Ending Judicial Usurpation of Insurance Regulatory Authority: The Problem of Class Action Litigation Involving Jurisdiction of State Insurance Departments

In a growing number of class action lawsuits against insurers, plaintiff attorneys seek not only to win large monetary awards, but also to regulate insurers' behavior in the marketplace and manage their relations with consumers. Such regulatory class actions threaten basic principles of republi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of insurance regulation 2005-10, Vol.24 (1), p.69
1. Verfasser: Detlefsen, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Journal of insurance regulation
container_volume 24
creator Detlefsen, Robert
description In a growing number of class action lawsuits against insurers, plaintiff attorneys seek not only to win large monetary awards, but also to regulate insurers' behavior in the marketplace and manage their relations with consumers. Such regulatory class actions threaten basic principles of republican democracy. Experience shows that modern class action litigation is a deeply flawed mechanism for resolving disputes between private parties. The overall effect of judicial usurpations of insurance regulatory authority is to subvert and destabilize the regulation of insurance, thus adding to the cost and decreasing the availability of insurance products. States can remedy this problem by enacting legislation that would require trial courts to refrain from certifying a proposed class action if the claims at issue are within the jurisdiction of a state administrative agency, such as an insurance department.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204939183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>974656281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2049391833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjc2OAUEUhWthEgzvcGMvKd1CsxNMmFiIn8ROSrtaSanqqXtL4lXmafUMEkurk5Pz85VERXbjTjNqJ5uyqBKdpGxFMpEV8Tu2e20z-A57nWplYE3B54q1s-AOMLWFVTZFWGAWjGLnrzAIfHRe87UPqyPC3LudwfNffWgUEQzS__lMs87uT1N7ceZy53hNBeoJWLJifMGMMFeez2iZauLjoAxh_aGfovE1Xg0nzdy7n4DE25ML3hbRNpLtXtxrJXH8VukGpdhaHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204939183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ending Judicial Usurpation of Insurance Regulatory Authority: The Problem of Class Action Litigation Involving Jurisdiction of State Insurance Departments</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Detlefsen, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Detlefsen, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In a growing number of class action lawsuits against insurers, plaintiff attorneys seek not only to win large monetary awards, but also to regulate insurers' behavior in the marketplace and manage their relations with consumers. Such regulatory class actions threaten basic principles of republican democracy. Experience shows that modern class action litigation is a deeply flawed mechanism for resolving disputes between private parties. The overall effect of judicial usurpations of insurance regulatory authority is to subvert and destabilize the regulation of insurance, thus adding to the cost and decreasing the availability of insurance products. States can remedy this problem by enacting legislation that would require trial courts to refrain from certifying a proposed class action if the claims at issue are within the jurisdiction of a state administrative agency, such as an insurance department.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-248X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kansas City: National Association of Insurance Commissioners</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Attorneys ; Bankruptcy ; Class action lawsuits ; Constitution-US ; Consumers ; Decision making ; Democracy ; Empowerment ; Federal court decisions ; Insurance examiners ; Jurisdiction ; Legislation ; Legislatures ; Regulation ; State court decisions ; State regulation ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Journal of insurance regulation, 2005-10, Vol.24 (1), p.69</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Association of Insurance Commissioners Fall 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Detlefsen, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Ending Judicial Usurpation of Insurance Regulatory Authority: The Problem of Class Action Litigation Involving Jurisdiction of State Insurance Departments</title><title>Journal of insurance regulation</title><description>In a growing number of class action lawsuits against insurers, plaintiff attorneys seek not only to win large monetary awards, but also to regulate insurers' behavior in the marketplace and manage their relations with consumers. Such regulatory class actions threaten basic principles of republican democracy. Experience shows that modern class action litigation is a deeply flawed mechanism for resolving disputes between private parties. The overall effect of judicial usurpations of insurance regulatory authority is to subvert and destabilize the regulation of insurance, thus adding to the cost and decreasing the availability of insurance products. States can remedy this problem by enacting legislation that would require trial courts to refrain from certifying a proposed class action if the claims at issue are within the jurisdiction of a state administrative agency, such as an insurance department.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Class action lawsuits</subject><subject>Constitution-US</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Insurance examiners</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>State regulation</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0736-248X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjc2OAUEUhWthEgzvcGMvKd1CsxNMmFiIn8ROSrtaSanqqXtL4lXmafUMEkurk5Pz85VERXbjTjNqJ5uyqBKdpGxFMpEV8Tu2e20z-A57nWplYE3B54q1s-AOMLWFVTZFWGAWjGLnrzAIfHRe87UPqyPC3LudwfNffWgUEQzS__lMs87uT1N7ceZy53hNBeoJWLJifMGMMFeez2iZauLjoAxh_aGfovE1Xg0nzdy7n4DE25ML3hbRNpLtXtxrJXH8VukGpdhaHQ</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Detlefsen, Robert</creator><general>National Association of Insurance Commissioners</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Ending Judicial Usurpation of Insurance Regulatory Authority: The Problem of Class Action Litigation Involving Jurisdiction of State Insurance Departments</title><author>Detlefsen, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2049391833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Class action lawsuits</topic><topic>Constitution-US</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Insurance examiners</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>State regulation</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Detlefsen, Robert</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of insurance regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Detlefsen, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ending Judicial Usurpation of Insurance Regulatory Authority: The Problem of Class Action Litigation Involving Jurisdiction of State Insurance Departments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insurance regulation</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><pages>69-</pages><issn>0736-248X</issn><abstract>In a growing number of class action lawsuits against insurers, plaintiff attorneys seek not only to win large monetary awards, but also to regulate insurers' behavior in the marketplace and manage their relations with consumers. Such regulatory class actions threaten basic principles of republican democracy. Experience shows that modern class action litigation is a deeply flawed mechanism for resolving disputes between private parties. The overall effect of judicial usurpations of insurance regulatory authority is to subvert and destabilize the regulation of insurance, thus adding to the cost and decreasing the availability of insurance products. States can remedy this problem by enacting legislation that would require trial courts to refrain from certifying a proposed class action if the claims at issue are within the jurisdiction of a state administrative agency, such as an insurance department.</abstract><cop>Kansas City</cop><pub>National Association of Insurance Commissioners</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-248X
ispartof Journal of insurance regulation, 2005-10, Vol.24 (1), p.69
issn 0736-248X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_204939183
source Business Source Complete
subjects Accountability
Attorneys
Bankruptcy
Class action lawsuits
Constitution-US
Consumers
Decision making
Democracy
Empowerment
Federal court decisions
Insurance examiners
Jurisdiction
Legislation
Legislatures
Regulation
State court decisions
State regulation
Trials
title Ending Judicial Usurpation of Insurance Regulatory Authority: The Problem of Class Action Litigation Involving Jurisdiction of State Insurance Departments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A42%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ending%20Judicial%20Usurpation%20of%20Insurance%20Regulatory%20Authority:%20The%20Problem%20of%20Class%20Action%20Litigation%20Involving%20Jurisdiction%20of%20State%20Insurance%20Departments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insurance%20regulation&rft.au=Detlefsen,%20Robert&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.pages=69-&rft.issn=0736-248X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E974656281%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204939183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true