Evidence-based care, 3: measuring performance: how are we managing this problem?

The authors have frequently been surprised by discrepancies between what they perceived they were doing and what they found when they audited their medical records. Because these discrepancies are common it is important to measure physician performance to ensure that effective care is being provided...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 1994-05, Vol.150 (10), p.1575
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1575
container_title Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)
container_volume 150
description The authors have frequently been surprised by discrepancies between what they perceived they were doing and what they found when they audited their medical records. Because these discrepancies are common it is important to measure physician performance to ensure that effective care is being provided. To measure clinical performance physicians must decide what to measure, whether the needed information is available, how to select an appropriate sample of patients, how to collect the information needed and how to interpret the information collected. It is essential that this process be as efficient as possible because of the already heavy demands on physicians' time. The aim of performance measurement is to collect the minimum amount of information needed to determine how well physicians are performing and whether they need to improve.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204826449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>441561331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-23731c5a4e7a44c43e2cc2f5b5343d8fc72e66d20d7fb27726aa9a9a5f001f8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1LAzEQhoMouFb_Q_BsIDvJJtleREq1QkEPei7ZZNJu6X6Y7Nq_b0TnPQy8PMwzF6QopTEMBNSXpOAGOBO1VNfkJqUjzyNAF-R9_d167B2yxib01NmID1QsaYc2zbHt93TEGIbY2Qwt6WE404zQM9Lc2P0vMB3aRMc4NCfsHm_JVbCnhHf_e0E-n9cfqw3bvr28rp62bCwNn_JbWpSushK1ldJJgeAchKqphBTeBKcBlfLAvQ4NaA3K2jqnCpyXwXixIPd_d7P4a8Y07Y7DHPus3AGXBpSUtfgBRrVLEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204826449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence-based care, 3: measuring performance: how are we managing this problem?</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><description>The authors have frequently been surprised by discrepancies between what they perceived they were doing and what they found when they audited their medical records. Because these discrepancies are common it is important to measure physician performance to ensure that effective care is being provided. To measure clinical performance physicians must decide what to measure, whether the needed information is available, how to select an appropriate sample of patients, how to collect the information needed and how to interpret the information collected. It is essential that this process be as efficient as possible because of the already heavy demands on physicians' time. The aim of performance measurement is to collect the minimum amount of information needed to determine how well physicians are performing and whether they need to improve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMAJAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: CMA Impact, Inc</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Health care ; Physicians ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 1994-05, Vol.150 (10), p.1575</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canadian Medical Association May 15, 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><title>Evidence-based care, 3: measuring performance: how are we managing this problem?</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</title><description>The authors have frequently been surprised by discrepancies between what they perceived they were doing and what they found when they audited their medical records. Because these discrepancies are common it is important to measure physician performance to ensure that effective care is being provided. To measure clinical performance physicians must decide what to measure, whether the needed information is available, how to select an appropriate sample of patients, how to collect the information needed and how to interpret the information collected. It is essential that this process be as efficient as possible because of the already heavy demands on physicians' time. The aim of performance measurement is to collect the minimum amount of information needed to determine how well physicians are performing and whether they need to improve.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjk1LAzEQhoMouFb_Q_BsIDvJJtleREq1QkEPei7ZZNJu6X6Y7Nq_b0TnPQy8PMwzF6QopTEMBNSXpOAGOBO1VNfkJqUjzyNAF-R9_d167B2yxib01NmID1QsaYc2zbHt93TEGIbY2Qwt6WE404zQM9Lc2P0vMB3aRMc4NCfsHm_JVbCnhHf_e0E-n9cfqw3bvr28rp62bCwNn_JbWpSushK1ldJJgeAchKqphBTeBKcBlfLAvQ4NaA3K2jqnCpyXwXixIPd_d7P4a8Y07Y7DHPus3AGXBpSUtfgBRrVLEg</recordid><startdate>19940515</startdate><enddate>19940515</enddate><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940515</creationdate><title>Evidence-based care, 3: measuring performance: how are we managing this problem?</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-23731c5a4e7a44c43e2cc2f5b5343d8fc72e66d20d7fb27726aa9a9a5f001f8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence-based care, 3: measuring performance: how are we managing this problem?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle><date>1994-05-15</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1575</spage><pages>1575-</pages><issn>0820-3946</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><coden>CMAJAX</coden><abstract>The authors have frequently been surprised by discrepancies between what they perceived they were doing and what they found when they audited their medical records. Because these discrepancies are common it is important to measure physician performance to ensure that effective care is being provided. To measure clinical performance physicians must decide what to measure, whether the needed information is available, how to select an appropriate sample of patients, how to collect the information needed and how to interpret the information collected. It is essential that this process be as efficient as possible because of the already heavy demands on physicians' time. The aim of performance measurement is to collect the minimum amount of information needed to determine how well physicians are performing and whether they need to improve.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>CMA Impact, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0820-3946
ispartof Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 1994-05, Vol.150 (10), p.1575
issn 0820-3946
1488-2329
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_204826449
source PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Evaluation
Health care
Physicians
R&D
Research & development
title Evidence-based care, 3: measuring performance: how are we managing this problem?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A51%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence-based%20care,%203:%20measuring%20performance:%20how%20are%20we%20managing%20this%20problem?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal%20(CMAJ)&rft.date=1994-05-15&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1575&rft.pages=1575-&rft.issn=0820-3946&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft.coden=CMAJAX&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E441561331%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204826449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true