, D. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Cross-Cultural Validity of a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation</title><title>Journal of child and family studies</title><addtitle>J Child Fam Stud</addtitle><description>Separation from parents is a key aspect of adolescent development and has been linked to a variety of important mental and behavioral health outcomes. Separation-individuation measures were developed in the United States and have been used in Asian contexts. However, no cross-cultural studies have demonstrated that measures of separation-individuation tap the same domains across Asian and American adolescents. This article describes two studies conducted to develop and initially validate a scale for measuring adolescent separation-individuation. Study 1 (
n
=
300) developed a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation (BMSI) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. The result was a 32-item BMSI that provided comparable test information to the original 148-item measure. Study 2 examined the BMSI for measurement invariance and convergent validity across U.S. and Taiwanese samples (
ns
= 231 and 323). Findings suggest that functional independence, attitudinal independence, and emotional independence may be culturally invariant separation-individuation constructs. However, conflictual independence seems to be more culturally dependent in that its items were only partially scalar invariant and it was only loosely related to the other separation-individuation factors. Findings are consistent with previous research that recommended against using total scores for the PSI (i.e., scoring a single separation-individuation dimension). This study suggests the BMSI holds promise as a brief measure of separation-individuation that can be used in cross-cultural research.</description><subject>Adolescent Development</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cultural studies</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Personal names</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Separation-Individuation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1062-1024</issn><issn>1573-2843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPE2bB-JE6OEF6VijgAvVqOY6NUaRLspFL_HocgceK0s6OZfQxClxSuKYC8CRQylhKgGaFUAGFHaEETyQnLBD-OGFJGKDBxis5C2AJAnrF8gTb3dm-brt_ZdsC6rXDhuxBIMTbD6HWDN7qpq3o44M5hje98bR1-sTqM3k7Um-2110PdtWTVVvW-rsaf7hydON0Ee_Fbl-jj8eG9eCbr16dVcbsmhtN0IMYJCmWeSCNEBlIy6UxmJOfCsMqW8dycOSs5NUaKNBK8jCixLlJQioov0dU8t_fd12jDoLbd6Nu4UjFIEp6K-H5U0Vllpue8dar39U77g6KgpvjUHJ-K8akpPsWih82eELXtp_V_k_83fQOiRHIw</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Chen, C. C.</creator><creator>Richardson, G. B.</creator><creator>Lai, M. H. C.</creator><creator>Dai, C. L.</creator><creator>Hays, D. G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-0934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Development and Cross-Cultural Validity of a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation</title><author>Chen, C. C. ; Richardson, G. B. ; Lai, M. H. C. ; Dai, C. L. ; Hays, D. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-cf410b957c44807727fc8c7334c2deb02492fe731cc746eb03bcc75ef7310b4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent Development</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cultural studies</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Personal names</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Separation-Individuation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, G. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, M. H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, D. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, C. C.</au><au>Richardson, G. B.</au><au>Lai, M. H. C.</au><au>Dai, C. L.</au><au>Hays, D. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Cross-Cultural Validity of a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle><stitle>J Child Fam Stud</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2797</spage><epage>2810</epage><pages>2797-2810</pages><issn>1062-1024</issn><eissn>1573-2843</eissn><abstract>Separation from parents is a key aspect of adolescent development and has been linked to a variety of important mental and behavioral health outcomes. Separation-individuation measures were developed in the United States and have been used in Asian contexts. However, no cross-cultural studies have demonstrated that measures of separation-individuation tap the same domains across Asian and American adolescents. This article describes two studies conducted to develop and initially validate a scale for measuring adolescent separation-individuation. Study 1 (
n
=
300) developed a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation (BMSI) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. The result was a 32-item BMSI that provided comparable test information to the original 148-item measure. Study 2 examined the BMSI for measurement invariance and convergent validity across U.S. and Taiwanese samples (
ns
= 231 and 323). Findings suggest that functional independence, attitudinal independence, and emotional independence may be culturally invariant separation-individuation constructs. However, conflictual independence seems to be more culturally dependent in that its items were only partially scalar invariant and it was only loosely related to the other separation-individuation factors. Findings are consistent with previous research that recommended against using total scores for the PSI (i.e., scoring a single separation-individuation dimension). This study suggests the BMSI holds promise as a brief measure of separation-individuation that can be used in cross-cultural research.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10826-018-1140-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-0934</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-1024 |
ispartof | Journal of child and family studies, 2018-09, Vol.27 (9), p.2797-2810 |
issn | 1062-1024 1573-2843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2055364843 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Development Adolescents Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Child development Confirmatory factor analysis Convergent validity Cross cultural studies Cultural studies Factor Analysis Health behavior Health status Identity formation Item Response Theory Measurement Mental health Metadata Original Paper Parents & parenting Personal names Psychology Separation-Individuation Social Sciences Sociology Validity |
title | Development and Cross-Cultural Validity of a Brief Measure of Separation-Individuation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A22%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Cross-Cultural%20Validity%20of%20a%20Brief%20Measure%20of%20Separation-Individuation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20and%20family%20studies&rft.au=Chen,%20C.%20C.&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2797&rft.epage=2810&rft.pages=2797-2810&rft.issn=1062-1024&rft.eissn=1573-2843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10826-018-1140-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2055364843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2055364843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |