Effectiveness, objectives, and the EFFIE awards
A study of how briefs are constructed for the EFFIES award program - which showcases effectiveness in advertising - is presented. The objectives used and the design of the evaluation mechanisms by which the effectiveness was assessed are investigated. It was found that most of the objectives were no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advertising research 1996-07, Vol.36 (4), p.54 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 54 |
container_title | Journal of advertising research |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Moriarty, Sandra E |
description | A study of how briefs are constructed for the EFFIES award program - which showcases effectiveness in advertising - is presented. The objectives used and the design of the evaluation mechanisms by which the effectiveness was assessed are investigated. It was found that most of the objectives were not measurable as stated. Of the cases used in the analysis, only 17% stated measurable objectives. Most of the cases (50%) were focused on communication objectives, although some were centered primarily on marketing effects (25%) with little attempt to assess communication effects; the remaining 25% were split between communication and marketing effects. The marketing effects were dominated by sales and share objectives; the communication effects were dominated by persuasive effects that focused on behavior and attitude. In terms of support, it was found that 91% of the evidence statements were clearly linked to objectives; however, it was also found that few of the cases made a clear causal argument linking the effect to the advertising message. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205139577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A18782737</galeid><sourcerecordid>A18782737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g255t-5311a52e38417a9d8117ab2ebcd90f854fbb5dbd855cc1f7c720db3bc18937c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj09LxDAQxYMoWFe_Q_G8wUzSkOS4LK0uLHjRc8nf2lJbbbL69Y3Um8sc3rzhx7yZC1SAqAgGRdQlKgihgGWl1DW6iXEg2RPOC_RQh-Bt6r_85GPclrMZVpt7PbkyvfmybppDXepvvbh4i66CHqO_-9MNem3ql_0TPj4_Hva7I-4o5wlzBqA59UxWILRyErIY6o11igTJq2AMd8ZJzq2FIKygxBlmLEjFhCVsg-7XvR_L_HnyMbXDfFqmHNnmw4EpLkSGtivU6dG3_RTmtGjb5VcWPc6TD30e70AKSQX7xfEZPJfz7739z_8A5xNd8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205139577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness, objectives, and the EFFIE awards</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Moriarty, Sandra E</creator><creatorcontrib>Moriarty, Sandra E</creatorcontrib><description>A study of how briefs are constructed for the EFFIES award program - which showcases effectiveness in advertising - is presented. The objectives used and the design of the evaluation mechanisms by which the effectiveness was assessed are investigated. It was found that most of the objectives were not measurable as stated. Of the cases used in the analysis, only 17% stated measurable objectives. Most of the cases (50%) were focused on communication objectives, although some were centered primarily on marketing effects (25%) with little attempt to assess communication effects; the remaining 25% were split between communication and marketing effects. The marketing effects were dominated by sales and share objectives; the communication effects were dominated by persuasive effects that focused on behavior and attitude. In terms of support, it was found that 91% of the evidence statements were clearly linked to objectives; however, it was also found that few of the cases made a clear causal argument linking the effect to the advertising message.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-1909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: World Advertising Research Center Ltd</publisher><subject>Achievements and awards ; Advertising ; Advertising campaigns ; Attitudes ; Awards & honors ; Behavior ; Communication ; Consumers ; Effectiveness ; Marketing ; Objectives ; Statistical analysis ; Strategic planning ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of advertising research, 1996-07, Vol.36 (4), p.54</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 World Advertising Research Center Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Advertising Research Foundation Jul/Aug 1996</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moriarty, Sandra E</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness, objectives, and the EFFIE awards</title><title>Journal of advertising research</title><description>A study of how briefs are constructed for the EFFIES award program - which showcases effectiveness in advertising - is presented. The objectives used and the design of the evaluation mechanisms by which the effectiveness was assessed are investigated. It was found that most of the objectives were not measurable as stated. Of the cases used in the analysis, only 17% stated measurable objectives. Most of the cases (50%) were focused on communication objectives, although some were centered primarily on marketing effects (25%) with little attempt to assess communication effects; the remaining 25% were split between communication and marketing effects. The marketing effects were dominated by sales and share objectives; the communication effects were dominated by persuasive effects that focused on behavior and attitude. In terms of support, it was found that 91% of the evidence statements were clearly linked to objectives; however, it was also found that few of the cases made a clear causal argument linking the effect to the advertising message.</description><subject>Achievements and awards</subject><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising campaigns</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Awards & honors</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8499</issn><issn>1740-1909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj09LxDAQxYMoWFe_Q_G8wUzSkOS4LK0uLHjRc8nf2lJbbbL69Y3Um8sc3rzhx7yZC1SAqAgGRdQlKgihgGWl1DW6iXEg2RPOC_RQh-Bt6r_85GPclrMZVpt7PbkyvfmybppDXepvvbh4i66CHqO_-9MNem3ql_0TPj4_Hva7I-4o5wlzBqA59UxWILRyErIY6o11igTJq2AMd8ZJzq2FIKygxBlmLEjFhCVsg-7XvR_L_HnyMbXDfFqmHNnmw4EpLkSGtivU6dG3_RTmtGjb5VcWPc6TD30e70AKSQX7xfEZPJfz7739z_8A5xNd8A</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Moriarty, Sandra E</creator><general>World Advertising Research Center Ltd</general><general>Advertising Research Foundation</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>Effectiveness, objectives, and the EFFIE awards</title><author>Moriarty, Sandra E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g255t-5311a52e38417a9d8117ab2ebcd90f854fbb5dbd855cc1f7c720db3bc18937c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Achievements and awards</topic><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising campaigns</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Awards & honors</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moriarty, Sandra E</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of advertising research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moriarty, Sandra E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness, objectives, and the EFFIE awards</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advertising research</jtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>54</spage><pages>54-</pages><issn>0021-8499</issn><eissn>1740-1909</eissn><coden>JADRAV</coden><abstract>A study of how briefs are constructed for the EFFIES award program - which showcases effectiveness in advertising - is presented. The objectives used and the design of the evaluation mechanisms by which the effectiveness was assessed are investigated. It was found that most of the objectives were not measurable as stated. Of the cases used in the analysis, only 17% stated measurable objectives. Most of the cases (50%) were focused on communication objectives, although some were centered primarily on marketing effects (25%) with little attempt to assess communication effects; the remaining 25% were split between communication and marketing effects. The marketing effects were dominated by sales and share objectives; the communication effects were dominated by persuasive effects that focused on behavior and attitude. In terms of support, it was found that 91% of the evidence statements were clearly linked to objectives; however, it was also found that few of the cases made a clear causal argument linking the effect to the advertising message.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>World Advertising Research Center Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8499 |
ispartof | Journal of advertising research, 1996-07, Vol.36 (4), p.54 |
issn | 0021-8499 1740-1909 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205139577 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Achievements and awards Advertising Advertising campaigns Attitudes Awards & honors Behavior Communication Consumers Effectiveness Marketing Objectives Statistical analysis Strategic planning Studies |
title | Effectiveness, objectives, and the EFFIE awards |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness,%20objectives,%20and%20the%20EFFIE%20awards&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advertising%20research&rft.au=Moriarty,%20Sandra%20E&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=54&rft.pages=54-&rft.issn=0021-8499&rft.eissn=1740-1909&rft.coden=JADRAV&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA18782737%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205139577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A18782737&rfr_iscdi=true |