Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies; Commentary: Political Uses of Structure and Process; Commentary: Administrative Process and Organizational Form as Legislative Responses to Agency Costs

Structure and process can be viewed as embodying an ex ante agreement among legislators and the president that limits the ability of each to engage in ex post opportunistic behavior. Since each has an incentive to influence the agency to make policies that are not consistent with the coalition'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Virginia law review 1989-03, Vol.75 (2), p.431
Hauptverfasser: McCubbins, Matthew D, Noll, Roger G, Weingast, Barry R, Robinson, Glen O, Horn, Murray J, Shepsle, Kenneth A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 431
container_title Virginia law review
container_volume 75
creator McCubbins, Matthew D
Noll, Roger G
Weingast, Barry R
Robinson, Glen O
Horn, Murray J
Shepsle, Kenneth A
description Structure and process can be viewed as embodying an ex ante agreement among legislators and the president that limits the ability of each to engage in ex post opportunistic behavior. Since each has an incentive to influence the agency to make policies that are not consistent with the coalition's legislative agreement, all can benefit by limiting their own opportunism. Effective political control of an agency requires ex ante constraints on the agency. A case study of air pollution control regulation illustrates the difficulty with ex post legislative changes. Robinson says that the McCubbins, Noll, and Weingast model is too general to show how processes and structure can be used in favor of specific political interventions. Horn and Shepsle argue that the enacting coalition must try to protect the deal it struck and must be concerned about the influence of subsequent political coalitions.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205308875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1346710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2053088753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjs1Lw0AQxaMg2qr_w-LZwvYjJtFTKJYeBIsf57Jsp3HLZqfOTIT617sxFVE8eBrmze-9eYdJb1hMRoOiuMpOkj7zRmud5ZO0d3D8KNRYaQiUCSu1ILTAfKkW6J04y50aF7u7VuWqdsGxkBH3BqokMqGCGoJ0nLzAl9F4NcUghF7hWpUVBOuAb6JYt7yhGPeNPjNwy_1Z5qfpV4c988nfU2WCe48HDDF0hlQrw-oOKse-wx-Atxjab4Jdq11MZ-Gz5GhtPMP5fp4mF7Pbp-l8sCV8bYBlucGGYiwvRzod6zzP0vG_oA_vC4Fe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205308875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies; Commentary: Political Uses of Structure and Process; Commentary: Administrative Process and Organizational Form as Legislative Responses to Agency Costs</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>McCubbins, Matthew D ; Noll, Roger G ; Weingast, Barry R ; Robinson, Glen O ; Horn, Murray J ; Shepsle, Kenneth A</creator><creatorcontrib>McCubbins, Matthew D ; Noll, Roger G ; Weingast, Barry R ; Robinson, Glen O ; Horn, Murray J ; Shepsle, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><description>Structure and process can be viewed as embodying an ex ante agreement among legislators and the president that limits the ability of each to engage in ex post opportunistic behavior. Since each has an incentive to influence the agency to make policies that are not consistent with the coalition's legislative agreement, all can benefit by limiting their own opportunism. Effective political control of an agency requires ex ante constraints on the agency. A case study of air pollution control regulation illustrates the difficulty with ex post legislative changes. Robinson says that the McCubbins, Noll, and Weingast model is too general to show how processes and structure can be used in favor of specific political interventions. Horn and Shepsle argue that the enacting coalition must try to protect the deal it struck and must be concerned about the influence of subsequent political coalitions.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1942-9967</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VLIBAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlottesville: The Virginia Law Review Association</publisher><subject>Federal legislation ; Government agencies ; Politics ; Pollution control ; Public officials</subject><ispartof>Virginia law review, 1989-03, Vol.75 (2), p.431</ispartof><rights>Copyright Virginia Law Review Association Mar 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCubbins, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Roger G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weingast, Barry R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Glen O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Murray J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepsle, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><title>Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies; Commentary: Political Uses of Structure and Process; Commentary: Administrative Process and Organizational Form as Legislative Responses to Agency Costs</title><title>Virginia law review</title><description>Structure and process can be viewed as embodying an ex ante agreement among legislators and the president that limits the ability of each to engage in ex post opportunistic behavior. Since each has an incentive to influence the agency to make policies that are not consistent with the coalition's legislative agreement, all can benefit by limiting their own opportunism. Effective political control of an agency requires ex ante constraints on the agency. A case study of air pollution control regulation illustrates the difficulty with ex post legislative changes. Robinson says that the McCubbins, Noll, and Weingast model is too general to show how processes and structure can be used in favor of specific political interventions. Horn and Shepsle argue that the enacting coalition must try to protect the deal it struck and must be concerned about the influence of subsequent political coalitions.</description><subject>Federal legislation</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><issn>1942-9967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjs1Lw0AQxaMg2qr_w-LZwvYjJtFTKJYeBIsf57Jsp3HLZqfOTIT617sxFVE8eBrmze-9eYdJb1hMRoOiuMpOkj7zRmud5ZO0d3D8KNRYaQiUCSu1ILTAfKkW6J04y50aF7u7VuWqdsGxkBH3BqokMqGCGoJ0nLzAl9F4NcUghF7hWpUVBOuAb6JYt7yhGPeNPjNwy_1Z5qfpV4c988nfU2WCe48HDDF0hlQrw-oOKse-wx-Atxjab4Jdq11MZ-Gz5GhtPMP5fp4mF7Pbp-l8sCV8bYBlucGGYiwvRzod6zzP0vG_oA_vC4Fe</recordid><startdate>19890301</startdate><enddate>19890301</enddate><creator>McCubbins, Matthew D</creator><creator>Noll, Roger G</creator><creator>Weingast, Barry R</creator><creator>Robinson, Glen O</creator><creator>Horn, Murray J</creator><creator>Shepsle, Kenneth A</creator><general>The Virginia Law Review Association</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19890301</creationdate><title>Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies; Commentary: Political Uses of Structure and Process; Commentary: Administrative Process and Organizational Form as Legislative Responses to Agency Costs</title><author>McCubbins, Matthew D ; Noll, Roger G ; Weingast, Barry R ; Robinson, Glen O ; Horn, Murray J ; Shepsle, Kenneth A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2053088753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Federal legislation</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCubbins, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Roger G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weingast, Barry R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Glen O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Murray J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepsle, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Virginia law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCubbins, Matthew D</au><au>Noll, Roger G</au><au>Weingast, Barry R</au><au>Robinson, Glen O</au><au>Horn, Murray J</au><au>Shepsle, Kenneth A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies; Commentary: Political Uses of Structure and Process; Commentary: Administrative Process and Organizational Form as Legislative Responses to Agency Costs</atitle><jtitle>Virginia law review</jtitle><date>1989-03-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>431</spage><pages>431-</pages><eissn>1942-9967</eissn><coden>VLIBAD</coden><abstract>Structure and process can be viewed as embodying an ex ante agreement among legislators and the president that limits the ability of each to engage in ex post opportunistic behavior. Since each has an incentive to influence the agency to make policies that are not consistent with the coalition's legislative agreement, all can benefit by limiting their own opportunism. Effective political control of an agency requires ex ante constraints on the agency. A case study of air pollution control regulation illustrates the difficulty with ex post legislative changes. Robinson says that the McCubbins, Noll, and Weingast model is too general to show how processes and structure can be used in favor of specific political interventions. Horn and Shepsle argue that the enacting coalition must try to protect the deal it struck and must be concerned about the influence of subsequent political coalitions.</abstract><cop>Charlottesville</cop><pub>The Virginia Law Review Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1942-9967
ispartof Virginia law review, 1989-03, Vol.75 (2), p.431
issn 1942-9967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_205308875
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Federal legislation
Government agencies
Politics
Pollution control
Public officials
title Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies; Commentary: Political Uses of Structure and Process; Commentary: Administrative Process and Organizational Form as Legislative Responses to Agency Costs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T09%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structure%20and%20Process,%20Politics%20and%20Policy:%20Administrative%20Arrangements%20and%20the%20Political%20Control%20of%20Agencies;%20Commentary:%20Political%20Uses%20of%20Structure%20and%20Process;%20Commentary:%20Administrative%20Process%20and%20Organizational%20Form%20as%20Legislative%20Responses%20to%20Agency%20Costs&rft.jtitle=Virginia%20law%20review&rft.au=McCubbins,%20Matthew%20D&rft.date=1989-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=431&rft.pages=431-&rft.eissn=1942-9967&rft.coden=VLIBAD&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1346710%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205308875&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true