Biochemical and Microbial Biomarkers of Feed Efficiency in Black Angus Steers

As the global population is expected to exceed 9 billion people by 2050, finding novel methods of improving food production is imperative. The rumen microbi-ome is critical in ruminant nutrition and contributes to nutrient utilization and feed efficiency in cattle. Therefore, the objective of this s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2018-04, Vol.96, p.237-237
Hauptverfasser: Clemmons, B A, Martino, C, Embree, M, Melchior, E A, Voy, B H, Campagna, S R, Myer, P R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue
container_start_page 237
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 96
creator Clemmons, B A
Martino, C
Embree, M
Melchior, E A
Voy, B H
Campagna, S R
Myer, P R
description As the global population is expected to exceed 9 billion people by 2050, finding novel methods of improving food production is imperative. The rumen microbi-ome is critical in ruminant nutrition and contributes to nutrient utilization and feed efficiency in cattle. Therefore, the objective of this study was to interrogate microbial and biochemical factors affecting divergences in feed efficiency in Black Angus steers. Fifty Black Angus steers of 7 months of age, weighing 264 ± 2.7 kg were acclimated to the GrowSafe© feeding system for lOd prior to intake measurement, and fed a step-up receiving diet 14d before receiving a growing ration (11.57% CP and 76.93% TDN DM) with 28 mg monensin/kg DM. Steers were maintained on the diet for 70d. Weekly BW was measured, serum collected, and rumen content was obtained via gastric tubing. Based on performance and FI measured from 0 to 70d, the average RFI was calculated and steers were divided into low- (n=14) and high-RFI (n= 15) groups based on 0.5 SD below and above the mean RFI, respectively. Untargeted serum metabolomics was conducted utilizing the Dionex UltiMate 3000 UPLC system and elec-trospray ionization was used to introduce the samples into an Exactive Plus Orbitrap MS. Genomic DNA was extracted from rumen content and the amplified VI-V3 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was sequenced for analyses. Missing values were approximated through matrix completion and data was normalized using a centered log-ratio transformation. Random Forests supervised machine learning and feature selection was performed on the bacterial compositions. Residual feed intake was associated with several attributes of the rumen bacteriome. Low-RFI steers were associated with decreased bacterial a- (P = 0.03) and p- diversity (R2 = 1, P = 0.001). Several serum metabolites were associated with RFI. Based on fold change (high/low RFI), low-RFI steers had greater abundances of pantothenate (0.375; P = 0.04) and reduced abundances of glucose-6-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.02) and glucose-1-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.03). Machine learning on RFI was highly predictive of both serum metabolomic signature and rumen bacterial composition (accuracy >0.7). Fold change Flavobacteriia abundances were greater with increased pantothenate contrasted to reduced pantothenate (5.06; P = 0.04). Greater abundances of pantothenate-producing bacteria, such as Flavobacteriia, may result in improved nutrient utilization in low-RFI steers. Pantothenate
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048062713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2048062713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20480627133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirsOgjAUQBujifj4h5s4k_RhEUcxEBcm3UktrZZHqy0M_r0MfoDTyck5MxQRTnnMSMLmKMKYkjhNCV2iVQgNxoTyI49QmRknn6o3UnQgbA2lkd7dzWRT6YVvlQ_gNBRK1ZBrbaRRVn7AWMg6IVs42ccY4DqoadyghRZdUNsf12hX5LfzJX559x5VGKrGjd5OqaJ4n-KEHghj_11fF2Y-FA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048062713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biochemical and Microbial Biomarkers of Feed Efficiency in Black Angus Steers</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Clemmons, B A ; Martino, C ; Embree, M ; Melchior, E A ; Voy, B H ; Campagna, S R ; Myer, P R</creator><creatorcontrib>Clemmons, B A ; Martino, C ; Embree, M ; Melchior, E A ; Voy, B H ; Campagna, S R ; Myer, P R</creatorcontrib><description>As the global population is expected to exceed 9 billion people by 2050, finding novel methods of improving food production is imperative. The rumen microbi-ome is critical in ruminant nutrition and contributes to nutrient utilization and feed efficiency in cattle. Therefore, the objective of this study was to interrogate microbial and biochemical factors affecting divergences in feed efficiency in Black Angus steers. Fifty Black Angus steers of 7 months of age, weighing 264 ± 2.7 kg were acclimated to the GrowSafe© feeding system for lOd prior to intake measurement, and fed a step-up receiving diet 14d before receiving a growing ration (11.57% CP and 76.93% TDN DM) with 28 mg monensin/kg DM. Steers were maintained on the diet for 70d. Weekly BW was measured, serum collected, and rumen content was obtained via gastric tubing. Based on performance and FI measured from 0 to 70d, the average RFI was calculated and steers were divided into low- (n=14) and high-RFI (n= 15) groups based on 0.5 SD below and above the mean RFI, respectively. Untargeted serum metabolomics was conducted utilizing the Dionex UltiMate 3000 UPLC system and elec-trospray ionization was used to introduce the samples into an Exactive Plus Orbitrap MS. Genomic DNA was extracted from rumen content and the amplified VI-V3 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was sequenced for analyses. Missing values were approximated through matrix completion and data was normalized using a centered log-ratio transformation. Random Forests supervised machine learning and feature selection was performed on the bacterial compositions. Residual feed intake was associated with several attributes of the rumen bacteriome. Low-RFI steers were associated with decreased bacterial a- (P = 0.03) and p- diversity (R2 = 1, P = 0.001). Several serum metabolites were associated with RFI. Based on fold change (high/low RFI), low-RFI steers had greater abundances of pantothenate (0.375; P = 0.04) and reduced abundances of glucose-6-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.02) and glucose-1-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.03). Machine learning on RFI was highly predictive of both serum metabolomic signature and rumen bacterial composition (accuracy &gt;0.7). Fold change Flavobacteriia abundances were greater with increased pantothenate contrasted to reduced pantothenate (5.06; P = 0.04). Greater abundances of pantothenate-producing bacteria, such as Flavobacteriia, may result in improved nutrient utilization in low-RFI steers. Pantothenate and/or Flavobacteriia may serve as potentially novel biomarkers to assess or predict feed efficiency in Black Angus steers on a backgrounding diet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biochemistry ; Biomarkers ; Cattle ; Composition ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Diet ; DNA ; Feed efficiency ; Feeds ; Food production ; Genetic transformation ; Glucose ; Glucose-1-phosphate ; Ionization ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Metabolites ; Metabolomics ; Microorganisms ; Monensin ; Nutrient utilization ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Phosphates ; Production methods ; rRNA 16S ; Rumen ; Ruminant nutrition</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96, p.237-237</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clemmons, B A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melchior, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voy, B H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagna, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myer, P R</creatorcontrib><title>Biochemical and Microbial Biomarkers of Feed Efficiency in Black Angus Steers</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>As the global population is expected to exceed 9 billion people by 2050, finding novel methods of improving food production is imperative. The rumen microbi-ome is critical in ruminant nutrition and contributes to nutrient utilization and feed efficiency in cattle. Therefore, the objective of this study was to interrogate microbial and biochemical factors affecting divergences in feed efficiency in Black Angus steers. Fifty Black Angus steers of 7 months of age, weighing 264 ± 2.7 kg were acclimated to the GrowSafe© feeding system for lOd prior to intake measurement, and fed a step-up receiving diet 14d before receiving a growing ration (11.57% CP and 76.93% TDN DM) with 28 mg monensin/kg DM. Steers were maintained on the diet for 70d. Weekly BW was measured, serum collected, and rumen content was obtained via gastric tubing. Based on performance and FI measured from 0 to 70d, the average RFI was calculated and steers were divided into low- (n=14) and high-RFI (n= 15) groups based on 0.5 SD below and above the mean RFI, respectively. Untargeted serum metabolomics was conducted utilizing the Dionex UltiMate 3000 UPLC system and elec-trospray ionization was used to introduce the samples into an Exactive Plus Orbitrap MS. Genomic DNA was extracted from rumen content and the amplified VI-V3 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was sequenced for analyses. Missing values were approximated through matrix completion and data was normalized using a centered log-ratio transformation. Random Forests supervised machine learning and feature selection was performed on the bacterial compositions. Residual feed intake was associated with several attributes of the rumen bacteriome. Low-RFI steers were associated with decreased bacterial a- (P = 0.03) and p- diversity (R2 = 1, P = 0.001). Several serum metabolites were associated with RFI. Based on fold change (high/low RFI), low-RFI steers had greater abundances of pantothenate (0.375; P = 0.04) and reduced abundances of glucose-6-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.02) and glucose-1-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.03). Machine learning on RFI was highly predictive of both serum metabolomic signature and rumen bacterial composition (accuracy &gt;0.7). Fold change Flavobacteriia abundances were greater with increased pantothenate contrasted to reduced pantothenate (5.06; P = 0.04). Greater abundances of pantothenate-producing bacteria, such as Flavobacteriia, may result in improved nutrient utilization in low-RFI steers. Pantothenate and/or Flavobacteriia may serve as potentially novel biomarkers to assess or predict feed efficiency in Black Angus steers on a backgrounding diet.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Feed efficiency</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Genetic transformation</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose-1-phosphate</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Metabolomics</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monensin</subject><subject>Nutrient utilization</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Ruminant nutrition</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirsOgjAUQBujifj4h5s4k_RhEUcxEBcm3UktrZZHqy0M_r0MfoDTyck5MxQRTnnMSMLmKMKYkjhNCV2iVQgNxoTyI49QmRknn6o3UnQgbA2lkd7dzWRT6YVvlQ_gNBRK1ZBrbaRRVn7AWMg6IVs42ccY4DqoadyghRZdUNsf12hX5LfzJX559x5VGKrGjd5OqaJ4n-KEHghj_11fF2Y-FA</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Clemmons, B A</creator><creator>Martino, C</creator><creator>Embree, M</creator><creator>Melchior, E A</creator><creator>Voy, B H</creator><creator>Campagna, S R</creator><creator>Myer, P R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Biochemical and Microbial Biomarkers of Feed Efficiency in Black Angus Steers</title><author>Clemmons, B A ; Martino, C ; Embree, M ; Melchior, E A ; Voy, B H ; Campagna, S R ; Myer, P R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20480627133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Feed efficiency</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Genetic transformation</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose-1-phosphate</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Metabolomics</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monensin</topic><topic>Nutrient utilization</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Ruminant nutrition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clemmons, B A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melchior, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voy, B H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagna, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myer, P R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clemmons, B A</au><au>Martino, C</au><au>Embree, M</au><au>Melchior, E A</au><au>Voy, B H</au><au>Campagna, S R</au><au>Myer, P R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biochemical and Microbial Biomarkers of Feed Efficiency in Black Angus Steers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>237</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>237-237</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>As the global population is expected to exceed 9 billion people by 2050, finding novel methods of improving food production is imperative. The rumen microbi-ome is critical in ruminant nutrition and contributes to nutrient utilization and feed efficiency in cattle. Therefore, the objective of this study was to interrogate microbial and biochemical factors affecting divergences in feed efficiency in Black Angus steers. Fifty Black Angus steers of 7 months of age, weighing 264 ± 2.7 kg were acclimated to the GrowSafe© feeding system for lOd prior to intake measurement, and fed a step-up receiving diet 14d before receiving a growing ration (11.57% CP and 76.93% TDN DM) with 28 mg monensin/kg DM. Steers were maintained on the diet for 70d. Weekly BW was measured, serum collected, and rumen content was obtained via gastric tubing. Based on performance and FI measured from 0 to 70d, the average RFI was calculated and steers were divided into low- (n=14) and high-RFI (n= 15) groups based on 0.5 SD below and above the mean RFI, respectively. Untargeted serum metabolomics was conducted utilizing the Dionex UltiMate 3000 UPLC system and elec-trospray ionization was used to introduce the samples into an Exactive Plus Orbitrap MS. Genomic DNA was extracted from rumen content and the amplified VI-V3 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was sequenced for analyses. Missing values were approximated through matrix completion and data was normalized using a centered log-ratio transformation. Random Forests supervised machine learning and feature selection was performed on the bacterial compositions. Residual feed intake was associated with several attributes of the rumen bacteriome. Low-RFI steers were associated with decreased bacterial a- (P = 0.03) and p- diversity (R2 = 1, P = 0.001). Several serum metabolites were associated with RFI. Based on fold change (high/low RFI), low-RFI steers had greater abundances of pantothenate (0.375; P = 0.04) and reduced abundances of glucose-6-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.02) and glucose-1-phosphate (2.13; P = 0.03). Machine learning on RFI was highly predictive of both serum metabolomic signature and rumen bacterial composition (accuracy &gt;0.7). Fold change Flavobacteriia abundances were greater with increased pantothenate contrasted to reduced pantothenate (5.06; P = 0.04). Greater abundances of pantothenate-producing bacteria, such as Flavobacteriia, may result in improved nutrient utilization in low-RFI steers. Pantothenate and/or Flavobacteriia may serve as potentially novel biomarkers to assess or predict feed efficiency in Black Angus steers on a backgrounding diet.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96, p.237-237
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2048062713
source Electronic Journals Library; Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access; PubMed Central
subjects Bacteria
Biochemistry
Biomarkers
Cattle
Composition
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Diet
DNA
Feed efficiency
Feeds
Food production
Genetic transformation
Glucose
Glucose-1-phosphate
Ionization
Learning algorithms
Machine learning
Metabolites
Metabolomics
Microorganisms
Monensin
Nutrient utilization
Nutrients
Nutrition
Phosphates
Production methods
rRNA 16S
Rumen
Ruminant nutrition
title Biochemical and Microbial Biomarkers of Feed Efficiency in Black Angus Steers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A34%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biochemical%20and%20Microbial%20Biomarkers%20of%20Feed%20Efficiency%20in%20Black%20Angus%20Steers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Clemmons,%20B%20A&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=237-237&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2048062713%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048062713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true