THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED
Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language (Baltimore) 2016-09, Vol.92 (3), p.591-618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 618 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 591 |
container_title | Language (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Haig, Geoffrey Schnell, Stefan |
description | Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.* |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/lan.2016.0049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048123577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44164108</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44164108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d031eba188db2675a3cf51828f0f4841559c928b5dc139588597becf7d33de653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFaX7gPiSlLvnTuvLGub1kCh0KQFV0MeEzC0TU3Shf_ehoq6cnU253wHPsbuEUZIkp636X7EAdUIQAQXbICSpA9KyUs2AAi0byToa3bTthUAkOHBgD0lr6E3jeLJcr2KQ-9lHEext5x54Wo-TqJNlLx5q3ATxVESTm_ZVZluW3f3nUO2noXJ5NVfLOfRZLzwc1Km8wsgdFmKxhQZV1qmlJcSDTcllMIIlDLIA24yWeRIgTRGBjpzeakLosIpSUP2cOYemvrj6NrOVvWx2Z8uLQdhkJPU-r8WGjIaDWLP8s-tvKnbtnGlPTTvu7T5tAi2t2ZP1mxvzfbWTn3xQ61c3u2OrfsFKx5oRTbuzfZiUVFvsp89nmdV29XN3w9OoK0QqASCoS_LU3Rm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1838718115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Haig, Geoffrey ; Schnell, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Haig, Geoffrey ; Schnell, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.*</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-8507</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-0665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-0665</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0049</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANGA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Linguistic Society of America</publisher><subject>Alignment ; Bias ; Case marking ; Diachronic linguistics ; Discourse ; Discourse analysis ; Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963) ; English language ; Ergative constructions ; Grammar, Comparative and general ; Historians ; Information management ; Information sharing ; Language ; Language diversity ; Language typology ; Morphosyntax ; Noun phrases ; Portuguese language ; Pronouns ; Reference (Semantic) ; Referents ; Semantic features</subject><ispartof>Language (Baltimore), 2016-09, Vol.92 (3), p.591-618</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2016 Linguistic Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © Linguistic Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Linguistic Society of America Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d031eba188db2675a3cf51828f0f4841559c928b5dc139588597becf7d33de653</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44164108$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44164108$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haig, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnell, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</title><title>Language (Baltimore)</title><description>Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.*</description><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Case marking</subject><subject>Diachronic linguistics</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963)</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Ergative constructions</subject><subject>Grammar, Comparative and general</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language diversity</subject><subject>Language typology</subject><subject>Morphosyntax</subject><subject>Noun phrases</subject><subject>Portuguese language</subject><subject>Pronouns</subject><subject>Reference (Semantic)</subject><subject>Referents</subject><subject>Semantic features</subject><issn>0097-8507</issn><issn>1535-0665</issn><issn>1535-0665</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFaX7gPiSlLvnTuvLGub1kCh0KQFV0MeEzC0TU3Shf_ehoq6cnU253wHPsbuEUZIkp636X7EAdUIQAQXbICSpA9KyUs2AAi0byToa3bTthUAkOHBgD0lr6E3jeLJcr2KQ-9lHEext5x54Wo-TqJNlLx5q3ATxVESTm_ZVZluW3f3nUO2noXJ5NVfLOfRZLzwc1Km8wsgdFmKxhQZV1qmlJcSDTcllMIIlDLIA24yWeRIgTRGBjpzeakLosIpSUP2cOYemvrj6NrOVvWx2Z8uLQdhkJPU-r8WGjIaDWLP8s-tvKnbtnGlPTTvu7T5tAi2t2ZP1mxvzfbWTn3xQ61c3u2OrfsFKx5oRTbuzfZiUVFvsp89nmdV29XN3w9OoK0QqASCoS_LU3Rm</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Haig, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Schnell, Stefan</creator><general>Linguistic Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</title><author>Haig, Geoffrey ; Schnell, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-d031eba188db2675a3cf51828f0f4841559c928b5dc139588597becf7d33de653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Case marking</topic><topic>Diachronic linguistics</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963)</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Ergative constructions</topic><topic>Grammar, Comparative and general</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language diversity</topic><topic>Language typology</topic><topic>Morphosyntax</topic><topic>Noun phrases</topic><topic>Portuguese language</topic><topic>Pronouns</topic><topic>Reference (Semantic)</topic><topic>Referents</topic><topic>Semantic features</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haig, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnell, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Language (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haig, Geoffrey</au><au>Schnell, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED</atitle><jtitle>Language (Baltimore)</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>591-618</pages><issn>0097-8507</issn><issn>1535-0665</issn><eissn>1535-0665</eissn><coden>LANGA2</coden><abstract>Since Du Bois's (1987b) seminal paper, ergative alignment in morphosyntax has been claimed to correlate with a characteristic constellation of argument realization in discourse: both intransitive subjects (S) and transitive objects (P) serve to introduce new referents via full noun phrases (NPs), while transitive subjects (A) are dispreferred for this function and are thus mostly realized as pronouns or zero (e.g. Dixon 1995, Du Bois et al. 2003, Goldberg 2004). This ergative patterning in discourse is generally accounted for in terms of information-management strategies employed by speakers in dealing with the cognitive demands of introducing and monitoring referents in discourse. These claims have recently been questioned by Everett (2009), whose data (English and Portuguese) show no support for the claimed ergative bias in discourse and raise doubts about explanations in terms of information management. The present article subjects the claims of an ergative bias in discourse to more rigorous testing, drawing on the largest database compiled to date (nineteen spoken-language corpora from fifteen typologically diverse languages), and assesses the explanatory frameworks. We find that, with the exception of Du Bois's original Sakapultek data, there is very little evidence for the postulated ergative pattern in natural spokenlanguage discourse crosslinguistically. Although our findings do confirm low levels of full NPs in the A role (Du Bois's ' Non-lexical A' constraint), we concur with Everett (2009) that the semantic feature [± human] provides an empirically more sound and conceptually more economical account than earlier explanations framed in terms of information management. Finally, we address the plausibility of emergentist claims for a diachronic link between ergative alignment in morphosyntax and information flow in discourse. The raw data used in this article and extensive exemplification of the methodology employed are available as online supplementary materials.*</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Linguistic Society of America</pub><doi>10.1353/lan.2016.0049</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0097-8507 |
ispartof | Language (Baltimore), 2016-09, Vol.92 (3), p.591-618 |
issn | 0097-8507 1535-0665 1535-0665 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2048123577 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Alignment Bias Case marking Diachronic linguistics Discourse Discourse analysis Du Bois, W E B (1868-1963) English language Ergative constructions Grammar, Comparative and general Historians Information management Information sharing Language Language diversity Language typology Morphosyntax Noun phrases Portuguese language Pronouns Reference (Semantic) Referents Semantic features |
title | THE DISCOURSE BASIS OF ERGATIVITY REVISITED |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A15%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20DISCOURSE%20BASIS%20OF%20ERGATIVITY%20REVISITED&rft.jtitle=Language%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Haig,%20Geoffrey&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=591-618&rft.issn=0097-8507&rft.eissn=1535-0665&rft.coden=LANGA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/lan.2016.0049&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44164108%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1838718115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44164108&rfr_iscdi=true |