Enhancing photovoltaic performance of DSSCs sensitized with Ru-II complexes by D–π–A configured carbazole based co-sensitizers

Herein, we report the photovoltaic performance studies of four D–π–A configured carbazole based co-sensitizers, P1–4, in DSSCs sensitized with Ru-II complexes, i.e. NCSU-10 / N3 . The organic co-sensitizers ( P1–4 ) comprise carbazole as a donor scaffold, a phenylene ring as a π-spacer and electron...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New journal of chemistry 2018, Vol.42 (12), p.9443-9448
Hauptverfasser: Naik, Praveen, Elmorsy, Mohamed R., Su, Rui, El-Shafei, Ahmed, Adhikari, Airody Vasudeva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Herein, we report the photovoltaic performance studies of four D–π–A configured carbazole based co-sensitizers, P1–4, in DSSCs sensitized with Ru-II complexes, i.e. NCSU-10 / N3 . The organic co-sensitizers ( P1–4 ) comprise carbazole as a donor scaffold, a phenylene ring as a π-spacer and electron withdrawing functional groups, viz. cyanoacetic acid ( P1 ), rhodanine-3-acetic acid ( P1–2 ), barbituric acid ( P3 ), and thiobarbituric acid ( P4 ) as acceptor/anchoring units. From the results, it is evident that the device fabricated using co-sensitizer P1 carrying cyanoacetic acid, at the concentration of 0.2 mM NCSU-10, exhibited an enhanced photon conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.19% with a J SC of 21.20 mA cm −2 , V OC of 0.658 V and FF of 65.85%, while P3 containing barbituric acid displayed a PCE of 8.75% with a J SC of 22.23 mA cm −2 , V OC of 0.671 V and FF of 58.64%, whereas NCSU-10 (0.2 mM) alone displayed a PCE of 8.28% with a J SC of 20.38 mA cm −2 , V OC of 0.665 V and FF of 61.09%, but the dyes P2 carrying rhodanine-3-acetic acid and P4 containing thiobarbituric acid showed considerably lower performance. The co-sensitized devices of N3 with P1–4 displayed inferior photovoltaic performance compared to N3 itself, probably due to inefficient suppression of back current. The observed results have thrown new light upon the selection of appropriate and matchable co-sensitizers for improving photovoltaic performance of Ru-II based sensitizers.
ISSN:1144-0546
1369-9261
DOI:10.1039/C8NJ00927A