OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS

In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the lette...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Banking law journal 2008-10, Vol.125 (9), p.776
1. Verfasser: Dolan, John F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 776
container_title The Banking law journal
container_volume 125
creator Dolan, John F
description In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205307158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1571291081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-1a553ebdb42253f86da9a6763510dce9725e5f6e8b7ce8e03452719fcb6e04f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjr1OwzAURi0EEqHwDha7pWs713bGyr0tkVJcJR7YqvzYQ4Voadr3pwimbzk657tjhdJOCo1S3bMCAFAggnlkT_N8AFBSoy2YDWvuw3ZHsX7fcN8s623HY-D04anreEMxUst_oZZWdeS7NniiVffMHnL_OaeX_12wuKbo30QTNrVfNuJU2YuQPaJOwzSUSqHOzkx91RtrbqdgGlNlFSbMJrnBjskl0CUqK6s8DiZBmZVesNc_7el8_L6m-bI_HK_nr1txrwA1WIlO_wCjWzyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205307158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Dolan, John F</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-5506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2381-3512</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BLJODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: LexisNexis</publisher><subject>Banking law ; Bankruptcy ; Letters of credit ; Overdrafts ; Proceeds ; State court decisions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Banking law journal, 2008-10, Vol.125 (9), p.776</ispartof><rights>Copyright Thomson Media Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><title>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</title><title>The Banking law journal</title><description>In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it.</description><subject>Banking law</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Letters of credit</subject><subject>Overdrafts</subject><subject>Proceeds</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0005-5506</issn><issn>2381-3512</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjr1OwzAURi0EEqHwDha7pWs713bGyr0tkVJcJR7YqvzYQ4Voadr3pwimbzk657tjhdJOCo1S3bMCAFAggnlkT_N8AFBSoy2YDWvuw3ZHsX7fcN8s623HY-D04anreEMxUst_oZZWdeS7NniiVffMHnL_OaeX_12wuKbo30QTNrVfNuJU2YuQPaJOwzSUSqHOzkx91RtrbqdgGlNlFSbMJrnBjskl0CUqK6s8DiZBmZVesNc_7el8_L6m-bI_HK_nr1txrwA1WIlO_wCjWzyM</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Dolan, John F</creator><general>LexisNexis</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</title><author>Dolan, John F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-1a553ebdb42253f86da9a6763510dce9725e5f6e8b7ce8e03452719fcb6e04f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Banking law</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Letters of credit</topic><topic>Overdrafts</topic><topic>Proceeds</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolan, John F</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Banking law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolan, John F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS</atitle><jtitle>The Banking law journal</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>776</spage><pages>776-</pages><issn>0005-5506</issn><eissn>2381-3512</eissn><coden>BLJODA</coden><abstract>In this article, the author examines transactions in which a letter of credit beneficiary draws on the credit for an amount that ultimately exceeds the amount to which the beneficiary has a valid claim, and analyzes who is entitled to these overdrafts. The author concludes that, generally, the letter of credit applicant (or its trustee in bankruptcy) has the superior claim to the excess payment held by the beneficiary superior to claims of the beneficiary and to claims of the bank issuer. Allowing the applicant or its trustee in bankruptcy to recover from the beneficiary excess payments made under the credit does not offend letter of credit law. That applicant's claim to recover that excess, furthermore, is superior to that of the letter of credit issuer, unless the issuer has taken from the applicant an assignment of that claim or has a security interest in it.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>LexisNexis</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-5506
ispartof The Banking law journal, 2008-10, Vol.125 (9), p.776
issn 0005-5506
2381-3512
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_205307158
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Banking law
Bankruptcy
Letters of credit
Overdrafts
Proceeds
State court decisions
Studies
title OF COMPETING CLAIMS TO EXCESS LETTER OF CREDIT PROCEEDS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A21%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OF%20COMPETING%20CLAIMS%20TO%20EXCESS%20LETTER%20OF%20CREDIT%20PROCEEDS&rft.jtitle=The%20Banking%20law%20journal&rft.au=Dolan,%20John%20F&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=776&rft.pages=776-&rft.issn=0005-5506&rft.eissn=2381-3512&rft.coden=BLJODA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1571291081%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205307158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true