Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds

For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selectio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ibis (London, England) England), 2004-11, Vol.146 (s2), p.123-130
Hauptverfasser: BUTLER, SIMON J., GILLINGS, SIMON
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 130
container_issue s2
container_start_page 123
container_title Ibis (London, England)
container_volume 146
creator BUTLER, SIMON J.
GILLINGS, SIMON
description For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205495822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>868961341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1PwyAYhYnRxDn9D8T7Vj7KGIk3anTOLBqjRu8IpeCYWzuBxvXfS63xWi7gfTnn4eMAADHKcRpnqxwXvMgEFm85QajIEaKM5Ls9MPoT9sEIISwynKZDcBTCKrWcCjwC9rFVdXS2c_U7jEsDjbVGxwAbC5eqdFFFGKJvdWy9gU0Nt950sDIxmZK8drGDqq6g0tqE4H53YgOt8pt1r5TOV-EYHFi1Dubkdx2Dl5vr56vbbPEwm19dLDJdEEYyKiZIUUUFU5yXgio25ZwiS5ClXBNDsWFWaKvpJD2foFKhyjBEbWU5MWVJx-B0OHfrm8_WhChXTevrdKUkiBWCTQlJpulg0r4JwRsrt95tlO8kRrIPVa5kn53ss5N9qPInVLlL6PmAfrm16f7NyfnlPBUJzwbchWh2f7jyHzJ9iDP5ej-T4u756YbPUkO_AW8BjiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205495822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>BUTLER, SIMON J. ; GILLINGS, SIMON</creator><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, SIMON J. ; GILLINGS, SIMON</creatorcontrib><description>For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-1019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-919X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Birds ; Farms ; Habitats ; Predation ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Ibis (London, England), 2004-11, Vol.146 (s2), p.123-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.2004.00352.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.2004.00352.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, SIMON J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLINGS, SIMON</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</title><title>Ibis (London, England)</title><description>For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0019-1019</issn><issn>1474-919X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1PwyAYhYnRxDn9D8T7Vj7KGIk3anTOLBqjRu8IpeCYWzuBxvXfS63xWi7gfTnn4eMAADHKcRpnqxwXvMgEFm85QajIEaKM5Ls9MPoT9sEIISwynKZDcBTCKrWcCjwC9rFVdXS2c_U7jEsDjbVGxwAbC5eqdFFFGKJvdWy9gU0Nt950sDIxmZK8drGDqq6g0tqE4H53YgOt8pt1r5TOV-EYHFi1Dubkdx2Dl5vr56vbbPEwm19dLDJdEEYyKiZIUUUFU5yXgio25ZwiS5ClXBNDsWFWaKvpJD2foFKhyjBEbWU5MWVJx-B0OHfrm8_WhChXTevrdKUkiBWCTQlJpulg0r4JwRsrt95tlO8kRrIPVa5kn53ss5N9qPInVLlL6PmAfrm16f7NyfnlPBUJzwbchWh2f7jyHzJ9iDP5ej-T4u756YbPUkO_AW8BjiQ</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>BUTLER, SIMON J.</creator><creator>GILLINGS, SIMON</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</title><author>BUTLER, SIMON J. ; GILLINGS, SIMON</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, SIMON J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLINGS, SIMON</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ibis (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BUTLER, SIMON J.</au><au>GILLINGS, SIMON</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</atitle><jtitle>Ibis (London, England)</jtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>s2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>123-130</pages><issn>0019-1019</issn><eissn>1474-919X</eissn><abstract>For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-1019
ispartof Ibis (London, England), 2004-11, Vol.146 (s2), p.123-130
issn 0019-1019
1474-919X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_205495822
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animal behavior
Birds
Farms
Habitats
Predation
Vegetation
title Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A37%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20the%20effects%20of%20habitat%20structure%20on%20prey%20detectability%20and%20accessibility%20to%20farmland%20birds&rft.jtitle=Ibis%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=BUTLER,%20SIMON%20J.&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=s2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=123-130&rft.issn=0019-1019&rft.eissn=1474-919X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E868961341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205495822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true