FIFTH COLLOQUIUM ON CHALLENGES IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW THE MICHIGAN GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO WORK

FIFTH COLLOQUIUM ON CHALLENGES IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW THE MICHIGAN GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO WORK

[...] where the domestic legal system constrains the extent to which national decisionmakers may use international law, it is appropriate to refer to the Bangalore Principles on the Domestic Application of International Human Rights Norms.8 According to the Bangalore Principles, domestic decisionmak...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Michigan journal of international law 2010-01, Vol.31 (2), p.289
1. Verfasser: Mathew, Penelope
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Human rights
International law
State laws
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 289
container_title Michigan journal of international law
container_volume 31
creator Mathew, Penelope
description [...] where the domestic legal system constrains the extent to which national decisionmakers may use international law, it is appropriate to refer to the Bangalore Principles on the Domestic Application of International Human Rights Norms.8 According to the Bangalore Principles, domestic decisionmakers such as the judiciary should always refer, so far as is possible, to relevant international human rights standards.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205433146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2021458901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2054331463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMsKwjAURLNQ8PkPF_dC-rJuQ71JLqYJ1hSXxYUiIj4a-_9W8AOEgVmcMzNg44hn8TJer_IRm4Rw5Tzi-Tods4sk6TUUzhi3q6kuwVkotDAGrcI9kO3jsbLCk7PCQIWyVohgxAG8Riip0KSEBVXTBg3ZftRffFFFSnvwDg6u2s7Y8Hy8hdP811O2kOgLvXy2j1d3Cu_m-ujae4-amGdpkkTpKvlL-gB0Hjw-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205433146</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FIFTH COLLOQUIUM ON CHALLENGES IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW THE MICHIGAN GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO WORK</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Mathew, Penelope</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Penelope</creatorcontrib><description>[...] where the domestic legal system constrains the extent to which national decisionmakers may use international law, it is appropriate to refer to the Bangalore Principles on the Domestic Application of International Human Rights Norms.8 According to the Bangalore Principles, domestic decisionmakers such as the judiciary should always refer, so far as is possible, to relevant international human rights standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-2867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor: Michigan Journal of International Law</publisher><subject>Human rights ; International law ; State laws</subject><ispartof>Michigan journal of international law, 2010-01, Vol.31 (2), p.289</ispartof><rights>Copyright Michigan Journal of International Law Winter 2010</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Penelope</creatorcontrib><title>FIFTH COLLOQUIUM ON CHALLENGES IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW THE MICHIGAN GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO WORK</title><title>Michigan journal of international law</title><description>[...] where the domestic legal system constrains the extent to which national decisionmakers may use international law, it is appropriate to refer to the Bangalore Principles on the Domestic Application of International Human Rights Norms.8 According to the Bangalore Principles, domestic decisionmakers such as the judiciary should always refer, so far as is possible, to relevant international human rights standards.</description><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>State laws</subject><issn>1052-2867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjMsKwjAURLNQ8PkPF_dC-rJuQ71JLqYJ1hSXxYUiIj4a-_9W8AOEgVmcMzNg44hn8TJer_IRm4Rw5Tzi-Tods4sk6TUUzhi3q6kuwVkotDAGrcI9kO3jsbLCk7PCQIWyVohgxAG8Riip0KSEBVXTBg3ZftRffFFFSnvwDg6u2s7Y8Hy8hdP811O2kOgLvXy2j1d3Cu_m-ujae4-amGdpkkTpKvlL-gB0Hjw-</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Mathew, Penelope</creator><general>Michigan Journal of International Law</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>FIFTH COLLOQUIUM ON CHALLENGES IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW THE MICHIGAN GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO WORK</title><author>Mathew, Penelope</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2054331463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>State laws</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Penelope</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Michigan journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathew, Penelope</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FIFTH COLLOQUIUM ON CHALLENGES IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW THE MICHIGAN GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO WORK</atitle><jtitle>Michigan journal of international law</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>289</spage><pages>289-</pages><issn>1052-2867</issn><abstract>[...] where the domestic legal system constrains the extent to which national decisionmakers may use international law, it is appropriate to refer to the Bangalore Principles on the Domestic Application of International Human Rights Norms.8 According to the Bangalore Principles, domestic decisionmakers such as the judiciary should always refer, so far as is possible, to relevant international human rights standards.</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor</cop><pub>Michigan Journal of International Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-2867
ispartof Michigan journal of international law, 2010-01, Vol.31 (2), p.289
issn 1052-2867
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_205433146
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Human rights
International law
State laws
title FIFTH COLLOQUIUM ON CHALLENGES IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW THE MICHIGAN GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO WORK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A38%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FIFTH%20COLLOQUIUM%20ON%20CHALLENGES%20IN%20INTERNATIONAL%20REFUGEE%20LAW%20THE%20MICHIGAN%20GUIDELINES%20ON%20THE%20RIGHT%20TO%20WORK&rft.jtitle=Michigan%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=Mathew,%20Penelope&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=289&rft.pages=289-&rft.issn=1052-2867&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2021458901%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205433146&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true