OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS
In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the lette...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Banking law journal 2008-10, Vol.125 (9), p.776 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 776 |
container_title | The Banking law journal |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Dolan, John F |
description | In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205307158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1571291081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-1a553ebdb42253f86da9a6763510dce9725e5f6e8b7ce8e03452719fcb6e04f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjr1OwzAURi0EEqHwDha7pWs713bGyr0tkVJcJR7YqvzYQ4Voadr3pwimbzk657tjhdJOCo1S3bMCAFAggnlkT_N8AFBSoy2YDWvuw3ZHsX7fcN8s623HY-D04anreEMxUst_oZZWdeS7NniiVffMHnL_OaeX_12wuKbo30QTNrVfNuJU2YuQPaJOwzSUSqHOzkx91RtrbqdgGlNlFSbMJrnBjskl0CUqK6s8DiZBmZVesNc_7el8_L6m-bI_HK_nr1txrwA1WIlO_wCjWzyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205307158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Dolan, John F</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-5506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2381-3512</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BLJODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: LexisNexis</publisher><subject>Banking law ; Bankruptcy ; Letters of credit ; Overdrafts ; Proceeds ; State court decisions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Banking law journal, 2008-10, Vol.125 (9), p.776</ispartof><rights>Copyright Thomson Media Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><title>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</title><title>The Banking law journal</title><description>In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it.</description><subject>Banking law</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Letters of credit</subject><subject>Overdrafts</subject><subject>Proceeds</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0005-5506</issn><issn>2381-3512</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjr1OwzAURi0EEqHwDha7pWs713bGyr0tkVJcJR7YqvzYQ4Voadr3pwimbzk657tjhdJOCo1S3bMCAFAggnlkT_N8AFBSoy2YDWvuw3ZHsX7fcN8s623HY-D04anreEMxUst_oZZWdeS7NniiVffMHnL_OaeX_12wuKbo30QTNrVfNuJU2YuQPaJOwzSUSqHOzkx91RtrbqdgGlNlFSbMJrnBjskl0CUqK6s8DiZBmZVesNc_7el8_L6m-bI_HK_nr1txrwA1WIlO_wCjWzyM</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Dolan, John F</creator><general>LexisNexis</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</title><author>Dolan, John F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-1a553ebdb42253f86da9a6763510dce9725e5f6e8b7ce8e03452719fcb6e04f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Banking law</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Letters of credit</topic><topic>Overdrafts</topic><topic>Proceeds</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Banking law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolan, John F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</atitle><jtitle>The Banking law journal</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>776</spage><pages>776-</pages><issn>0005-5506</issn><eissn>2381-3512</eissn><coden>BLJODA</coden><abstract>In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>LexisNexis</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0005-5506 |
ispartof | The Banking law journal, 2008-10, Vol.125 (9), p.776 |
issn | 0005-5506 2381-3512 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205307158 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Banking law Bankruptcy Letters of credit Overdrafts Proceeds State court decisions Studies |
title | OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A21%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OF%20COMPETING%20CLAIMS%20TO%20EXCESS%20LETTER%20OF%20CREDIT%20PROCEEDS&rft.jtitle=The%20Banking%20law%20journal&rft.au=Dolan,%20John%20F&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=776&rft.pages=776-&rft.issn=0005-5506&rft.eissn=2381-3512&rft.coden=BLJODA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1571291081%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205307158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |