Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds
For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selectio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ibis (London, England) England), 2004-11, Vol.146 (s2), p.123-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | s2 |
container_start_page | 123 |
container_title | Ibis (London, England) |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | BUTLER, SIMON J. GILLINGS, SIMON |
description | For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205495822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>868961341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1PwyAYhYnRxDn9D8T7Vj7KGIk3anTOLBqjRu8IpeCYWzuBxvXfS63xWi7gfTnn4eMAADHKcRpnqxwXvMgEFm85QajIEaKM5Ls9MPoT9sEIISwynKZDcBTCKrWcCjwC9rFVdXS2c_U7jEsDjbVGxwAbC5eqdFFFGKJvdWy9gU0Nt950sDIxmZK8drGDqq6g0tqE4H53YgOt8pt1r5TOV-EYHFi1Dubkdx2Dl5vr56vbbPEwm19dLDJdEEYyKiZIUUUFU5yXgio25ZwiS5ClXBNDsWFWaKvpJD2foFKhyjBEbWU5MWVJx-B0OHfrm8_WhChXTevrdKUkiBWCTQlJpulg0r4JwRsrt95tlO8kRrIPVa5kn53ss5N9qPInVLlL6PmAfrm16f7NyfnlPBUJzwbchWh2f7jyHzJ9iDP5ej-T4u756YbPUkO_AW8BjiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205495822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>BUTLER, SIMON J. ; GILLINGS, SIMON</creator><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, SIMON J. ; GILLINGS, SIMON</creatorcontrib><description>For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-1019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-919X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Birds ; Farms ; Habitats ; Predation ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Ibis (London, England), 2004-11, Vol.146 (s2), p.123-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.2004.00352.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1474-919X.2004.00352.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, SIMON J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLINGS, SIMON</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</title><title>Ibis (London, England)</title><description>For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0019-1019</issn><issn>1474-919X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1PwyAYhYnRxDn9D8T7Vj7KGIk3anTOLBqjRu8IpeCYWzuBxvXfS63xWi7gfTnn4eMAADHKcRpnqxwXvMgEFm85QajIEaKM5Ls9MPoT9sEIISwynKZDcBTCKrWcCjwC9rFVdXS2c_U7jEsDjbVGxwAbC5eqdFFFGKJvdWy9gU0Nt950sDIxmZK8drGDqq6g0tqE4H53YgOt8pt1r5TOV-EYHFi1Dubkdx2Dl5vr56vbbPEwm19dLDJdEEYyKiZIUUUFU5yXgio25ZwiS5ClXBNDsWFWaKvpJD2foFKhyjBEbWU5MWVJx-B0OHfrm8_WhChXTevrdKUkiBWCTQlJpulg0r4JwRsrt95tlO8kRrIPVa5kn53ss5N9qPInVLlL6PmAfrm16f7NyfnlPBUJzwbchWh2f7jyHzJ9iDP5ej-T4u756YbPUkO_AW8BjiQ</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>BUTLER, SIMON J.</creator><creator>GILLINGS, SIMON</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</title><author>BUTLER, SIMON J. ; GILLINGS, SIMON</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-3960a3a395a77b93a587730f20f37c2e31e5f9cfc3673920ba0de503fdf72ebb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BUTLER, SIMON J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLINGS, SIMON</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ibis (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BUTLER, SIMON J.</au><au>GILLINGS, SIMON</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds</atitle><jtitle>Ibis (London, England)</jtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>s2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>123-130</pages><issn>0019-1019</issn><eissn>1474-919X</eissn><abstract>For species that rely on visual cues to detect prey items, increasing the structural complexity of a patch can greatly influence forager behaviour through consequent reductions in prey detectability and accessibility. These effects are likely to manifest themselves in terms of foraging site selection and there is plentiful evidence for preferential site selection for a suite of taxa. However, the underlying effects of habitat structure on foraging behaviour, which are likely to drive these observed site selections, are much less well understood. We present the results of two studies designed to quantify the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility to avian invertebrate feeders and granivores on farmland. There was a significant negative relationship between potential prey detectability and both distance and vegetation height in cereal crops and stubbles for Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus. The interscan distance travelled by Lapwings differed significantly between habitats, with longer distances travelled in cereal crops and harrowed compared with ploughed soil and grasses. The peck rate, head‐up rate and mean search period of foraging Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs were not affected by increasing vegetation structure but forager mobility was significantly reduced. We hope that by quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on prey detectability and accessibility we can highlight the importance of considering these factors, as well as prey abundance, when developing management strategies for farmland birds.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0019-1019 |
ispartof | Ibis (London, England), 2004-11, Vol.146 (s2), p.123-130 |
issn | 0019-1019 1474-919X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205495822 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Animal behavior Birds Farms Habitats Predation Vegetation |
title | Quantifying the effects of habitat structure on prey detectability and accessibility to farmland birds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A37%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20the%20effects%20of%20habitat%20structure%20on%20prey%20detectability%20and%20accessibility%20to%20farmland%20birds&rft.jtitle=Ibis%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=BUTLER,%20SIMON%20J.&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=s2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=123-130&rft.issn=0019-1019&rft.eissn=1474-919X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00352.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E868961341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205495822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |