THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED

Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language (Baltimore) 2016-09, Vol.92 (3), p.591-618
Hauptverfasser: Haig, Geoffrey, Schnell, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 618
container_issue 3
container_start_page 591
container_title Language (Baltimore)
container_volume 92
creator Haig, Geoffrey
Schnell, Stefan
description Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.*
doi_str_mv 10.1353/lan.2016.0049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048123577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44164108</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44164108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d031eba188db2675a3cf51828f0f4841559c928b5dc139588597becf7d33de653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFaX7gPiSlLvnTuvLGub1kCh0KQFV0MeEzC0TU3Shf_ehoq6cnU253wHPsbuEUZIkp636X7EAdUIQAQXbICSpA9KyUs2AAi0byToa3bTthUAkOHBgD0lr6E3jeLJcr2KQ-9lHEext5x54Wo-TqJNlLx5q3ATxVESTm_ZVZluW3f3nUO2noXJ5NVfLOfRZLzwc1Km8wsgdFmKxhQZV1qmlJcSDTcllMIIlDLIA24yWeRIgTRGBjpzeakLosIpSUP2cOYemvrj6NrOVvWx2Z8uLQdhkJPU-r8WGjIaDWLP8s-tvKnbtnGlPTTvu7T5tAi2t2ZP1mxvzfbWTn3xQ61c3u2OrfsFKx5oRTbuzfZiUVFvsp89nmdV29XN3w9OoK0QqASCoS_LU3Rm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1838718115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Haig, Geoffrey ; Schnell, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Haig, Geoffrey ; Schnell, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.*</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-8507</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-0665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-0665</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0049</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANGA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Linguistic Society of America</publisher><subject>Alignment ; Bias ; Case marking ; Diachronic linguistics ; Discourse ; Discourse analysis ; Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963) ; English language ; Ergative constructions ; Grammar, Comparative and general ; Historians ; Information management ; Information sharing ; Language ; Language diversity ; Language typology ; Morphosyntax ; Noun phrases ; Portuguese language ; Pronouns ; Reference (Semantic) ; Referents ; Semantic features</subject><ispartof>Language (Baltimore), 2016-09, Vol.92 (3), p.591-618</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2016 Linguistic Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © Linguistic Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Linguistic Society of America Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d031eba188db2675a3cf51828f0f4841559c928b5dc139588597becf7d33de653</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44164108$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44164108$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haig, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnell, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</title><title>Language (Baltimore)</title><description>Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.*</description><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Case marking</subject><subject>Diachronic linguistics</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963)</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Ergative constructions</subject><subject>Grammar, Comparative and general</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language diversity</subject><subject>Language typology</subject><subject>Morphosyntax</subject><subject>Noun phrases</subject><subject>Portuguese language</subject><subject>Pronouns</subject><subject>Reference (Semantic)</subject><subject>Referents</subject><subject>Semantic features</subject><issn>0097-8507</issn><issn>1535-0665</issn><issn>1535-0665</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFaX7gPiSlLvnTuvLGub1kCh0KQFV0MeEzC0TU3Shf_ehoq6cnU253wHPsbuEUZIkp636X7EAdUIQAQXbICSpA9KyUs2AAi0byToa3bTthUAkOHBgD0lr6E3jeLJcr2KQ-9lHEext5x54Wo-TqJNlLx5q3ATxVESTm_ZVZluW3f3nUO2noXJ5NVfLOfRZLzwc1Km8wsgdFmKxhQZV1qmlJcSDTcllMIIlDLIA24yWeRIgTRGBjpzeakLosIpSUP2cOYemvrj6NrOVvWx2Z8uLQdhkJPU-r8WGjIaDWLP8s-tvKnbtnGlPTTvu7T5tAi2t2ZP1mxvzfbWTn3xQ61c3u2OrfsFKx5oRTbuzfZiUVFvsp89nmdV29XN3w9OoK0QqASCoS_LU3Rm</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Haig, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Schnell, Stefan</creator><general>Linguistic Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</title><author>Haig, Geoffrey ; Schnell, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d031eba188db2675a3cf51828f0f4841559c928b5dc139588597becf7d33de653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Case marking</topic><topic>Diachronic linguistics</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963)</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Ergative constructions</topic><topic>Grammar, Comparative and general</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language diversity</topic><topic>Language typology</topic><topic>Morphosyntax</topic><topic>Noun phrases</topic><topic>Portuguese language</topic><topic>Pronouns</topic><topic>Reference (Semantic)</topic><topic>Referents</topic><topic>Semantic features</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haig, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnell, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Language (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haig, Geoffrey</au><au>Schnell, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</atitle><jtitle>Language (Baltimore)</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>591-618</pages><issn>0097-8507</issn><issn>1535-0665</issn><eissn>1535-0665</eissn><coden>LANGA2</coden><abstract>Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.*</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Linguistic Society of America</pub><doi>10.1353/lan.2016.0049</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0097-8507
ispartof Language (Baltimore), 2016-09, Vol.92 (3), p.591-618
issn 0097-8507
1535-0665
1535-0665
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2048123577
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Alignment
Bias
Case marking
Diachronic linguistics
Discourse
Discourse analysis
Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963)
English language
Ergative constructions
Grammar, Comparative and general
Historians
Information management
Information sharing
Language
Language diversity
Language typology
Morphosyntax
Noun phrases
Portuguese language
Pronouns
Reference (Semantic)
Referents
Semantic features
title THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A15%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20DISCOURSE%20BASIS%20OF%20ERGATIVITY%20REVISITED&rft.jtitle=Language%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Haig,%20Geoffrey&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=591-618&rft.issn=0097-8507&rft.eissn=1535-0665&rft.coden=LANGA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/lan.2016.0049&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44164108%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1838718115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44164108&rfr_iscdi=true