A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries

Hofstede’s “long-term orientation” (LTO) may be one of the most important dimensions of national culture, as it highlights differences on a continuum from East Asia to Africa and Latin America, strongly associated with differences in educational achievement. However, LTO’s structure lacks theoretica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cross-cultural research 2018-07, Vol.52 (3), p.309-333
Hauptverfasser: Minkov, Michael, Bond, Michael H., Dutt, Pinaki, Schachner, Michael, Morales, Oswaldo, Sanchez, Carlos, Jandosova, Janar, Khassenbekov, Yerlan, Mudd, Ben
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 333
container_issue 3
container_start_page 309
container_title Cross-cultural research
container_volume 52
creator Minkov, Michael
Bond, Michael H.
Dutt, Pinaki
Schachner, Michael
Morales, Oswaldo
Sanchez, Carlos
Jandosova, Janar
Khassenbekov, Yerlan
Mudd, Ben
description Hofstede’s “long-term orientation” (LTO) may be one of the most important dimensions of national culture, as it highlights differences on a continuum from East Asia to Africa and Latin America, strongly associated with differences in educational achievement. However, LTO’s structure lacks theoretical coherence. We show that a statistically similar, and theoretically more focused and coherent, dimension of national culture, called “flexibility versus monumentalism,” or vice versa, can be extracted from national differences in self-enhancement and self-stability or self-consistency, as well as a willingness to help people. Using data from nearly 53,000 respondents recruited probabilistically from 54 countries, we provide a new national flexibility-versus-monumentalism index that measures key cultural differences on the world’s East–West geographic axis and predicts educational achievement better than LTO or any other known dimension of national culture.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1069397117727488
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2051411494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1069397117727488</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2051411494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-91b24c566294443ed2624c18b111aa43a1d819bf5ac9441a294416e93a034c233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI7uXQZcV3Pz0x93w2gdYVQQdVvSNtUMbTMmKTo7X8PX80lMGUEQXN1zOd85Fy5Cx0BOAZLkDEicsSwZNU14mu6gCQhBIyaSdDfoYEejv48OnFsRQoDQZIL6Gb5XlemdrpWVXpsemwYvTOO8qtXXx6fDuW78C77QnQqU6c_xrXrDeavedalb7Tf4SVk3OHxj-iEwXrbadfhCeolzazosOJ6bofdWK3eI9hrZOnX0M6foMb98mC-i5d3V9Xy2jCqWCB9lUFJeiTimGeecqZrGYYe0BAApOZNQp5CVjZBVAECOGMQqY5IwXlHGpuhk27u25nVQzhcrM9g-nCwoEcABeMYDRbZUZY1zVjXF2upO2k0BpBg_Wfz9aohE24iTz-q39F_-GycRdp0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2051411494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Minkov, Michael ; Bond, Michael H. ; Dutt, Pinaki ; Schachner, Michael ; Morales, Oswaldo ; Sanchez, Carlos ; Jandosova, Janar ; Khassenbekov, Yerlan ; Mudd, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>Minkov, Michael ; Bond, Michael H. ; Dutt, Pinaki ; Schachner, Michael ; Morales, Oswaldo ; Sanchez, Carlos ; Jandosova, Janar ; Khassenbekov, Yerlan ; Mudd, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Hofstede’s “long-term orientation” (LTO) may be one of the most important dimensions of national culture, as it highlights differences on a continuum from East Asia to Africa and Latin America, strongly associated with differences in educational achievement. However, LTO’s structure lacks theoretical coherence. We show that a statistically similar, and theoretically more focused and coherent, dimension of national culture, called “flexibility versus monumentalism,” or vice versa, can be extracted from national differences in self-enhancement and self-stability or self-consistency, as well as a willingness to help people. Using data from nearly 53,000 respondents recruited probabilistically from 54 countries, we provide a new national flexibility-versus-monumentalism index that measures key cultural differences on the world’s East–West geographic axis and predicts educational achievement better than LTO or any other known dimension of national culture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1069397117727488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Coherence ; Cultural differences ; Educational attainment ; Flexibility ; Selfenhancement</subject><ispartof>Cross-cultural research, 2018-07, Vol.52 (3), p.309-333</ispartof><rights>2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-91b24c566294443ed2624c18b111aa43a1d819bf5ac9441a294416e93a034c233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-91b24c566294443ed2624c18b111aa43a1d819bf5ac9441a294416e93a034c233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1069397117727488$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1069397117727488$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minkov, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutt, Pinaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Oswaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jandosova, Janar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khassenbekov, Yerlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudd, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries</title><title>Cross-cultural research</title><description>Hofstede’s “long-term orientation” (LTO) may be one of the most important dimensions of national culture, as it highlights differences on a continuum from East Asia to Africa and Latin America, strongly associated with differences in educational achievement. However, LTO’s structure lacks theoretical coherence. We show that a statistically similar, and theoretically more focused and coherent, dimension of national culture, called “flexibility versus monumentalism,” or vice versa, can be extracted from national differences in self-enhancement and self-stability or self-consistency, as well as a willingness to help people. Using data from nearly 53,000 respondents recruited probabilistically from 54 countries, we provide a new national flexibility-versus-monumentalism index that measures key cultural differences on the world’s East–West geographic axis and predicts educational achievement better than LTO or any other known dimension of national culture.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Selfenhancement</subject><issn>1069-3971</issn><issn>1552-3578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI7uXQZcV3Pz0x93w2gdYVQQdVvSNtUMbTMmKTo7X8PX80lMGUEQXN1zOd85Fy5Cx0BOAZLkDEicsSwZNU14mu6gCQhBIyaSdDfoYEejv48OnFsRQoDQZIL6Gb5XlemdrpWVXpsemwYvTOO8qtXXx6fDuW78C77QnQqU6c_xrXrDeavedalb7Tf4SVk3OHxj-iEwXrbadfhCeolzazosOJ6bofdWK3eI9hrZOnX0M6foMb98mC-i5d3V9Xy2jCqWCB9lUFJeiTimGeecqZrGYYe0BAApOZNQp5CVjZBVAECOGMQqY5IwXlHGpuhk27u25nVQzhcrM9g-nCwoEcABeMYDRbZUZY1zVjXF2upO2k0BpBg_Wfz9aohE24iTz-q39F_-GycRdp0</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Minkov, Michael</creator><creator>Bond, Michael H.</creator><creator>Dutt, Pinaki</creator><creator>Schachner, Michael</creator><creator>Morales, Oswaldo</creator><creator>Sanchez, Carlos</creator><creator>Jandosova, Janar</creator><creator>Khassenbekov, Yerlan</creator><creator>Mudd, Ben</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries</title><author>Minkov, Michael ; Bond, Michael H. ; Dutt, Pinaki ; Schachner, Michael ; Morales, Oswaldo ; Sanchez, Carlos ; Jandosova, Janar ; Khassenbekov, Yerlan ; Mudd, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-91b24c566294443ed2624c18b111aa43a1d819bf5ac9441a294416e93a034c233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Selfenhancement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minkov, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutt, Pinaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, Oswaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jandosova, Janar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khassenbekov, Yerlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudd, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Cross-cultural research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minkov, Michael</au><au>Bond, Michael H.</au><au>Dutt, Pinaki</au><au>Schachner, Michael</au><au>Morales, Oswaldo</au><au>Sanchez, Carlos</au><au>Jandosova, Janar</au><au>Khassenbekov, Yerlan</au><au>Mudd, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries</atitle><jtitle>Cross-cultural research</jtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>309-333</pages><issn>1069-3971</issn><eissn>1552-3578</eissn><abstract>Hofstede’s “long-term orientation” (LTO) may be one of the most important dimensions of national culture, as it highlights differences on a continuum from East Asia to Africa and Latin America, strongly associated with differences in educational achievement. However, LTO’s structure lacks theoretical coherence. We show that a statistically similar, and theoretically more focused and coherent, dimension of national culture, called “flexibility versus monumentalism,” or vice versa, can be extracted from national differences in self-enhancement and self-stability or self-consistency, as well as a willingness to help people. Using data from nearly 53,000 respondents recruited probabilistically from 54 countries, we provide a new national flexibility-versus-monumentalism index that measures key cultural differences on the world’s East–West geographic axis and predicts educational achievement better than LTO or any other known dimension of national culture.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1069397117727488</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-3971
ispartof Cross-cultural research, 2018-07, Vol.52 (3), p.309-333
issn 1069-3971
1552-3578
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2051411494
source SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Academic achievement
Coherence
Cultural differences
Educational attainment
Flexibility
Selfenhancement
title A Reconsideration of Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Flexibility Versus Monumentalism Data From 54 Countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Reconsideration%20of%20Hofstede%E2%80%99s%20Fifth%20Dimension:%20New%20Flexibility%20Versus%20Monumentalism%20Data%20From%2054%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Cross-cultural%20research&rft.au=Minkov,%20Michael&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=309-333&rft.issn=1069-3971&rft.eissn=1552-3578&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1069397117727488&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2051411494%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2051411494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1069397117727488&rfr_iscdi=true