Ecological Role of an Apex Predator Revealed by a Reintroduction Experiment and Bayesian Statistics

Recent studies suggest that apex predators play a pivotal role in maintaining healthy, balanced ecosystems. However, a criticism of studies investigating the ecological role of apex predators is that understanding does not come from manipulative experiments. Here, we use a before-after-control-impac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosystems (New York) 2019-03, Vol.22 (2), p.283-295
Hauptverfasser: Moseby, K. E., Crowther, M. S., Letnic, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 295
container_issue 2
container_start_page 283
container_title Ecosystems (New York)
container_volume 22
creator Moseby, K. E.
Crowther, M. S.
Letnic, M.
description Recent studies suggest that apex predators play a pivotal role in maintaining healthy, balanced ecosystems. However, a criticism of studies investigating the ecological role of apex predators is that understanding does not come from manipulative experiments. Here, we use a before-after-control-impact-paired design to test predictions generated from trophic cascade theory (TCT) and mesopredator release hypothesis (MRH) by experimentally introducing dingoes into a 37-km² paddock and measuring the resultant effects on mammal assemblages. To increase precision of parameter estimates generated by our experiment, we used a Bayesian framework which included prior information recorded from a mensurative study located in a comparable ecosystem that contrasted indices of mammal abundance where dingoes were common and rare. Results of the mensurative study were consistent with TCT and MRH. When using an uninformative prior, results of the experiment showed that dingo addition only had a negative effect on kangaroo activity. Use of an informative prior reduced uncertainty of the posterior mean parameter estimates from the experiment and suggested that red foxes were affected negatively and small mammals and rabbits were affected positively by dingo introduction. However, the prior had a strong influence on the posterior mean effect sizes for small mammals, rabbits and foxes. Opposite polarity of uninformed and prior parameter estimates for rabbits suggests that the prior was incompatible with the uninformed estimates from the manipulative experiment. Our study shows how use of logical informative priors can help to overcome statistical issues associated with low-replication in large-scale experiments, but the strong influence of the prior means that our findings were driven largely by the mensurative study.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10021-018-0269-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2052548367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713731589</galeid><jstor_id>48701623</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713731589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-82af1a33f890f260883b233a258c744dc6cf5cb12dd160513ed21febf25d6dbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtrGzEQgJeSQPPoD-ihIMh5HT12tdqja5w2YGhJ0rPQSiMjs1m5khzsf99JtzS3IJBGYr4ZzVdVnxldMEq724w7ZzVlqqZc9rX8UF2wRrQ1lbw_-xvzulcN_Vhd5ryjlLWqaS4qu7ZxjNtgzUge4ggkemImstzDkfxM4EyJiTzAC5gRHBlOxOAtTCVFd7AlxImsj3tI4RmmgqAjX80JcsASj8WUkEuw-bo692bM8OnfeVX9uls_rb7Xmx_f7lfLTW1F15VaceOZEcKrnnouqVJi4EIY3irbNY2z0vrWDow7xyRtmQDHmYfB89ZJN4C4qm7muvsUfx8gF72LhzRhS81py9tGCdlh1mLO2uJIOkw-lmQsLgfPwcYJfMD3ZcdEJ1BSjwCbAZtizgm83uO8Jp00o_pVvp7la5SvX-VriQyfmYy50xbS21feg77M0C6j9f9dGtVRJtHEH-62kIE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2052548367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological Role of an Apex Predator Revealed by a Reintroduction Experiment and Bayesian Statistics</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Moseby, K. E. ; Crowther, M. S. ; Letnic, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moseby, K. E. ; Crowther, M. S. ; Letnic, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies suggest that apex predators play a pivotal role in maintaining healthy, balanced ecosystems. However, a criticism of studies investigating the ecological role of apex predators is that understanding does not come from manipulative experiments. Here, we use a before-after-control-impact-paired design to test predictions generated from trophic cascade theory (TCT) and mesopredator release hypothesis (MRH) by experimentally introducing dingoes into a 37-km² paddock and measuring the resultant effects on mammal assemblages. To increase precision of parameter estimates generated by our experiment, we used a Bayesian framework which included prior information recorded from a mensurative study located in a comparable ecosystem that contrasted indices of mammal abundance where dingoes were common and rare. Results of the mensurative study were consistent with TCT and MRH. When using an uninformative prior, results of the experiment showed that dingo addition only had a negative effect on kangaroo activity. Use of an informative prior reduced uncertainty of the posterior mean parameter estimates from the experiment and suggested that red foxes were affected negatively and small mammals and rabbits were affected positively by dingo introduction. However, the prior had a strong influence on the posterior mean effect sizes for small mammals, rabbits and foxes. Opposite polarity of uninformed and prior parameter estimates for rabbits suggests that the prior was incompatible with the uninformed estimates from the manipulative experiment. Our study shows how use of logical informative priors can help to overcome statistical issues associated with low-replication in large-scale experiments, but the strong influence of the prior means that our findings were driven largely by the mensurative study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-018-0269-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Management ; Estimates ; Experiments ; Foxes ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Mammals ; Original Articles ; Parameter estimation ; Parameter uncertainty ; Plant Sciences ; Polarity ; Predators ; Rabbits ; Reintroduction ; Small mammals ; Statistics ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2019-03, Vol.22 (2), p.283-295</ispartof><rights>2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Ecosystems is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-82af1a33f890f260883b233a258c744dc6cf5cb12dd160513ed21febf25d6dbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-82af1a33f890f260883b233a258c744dc6cf5cb12dd160513ed21febf25d6dbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48701623$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48701623$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moseby, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letnic, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological Role of an Apex Predator Revealed by a Reintroduction Experiment and Bayesian Statistics</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><addtitle>Ecosystems</addtitle><description>Recent studies suggest that apex predators play a pivotal role in maintaining healthy, balanced ecosystems. However, a criticism of studies investigating the ecological role of apex predators is that understanding does not come from manipulative experiments. Here, we use a before-after-control-impact-paired design to test predictions generated from trophic cascade theory (TCT) and mesopredator release hypothesis (MRH) by experimentally introducing dingoes into a 37-km² paddock and measuring the resultant effects on mammal assemblages. To increase precision of parameter estimates generated by our experiment, we used a Bayesian framework which included prior information recorded from a mensurative study located in a comparable ecosystem that contrasted indices of mammal abundance where dingoes were common and rare. Results of the mensurative study were consistent with TCT and MRH. When using an uninformative prior, results of the experiment showed that dingo addition only had a negative effect on kangaroo activity. Use of an informative prior reduced uncertainty of the posterior mean parameter estimates from the experiment and suggested that red foxes were affected negatively and small mammals and rabbits were affected positively by dingo introduction. However, the prior had a strong influence on the posterior mean effect sizes for small mammals, rabbits and foxes. Opposite polarity of uninformed and prior parameter estimates for rabbits suggests that the prior was incompatible with the uninformed estimates from the manipulative experiment. Our study shows how use of logical informative priors can help to overcome statistical issues associated with low-replication in large-scale experiments, but the strong influence of the prior means that our findings were driven largely by the mensurative study.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Polarity</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Reintroduction</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtrGzEQgJeSQPPoD-ihIMh5HT12tdqja5w2YGhJ0rPQSiMjs1m5khzsf99JtzS3IJBGYr4ZzVdVnxldMEq724w7ZzVlqqZc9rX8UF2wRrQ1lbw_-xvzulcN_Vhd5ryjlLWqaS4qu7ZxjNtgzUge4ggkemImstzDkfxM4EyJiTzAC5gRHBlOxOAtTCVFd7AlxImsj3tI4RmmgqAjX80JcsASj8WUkEuw-bo692bM8OnfeVX9uls_rb7Xmx_f7lfLTW1F15VaceOZEcKrnnouqVJi4EIY3irbNY2z0vrWDow7xyRtmQDHmYfB89ZJN4C4qm7muvsUfx8gF72LhzRhS81py9tGCdlh1mLO2uJIOkw-lmQsLgfPwcYJfMD3ZcdEJ1BSjwCbAZtizgm83uO8Jp00o_pVvp7la5SvX-VriQyfmYy50xbS21feg77M0C6j9f9dGtVRJtHEH-62kIE</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Moseby, K. E.</creator><creator>Crowther, M. S.</creator><creator>Letnic, M.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Ecological Role of an Apex Predator Revealed by a Reintroduction Experiment and Bayesian Statistics</title><author>Moseby, K. E. ; Crowther, M. S. ; Letnic, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-82af1a33f890f260883b233a258c744dc6cf5cb12dd160513ed21febf25d6dbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Polarity</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Reintroduction</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moseby, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letnic, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moseby, K. E.</au><au>Crowther, M. S.</au><au>Letnic, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological Role of an Apex Predator Revealed by a Reintroduction Experiment and Bayesian Statistics</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Ecosystems</stitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>283-295</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>Recent studies suggest that apex predators play a pivotal role in maintaining healthy, balanced ecosystems. However, a criticism of studies investigating the ecological role of apex predators is that understanding does not come from manipulative experiments. Here, we use a before-after-control-impact-paired design to test predictions generated from trophic cascade theory (TCT) and mesopredator release hypothesis (MRH) by experimentally introducing dingoes into a 37-km² paddock and measuring the resultant effects on mammal assemblages. To increase precision of parameter estimates generated by our experiment, we used a Bayesian framework which included prior information recorded from a mensurative study located in a comparable ecosystem that contrasted indices of mammal abundance where dingoes were common and rare. Results of the mensurative study were consistent with TCT and MRH. When using an uninformative prior, results of the experiment showed that dingo addition only had a negative effect on kangaroo activity. Use of an informative prior reduced uncertainty of the posterior mean parameter estimates from the experiment and suggested that red foxes were affected negatively and small mammals and rabbits were affected positively by dingo introduction. However, the prior had a strong influence on the posterior mean effect sizes for small mammals, rabbits and foxes. Opposite polarity of uninformed and prior parameter estimates for rabbits suggests that the prior was incompatible with the uninformed estimates from the manipulative experiment. Our study shows how use of logical informative priors can help to overcome statistical issues associated with low-replication in large-scale experiments, but the strong influence of the prior means that our findings were driven largely by the mensurative study.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-018-0269-6</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-9840
ispartof Ecosystems (New York), 2019-03, Vol.22 (2), p.283-295
issn 1432-9840
1435-0629
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2052548367
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Bayesian analysis
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecological monitoring
Ecology
Ecosystems
Environmental Management
Estimates
Experiments
Foxes
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Hydrology/Water Resources
Life Sciences
Mammals
Original Articles
Parameter estimation
Parameter uncertainty
Plant Sciences
Polarity
Predators
Rabbits
Reintroduction
Small mammals
Statistics
Zoology
title Ecological Role of an Apex Predator Revealed by a Reintroduction Experiment and Bayesian Statistics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A34%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20Role%20of%20an%20Apex%20Predator%20Revealed%20by%20a%20Reintroduction%20Experiment%20and%20Bayesian%20Statistics&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Moseby,%20K.%20E.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=283-295&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-018-0269-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713731589%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2052548367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713731589&rft_jstor_id=48701623&rfr_iscdi=true