Is spatial variation in population size structures of a stream-dwelling caddisfly due to the altered effects of a predator by a third-party species?

Predators alter abundances and life history characteristics of prey, and effects of predator–prey interactions can be altered by third-party species. Here, we examine size structures of the caddisfly, Phylloicus hansoni , in Trinidadian streams with two distinct fish assemblages: upstream reaches wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2018-09, Vol.820 (1), p.65-77
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Kelly M., Stoker, David, Pringle, Catherine M., Simon, Troy N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 820
creator Murray, Kelly M.
Stoker, David
Pringle, Catherine M.
Simon, Troy N.
description Predators alter abundances and life history characteristics of prey, and effects of predator–prey interactions can be altered by third-party species. Here, we examine size structures of the caddisfly, Phylloicus hansoni , in Trinidadian streams with two distinct fish assemblages: upstream reaches where the predatory killifish, Anablepsoides hartii , is the only fish species ( Killifish - Only reaches), and downstream reaches where killifish and the omnivorous guppy, Poecilia reticulata , coexist ( Killifish – Guppy reaches). We asked: Do P. hansoni larvae exhibit differences in size structure between reaches with differing fish assemblages? We found that size distributions of larvae differed between reaches in the majority of replicate streams, with smaller median body lengths in Killifish - Only reaches. Killifish – Guppy reaches had higher proportions of the largest instar, but we did not find differences in body length within an instar. No evidence of size-selective predation was found through analysis of killifish stomach contents, and environmental variables were largely similar between upstream and downstream reaches of the five study streams, aside from higher killifish abundances in upstream reaches. Our results, coupled with previous evidence of guppies altering killifish populations, suggest that the mediating effects of a third-party species (guppies) on predator–prey (killifish–caddisfly) interactions can affect the population size structure of prey populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-018-3674-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2049751014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A545474744</galeid><sourcerecordid>A545474744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-988f556c9c1b1f86d5762bfa9aa71eb67c94d9c852ad660fd4a8057111bd6a333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEEkvpA3CzxImDi53EsXNCVQVlpUpIQM_WxB5vXWXjYDvA9jl4YBylEuoBzcH-x_83HumvqjecXXDG5PvEmRSMMq5o08mWsmfVjgvZUMG5fF7t2PqiuFAvq1cp3bPC9DXbVX_2iaQZsoeR_IToyy1MxE9kDvMybir5ByQpx8XkJWIiwRFYNcKR2l84jn46EAPW-uTGE7ELkhxIvkMCY8aIlqBzaPIjOZcO5BDJcCoq3_lo6Qwxn8oiaDymD6-rFw7GhOeP51l1--nj96vP9ObL9f7q8oaaRvWZ9ko5ITrTGz5wpzorZFcPDnoAyXHopOlb2xslarBdx5xtQTEhOeeD7aBpmrPq7TZ3juHHginr-7DEqXypa9b2UnDG2-K62FwHGFH7yYUcwZSyePQmTOh86V-KVrSy1Aq8ewIUT8bf-QBLSnr_7etTL9-8JoaUIjo9R3-EeNKc6TVZvSWrS356TVazwtQbk4p3OmD8t_b_ob-S9adB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049751014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is spatial variation in population size structures of a stream-dwelling caddisfly due to the altered effects of a predator by a third-party species?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Murray, Kelly M. ; Stoker, David ; Pringle, Catherine M. ; Simon, Troy N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kelly M. ; Stoker, David ; Pringle, Catherine M. ; Simon, Troy N.</creatorcontrib><description>Predators alter abundances and life history characteristics of prey, and effects of predator–prey interactions can be altered by third-party species. Here, we examine size structures of the caddisfly, Phylloicus hansoni , in Trinidadian streams with two distinct fish assemblages: upstream reaches where the predatory killifish, Anablepsoides hartii , is the only fish species ( Killifish - Only reaches), and downstream reaches where killifish and the omnivorous guppy, Poecilia reticulata , coexist ( Killifish – Guppy reaches). We asked: Do P. hansoni larvae exhibit differences in size structure between reaches with differing fish assemblages? We found that size distributions of larvae differed between reaches in the majority of replicate streams, with smaller median body lengths in Killifish - Only reaches. Killifish – Guppy reaches had higher proportions of the largest instar, but we did not find differences in body length within an instar. No evidence of size-selective predation was found through analysis of killifish stomach contents, and environmental variables were largely similar between upstream and downstream reaches of the five study streams, aside from higher killifish abundances in upstream reaches. Our results, coupled with previous evidence of guppies altering killifish populations, suggest that the mediating effects of a third-party species (guppies) on predator–prey (killifish–caddisfly) interactions can affect the population size structure of prey populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-018-3674-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Aquatic insects ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body length ; Downstream ; Ecology ; Fish ; Fishes ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Freshwater fishes ; Instars ; Interactions ; Interspecific relationships ; Larvae ; Life history ; Life Sciences ; Population number ; Populations ; Predation ; Predator-prey interactions ; Predators ; Prey ; Primary Research Paper ; Rivers ; Spatial variations ; Species ; Stomach ; Stomach content ; Streams ; Third party ; Upstream ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2018-09, Vol.820 (1), p.65-77</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Hydrobiologia is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-988f556c9c1b1f86d5762bfa9aa71eb67c94d9c852ad660fd4a8057111bd6a333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-988f556c9c1b1f86d5762bfa9aa71eb67c94d9c852ad660fd4a8057111bd6a333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4774-6948 ; 0000-0001-7153-8092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-018-3674-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-018-3674-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoker, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pringle, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Troy N.</creatorcontrib><title>Is spatial variation in population size structures of a stream-dwelling caddisfly due to the altered effects of a predator by a third-party species?</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Predators alter abundances and life history characteristics of prey, and effects of predator–prey interactions can be altered by third-party species. Here, we examine size structures of the caddisfly, Phylloicus hansoni , in Trinidadian streams with two distinct fish assemblages: upstream reaches where the predatory killifish, Anablepsoides hartii , is the only fish species ( Killifish - Only reaches), and downstream reaches where killifish and the omnivorous guppy, Poecilia reticulata , coexist ( Killifish – Guppy reaches). We asked: Do P. hansoni larvae exhibit differences in size structure between reaches with differing fish assemblages? We found that size distributions of larvae differed between reaches in the majority of replicate streams, with smaller median body lengths in Killifish - Only reaches. Killifish – Guppy reaches had higher proportions of the largest instar, but we did not find differences in body length within an instar. No evidence of size-selective predation was found through analysis of killifish stomach contents, and environmental variables were largely similar between upstream and downstream reaches of the five study streams, aside from higher killifish abundances in upstream reaches. Our results, coupled with previous evidence of guppies altering killifish populations, suggest that the mediating effects of a third-party species (guppies) on predator–prey (killifish–caddisfly) interactions can affect the population size structure of prey populations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body length</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Instars</subject><subject>Interactions</subject><subject>Interspecific relationships</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predator-prey interactions</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Primary Research Paper</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Stomach content</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Third party</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEEkvpA3CzxImDi53EsXNCVQVlpUpIQM_WxB5vXWXjYDvA9jl4YBylEuoBzcH-x_83HumvqjecXXDG5PvEmRSMMq5o08mWsmfVjgvZUMG5fF7t2PqiuFAvq1cp3bPC9DXbVX_2iaQZsoeR_IToyy1MxE9kDvMybir5ByQpx8XkJWIiwRFYNcKR2l84jn46EAPW-uTGE7ELkhxIvkMCY8aIlqBzaPIjOZcO5BDJcCoq3_lo6Qwxn8oiaDymD6-rFw7GhOeP51l1--nj96vP9ObL9f7q8oaaRvWZ9ko5ITrTGz5wpzorZFcPDnoAyXHopOlb2xslarBdx5xtQTEhOeeD7aBpmrPq7TZ3juHHginr-7DEqXypa9b2UnDG2-K62FwHGFH7yYUcwZSyePQmTOh86V-KVrSy1Aq8ewIUT8bf-QBLSnr_7etTL9-8JoaUIjo9R3-EeNKc6TVZvSWrS356TVazwtQbk4p3OmD8t_b_ob-S9adB</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Murray, Kelly M.</creator><creator>Stoker, David</creator><creator>Pringle, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Simon, Troy N.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-8092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Is spatial variation in population size structures of a stream-dwelling caddisfly due to the altered effects of a predator by a third-party species?</title><author>Murray, Kelly M. ; Stoker, David ; Pringle, Catherine M. ; Simon, Troy N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-988f556c9c1b1f86d5762bfa9aa71eb67c94d9c852ad660fd4a8057111bd6a333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body length</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Instars</topic><topic>Interactions</topic><topic>Interspecific relationships</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predator-prey interactions</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Primary Research Paper</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Stomach content</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Third party</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoker, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pringle, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Troy N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Kelly M.</au><au>Stoker, David</au><au>Pringle, Catherine M.</au><au>Simon, Troy N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is spatial variation in population size structures of a stream-dwelling caddisfly due to the altered effects of a predator by a third-party species?</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>820</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>65-77</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Predators alter abundances and life history characteristics of prey, and effects of predator–prey interactions can be altered by third-party species. Here, we examine size structures of the caddisfly, Phylloicus hansoni , in Trinidadian streams with two distinct fish assemblages: upstream reaches where the predatory killifish, Anablepsoides hartii , is the only fish species ( Killifish - Only reaches), and downstream reaches where killifish and the omnivorous guppy, Poecilia reticulata , coexist ( Killifish – Guppy reaches). We asked: Do P. hansoni larvae exhibit differences in size structure between reaches with differing fish assemblages? We found that size distributions of larvae differed between reaches in the majority of replicate streams, with smaller median body lengths in Killifish - Only reaches. Killifish – Guppy reaches had higher proportions of the largest instar, but we did not find differences in body length within an instar. No evidence of size-selective predation was found through analysis of killifish stomach contents, and environmental variables were largely similar between upstream and downstream reaches of the five study streams, aside from higher killifish abundances in upstream reaches. Our results, coupled with previous evidence of guppies altering killifish populations, suggest that the mediating effects of a third-party species (guppies) on predator–prey (killifish–caddisfly) interactions can affect the population size structure of prey populations.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-018-3674-0</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-6948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-8092</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2018-09, Vol.820 (1), p.65-77
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2049751014
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
Aquatic insects
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Body length
Downstream
Ecology
Fish
Fishes
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Freshwater fishes
Instars
Interactions
Interspecific relationships
Larvae
Life history
Life Sciences
Population number
Populations
Predation
Predator-prey interactions
Predators
Prey
Primary Research Paper
Rivers
Spatial variations
Species
Stomach
Stomach content
Streams
Third party
Upstream
Zoology
title Is spatial variation in population size structures of a stream-dwelling caddisfly due to the altered effects of a predator by a third-party species?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T03%3A56%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20spatial%20variation%20in%20population%20size%20structures%20of%20a%20stream-dwelling%20caddisfly%20due%20to%20the%20altered%20effects%20of%20a%20predator%20by%20a%20third-party%20species?&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Murray,%20Kelly%20M.&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=820&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=65-77&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-018-3674-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA545474744%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049751014&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A545474744&rfr_iscdi=true