Femoral block provides superior analgesia compared with intra-articular ropivacaine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Background and Objectives: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of the knee is a painful procedure requiring intensive postoperative pain management. This prospective study investigates analgesic quality after a femoral block as compared with intra-articular injection of loca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2003-01, Vol.28 (1), p.29-32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 32 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Regional anesthesia and pain medicine |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Iskandar, Henri Benard, Antoine Ruel-Raymond, Joelle Cochard, Gyslaine Manaud, Bertrand |
description | Background and Objectives: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of the knee is a painful procedure requiring intensive postoperative pain management. This prospective study investigates analgesic quality after a femoral block as compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic. Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for elective ACL repair under general anesthesia were included in our study. Upon completion of surgery, the patients were randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups: femoral group (n = 40) received a femoral block with 20 mL 1% ropivacaine; intra-articular group (n = 40) received 20 mL 1% ropivacaine injected intra-articularly. During the first 24 hours after surgery, all patients received 2 g propacetamol and 100 mg ketoprofen, intravenously. Additional postoperative analgesia was available with parenteral morphine if required. Analgesic duration was defined as the time from end of surgery to the first requirement for a supplemental analgesic. Data collection included patient demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, analgesic duration, and morphine use. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare the 2 groups Results: VAS score in the recovery room and during rehabilitation was higher in the intra-articular group than in the femoral group (P < .001). Morphine use was lower in the femoral group than in the intra-articular group (P < .001). Similarly, analgesic duration was longer in the femoral group than the intra-articular group (P < .0001). Conclusions: Compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic, femoral nerve block (FNB) provides better analgesia and allows a significant morphine-sparing effect after ACL repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:29-32. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/rapm.2003.50019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205115896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098733902277214</els_id><sourcerecordid>289144151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3be1d76e18f0088a3fb5a92684c113ced3af2d24d5b3947de9c7681b8ff9bfad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFv1DAQRi1ERUvhzA1Z3LO14zixj6iigFSpF3q2Jva4dZvEwXYWceaP42VX4tSTR9abT_M9Qj5wtuNMiqsE67xrGRM7yRjXr8gFl6JtVC_56zozrZpBCH1O3ub8xBhTQ9e_Iee8lf0gOnZB_tzgHBNMdJyifaZrivvgMNO8rZhCTBQWmB4wB6A2ziskdPRXKI80LCVBA6kEu02QaIpr2IOFsCAFX_CwWY4RNm02QEE6hQeYcSk0oY1LLvW_hLi8I2cepozvT-8lub_58uP6W3N79_X79efbxgqtSiNG5G7okStfiygQfpSg2151lnNh0QnwrWs7J0ehu8GhtkOv-Ki816MHJy7Jp2Nubflzw1zMU9xS7ZdNyyTnUum-QldHyKaYc0Jv1hRmSL8NZ-bg3Bycm4Nz88953fh4it3GGd1__iS5AvoIYC23D5hMtgGXenGoIopxMbwY_hfFFpUy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205115896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoral block provides superior analgesia compared with intra-articular ropivacaine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Iskandar, Henri ; Benard, Antoine ; Ruel-Raymond, Joelle ; Cochard, Gyslaine ; Manaud, Bertrand</creator><creatorcontrib>Iskandar, Henri ; Benard, Antoine ; Ruel-Raymond, Joelle ; Cochard, Gyslaine ; Manaud, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of the knee is a painful procedure requiring intensive postoperative pain management. This prospective study investigates analgesic quality after a femoral block as compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic. Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for elective ACL repair under general anesthesia were included in our study. Upon completion of surgery, the patients were randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups: femoral group (n = 40) received a femoral block with 20 mL 1% ropivacaine; intra-articular group (n = 40) received 20 mL 1% ropivacaine injected intra-articularly. During the first 24 hours after surgery, all patients received 2 g propacetamol and 100 mg ketoprofen, intravenously. Additional postoperative analgesia was available with parenteral morphine if required. Analgesic duration was defined as the time from end of surgery to the first requirement for a supplemental analgesic. Data collection included patient demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, analgesic duration, and morphine use. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare the 2 groups Results: VAS score in the recovery room and during rehabilitation was higher in the intra-articular group than in the femoral group (P < .001). Morphine use was lower in the femoral group than in the intra-articular group (P < .001). Similarly, analgesic duration was longer in the femoral group than the intra-articular group (P < .0001). Conclusions: Compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic, femoral nerve block (FNB) provides better analgesia and allows a significant morphine-sparing effect after ACL repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:29-32.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12567340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amides - administration & dosage ; Amides - adverse effects ; Amides - therapeutic use ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects ; Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Femoral Nerve ; Humans ; Injections, Intra-Articular ; Male ; Morphine - therapeutic use ; Nerve Block ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Regional anesthesia ; Ropivacaine</subject><ispartof>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2003-01, Vol.28 (1), p.29-32</ispartof><rights>2003 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright Churchill Livingstone Inc., Medical Publishers Jan/Feb 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3be1d76e18f0088a3fb5a92684c113ced3af2d24d5b3947de9c7681b8ff9bfad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12567340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iskandar, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benard, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruel-Raymond, Joelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochard, Gyslaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manaud, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><title>Femoral block provides superior analgesia compared with intra-articular ropivacaine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</title><title>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</title><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of the knee is a painful procedure requiring intensive postoperative pain management. This prospective study investigates analgesic quality after a femoral block as compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic. Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for elective ACL repair under general anesthesia were included in our study. Upon completion of surgery, the patients were randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups: femoral group (n = 40) received a femoral block with 20 mL 1% ropivacaine; intra-articular group (n = 40) received 20 mL 1% ropivacaine injected intra-articularly. During the first 24 hours after surgery, all patients received 2 g propacetamol and 100 mg ketoprofen, intravenously. Additional postoperative analgesia was available with parenteral morphine if required. Analgesic duration was defined as the time from end of surgery to the first requirement for a supplemental analgesic. Data collection included patient demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, analgesic duration, and morphine use. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare the 2 groups Results: VAS score in the recovery room and during rehabilitation was higher in the intra-articular group than in the femoral group (P < .001). Morphine use was lower in the femoral group than in the intra-articular group (P < .001). Similarly, analgesic duration was longer in the femoral group than the intra-articular group (P < .0001). Conclusions: Compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic, femoral nerve block (FNB) provides better analgesia and allows a significant morphine-sparing effect after ACL repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:29-32.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amides - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Amides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Amides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Nerve</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intra-Articular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Ropivacaine</subject><issn>1098-7339</issn><issn>1532-8651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFv1DAQRi1ERUvhzA1Z3LO14zixj6iigFSpF3q2Jva4dZvEwXYWceaP42VX4tSTR9abT_M9Qj5wtuNMiqsE67xrGRM7yRjXr8gFl6JtVC_56zozrZpBCH1O3ub8xBhTQ9e_Iee8lf0gOnZB_tzgHBNMdJyifaZrivvgMNO8rZhCTBQWmB4wB6A2ziskdPRXKI80LCVBA6kEu02QaIpr2IOFsCAFX_CwWY4RNm02QEE6hQeYcSk0oY1LLvW_hLi8I2cepozvT-8lub_58uP6W3N79_X79efbxgqtSiNG5G7okStfiygQfpSg2151lnNh0QnwrWs7J0ehu8GhtkOv-Ki816MHJy7Jp2Nubflzw1zMU9xS7ZdNyyTnUum-QldHyKaYc0Jv1hRmSL8NZ-bg3Bycm4Nz88953fh4it3GGd1__iS5AvoIYC23D5hMtgGXenGoIopxMbwY_hfFFpUy</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Iskandar, Henri</creator><creator>Benard, Antoine</creator><creator>Ruel-Raymond, Joelle</creator><creator>Cochard, Gyslaine</creator><creator>Manaud, Bertrand</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>Femoral block provides superior analgesia compared with intra-articular ropivacaine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</title><author>Iskandar, Henri ; Benard, Antoine ; Ruel-Raymond, Joelle ; Cochard, Gyslaine ; Manaud, Bertrand</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-3be1d76e18f0088a3fb5a92684c113ced3af2d24d5b3947de9c7681b8ff9bfad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amides - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Amides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Amides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Nerve</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intra-Articular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Ropivacaine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iskandar, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benard, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruel-Raymond, Joelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochard, Gyslaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manaud, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iskandar, Henri</au><au>Benard, Antoine</au><au>Ruel-Raymond, Joelle</au><au>Cochard, Gyslaine</au><au>Manaud, Bertrand</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoral block provides superior analgesia compared with intra-articular ropivacaine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>29-32</pages><issn>1098-7339</issn><eissn>1532-8651</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of the knee is a painful procedure requiring intensive postoperative pain management. This prospective study investigates analgesic quality after a femoral block as compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic. Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for elective ACL repair under general anesthesia were included in our study. Upon completion of surgery, the patients were randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups: femoral group (n = 40) received a femoral block with 20 mL 1% ropivacaine; intra-articular group (n = 40) received 20 mL 1% ropivacaine injected intra-articularly. During the first 24 hours after surgery, all patients received 2 g propacetamol and 100 mg ketoprofen, intravenously. Additional postoperative analgesia was available with parenteral morphine if required. Analgesic duration was defined as the time from end of surgery to the first requirement for a supplemental analgesic. Data collection included patient demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, analgesic duration, and morphine use. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare the 2 groups Results: VAS score in the recovery room and during rehabilitation was higher in the intra-articular group than in the femoral group (P < .001). Morphine use was lower in the femoral group than in the intra-articular group (P < .001). Similarly, analgesic duration was longer in the femoral group than the intra-articular group (P < .0001). Conclusions: Compared with intra-articular injection of local anesthetic, femoral nerve block (FNB) provides better analgesia and allows a significant morphine-sparing effect after ACL repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:29-32.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12567340</pmid><doi>10.1053/rapm.2003.50019</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-7339 |
ispartof | Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2003-01, Vol.28 (1), p.29-32 |
issn | 1098-7339 1532-8651 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205115896 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Amides - administration & dosage Amides - adverse effects Amides - therapeutic use Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects Anesthetics, Local - therapeutic use Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery Double-Blind Method Female Femoral Nerve Humans Injections, Intra-Articular Male Morphine - therapeutic use Nerve Block Pain Measurement Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - epidemiology Prospective Studies Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Regional anesthesia Ropivacaine |
title | Femoral block provides superior analgesia compared with intra-articular ropivacaine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoral%20block%20provides%20superior%20analgesia%20compared%20with%20intra-articular%20ropivacaine%20after%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Regional%20anesthesia%20and%20pain%20medicine&rft.au=Iskandar,%20Henri&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=29-32&rft.issn=1098-7339&rft.eissn=1532-8651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/rapm.2003.50019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E289144151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205115896&rft_id=info:pmid/12567340&rft_els_id=S1098733902277214&rfr_iscdi=true |