Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak
Clarkson offers arguments to counter the arguments given by Douglas Husak concerning his belief that criminal law subjects offenders to state punishment involving the deliberate iniction of hard treatment and censure. It is unwise to condemn criminal law because of the failings of the criminal justi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Criminal law and philosophy 2008-06, Vol.2 (2), p.131-135 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 135 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | Criminal law and philosophy |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Clarkson, C. M. V. |
| description | Clarkson offers arguments to counter the arguments given by Douglas Husak concerning his belief that criminal law subjects offenders to state punishment involving the deliberate iniction of hard treatment and censure. It is unwise to condemn criminal law because of the failings of the criminal justice system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11572-008-9049-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204877222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1897725121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-f09674a637fbd57026f74b104541629002a613c025db4129dce3d80d7769de153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfwFvwHn0vTZPGi4yhThgIY8NjSNvUdXbNTDpk396OKp48vXf4__689yPkGuEWAdRdREwVZwAZ0yA04ydkhJlCpjNIT393pfGcXMS4AZAcEz0ik7f1gU5Dva1b29C5_Xqgy7WjC9846iu66uqm7myobVvH7T2d0IWLO99GRztPZ_toPy7JWWWb6K5-5pisnh6X0xmbvz6_TCdzVnCpOlaBlkpYmagqL1MFXFZK5AgiFSi5BuBWYlIAT8tcINdl4ZIyg1IpqUuHaTImN0PvLvjPvYud2fh96K-OhoPIlOKc9yEcQkXwMQZXmV3_mw0Hg2COoswgyvSizFGUOTJ8YGKfbd9d-Cv-H_oGjHNoFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204877222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Clarkson, C. M. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarkson, C. M. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Clarkson offers arguments to counter the arguments given by Douglas Husak concerning his belief that criminal law subjects offenders to state punishment involving the deliberate iniction of hard treatment and censure. It is unwise to condemn criminal law because of the failings of the criminal justice system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1871-9791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1871-9805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11572-008-9049-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Criminal justice ; Criminal law ; Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law ; Ethics ; Husak, Douglas ; Law ; Law and Criminology ; Legal History ; Original Paper ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Law ; Theories of Law ; Utilitarianism</subject><ispartof>Criminal law and philosophy, 2008-06, Vol.2 (2), p.131-135</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-f09674a637fbd57026f74b104541629002a613c025db4129dce3d80d7769de153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11572-008-9049-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11572-008-9049-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarkson, C. M. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak</title><title>Criminal law and philosophy</title><addtitle>Criminal Law, Philosophy</addtitle><description>Clarkson offers arguments to counter the arguments given by Douglas Husak concerning his belief that criminal law subjects offenders to state punishment involving the deliberate iniction of hard treatment and censure. It is unwise to condemn criminal law because of the failings of the criminal justice system.</description><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Husak, Douglas</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Legal History</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Law</subject><subject>Theories of Law</subject><subject>Utilitarianism</subject><issn>1871-9791</issn><issn>1871-9805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfwFvwHn0vTZPGi4yhThgIY8NjSNvUdXbNTDpk396OKp48vXf4__689yPkGuEWAdRdREwVZwAZ0yA04ydkhJlCpjNIT393pfGcXMS4AZAcEz0ik7f1gU5Dva1b29C5_Xqgy7WjC9846iu66uqm7myobVvH7T2d0IWLO99GRztPZ_toPy7JWWWb6K5-5pisnh6X0xmbvz6_TCdzVnCpOlaBlkpYmagqL1MFXFZK5AgiFSi5BuBWYlIAT8tcINdl4ZIyg1IpqUuHaTImN0PvLvjPvYud2fh96K-OhoPIlOKc9yEcQkXwMQZXmV3_mw0Hg2COoswgyvSizFGUOTJ8YGKfbd9d-Cv-H_oGjHNoFQ</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Clarkson, C. M. V.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak</title><author>Clarkson, C. M. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-f09674a637fbd57026f74b104541629002a613c025db4129dce3d80d7769de153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Husak, Douglas</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Legal History</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Law</topic><topic>Theories of Law</topic><topic>Utilitarianism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarkson, C. M. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Criminal law and philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarkson, C. M. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak</atitle><jtitle>Criminal law and philosophy</jtitle><stitle>Criminal Law, Philosophy</stitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>131-135</pages><issn>1871-9791</issn><eissn>1871-9805</eissn><abstract>Clarkson offers arguments to counter the arguments given by Douglas Husak concerning his belief that criminal law subjects offenders to state punishment involving the deliberate iniction of hard treatment and censure. It is unwise to condemn criminal law because of the failings of the criminal justice system.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11572-008-9049-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1871-9791 |
| ispartof | Criminal law and philosophy, 2008-06, Vol.2 (2), p.131-135 |
| issn | 1871-9791 1871-9805 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204877222 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Criminal justice Criminal law Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law Ethics Husak, Douglas Law Law and Criminology Legal History Original Paper Philosophy Philosophy of Law Theories of Law Utilitarianism |
| title | Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A27%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Criminal%20Law?%20The%20Role%20of%20Utilitarianism:%20A%20Response%20to%20Husak&rft.jtitle=Criminal%20law%20and%20philosophy&rft.au=Clarkson,%20C.%20M.%20V.&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=131-135&rft.issn=1871-9791&rft.eissn=1871-9805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11572-008-9049-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1897725121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204877222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |