Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases
Traditionally, the courts have used property law rules to enforce clauses in leases that allow the lessor to withhold consent arbitrarily when the lessee seeks to assign or sublet property. Some recent cases, such as Kendall versus Ernest Pestana Inc. (1985), evidence a growing trend whereby courts...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Virginia law review 1988-05, Vol.74 (4), p.751-808 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 808 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 751 |
container_title | Virginia law review |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Johnson, Alex M. |
description | Traditionally, the courts have used property law rules to enforce clauses in leases that allow the lessor to withhold consent arbitrarily when the lessee seeks to assign or sublet property. Some recent cases, such as Kendall versus Ernest Pestana Inc. (1985), evidence a growing trend whereby courts are using contract principles to limit the lessor's right to restrict alienation arbitrarily. Short-term leases of 3 years or less and residential leases should be subject to implied terms, such as covenants of good faith and fair dealing, to correct inequities due to bargaining imperfections. Commercial and long-term leases, which are relational contracts and the result of individually negotiated contracts, should be enforced as the parties agreed. Otherwise, there will be a shift to more flexible, shorter term leases, and a death knell for long-term leases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1073123 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205349391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1073123</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1073123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-4330997d660538a7fed44e49bc450bf728de744d0f1a5a78aec1a1a6297cf8b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9Lw0AQBfBFFKxV_AqLCp6iu9lNNutNgn8KEUXiOUyTSW1ps3V2Q-m3N6W99jRz-PF4PMaupXiIlTCPUhglY3XCRtLqOLI2NadsJMTwp6mQ5-zC-4UQwmQ6GbFV7oiwDsstn3QBaU0Y5t2MF66bRSXSihcIHj3_6sn30AUeHP9wDVLHc9cFgjrwAjZPvHQboIYDL3_R0Za7ln_jEsLcdbA8pFyysxaWHq8Od8x-Xl_K_D0qPt8m-XMR1bGQIdJKCWtNM_RNVAamxUZr1HZa60RMWxNnDRqtG9FKSMBkgLUECWlsTd1mU6vG7Gafuyb316MP1cL1NPTwVTxEaqusHNDtMSSVkKk1mdyp-72qyXlP2FZrmq-AtpUU1W7w6jD4IO_2cuGDo6PsH7InfGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301697811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Johnson, Alex M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Alex M.</creatorcontrib><description>Traditionally, the courts have used property law rules to enforce clauses in leases that allow the lessor to withhold consent arbitrarily when the lessee seeks to assign or sublet property. Some recent cases, such as Kendall versus Ernest Pestana Inc. (1985), evidence a growing trend whereby courts are using contract principles to limit the lessor's right to restrict alienation arbitrarily. Short-term leases of 3 years or less and residential leases should be subject to implied terms, such as covenants of good faith and fair dealing, to correct inequities due to bargaining imperfections. Commercial and long-term leases, which are relational contracts and the result of individually negotiated contracts, should be enforced as the parties agreed. Otherwise, there will be a shift to more flexible, shorter term leases, and a death knell for long-term leases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6601</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-9967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1073123</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VLIBAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University, Va: Virginia Law Review Association</publisher><subject>Clauses ; Commercial courts ; Contract law ; Contract provisions ; Contracts ; Interpretations ; Lease agreements ; Leases ; Lessors ; Litigation ; Long term ; Mortgage loans ; Opportunistic behavior ; Restraint on alienation ; Rights ; State court decisions ; Tenancy at will ; Tenants</subject><ispartof>Virginia law review, 1988-05, Vol.74 (4), p.751-808</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1988 The Virginia Law Review Association</rights><rights>Copyright Virginia Law Review Association May 1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1073123$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1073123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27848,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Alex M.</creatorcontrib><title>Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases</title><title>Virginia law review</title><description>Traditionally, the courts have used property law rules to enforce clauses in leases that allow the lessor to withhold consent arbitrarily when the lessee seeks to assign or sublet property. Some recent cases, such as Kendall versus Ernest Pestana Inc. (1985), evidence a growing trend whereby courts are using contract principles to limit the lessor's right to restrict alienation arbitrarily. Short-term leases of 3 years or less and residential leases should be subject to implied terms, such as covenants of good faith and fair dealing, to correct inequities due to bargaining imperfections. Commercial and long-term leases, which are relational contracts and the result of individually negotiated contracts, should be enforced as the parties agreed. Otherwise, there will be a shift to more flexible, shorter term leases, and a death knell for long-term leases.</description><subject>Clauses</subject><subject>Commercial courts</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contract provisions</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Interpretations</subject><subject>Lease agreements</subject><subject>Leases</subject><subject>Lessors</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Long term</subject><subject>Mortgage loans</subject><subject>Opportunistic behavior</subject><subject>Restraint on alienation</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Tenancy at will</subject><subject>Tenants</subject><issn>0042-6601</issn><issn>1942-9967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9Lw0AQBfBFFKxV_AqLCp6iu9lNNutNgn8KEUXiOUyTSW1ps3V2Q-m3N6W99jRz-PF4PMaupXiIlTCPUhglY3XCRtLqOLI2NadsJMTwp6mQ5-zC-4UQwmQ6GbFV7oiwDsstn3QBaU0Y5t2MF66bRSXSihcIHj3_6sn30AUeHP9wDVLHc9cFgjrwAjZPvHQboIYDL3_R0Za7ln_jEsLcdbA8pFyysxaWHq8Od8x-Xl_K_D0qPt8m-XMR1bGQIdJKCWtNM_RNVAamxUZr1HZa60RMWxNnDRqtG9FKSMBkgLUECWlsTd1mU6vG7Gafuyb316MP1cL1NPTwVTxEaqusHNDtMSSVkKk1mdyp-72qyXlP2FZrmq-AtpUU1W7w6jD4IO_2cuGDo6PsH7InfGo</recordid><startdate>19880501</startdate><enddate>19880501</enddate><creator>Johnson, Alex M.</creator><general>Virginia Law Review Association</general><general>The Virginia Law Review Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880501</creationdate><title>Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases</title><author>Johnson, Alex M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-4330997d660538a7fed44e49bc450bf728de744d0f1a5a78aec1a1a6297cf8b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Clauses</topic><topic>Commercial courts</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contract provisions</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Interpretations</topic><topic>Lease agreements</topic><topic>Leases</topic><topic>Lessors</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Long term</topic><topic>Mortgage loans</topic><topic>Opportunistic behavior</topic><topic>Restraint on alienation</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Tenancy at will</topic><topic>Tenants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Alex M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Virginia law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Alex M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases</atitle><jtitle>Virginia law review</jtitle><date>1988-05-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>751</spage><epage>808</epage><pages>751-808</pages><issn>0042-6601</issn><eissn>1942-9967</eissn><coden>VLIBAD</coden><abstract>Traditionally, the courts have used property law rules to enforce clauses in leases that allow the lessor to withhold consent arbitrarily when the lessee seeks to assign or sublet property. Some recent cases, such as Kendall versus Ernest Pestana Inc. (1985), evidence a growing trend whereby courts are using contract principles to limit the lessor's right to restrict alienation arbitrarily. Short-term leases of 3 years or less and residential leases should be subject to implied terms, such as covenants of good faith and fair dealing, to correct inequities due to bargaining imperfections. Commercial and long-term leases, which are relational contracts and the result of individually negotiated contracts, should be enforced as the parties agreed. Otherwise, there will be a shift to more flexible, shorter term leases, and a death knell for long-term leases.</abstract><cop>University, Va</cop><pub>Virginia Law Review Association</pub><doi>10.2307/1073123</doi><tpages>58</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-6601 |
ispartof | Virginia law review, 1988-05, Vol.74 (4), p.751-808 |
issn | 0042-6601 1942-9967 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205349391 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR |
subjects | Clauses Commercial courts Contract law Contract provisions Contracts Interpretations Lease agreements Leases Lessors Litigation Long term Mortgage loans Opportunistic behavior Restraint on alienation Rights State court decisions Tenancy at will Tenants |
title | Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correctly%20Interpreting%20Long-Term%20Leases%20Pursuant%20to%20Modern%20Contract%20Law:%20Toward%20a%20Theory%20of%20Relational%20Leases&rft.jtitle=Virginia%20law%20review&rft.au=Johnson,%20Alex%20M.&rft.date=1988-05-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=751&rft.epage=808&rft.pages=751-808&rft.issn=0042-6601&rft.eissn=1942-9967&rft.coden=VLIBAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1073123&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1073123%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301697811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1073123&rfr_iscdi=true |