An application of the exploratory structural equation modeling framework to the study of personality faking

This study compared the suitability of the restrictive framework of independent cluster model (ICM) and a more flexible framework of exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) to a personality instrument in a faking study. We proposed and answered five research questions using the model-testing procedures described by Morin, Arens, and Marsh (2016). More specifically, we compared the fit of ICM-CFA and ESEM, and ESEM and bi-factor ESEM, and we investigated the patterns of factor correlations and the presence of cross-loadings in these models. In our faking condition, we found the ESEM applications provided the better representation of the data, and the adverse effects of the strict assumptions of ICM-based models to be most apparent. Limitations and practical implications were discussed. •More inflation of factor correlations manifested for the faking condition in ICM-CFA than ESEM.•The model fit improvement of ESEM was more apparent in the faking condition.•Cross-loadings are much more evident in the faking condition for ESEM.•The ideal employee factor is more apparent under the faking condition than the honest condition when B-ESEM is applied.•The variance for the ideal employee factor was inflated in the traditional bi-factor model as compared to ESEM.