Impacts of domestic cattle on forest and woody ecosystems in southern South America

There is a long lasting debate on the effects of domestic cattle grazing on natural ecosystems worldwide. Cattle are generally assumed to have negative effects on forest conservation; however, several studies also report positive and neutral effects. We aimed to investigate the available evidence fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant ecology 2018-08, Vol.219 (8), p.913-925
Hauptverfasser: Mazzini, F., Relva, M. A., Malizia, L. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 925
container_issue 8
container_start_page 913
container_title Plant ecology
container_volume 219
creator Mazzini, F.
Relva, M. A.
Malizia, L. R.
description There is a long lasting debate on the effects of domestic cattle grazing on natural ecosystems worldwide. Cattle are generally assumed to have negative effects on forest conservation; however, several studies also report positive and neutral effects. We aimed to investigate the available evidence for positive, negative and neutral effects of cattle grazing on forest and woody ecosystems of southern South America. We conducted a peer-review literature search using the ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus databases to identify studies dealing with cattle impacts for nature conservation. We compiled a database of 211 cases from 126 original publications. A reduced number of forest ecosystems (Patagonian forest, Chaco and Monte) concentrated ~ 85% of the reported study cases. The hierarchical cluster analysis to group cases based on cattle effects, ecological variables and ecosystems reported that negative effects (~ 66% of cases) were mostly informed for vegetation variables and mainly occur in Patagonian forest and Chaco; positive effects (∼16 %) were mostly informed for Monte (no particular variable associated), while neutral effects (∼ 18 %) were mostly informed for fauna-related variables and Uruguayan savanna. Our study suggests that grazing effects by cattle on southern South America forests are not homogeneous and depend on the particular forest ecosystem considered as well as on the forest attribute measured. Different cattle effects found can be partially explained by differences in grazing history and different ecosystems productivity. It is vital to improve our understanding of cattle–forest interactions to guide synergies between sustainable management and forest conservation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11258-018-0846-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2050194005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A545825370</galeid><jstor_id>48725241</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A545825370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-97e57b0b9debf4f581e7e8715032f1c23c5b8b07f014b9eee77689d592afed823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFqHDEMhofSQNJtHiCHgKHn2cr2KPYclyVNFxZ6SHs2Ho-czrIz3theyrx9vUxIb0UICfF_kvir6o7DmgOor4lzgboGXlI3D_X8obrhqGSNgOJj6aXGGoRU19WnlA4AhZJ4Uz3vxpN1ObHgWR9GSnlwzNmcj8TCxHyIZcTs1LM_IfQzIxfSnDKNiQ0TS-Gcf1Oc2POlYZuR4uDs5-rK22Oi27e6qn59e_y5_V7vfzzttpt97aRSuW4Voeqga3vqfONRc1KkFUeQwnMnpMNOd6A88KZriUipB9322ArrqddCrqovy95TDK_n8qc5hHOcykkjAIG3DQAW1XpRvdgjmWHyIUfrSvQ0Di5M5Icy32CDWqBUUAC-AC6GlCJ5c4rDaONsOJiL2WYx2xSzzcVsMxdGLEwq2umF4r9X_gfdL9Ah5RDfrzRaCRQNl38BC2OL9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2050194005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of domestic cattle on forest and woody ecosystems in southern South America</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mazzini, F. ; Relva, M. A. ; Malizia, L. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazzini, F. ; Relva, M. A. ; Malizia, L. R.</creatorcontrib><description>There is a long lasting debate on the effects of domestic cattle grazing on natural ecosystems worldwide. Cattle are generally assumed to have negative effects on forest conservation; however, several studies also report positive and neutral effects. We aimed to investigate the available evidence for positive, negative and neutral effects of cattle grazing on forest and woody ecosystems of southern South America. We conducted a peer-review literature search using the ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus databases to identify studies dealing with cattle impacts for nature conservation. We compiled a database of 211 cases from 126 original publications. A reduced number of forest ecosystems (Patagonian forest, Chaco and Monte) concentrated ~ 85% of the reported study cases. The hierarchical cluster analysis to group cases based on cattle effects, ecological variables and ecosystems reported that negative effects (~ 66% of cases) were mostly informed for vegetation variables and mainly occur in Patagonian forest and Chaco; positive effects (∼16 %) were mostly informed for Monte (no particular variable associated), while neutral effects (∼ 18 %) were mostly informed for fauna-related variables and Uruguayan savanna. Our study suggests that grazing effects by cattle on southern South America forests are not homogeneous and depend on the particular forest ecosystem considered as well as on the forest attribute measured. Different cattle effects found can be partially explained by differences in grazing history and different ecosystems productivity. It is vital to improve our understanding of cattle–forest interactions to guide synergies between sustainable management and forest conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-018-0846-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Applied Ecology ; Beef cattle ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Cluster analysis ; Community &amp; Population Ecology ; Conservation ; Ecological effects ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental management ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecology ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forests ; Grazing ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; Nature conservation ; Plant Ecology ; Protection and preservation ; Sustainability management ; Terrestial Ecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2018-08, Vol.219 (8), p.913-925</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Plant Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-97e57b0b9debf4f581e7e8715032f1c23c5b8b07f014b9eee77689d592afed823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-97e57b0b9debf4f581e7e8715032f1c23c5b8b07f014b9eee77689d592afed823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3820-5445</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48725241$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48725241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazzini, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relva, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malizia, L. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of domestic cattle on forest and woody ecosystems in southern South America</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>There is a long lasting debate on the effects of domestic cattle grazing on natural ecosystems worldwide. Cattle are generally assumed to have negative effects on forest conservation; however, several studies also report positive and neutral effects. We aimed to investigate the available evidence for positive, negative and neutral effects of cattle grazing on forest and woody ecosystems of southern South America. We conducted a peer-review literature search using the ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus databases to identify studies dealing with cattle impacts for nature conservation. We compiled a database of 211 cases from 126 original publications. A reduced number of forest ecosystems (Patagonian forest, Chaco and Monte) concentrated ~ 85% of the reported study cases. The hierarchical cluster analysis to group cases based on cattle effects, ecological variables and ecosystems reported that negative effects (~ 66% of cases) were mostly informed for vegetation variables and mainly occur in Patagonian forest and Chaco; positive effects (∼16 %) were mostly informed for Monte (no particular variable associated), while neutral effects (∼ 18 %) were mostly informed for fauna-related variables and Uruguayan savanna. Our study suggests that grazing effects by cattle on southern South America forests are not homogeneous and depend on the particular forest ecosystem considered as well as on the forest attribute measured. Different cattle effects found can be partially explained by differences in grazing history and different ecosystems productivity. It is vital to improve our understanding of cattle–forest interactions to guide synergies between sustainable management and forest conservation.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Community &amp; Population Ecology</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFqHDEMhofSQNJtHiCHgKHn2cr2KPYclyVNFxZ6SHs2Ho-czrIz3theyrx9vUxIb0UICfF_kvir6o7DmgOor4lzgboGXlI3D_X8obrhqGSNgOJj6aXGGoRU19WnlA4AhZJ4Uz3vxpN1ObHgWR9GSnlwzNmcj8TCxHyIZcTs1LM_IfQzIxfSnDKNiQ0TS-Gcf1Oc2POlYZuR4uDs5-rK22Oi27e6qn59e_y5_V7vfzzttpt97aRSuW4Voeqga3vqfONRc1KkFUeQwnMnpMNOd6A88KZriUipB9322ArrqddCrqovy95TDK_n8qc5hHOcykkjAIG3DQAW1XpRvdgjmWHyIUfrSvQ0Di5M5Icy32CDWqBUUAC-AC6GlCJ5c4rDaONsOJiL2WYx2xSzzcVsMxdGLEwq2umF4r9X_gfdL9Ah5RDfrzRaCRQNl38BC2OL9Q</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Mazzini, F.</creator><creator>Relva, M. A.</creator><creator>Malizia, L. R.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-5445</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Impacts of domestic cattle on forest and woody ecosystems in southern South America</title><author>Mazzini, F. ; Relva, M. A. ; Malizia, L. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-97e57b0b9debf4f581e7e8715032f1c23c5b8b07f014b9eee77689d592afed823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Community &amp; Population Ecology</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazzini, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relva, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malizia, L. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazzini, F.</au><au>Relva, M. A.</au><au>Malizia, L. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of domestic cattle on forest and woody ecosystems in southern South America</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>219</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>925</epage><pages>913-925</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>There is a long lasting debate on the effects of domestic cattle grazing on natural ecosystems worldwide. Cattle are generally assumed to have negative effects on forest conservation; however, several studies also report positive and neutral effects. We aimed to investigate the available evidence for positive, negative and neutral effects of cattle grazing on forest and woody ecosystems of southern South America. We conducted a peer-review literature search using the ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus databases to identify studies dealing with cattle impacts for nature conservation. We compiled a database of 211 cases from 126 original publications. A reduced number of forest ecosystems (Patagonian forest, Chaco and Monte) concentrated ~ 85% of the reported study cases. The hierarchical cluster analysis to group cases based on cattle effects, ecological variables and ecosystems reported that negative effects (~ 66% of cases) were mostly informed for vegetation variables and mainly occur in Patagonian forest and Chaco; positive effects (∼16 %) were mostly informed for Monte (no particular variable associated), while neutral effects (∼ 18 %) were mostly informed for fauna-related variables and Uruguayan savanna. Our study suggests that grazing effects by cattle on southern South America forests are not homogeneous and depend on the particular forest ecosystem considered as well as on the forest attribute measured. Different cattle effects found can be partially explained by differences in grazing history and different ecosystems productivity. It is vital to improve our understanding of cattle–forest interactions to guide synergies between sustainable management and forest conservation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-018-0846-y</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-5445</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-0237
ispartof Plant ecology, 2018-08, Vol.219 (8), p.913-925
issn 1385-0237
1573-5052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2050194005
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis
Applied Ecology
Beef cattle
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cattle
Cluster analysis
Community & Population Ecology
Conservation
Ecological effects
Ecological monitoring
Ecology
Ecosystems
Environmental management
Forest conservation
Forest ecology
Forest ecosystems
Forest management
Forests
Grazing
Life Sciences
Literature reviews
Nature conservation
Plant Ecology
Protection and preservation
Sustainability management
Terrestial Ecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Variables
title Impacts of domestic cattle on forest and woody ecosystems in southern South America
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A58%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20domestic%20cattle%20on%20forest%20and%20woody%20ecosystems%20in%20southern%20South%20America&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Mazzini,%20F.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=219&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=925&rft.pages=913-925&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-018-0846-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA545825370%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2050194005&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A545825370&rft_jstor_id=48725241&rfr_iscdi=true