Effects of Outpace™ Feed Additive on Nursery Pig Performance

Two experiments were performed to determine the effects of Outpace™ feed additive (PMI Nutritional Additives, Shoreview, MN) on growth performance of nursery pigs. Each experiment utilized 280 (14 reps/trt) crossbred pigs (PIC 337), with an initial BW of 6.11 kg. Pigs were weaned at 20 d of age and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2018-04, Vol.96, p.117-117
Hauptverfasser: Cooper, C V, Carter, S D, Aparachita, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117
container_issue
container_start_page 117
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 96
creator Cooper, C V
Carter, S D
Aparachita, P
description Two experiments were performed to determine the effects of Outpace™ feed additive (PMI Nutritional Additives, Shoreview, MN) on growth performance of nursery pigs. Each experiment utilized 280 (14 reps/trt) crossbred pigs (PIC 337), with an initial BW of 6.11 kg. Pigs were weaned at 20 d of age and were allotted 5 barrows and 5 gilts per pen and assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments in a completely randomized design. The 2 treatments consisted of the following: 1) Control (CNT) and 2) Control + OutPace (OP). Diets were fed in 5 phases, with the first diet being a common diet for all pigs. Outpace was included at 0.50% of diet in 2nd and 3rd phases and at 0.25% of the diet in the 4th and 5th phases at the expense of corn. Diets were comparable to a standard 5 phase nursery program and were formulated on an ME and SID Lysine basis. No medications were added to the diets throughout either experiment. Feed disappearance and BW were recorded to calculate ADG, ADFI, and G:F. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS with pen serving as the experimental unit. Effects tested included experiment, treatment, and the experiment and treatment interaction. There were no experiment by treatment interactions (P > 0.10), thus data from the 2 experiments were pooled. From d 0-21, there was no difference (P > 0.10) in ADG (249 vs. 248 g), ADFI (309 vs. 303 g), or G:F (0.81 vs. 0.82) between treatments. From d 21-42, there was a tendency (P = 0.09) for ADG (517 vs 530 g) to be greater for pigs fed the Outpace diet than those fed the control diet, but there were no differences (P = 0.50) in ADFI (784 vs 792 g) or G:F (0.66 vs 0.67) between treatments. For the overall period (d 0-42), there was no treatment effect (P > 0.10) on ADG (381 vs 390 g) or ADFI (537 vs 536 g). However, there was an improvement (P = 0.01) in G:F (0.71 vs 0.73) for pigs fed the Outpace treatment in comparison to those fed the control treatment. There was no treatment effect (P > 0.10) on morbidity or mortality. These results suggest that Outpace fed during the nursery phase had no effect on ADFI, but increased ADG (d 21-42) and improved feed efficiency from day 0-42.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048063211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2048063211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20480632113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDUy1TU2NDNmYeA0MDAy1LWwMDTiYOAqLs4yMDA0MrU05WSwc01LS00uKVbIT1PwLy0pSExOfdSySMEtNTVFwTElJbMksyxVIT9Pwa-0qDi1qFIhIDNdISC1KC2_KDcxLzmVh4E1LTGnOJUXSnMzKLu5hjh76BYU5ReWphaXxGfllxblAaXijQxMLAzMjI0MDY2JUwUAu4o5og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048063211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Outpace™ Feed Additive on Nursery Pig Performance</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cooper, C V ; Carter, S D ; Aparachita, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooper, C V ; Carter, S D ; Aparachita, P</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments were performed to determine the effects of Outpace™ feed additive (PMI Nutritional Additives, Shoreview, MN) on growth performance of nursery pigs. Each experiment utilized 280 (14 reps/trt) crossbred pigs (PIC 337), with an initial BW of 6.11 kg. Pigs were weaned at 20 d of age and were allotted 5 barrows and 5 gilts per pen and assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments in a completely randomized design. The 2 treatments consisted of the following: 1) Control (CNT) and 2) Control + OutPace (OP). Diets were fed in 5 phases, with the first diet being a common diet for all pigs. Outpace was included at 0.50% of diet in 2nd and 3rd phases and at 0.25% of the diet in the 4th and 5th phases at the expense of corn. Diets were comparable to a standard 5 phase nursery program and were formulated on an ME and SID Lysine basis. No medications were added to the diets throughout either experiment. Feed disappearance and BW were recorded to calculate ADG, ADFI, and G:F. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS with pen serving as the experimental unit. Effects tested included experiment, treatment, and the experiment and treatment interaction. There were no experiment by treatment interactions (P &gt; 0.10), thus data from the 2 experiments were pooled. From d 0-21, there was no difference (P &gt; 0.10) in ADG (249 vs. 248 g), ADFI (309 vs. 303 g), or G:F (0.81 vs. 0.82) between treatments. From d 21-42, there was a tendency (P = 0.09) for ADG (517 vs 530 g) to be greater for pigs fed the Outpace diet than those fed the control diet, but there were no differences (P = 0.50) in ADFI (784 vs 792 g) or G:F (0.66 vs 0.67) between treatments. For the overall period (d 0-42), there was no treatment effect (P &gt; 0.10) on ADG (381 vs 390 g) or ADFI (537 vs 536 g). However, there was an improvement (P = 0.01) in G:F (0.71 vs 0.73) for pigs fed the Outpace treatment in comparison to those fed the control treatment. There was no treatment effect (P &gt; 0.10) on morbidity or mortality. These results suggest that Outpace fed during the nursery phase had no effect on ADFI, but increased ADG (d 21-42) and improved feed efficiency from day 0-42.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Additives ; Corn ; Data processing ; Diet ; Effects ; Efficiency ; Feed additives ; Feed efficiency ; Feeds ; Food additives ; Hogs ; Lysine ; Morbidity ; Phases</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96, p.117-117</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooper, C V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aparachita, P</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Outpace™ Feed Additive on Nursery Pig Performance</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Two experiments were performed to determine the effects of Outpace™ feed additive (PMI Nutritional Additives, Shoreview, MN) on growth performance of nursery pigs. Each experiment utilized 280 (14 reps/trt) crossbred pigs (PIC 337), with an initial BW of 6.11 kg. Pigs were weaned at 20 d of age and were allotted 5 barrows and 5 gilts per pen and assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments in a completely randomized design. The 2 treatments consisted of the following: 1) Control (CNT) and 2) Control + OutPace (OP). Diets were fed in 5 phases, with the first diet being a common diet for all pigs. Outpace was included at 0.50% of diet in 2nd and 3rd phases and at 0.25% of the diet in the 4th and 5th phases at the expense of corn. Diets were comparable to a standard 5 phase nursery program and were formulated on an ME and SID Lysine basis. No medications were added to the diets throughout either experiment. Feed disappearance and BW were recorded to calculate ADG, ADFI, and G:F. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS with pen serving as the experimental unit. Effects tested included experiment, treatment, and the experiment and treatment interaction. There were no experiment by treatment interactions (P &gt; 0.10), thus data from the 2 experiments were pooled. From d 0-21, there was no difference (P &gt; 0.10) in ADG (249 vs. 248 g), ADFI (309 vs. 303 g), or G:F (0.81 vs. 0.82) between treatments. From d 21-42, there was a tendency (P = 0.09) for ADG (517 vs 530 g) to be greater for pigs fed the Outpace diet than those fed the control diet, but there were no differences (P = 0.50) in ADFI (784 vs 792 g) or G:F (0.66 vs 0.67) between treatments. For the overall period (d 0-42), there was no treatment effect (P &gt; 0.10) on ADG (381 vs 390 g) or ADFI (537 vs 536 g). However, there was an improvement (P = 0.01) in G:F (0.71 vs 0.73) for pigs fed the Outpace treatment in comparison to those fed the control treatment. There was no treatment effect (P &gt; 0.10) on morbidity or mortality. These results suggest that Outpace fed during the nursery phase had no effect on ADFI, but increased ADG (d 21-42) and improved feed efficiency from day 0-42.</description><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Feed efficiency</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Lysine</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Phases</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDUy1TU2NDNmYeA0MDAy1LWwMDTiYOAqLs4yMDA0MrU05WSwc01LS00uKVbIT1PwLy0pSExOfdSySMEtNTVFwTElJbMksyxVIT9Pwa-0qDi1qFIhIDNdISC1KC2_KDcxLzmVh4E1LTGnOJUXSnMzKLu5hjh76BYU5ReWphaXxGfllxblAaXijQxMLAzMjI0MDY2JUwUAu4o5og</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Cooper, C V</creator><creator>Carter, S D</creator><creator>Aparachita, P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Effects of Outpace™ Feed Additive on Nursery Pig Performance</title><author>Cooper, C V ; Carter, S D ; Aparachita, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20480632113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Feed efficiency</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Lysine</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Phases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooper, C V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aparachita, P</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooper, C V</au><au>Carter, S D</au><au>Aparachita, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Outpace™ Feed Additive on Nursery Pig Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>117</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>117-117</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Two experiments were performed to determine the effects of Outpace™ feed additive (PMI Nutritional Additives, Shoreview, MN) on growth performance of nursery pigs. Each experiment utilized 280 (14 reps/trt) crossbred pigs (PIC 337), with an initial BW of 6.11 kg. Pigs were weaned at 20 d of age and were allotted 5 barrows and 5 gilts per pen and assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments in a completely randomized design. The 2 treatments consisted of the following: 1) Control (CNT) and 2) Control + OutPace (OP). Diets were fed in 5 phases, with the first diet being a common diet for all pigs. Outpace was included at 0.50% of diet in 2nd and 3rd phases and at 0.25% of the diet in the 4th and 5th phases at the expense of corn. Diets were comparable to a standard 5 phase nursery program and were formulated on an ME and SID Lysine basis. No medications were added to the diets throughout either experiment. Feed disappearance and BW were recorded to calculate ADG, ADFI, and G:F. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS with pen serving as the experimental unit. Effects tested included experiment, treatment, and the experiment and treatment interaction. There were no experiment by treatment interactions (P &gt; 0.10), thus data from the 2 experiments were pooled. From d 0-21, there was no difference (P &gt; 0.10) in ADG (249 vs. 248 g), ADFI (309 vs. 303 g), or G:F (0.81 vs. 0.82) between treatments. From d 21-42, there was a tendency (P = 0.09) for ADG (517 vs 530 g) to be greater for pigs fed the Outpace diet than those fed the control diet, but there were no differences (P = 0.50) in ADFI (784 vs 792 g) or G:F (0.66 vs 0.67) between treatments. For the overall period (d 0-42), there was no treatment effect (P &gt; 0.10) on ADG (381 vs 390 g) or ADFI (537 vs 536 g). However, there was an improvement (P = 0.01) in G:F (0.71 vs 0.73) for pigs fed the Outpace treatment in comparison to those fed the control treatment. There was no treatment effect (P &gt; 0.10) on morbidity or mortality. These results suggest that Outpace fed during the nursery phase had no effect on ADFI, but increased ADG (d 21-42) and improved feed efficiency from day 0-42.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96, p.117-117
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2048063211
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central
subjects Additives
Corn
Data processing
Diet
Effects
Efficiency
Feed additives
Feed efficiency
Feeds
Food additives
Hogs
Lysine
Morbidity
Phases
title Effects of Outpace™ Feed Additive on Nursery Pig Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A44%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Outpace%E2%84%A2%20Feed%20Additive%20on%20Nursery%20Pig%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Cooper,%20C%20V&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=117-117&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2048063211%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048063211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true