Knotworking and the visibilization of learning in building design
Purpose – This paper aims to study the visibilization of learning in the context of developing a new collaborative practice, knotworking, in building design. The case under study describes the process of learning from the initiation of knotworking to its experimentation. The implementation of new bu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of workplace learning 2015-03, Vol.27 (2), p.128-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | The journal of workplace learning |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Kerosuo, Hannele Mäki, Tarja Korpela, Jenni |
description | Purpose
– This paper aims to study the visibilization of learning in the context of developing a new collaborative practice, knotworking, in building design. The case under study describes the process of learning from the initiation of knotworking to its experimentation. The implementation of new building information modeling tools acted as an impetus for this development.
Design/methodology/approach
– The research is based on activity-theoretically oriented ethnographic research. The four analytical steps created by Engeström (1999) for analyzing the expansive visibilization of learning are applied in the analysis.
Findings
– The envisioning of the idea of knotworking involved the first and the second steps of visibilization. First, a flowchart made the ideal process of design visible and triggered a discussion on the problems and requirements emerging in the project members’ work. Second, an idea for a new type of collaboration was introduced as a solution to these problems and requirements. Planning the knotworking experiment and explicating the associated design instruments involved the third step of expansive visibilization. The fourth step of visibilization took place during the experiment of knotworking in a design project.
Practical implications
– Two other knotworking projects have already been conducted, and plans have been made to commercialize knotworking in building design. New technical tools have been developed for energy calculation and the comparison of alternative design requirements.
Social implications
– Knotworking can improve the collaboration between designers with positive implications on the quality of a building design process.
Originality/value
– Development and learning are studied as a longitudinal process in the construction industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0092 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2049554243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1054340</ericid><sourcerecordid>2049554243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bbdd6d4ec0eafc26c14c01900114040098ed3a08dd315af7838bbc9ae36c08943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L8KC59jJJptmj6XUai14UTyGbJKtqdtsTbaK_vVmaREE5zIP3psPfghdErghBMRo8bLEBHAOhGKAMj9CAzIuBB6LojxOmnKOC57zU3QW4xpSlUIM0OTBt91nG96cX2XKm6x7tdmHi65yjftWnWt91tZZY1XwfcT5rNq5xvTa2OhW_hyd1KqJ9uLQh-j5dvY0vcPLx_n9dLLEmlLa4aoyhhtmNVhV65xrwjSQEoAQBqz_xhqqQBhDSaHqsaCiqnSpLOUaRMnoEF3v925D-76zsZPrdhd8OilzYGVRsJzRlIJ9Soc2xmBruQ1uo8KXJCB7UDKB6nUPSvag0sjVfsQGp3_jswWBglEGyR8d_I0NqjH_bfyDnv4AxsNyjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2049554243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knotworking and the visibilization of learning in building design</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Kerosuo, Hannele ; Mäki, Tarja ; Korpela, Jenni</creator><creatorcontrib>Kerosuo, Hannele ; Mäki, Tarja ; Korpela, Jenni</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– This paper aims to study the visibilization of learning in the context of developing a new collaborative practice, knotworking, in building design. The case under study describes the process of learning from the initiation of knotworking to its experimentation. The implementation of new building information modeling tools acted as an impetus for this development.
Design/methodology/approach
– The research is based on activity-theoretically oriented ethnographic research. The four analytical steps created by Engeström (1999) for analyzing the expansive visibilization of learning are applied in the analysis.
Findings
– The envisioning of the idea of knotworking involved the first and the second steps of visibilization. First, a flowchart made the ideal process of design visible and triggered a discussion on the problems and requirements emerging in the project members’ work. Second, an idea for a new type of collaboration was introduced as a solution to these problems and requirements. Planning the knotworking experiment and explicating the associated design instruments involved the third step of expansive visibilization. The fourth step of visibilization took place during the experiment of knotworking in a design project.
Practical implications
– Two other knotworking projects have already been conducted, and plans have been made to commercialize knotworking in building design. New technical tools have been developed for energy calculation and the comparison of alternative design requirements.
Social implications
– Knotworking can improve the collaboration between designers with positive implications on the quality of a building design process.
Originality/value
– Development and learning are studied as a longitudinal process in the construction industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-5626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Building construction ; Building Design ; Building information modeling ; Collaboration ; Construction industry ; Cooperation ; Design ; Designers ; Ethnography ; Experiments ; Finland ; Foreign Countries ; HR & organizational behaviour ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Qualitative research ; Research methodology ; Site planning ; Training & development</subject><ispartof>The journal of workplace learning, 2015-03, Vol.27 (2), p.128-141</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bbdd6d4ec0eafc26c14c01900114040098ed3a08dd315af7838bbc9ae36c08943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bbdd6d4ec0eafc26c14c01900114040098ed3a08dd315af7838bbc9ae36c08943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0092/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0092/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,21695,27924,27925,52686,52689,53244,53372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1054340$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kerosuo, Hannele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäki, Tarja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Jenni</creatorcontrib><title>Knotworking and the visibilization of learning in building design</title><title>The journal of workplace learning</title><description>Purpose
– This paper aims to study the visibilization of learning in the context of developing a new collaborative practice, knotworking, in building design. The case under study describes the process of learning from the initiation of knotworking to its experimentation. The implementation of new building information modeling tools acted as an impetus for this development.
Design/methodology/approach
– The research is based on activity-theoretically oriented ethnographic research. The four analytical steps created by Engeström (1999) for analyzing the expansive visibilization of learning are applied in the analysis.
Findings
– The envisioning of the idea of knotworking involved the first and the second steps of visibilization. First, a flowchart made the ideal process of design visible and triggered a discussion on the problems and requirements emerging in the project members’ work. Second, an idea for a new type of collaboration was introduced as a solution to these problems and requirements. Planning the knotworking experiment and explicating the associated design instruments involved the third step of expansive visibilization. The fourth step of visibilization took place during the experiment of knotworking in a design project.
Practical implications
– Two other knotworking projects have already been conducted, and plans have been made to commercialize knotworking in building design. New technical tools have been developed for energy calculation and the comparison of alternative design requirements.
Social implications
– Knotworking can improve the collaboration between designers with positive implications on the quality of a building design process.
Originality/value
– Development and learning are studied as a longitudinal process in the construction industry.</description><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Building Design</subject><subject>Building information modeling</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>HR & organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Site planning</subject><subject>Training & development</subject><issn>1366-5626</issn><issn>1758-7859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L8KC59jJJptmj6XUai14UTyGbJKtqdtsTbaK_vVmaREE5zIP3psPfghdErghBMRo8bLEBHAOhGKAMj9CAzIuBB6LojxOmnKOC57zU3QW4xpSlUIM0OTBt91nG96cX2XKm6x7tdmHi65yjftWnWt91tZZY1XwfcT5rNq5xvTa2OhW_hyd1KqJ9uLQh-j5dvY0vcPLx_n9dLLEmlLa4aoyhhtmNVhV65xrwjSQEoAQBqz_xhqqQBhDSaHqsaCiqnSpLOUaRMnoEF3v925D-76zsZPrdhd8OilzYGVRsJzRlIJ9Soc2xmBruQ1uo8KXJCB7UDKB6nUPSvag0sjVfsQGp3_jswWBglEGyR8d_I0NqjH_bfyDnv4AxsNyjQ</recordid><startdate>20150302</startdate><enddate>20150302</enddate><creator>Kerosuo, Hannele</creator><creator>Mäki, Tarja</creator><creator>Korpela, Jenni</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150302</creationdate><title>Knotworking and the visibilization of learning in building design</title><author>Kerosuo, Hannele ; Mäki, Tarja ; Korpela, Jenni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bbdd6d4ec0eafc26c14c01900114040098ed3a08dd315af7838bbc9ae36c08943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Building Design</topic><topic>Building information modeling</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>HR & organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Site planning</topic><topic>Training & development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kerosuo, Hannele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäki, Tarja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korpela, Jenni</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of workplace learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kerosuo, Hannele</au><au>Mäki, Tarja</au><au>Korpela, Jenni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1054340</ericid><atitle>Knotworking and the visibilization of learning in building design</atitle><jtitle>The journal of workplace learning</jtitle><date>2015-03-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>128-141</pages><issn>1366-5626</issn><eissn>1758-7859</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– This paper aims to study the visibilization of learning in the context of developing a new collaborative practice, knotworking, in building design. The case under study describes the process of learning from the initiation of knotworking to its experimentation. The implementation of new building information modeling tools acted as an impetus for this development.
Design/methodology/approach
– The research is based on activity-theoretically oriented ethnographic research. The four analytical steps created by Engeström (1999) for analyzing the expansive visibilization of learning are applied in the analysis.
Findings
– The envisioning of the idea of knotworking involved the first and the second steps of visibilization. First, a flowchart made the ideal process of design visible and triggered a discussion on the problems and requirements emerging in the project members’ work. Second, an idea for a new type of collaboration was introduced as a solution to these problems and requirements. Planning the knotworking experiment and explicating the associated design instruments involved the third step of expansive visibilization. The fourth step of visibilization took place during the experiment of knotworking in a design project.
Practical implications
– Two other knotworking projects have already been conducted, and plans have been made to commercialize knotworking in building design. New technical tools have been developed for energy calculation and the comparison of alternative design requirements.
Social implications
– Knotworking can improve the collaboration between designers with positive implications on the quality of a building design process.
Originality/value
– Development and learning are studied as a longitudinal process in the construction industry.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0092</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-5626 |
ispartof | The journal of workplace learning, 2015-03, Vol.27 (2), p.128-141 |
issn | 1366-5626 1758-7859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2049554243 |
source | Emerald Complete Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Building construction Building Design Building information modeling Collaboration Construction industry Cooperation Design Designers Ethnography Experiments Finland Foreign Countries HR & organizational behaviour Learning Learning Processes Qualitative research Research methodology Site planning Training & development |
title | Knotworking and the visibilization of learning in building design |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A00%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knotworking%20and%20the%20visibilization%20of%20learning%20in%20building%20design&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20workplace%20learning&rft.au=Kerosuo,%20Hannele&rft.date=2015-03-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=128-141&rft.issn=1366-5626&rft.eissn=1758-7859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JWL-10-2013-0092&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2049554243%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2049554243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1054340&rfr_iscdi=true |