Priming/Reaction-Time Evidence of the Structure of Auditors’ Knowledge of Financial Statement Errors
Audit research has generally concluded that auditors primarily organize their memory of financial statement errors by audit objective rather than transaction cycle. Although this stream of research has typically used the cue sorting method, the concept of primary organizing dimension is believed to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Auditing : a journal of practice and theory 2010-05, Vol.29 (1), p.99-123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Auditing : a journal of practice and theory |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Coyne, Michael P. Biggs, Stanley F. Rich, Jay S. |
description | Audit research has generally concluded that auditors primarily organize their memory of financial statement errors by audit objective rather than transaction cycle. Although this stream of research has typically used the cue sorting method, the concept of primary organizing dimension is believed to be sufficiently general to obtain consistent results with other experimental methods (e.g., Nelson et al. 1995). The purpose of this study is to determine if the finding that auditor knowledge of financial statement errors is organized primarily around audit objectives can be replicated with a priming/reaction time method. The priming/reaction time method is widely used in knowledge structure research and appears consistent with the concept of primary organizing dimension discussed in the audit literature. We conducted a study with sorting and priming/reaction time phases. Consistent with prior research, the sorting phase found that audit objective was the primary organizing dimension for both managers and staff. However, the priming/reaction time phase found that managers’ knowledge was primarily structured around transaction cycle, while staff demonstrated no primary organizing structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.99 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205439952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2021440251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7b17b0a0ab0b1a26d7924da1b2738add73ae734d8d14336e3575628754b4efd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFOwzAQRS0EEqWwZxmxTzq249heVlULiEogKGvLiZ3iqnWK44DYcQ2ux0lIWlajmXn6X3oIXWPICAUx0Z3JCAybzHAm5QkaYcZEyqXEp2gEhIsUqIBzdNG2GwDgheAjVD8Ft3N-PXm2uoqu8enK7Wwy_3DG-somTZ3EN5u8xNBVsQuHw7QzLjah_f3-SR5887m1Zn14LJzXvnJ62_M62p31MZmH0KOX6KzW29Ze_c8xel3MV7O7dPl4ez-bLtOKAo4pLzEvQYMuocSaFIZLkhuNS8Kp0MZwqi2nuREG55QWljLOCiI4y8vc1obRMbo55u5D897ZNqpN0wXfVyoCLKdSMtJDcISq0LRtsLXa9xJ0-FIY1CBT9TLVIFMRqbCSkv4BR3xpiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205439952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Priming/Reaction-Time Evidence of the Structure of Auditors’ Knowledge of Financial Statement Errors</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Coyne, Michael P. ; Biggs, Stanley F. ; Rich, Jay S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coyne, Michael P. ; Biggs, Stanley F. ; Rich, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><description>Audit research has generally concluded that auditors primarily organize their memory of financial statement errors by audit objective rather than transaction cycle. Although this stream of research has typically used the cue sorting method, the concept of primary organizing dimension is believed to be sufficiently general to obtain consistent results with other experimental methods (e.g., Nelson et al. 1995). The purpose of this study is to determine if the finding that auditor knowledge of financial statement errors is organized primarily around audit objectives can be replicated with a priming/reaction time method. The priming/reaction time method is widely used in knowledge structure research and appears consistent with the concept of primary organizing dimension discussed in the audit literature. We conducted a study with sorting and priming/reaction time phases. Consistent with prior research, the sorting phase found that audit objective was the primary organizing dimension for both managers and staff. However, the priming/reaction time phase found that managers’ knowledge was primarily structured around transaction cycle, while staff demonstrated no primary organizing structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-0380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-7991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.99</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sarasota: American Accounting Association</publisher><subject>Audit objectives ; Auditing ; Auditors ; Decision making ; Errors ; Experimental methods ; Financial statements ; Hypotheses ; Knowledge ; Memory ; Research methodology ; Response time ; Semantics ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory, 2010-05, Vol.29 (1), p.99-123</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Accounting Association May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7b17b0a0ab0b1a26d7924da1b2738add73ae734d8d14336e3575628754b4efd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7b17b0a0ab0b1a26d7924da1b2738add73ae734d8d14336e3575628754b4efd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coyne, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Stanley F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><title>Priming/Reaction-Time Evidence of the Structure of Auditors’ Knowledge of Financial Statement Errors</title><title>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory</title><description>Audit research has generally concluded that auditors primarily organize their memory of financial statement errors by audit objective rather than transaction cycle. Although this stream of research has typically used the cue sorting method, the concept of primary organizing dimension is believed to be sufficiently general to obtain consistent results with other experimental methods (e.g., Nelson et al. 1995). The purpose of this study is to determine if the finding that auditor knowledge of financial statement errors is organized primarily around audit objectives can be replicated with a priming/reaction time method. The priming/reaction time method is widely used in knowledge structure research and appears consistent with the concept of primary organizing dimension discussed in the audit literature. We conducted a study with sorting and priming/reaction time phases. Consistent with prior research, the sorting phase found that audit objective was the primary organizing dimension for both managers and staff. However, the priming/reaction time phase found that managers’ knowledge was primarily structured around transaction cycle, while staff demonstrated no primary organizing structure.</description><subject>Audit objectives</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Experimental methods</subject><subject>Financial statements</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Response time</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0278-0380</issn><issn>1558-7991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEFOwzAQRS0EEqWwZxmxTzq249heVlULiEogKGvLiZ3iqnWK44DYcQ2ux0lIWlajmXn6X3oIXWPICAUx0Z3JCAybzHAm5QkaYcZEyqXEp2gEhIsUqIBzdNG2GwDgheAjVD8Ft3N-PXm2uoqu8enK7Wwy_3DG-somTZ3EN5u8xNBVsQuHw7QzLjah_f3-SR5887m1Zn14LJzXvnJ62_M62p31MZmH0KOX6KzW29Ze_c8xel3MV7O7dPl4ez-bLtOKAo4pLzEvQYMuocSaFIZLkhuNS8Kp0MZwqi2nuREG55QWljLOCiI4y8vc1obRMbo55u5D897ZNqpN0wXfVyoCLKdSMtJDcISq0LRtsLXa9xJ0-FIY1CBT9TLVIFMRqbCSkv4BR3xpiw</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Coyne, Michael P.</creator><creator>Biggs, Stanley F.</creator><creator>Rich, Jay S.</creator><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Priming/Reaction-Time Evidence of the Structure of Auditors’ Knowledge of Financial Statement Errors</title><author>Coyne, Michael P. ; Biggs, Stanley F. ; Rich, Jay S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-7b17b0a0ab0b1a26d7924da1b2738add73ae734d8d14336e3575628754b4efd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Audit objectives</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Experimental methods</topic><topic>Financial statements</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Response time</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coyne, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biggs, Stanley F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coyne, Michael P.</au><au>Biggs, Stanley F.</au><au>Rich, Jay S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Priming/Reaction-Time Evidence of the Structure of Auditors’ Knowledge of Financial Statement Errors</atitle><jtitle>Auditing : a journal of practice and theory</jtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>99-123</pages><issn>0278-0380</issn><eissn>1558-7991</eissn><abstract>Audit research has generally concluded that auditors primarily organize their memory of financial statement errors by audit objective rather than transaction cycle. Although this stream of research has typically used the cue sorting method, the concept of primary organizing dimension is believed to be sufficiently general to obtain consistent results with other experimental methods (e.g., Nelson et al. 1995). The purpose of this study is to determine if the finding that auditor knowledge of financial statement errors is organized primarily around audit objectives can be replicated with a priming/reaction time method. The priming/reaction time method is widely used in knowledge structure research and appears consistent with the concept of primary organizing dimension discussed in the audit literature. We conducted a study with sorting and priming/reaction time phases. Consistent with prior research, the sorting phase found that audit objective was the primary organizing dimension for both managers and staff. However, the priming/reaction time phase found that managers’ knowledge was primarily structured around transaction cycle, while staff demonstrated no primary organizing structure.</abstract><cop>Sarasota</cop><pub>American Accounting Association</pub><doi>10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.99</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-0380 |
ispartof | Auditing : a journal of practice and theory, 2010-05, Vol.29 (1), p.99-123 |
issn | 0278-0380 1558-7991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205439952 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Audit objectives Auditing Auditors Decision making Errors Experimental methods Financial statements Hypotheses Knowledge Memory Research methodology Response time Semantics Studies |
title | Priming/Reaction-Time Evidence of the Structure of Auditors’ Knowledge of Financial Statement Errors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A26%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Priming/Reaction-Time%20Evidence%20of%20the%20Structure%20of%20Auditors%E2%80%99%20Knowledge%20of%20Financial%20Statement%20Errors&rft.jtitle=Auditing%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20practice%20and%20theory&rft.au=Coyne,%20Michael%20P.&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=99-123&rft.issn=0278-0380&rft.eissn=1558-7991&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.99&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2021440251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205439952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |