When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences
This paper proposes three new measures of components STEM career preferences (affinity, certainty, and goal), and then explores which dimensions of science learning activation (fascination, values, competency belief, and scientific sensemaking) are predictive of STEM career preferences. Drawn from t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of science education 2018-06, Vol.40 (9), p.1034-1057 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1057 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1034 |
container_title | International journal of science education |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Dorph, Rena Bathgate, Meghan E. Schunn, Christian D. Cannady, Matthew A. |
description | This paper proposes three new measures of components STEM career preferences (affinity, certainty, and goal), and then explores which dimensions of science learning activation (fascination, values, competency belief, and scientific sensemaking) are predictive of STEM career preferences. Drawn from the ALES14 dataset, a sample of 2938 sixth and eighth grade middle-school students from 11 schools in two purposefully selected diverse areas (Western Pennsylvania & the Bay Area of California) was used for the analyses presented in this paper. These schools were chosen to represent socio-economic and ethnic diversity. Findings indicate that, overall, youth who are activated towards science learning are more likely to have affinity towards STEM careers, certainty about their future career goals, and have identified a specific STEM career goal. However, different dimensions of science learning activation are more strongly correlated with different aspects career preference across different STEM career foci (e.g. science, engineering, technology, health, etc.). Gender, age, minority status, and home resources also have explanatory power. While many results are consistent with prior research, there are also novel results that offer important fodder for future research. Critically, our strategy of measuring affinity towards the specific disciplines that make up STEM, measuring STEM and health career goals separately, and looking at career affinity and career goals separately, offers interesting results and underscores the value of disentangling the conceptual melting pot of what has previously been known as 'career interest.' Study findings also have implications for design of science learning opportunities for youth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048311558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1181313</ericid><sourcerecordid>2048311558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b321d0a7bc5fc803934fb66e55ca7f0216f23a12505dd306a6ab904b9db11db93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha2qSN0CPwHJUs9ZZuLYm_TUCi1lEYgDICQuluPYu16FOB1nu-Lfk3Shx57m8L437-kxdoYwRyjhHCoJoCoxzwEXcxQKpMg_sRkWqshkXlaf2Wxisgn6wr6mtAWAQi3UjD0_bVzHV3xNcc93_Xc-bBwn15ohxC5tQs-j58kG11nHW2eoC92aGzuEP38RPkR-_7C85daQc8R7ct7RRKcTduRNm9zp-z1mj5fLh4ur7Obu1-ri501mx6ZDVoscGzCL2kpvSxCVKHytlJPSmoWHHJXPhcFcgmwaAcooU1dQ1FVTIzZ1JY7Zt8PfnuLvnUuD3sYddWOkzqEoBaKU5UjJA2UppjS21D2FF0OvGkFPM-qPGfU0o36fcfSdHXyOgv3nWV4jlihQjPqPgx46H-nF7CO1jR7MaxvJk-lsSFr8P-INTESCFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048311558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences</title><source>Taylor & Francis Online</source><creator>Dorph, Rena ; Bathgate, Meghan E. ; Schunn, Christian D. ; Cannady, Matthew A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorph, Rena ; Bathgate, Meghan E. ; Schunn, Christian D. ; Cannady, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper proposes three new measures of components STEM career preferences (affinity, certainty, and goal), and then explores which dimensions of science learning activation (fascination, values, competency belief, and scientific sensemaking) are predictive of STEM career preferences. Drawn from the ALES14 dataset, a sample of 2938 sixth and eighth grade middle-school students from 11 schools in two purposefully selected diverse areas (Western Pennsylvania & the Bay Area of California) was used for the analyses presented in this paper. These schools were chosen to represent socio-economic and ethnic diversity. Findings indicate that, overall, youth who are activated towards science learning are more likely to have affinity towards STEM careers, certainty about their future career goals, and have identified a specific STEM career goal. However, different dimensions of science learning activation are more strongly correlated with different aspects career preference across different STEM career foci (e.g. science, engineering, technology, health, etc.). Gender, age, minority status, and home resources also have explanatory power. While many results are consistent with prior research, there are also novel results that offer important fodder for future research. Critically, our strategy of measuring affinity towards the specific disciplines that make up STEM, measuring STEM and health career goals separately, and looking at career affinity and career goals separately, offers interesting results and underscores the value of disentangling the conceptual melting pot of what has previously been known as 'career interest.' Study findings also have implications for design of science learning opportunities for youth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Affinity ; Career Choice ; Careers ; Competency based learning ; Correlation ; Ethnic Diversity ; Factor Analysis ; Grade 8 ; Item Response Theory ; learning environment ; learning outcomes ; Medical technology ; Middle School Students ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Multiple Regression Analysis ; Objectives ; Occupational Aspiration ; Occupational choice ; policy development ; Predictor Variables ; Preferences ; Rating Scales ; Science ; Science and technology ; Science Careers ; science centre ; Science Instruction ; Sensemaking ; society ; Socioeconomic factors ; STEM Education ; technology ; Vocational Interests</subject><ispartof>International journal of science education, 2018-06, Vol.40 (9), p.1034-1057</ispartof><rights>2017 The Regents of the University of California. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Regents of the University of California. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b321d0a7bc5fc803934fb66e55ca7f0216f23a12505dd306a6ab904b9db11db93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b321d0a7bc5fc803934fb66e55ca7f0216f23a12505dd306a6ab904b9db11db93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4022-3789 ; 0000-0001-8003-3061 ; 0000-0003-3589-297X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1181313$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorph, Rena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathgate, Meghan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunn, Christian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannady, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><title>When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences</title><title>International journal of science education</title><description>This paper proposes three new measures of components STEM career preferences (affinity, certainty, and goal), and then explores which dimensions of science learning activation (fascination, values, competency belief, and scientific sensemaking) are predictive of STEM career preferences. Drawn from the ALES14 dataset, a sample of 2938 sixth and eighth grade middle-school students from 11 schools in two purposefully selected diverse areas (Western Pennsylvania & the Bay Area of California) was used for the analyses presented in this paper. These schools were chosen to represent socio-economic and ethnic diversity. Findings indicate that, overall, youth who are activated towards science learning are more likely to have affinity towards STEM careers, certainty about their future career goals, and have identified a specific STEM career goal. However, different dimensions of science learning activation are more strongly correlated with different aspects career preference across different STEM career foci (e.g. science, engineering, technology, health, etc.). Gender, age, minority status, and home resources also have explanatory power. While many results are consistent with prior research, there are also novel results that offer important fodder for future research. Critically, our strategy of measuring affinity towards the specific disciplines that make up STEM, measuring STEM and health career goals separately, and looking at career affinity and career goals separately, offers interesting results and underscores the value of disentangling the conceptual melting pot of what has previously been known as 'career interest.' Study findings also have implications for design of science learning opportunities for youth.</description><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Competency based learning</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Ethnic Diversity</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>learning environment</subject><subject>learning outcomes</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Occupational Aspiration</subject><subject>Occupational choice</subject><subject>policy development</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>Science Careers</subject><subject>science centre</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Sensemaking</subject><subject>society</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>Vocational Interests</subject><issn>0950-0693</issn><issn>1464-5289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha2qSN0CPwHJUs9ZZuLYm_TUCi1lEYgDICQuluPYu16FOB1nu-Lfk3Shx57m8L437-kxdoYwRyjhHCoJoCoxzwEXcxQKpMg_sRkWqshkXlaf2Wxisgn6wr6mtAWAQi3UjD0_bVzHV3xNcc93_Xc-bBwn15ohxC5tQs-j58kG11nHW2eoC92aGzuEP38RPkR-_7C85daQc8R7ct7RRKcTduRNm9zp-z1mj5fLh4ur7Obu1-ri501mx6ZDVoscGzCL2kpvSxCVKHytlJPSmoWHHJXPhcFcgmwaAcooU1dQ1FVTIzZ1JY7Zt8PfnuLvnUuD3sYddWOkzqEoBaKU5UjJA2UppjS21D2FF0OvGkFPM-qPGfU0o36fcfSdHXyOgv3nWV4jlihQjPqPgx46H-nF7CO1jR7MaxvJk-lsSFr8P-INTESCFQ</recordid><startdate>20180613</startdate><enddate>20180613</enddate><creator>Dorph, Rena</creator><creator>Bathgate, Meghan E.</creator><creator>Schunn, Christian D.</creator><creator>Cannady, Matthew A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-3789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8003-3061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-297X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180613</creationdate><title>When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences</title><author>Dorph, Rena ; Bathgate, Meghan E. ; Schunn, Christian D. ; Cannady, Matthew A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-b321d0a7bc5fc803934fb66e55ca7f0216f23a12505dd306a6ab904b9db11db93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Competency based learning</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Ethnic Diversity</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>learning environment</topic><topic>learning outcomes</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Multiple Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Occupational Aspiration</topic><topic>Occupational choice</topic><topic>policy development</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>Science Careers</topic><topic>science centre</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Sensemaking</topic><topic>society</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>Vocational Interests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorph, Rena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathgate, Meghan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunn, Christian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannady, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of science education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorph, Rena</au><au>Bathgate, Meghan E.</au><au>Schunn, Christian D.</au><au>Cannady, Matthew A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1181313</ericid><atitle>When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences</atitle><jtitle>International journal of science education</jtitle><date>2018-06-13</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1034</spage><epage>1057</epage><pages>1034-1057</pages><issn>0950-0693</issn><eissn>1464-5289</eissn><abstract>This paper proposes three new measures of components STEM career preferences (affinity, certainty, and goal), and then explores which dimensions of science learning activation (fascination, values, competency belief, and scientific sensemaking) are predictive of STEM career preferences. Drawn from the ALES14 dataset, a sample of 2938 sixth and eighth grade middle-school students from 11 schools in two purposefully selected diverse areas (Western Pennsylvania & the Bay Area of California) was used for the analyses presented in this paper. These schools were chosen to represent socio-economic and ethnic diversity. Findings indicate that, overall, youth who are activated towards science learning are more likely to have affinity towards STEM careers, certainty about their future career goals, and have identified a specific STEM career goal. However, different dimensions of science learning activation are more strongly correlated with different aspects career preference across different STEM career foci (e.g. science, engineering, technology, health, etc.). Gender, age, minority status, and home resources also have explanatory power. While many results are consistent with prior research, there are also novel results that offer important fodder for future research. Critically, our strategy of measuring affinity towards the specific disciplines that make up STEM, measuring STEM and health career goals separately, and looking at career affinity and career goals separately, offers interesting results and underscores the value of disentangling the conceptual melting pot of what has previously been known as 'career interest.' Study findings also have implications for design of science learning opportunities for youth.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-3789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8003-3061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-297X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-0693 |
ispartof | International journal of science education, 2018-06, Vol.40 (9), p.1034-1057 |
issn | 0950-0693 1464-5289 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2048311558 |
source | Taylor & Francis Online |
subjects | Affinity Career Choice Careers Competency based learning Correlation Ethnic Diversity Factor Analysis Grade 8 Item Response Theory learning environment learning outcomes Medical technology Middle School Students Multiculturalism & pluralism Multiple Regression Analysis Objectives Occupational Aspiration Occupational choice policy development Predictor Variables Preferences Rating Scales Science Science and technology Science Careers science centre Science Instruction Sensemaking society Socioeconomic factors STEM Education technology Vocational Interests |
title | When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20I%20grow%20up:%20the%20relationship%20of%20science%20learning%20activation%20to%20STEM%20career%20preferences&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20science%20education&rft.au=Dorph,%20Rena&rft.date=2018-06-13&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1034&rft.epage=1057&rft.pages=1034-1057&rft.issn=0950-0693&rft.eissn=1464-5289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2048311558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048311558&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1181313&rfr_iscdi=true |