Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns
Against a backdrop of substantial and persistent disruption in Australian federal politics, this article examines the uses of Twitter in campaigning in the 2013 and 2016 federal elections. We comprehensively tracked the tweets posted by, and directed at, all candidates during the final 2 weeks of th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journalism & mass communication quarterly 2018-06, Vol.95 (2), p.425-448 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 448 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 425 |
container_title | Journalism & mass communication quarterly |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Bruns, Axel Moon, Brenda |
description | Against a backdrop of substantial and persistent disruption in Australian federal politics, this article examines the uses of Twitter in campaigning in the 2013 and 2016 federal elections. We comprehensively tracked the tweets posted by, and directed at, all candidates during the final 2 weeks of these campaigns, and compare patterns in candidate and audience activity across the two elections. This documents considerable shifts in campaigning strategies, electorate responses, and central themes of the debate from 2013 to 2016; we show that these shifts are in line with the changing electoral fortunes of Australia’s major party blocs during an exceptionally tumultuous period in federal politics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1077699018766505 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048827280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1077699018766505</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2048827280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-fc7efcf1bb2cff095a937ec6f452c844022e48feba151034fe8b5ca7ca3a02c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHhc8R2d2k-zGWwmtChUPVfAWJtvduiVN6m568N-bUEEQPM2D97038Bi7RrhFVOoOQam8KAC1yvMMshM2EZhjkkp4P2WT0U5G_5xdxLgFAASNE7ZadcZTw5_t2hP3LZ8dYh-o8dTyhV3bQfJ5Y03vuzbe87Lb7Sn4dsP7D8sFoOTUrkeR85IGz2_aeMnOHDXRXv3cKXtbzF_Lx2T58vBUzpaJkRn2iTPKOuOwroVxDoqMCqmsyV2aCaPTFISwqXa2JswQZOqsrjNDypAkEEbJKbs59u5D93mwsa-23SG0w8tKQKq1UELDQMGRMqGLMVhX7YPfUfiqEKpxuurvdEMkOUYibexv6b_8NyufbBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048827280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bruns, Axel ; Moon, Brenda</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruns, Axel ; Moon, Brenda</creatorcontrib><description>Against a backdrop of substantial and persistent disruption in Australian federal politics, this article examines the uses of Twitter in campaigning in the 2013 and 2016 federal elections. We comprehensively tracked the tweets posted by, and directed at, all candidates during the final 2 weeks of these campaigns, and compare patterns in candidate and audience activity across the two elections. This documents considerable shifts in campaigning strategies, electorate responses, and central themes of the debate from 2013 to 2016; we show that these shifts are in line with the changing electoral fortunes of Australia’s major party blocs during an exceptionally tumultuous period in federal politics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-6990</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-430X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1077699018766505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Campaigns ; Candidates ; Digital media ; Disruption ; Elections ; Negative campaigning ; News media ; Political campaigns ; Political leadership ; Political systems ; Politicians ; Politics ; Popularity ; Populism ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Voter behavior ; Voters ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 2018-06, Vol.95 (2), p.425-448</ispartof><rights>2018 AEJMC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-fc7efcf1bb2cff095a937ec6f452c844022e48feba151034fe8b5ca7ca3a02c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-fc7efcf1bb2cff095a937ec6f452c844022e48feba151034fe8b5ca7ca3a02c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3943-133X ; 0000-0003-2571-0650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077699018766505$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077699018766505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruns, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Brenda</creatorcontrib><title>Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns</title><title>Journalism & mass communication quarterly</title><description>Against a backdrop of substantial and persistent disruption in Australian federal politics, this article examines the uses of Twitter in campaigning in the 2013 and 2016 federal elections. We comprehensively tracked the tweets posted by, and directed at, all candidates during the final 2 weeks of these campaigns, and compare patterns in candidate and audience activity across the two elections. This documents considerable shifts in campaigning strategies, electorate responses, and central themes of the debate from 2013 to 2016; we show that these shifts are in line with the changing electoral fortunes of Australia’s major party blocs during an exceptionally tumultuous period in federal politics.</description><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Negative campaigning</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>1077-6990</issn><issn>2161-430X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHhc8R2d2k-zGWwmtChUPVfAWJtvduiVN6m568N-bUEEQPM2D97038Bi7RrhFVOoOQam8KAC1yvMMshM2EZhjkkp4P2WT0U5G_5xdxLgFAASNE7ZadcZTw5_t2hP3LZ8dYh-o8dTyhV3bQfJ5Y03vuzbe87Lb7Sn4dsP7D8sFoOTUrkeR85IGz2_aeMnOHDXRXv3cKXtbzF_Lx2T58vBUzpaJkRn2iTPKOuOwroVxDoqMCqmsyV2aCaPTFISwqXa2JswQZOqsrjNDypAkEEbJKbs59u5D93mwsa-23SG0w8tKQKq1UELDQMGRMqGLMVhX7YPfUfiqEKpxuurvdEMkOUYibexv6b_8NyufbBE</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Bruns, Axel</creator><creator>Moon, Brenda</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-133X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-0650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns</title><author>Bruns, Axel ; Moon, Brenda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-fc7efcf1bb2cff095a937ec6f452c844022e48feba151034fe8b5ca7ca3a02c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Negative campaigning</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruns, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Brenda</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journalism & mass communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruns, Axel</au><au>Moon, Brenda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns</atitle><jtitle>Journalism & mass communication quarterly</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>448</epage><pages>425-448</pages><issn>1077-6990</issn><eissn>2161-430X</eissn><abstract>Against a backdrop of substantial and persistent disruption in Australian federal politics, this article examines the uses of Twitter in campaigning in the 2013 and 2016 federal elections. We comprehensively tracked the tweets posted by, and directed at, all candidates during the final 2 weeks of these campaigns, and compare patterns in candidate and audience activity across the two elections. This documents considerable shifts in campaigning strategies, electorate responses, and central themes of the debate from 2013 to 2016; we show that these shifts are in line with the changing electoral fortunes of Australia’s major party blocs during an exceptionally tumultuous period in federal politics.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1077699018766505</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-133X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-0650</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1077-6990 |
ispartof | Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 2018-06, Vol.95 (2), p.425-448 |
issn | 1077-6990 2161-430X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2048827280 |
source | SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Campaigns Candidates Digital media Disruption Elections Negative campaigning News media Political campaigns Political leadership Political systems Politicians Politics Popularity Populism Social Media Social networks Voter behavior Voters Voting |
title | Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T03%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Media%20in%20Australian%20Federal%20Elections:%20Comparing%20the%202013%20and%202016%20Campaigns&rft.jtitle=Journalism%20&%20mass%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Bruns,%20Axel&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=448&rft.pages=425-448&rft.issn=1077-6990&rft.eissn=2161-430X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1077699018766505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2048827280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048827280&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1077699018766505&rfr_iscdi=true |