Brandeis and the New Haven-Boston & Maine Merger Battle Revisited
Despite Louis Brandeis' well-publicized opposition to the New Haven-Boston & Maine railroad merger of 1907–1909, a large number of public-spirited men, including many progressive reform leaders whom Brandeis had worked with and admired, favored the combination. They saw the merger not as a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Business history review 1962-01, Vol.36 (4), p.408-430 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 430 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 408 |
| container_title | Business history review |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Abrams, Richard M. |
| description | Despite Louis Brandeis' well-publicized opposition to the New Haven-Boston & Maine railroad merger of 1907–1909, a large number of public-spirited men, including many progressive reform leaders whom Brandeis had worked with and admired, favored the combination. They saw the merger not as a conspiracy against the public interest, but a necessary response in the public interest to a commercial crisis in Massachusetts. This examination of their reasoning and action tempers Brandeis' widely accepted assessment of the controversy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3111916 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205501473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_3111916</cupid><jstor_id>3111916</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3111916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-329434cbb41c2543790395645bf4bb8cbb02e61181cca257a375b2f34d716bea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9PwkAQxTdGExGNX8DDxoPGQ3W3-689AhEwAQxGE26bbTvFIrS4W1C_vWtKIPH0Mnm_zJt5CF1Sch8yoh4YpTSm8gi1QsJ5oGQ0O0YtQogKZETEKTpzbuFHQSlroU7XmjKDwmEvuH4HPIEvPDRbKINu5eqqxDd4bIoS8BjsHCzumrpeAn6BbeGKGrJzdJKbpYOLnbbRW__xtTcMRs-Dp15nFKSMizpgYcwZT5OE0zQUnKmYsFhILpKcJ0nkDRKCpDSiaWpCoQxTIglzxjNFZQKGtdF1s3dtq88NuFovqo0tfaQOiRCEcsU8dNtAqa2cs5DrtS1Wxv5oSvRfPXpXjyevGnLhn7R77GAHjV24Gr73trEfWip_mpaDqe5PqJzyGdczz9_tgs0qsUU2h8N5_6N_AQfNeTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205501473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brandeis and the New Haven-Boston & Maine Merger Battle Revisited</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Abrams, Richard M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite Louis Brandeis' well-publicized opposition to the New Haven-Boston & Maine railroad merger of 1907–1909, a large number of public-spirited men, including many progressive reform leaders whom Brandeis had worked with and admired, favored the combination. They saw the merger not as a conspiracy against the public interest, but a necessary response in the public interest to a commercial crisis in Massachusetts. This examination of their reasoning and action tempers Brandeis' widely accepted assessment of the controversy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-768X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3111916</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BHRVAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Annual reports ; Business history ; Business structures ; Corporate regulation ; Corporations ; Monopoly ; Ports ; Rail industry ; Rail lines ; Railway systems</subject><ispartof>Business history review, 1962-01, Vol.36 (4), p.408-430</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1962</rights><rights>Copyright 1962 The President and Fellows of Harvard College</rights><rights>Copyright Harvard Business School Winter 1962</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-329434cbb41c2543790395645bf4bb8cbb02e61181cca257a375b2f34d716bea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-329434cbb41c2543790395645bf4bb8cbb02e61181cca257a375b2f34d716bea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3111916$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3111916$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><title>Brandeis and the New Haven-Boston & Maine Merger Battle Revisited</title><title>Business history review</title><addtitle>Bus. Hist. Rev</addtitle><description>Despite Louis Brandeis' well-publicized opposition to the New Haven-Boston & Maine railroad merger of 1907–1909, a large number of public-spirited men, including many progressive reform leaders whom Brandeis had worked with and admired, favored the combination. They saw the merger not as a conspiracy against the public interest, but a necessary response in the public interest to a commercial crisis in Massachusetts. This examination of their reasoning and action tempers Brandeis' widely accepted assessment of the controversy.</description><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Business history</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Corporate regulation</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Monopoly</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>Rail industry</subject><subject>Rail lines</subject><subject>Railway systems</subject><issn>0007-6805</issn><issn>2044-768X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1962</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9PwkAQxTdGExGNX8DDxoPGQ3W3-689AhEwAQxGE26bbTvFIrS4W1C_vWtKIPH0Mnm_zJt5CF1Sch8yoh4YpTSm8gi1QsJ5oGQ0O0YtQogKZETEKTpzbuFHQSlroU7XmjKDwmEvuH4HPIEvPDRbKINu5eqqxDd4bIoS8BjsHCzumrpeAn6BbeGKGrJzdJKbpYOLnbbRW__xtTcMRs-Dp15nFKSMizpgYcwZT5OE0zQUnKmYsFhILpKcJ0nkDRKCpDSiaWpCoQxTIglzxjNFZQKGtdF1s3dtq88NuFovqo0tfaQOiRCEcsU8dNtAqa2cs5DrtS1Wxv5oSvRfPXpXjyevGnLhn7R77GAHjV24Gr73trEfWip_mpaDqe5PqJzyGdczz9_tgs0qsUU2h8N5_6N_AQfNeTw</recordid><startdate>19620101</startdate><enddate>19620101</enddate><creator>Abrams, Richard M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19620101</creationdate><title>Brandeis and the New Haven-Boston & Maine Merger Battle Revisited</title><author>Abrams, Richard M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-329434cbb41c2543790395645bf4bb8cbb02e61181cca257a375b2f34d716bea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1962</creationdate><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Business history</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Corporate regulation</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Monopoly</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>Rail industry</topic><topic>Rail lines</topic><topic>Railway systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Business history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abrams, Richard M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brandeis and the New Haven-Boston & Maine Merger Battle Revisited</atitle><jtitle>Business history review</jtitle><addtitle>Bus. Hist. Rev</addtitle><date>1962-01-01</date><risdate>1962</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>408-430</pages><issn>0007-6805</issn><eissn>2044-768X</eissn><coden>BHRVAG</coden><abstract>Despite Louis Brandeis' well-publicized opposition to the New Haven-Boston & Maine railroad merger of 1907–1909, a large number of public-spirited men, including many progressive reform leaders whom Brandeis had worked with and admired, favored the combination. They saw the merger not as a conspiracy against the public interest, but a necessary response in the public interest to a commercial crisis in Massachusetts. This examination of their reasoning and action tempers Brandeis' widely accepted assessment of the controversy.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/3111916</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-6805 |
| ispartof | Business history review, 1962-01, Vol.36 (4), p.408-430 |
| issn | 0007-6805 2044-768X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205501473 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR |
| subjects | Annual reports Business history Business structures Corporate regulation Corporations Monopoly Ports Rail industry Rail lines Railway systems |
| title | Brandeis and the New Haven-Boston & Maine Merger Battle Revisited |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A24%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brandeis%20and%20the%20New%20Haven-Boston%20&%20Maine%20Merger%20Battle%20Revisited&rft.jtitle=Business%20history%20review&rft.au=Abrams,%20Richard%20M.&rft.date=1962-01-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=408-430&rft.issn=0007-6805&rft.eissn=2044-768X&rft.coden=BHRVAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3111916&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3111916%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205501473&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_3111916&rft_jstor_id=3111916&rfr_iscdi=true |