Optimization of Energy Level in Abdominal Organs with Single-Source Dual Energy CT

Dual energy CT (DECT) is one of the most popular imaging technologies with potential clinical applications. Since the first introduction of DECT in 2006, it has been introduced various abdominal clinical applications such as imaging of renal tumors, components of urinary stone, imaging of adrenal ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research journal of pharmacy and technology 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.353-358
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Kwanghyun, Choi, Joonkoo, Kim, Ghajung, Joongseok, Go, Kim, Seunggi, Yu, Sinyoung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 358
container_issue 1
container_start_page 353
container_title Research journal of pharmacy and technology
container_volume 11
creator Chang, Kwanghyun
Choi, Joonkoo
Kim, Ghajung
Joongseok, Go
Kim, Seunggi
Yu, Sinyoung
description Dual energy CT (DECT) is one of the most popular imaging technologies with potential clinical applications. Since the first introduction of DECT in 2006, it has been introduced various abdominal clinical applications such as imaging of renal tumors, components of urinary stone, imaging of adrenal adenoma, evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm, evaluation of small intestine and liver, and imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.1,2 DECT has several major advantages over traditional conventional single-source CT (CSCT) systems.3 First, arbitrary energy can be selected to obtain a virtual monochromatic energy level (keV) image. [...]of evaluating the changes of CNR and SNR for each substance inserted into the phantom, HU decreased trend with increasing keV in Adipose, Breast, Solid Water, Brain, Liver and Inner Bone which are close material to 0 of CNR and SNR, but the rate of decline was insignificant. A dataset of 80 kVp produces more noise than an image obtained at 120 kVp or 140 kVp. Because SSDE CT uses both low energy of 80 kVp and high energy of 140 kVp, it is necessary to evaluate and eliminate the noise generated in the low energy region. [...]after the injection of the contrast agent, the keV of the tissue according to the increase and decrease of the enhancement of the image obtained by the multiphase inspection was not measured and evaluated. Since the change of keV according to the injection rate of the contrast agent was applied to a total of 62 subjects, the error caused by the lack of the number of measurements cannot be excluded.
doi_str_mv 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00064.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048057305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2048057305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c145t-f674aab99804e52047f57c2342f8efd31d5144a0a279fa5692dcc4b95fdeb9fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUhoMoOOZeQQJet56kSZtcjjmdUBi4Cd6FtE1mRtfOpFPm09u6satz4P_Oz-FD6J5AzCUXjyAzFiUpfMQUiIgBIGUxuUKjS3B92Ym4RZMQtjBQglMmRuhtue_czv3qzrUNbi2eN8Zvjjg336bGrsHTomp3rtE1XvqNbgL-cd0nXrlmU5to1R58afDToY_Ph7P1Hbqxug5mcp5j9P48X88WUb58eZ1N86gkjHeRTTOmdSGlAGY4BZZZnpU0YdQKY6uEVJwwpkHTTFrNU0mrsmSF5LYyheyBMXo49e59-3UwoVPb_p3-06D6NgE8S4D3VHqiSt-G4I1Ve-922h8VATUoVIMdNZhSg0L1r1CR5A-NlWOe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048057305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of Energy Level in Abdominal Organs with Single-Source Dual Energy CT</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Chang, Kwanghyun ; Choi, Joonkoo ; Kim, Ghajung ; Joongseok, Go ; Kim, Seunggi ; Yu, Sinyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kwanghyun ; Choi, Joonkoo ; Kim, Ghajung ; Joongseok, Go ; Kim, Seunggi ; Yu, Sinyoung</creatorcontrib><description>Dual energy CT (DECT) is one of the most popular imaging technologies with potential clinical applications. Since the first introduction of DECT in 2006, it has been introduced various abdominal clinical applications such as imaging of renal tumors, components of urinary stone, imaging of adrenal adenoma, evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm, evaluation of small intestine and liver, and imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.1,2 DECT has several major advantages over traditional conventional single-source CT (CSCT) systems.3 First, arbitrary energy can be selected to obtain a virtual monochromatic energy level (keV) image. [...]of evaluating the changes of CNR and SNR for each substance inserted into the phantom, HU decreased trend with increasing keV in Adipose, Breast, Solid Water, Brain, Liver and Inner Bone which are close material to 0 of CNR and SNR, but the rate of decline was insignificant. A dataset of 80 kVp produces more noise than an image obtained at 120 kVp or 140 kVp. Because SSDE CT uses both low energy of 80 kVp and high energy of 140 kVp, it is necessary to evaluate and eliminate the noise generated in the low energy region. [...]after the injection of the contrast agent, the keV of the tissue according to the increase and decrease of the enhancement of the image obtained by the multiphase inspection was not measured and evaluated. Since the change of keV according to the injection rate of the contrast agent was applied to a total of 62 subjects, the error caused by the lack of the number of measurements cannot be excluded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-3618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-360X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-306X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00064.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raipur: A&amp;V Publications</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Energy ; Medical imaging ; Noise ; Statistics ; Work stations ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Research journal of pharmacy and technology, 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.353-358</ispartof><rights>Copyright A&amp;V Publications Jan 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kwanghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joonkoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ghajung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joongseok, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seunggi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sinyoung</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of Energy Level in Abdominal Organs with Single-Source Dual Energy CT</title><title>Research journal of pharmacy and technology</title><description>Dual energy CT (DECT) is one of the most popular imaging technologies with potential clinical applications. Since the first introduction of DECT in 2006, it has been introduced various abdominal clinical applications such as imaging of renal tumors, components of urinary stone, imaging of adrenal adenoma, evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm, evaluation of small intestine and liver, and imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.1,2 DECT has several major advantages over traditional conventional single-source CT (CSCT) systems.3 First, arbitrary energy can be selected to obtain a virtual monochromatic energy level (keV) image. [...]of evaluating the changes of CNR and SNR for each substance inserted into the phantom, HU decreased trend with increasing keV in Adipose, Breast, Solid Water, Brain, Liver and Inner Bone which are close material to 0 of CNR and SNR, but the rate of decline was insignificant. A dataset of 80 kVp produces more noise than an image obtained at 120 kVp or 140 kVp. Because SSDE CT uses both low energy of 80 kVp and high energy of 140 kVp, it is necessary to evaluate and eliminate the noise generated in the low energy region. [...]after the injection of the contrast agent, the keV of the tissue according to the increase and decrease of the enhancement of the image obtained by the multiphase inspection was not measured and evaluated. Since the change of keV according to the injection rate of the contrast agent was applied to a total of 62 subjects, the error caused by the lack of the number of measurements cannot be excluded.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>0974-3618</issn><issn>0974-360X</issn><issn>0974-306X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUhoMoOOZeQQJet56kSZtcjjmdUBi4Cd6FtE1mRtfOpFPm09u6satz4P_Oz-FD6J5AzCUXjyAzFiUpfMQUiIgBIGUxuUKjS3B92Ym4RZMQtjBQglMmRuhtue_czv3qzrUNbi2eN8Zvjjg336bGrsHTomp3rtE1XvqNbgL-cd0nXrlmU5to1R58afDToY_Ph7P1Hbqxug5mcp5j9P48X88WUb58eZ1N86gkjHeRTTOmdSGlAGY4BZZZnpU0YdQKY6uEVJwwpkHTTFrNU0mrsmSF5LYyheyBMXo49e59-3UwoVPb_p3-06D6NgE8S4D3VHqiSt-G4I1Ve-922h8VATUoVIMdNZhSg0L1r1CR5A-NlWOe</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Chang, Kwanghyun</creator><creator>Choi, Joonkoo</creator><creator>Kim, Ghajung</creator><creator>Joongseok, Go</creator><creator>Kim, Seunggi</creator><creator>Yu, Sinyoung</creator><general>A&amp;V Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Optimization of Energy Level in Abdominal Organs with Single-Source Dual Energy CT</title><author>Chang, Kwanghyun ; Choi, Joonkoo ; Kim, Ghajung ; Joongseok, Go ; Kim, Seunggi ; Yu, Sinyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c145t-f674aab99804e52047f57c2342f8efd31d5144a0a279fa5692dcc4b95fdeb9fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kwanghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joonkoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ghajung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joongseok, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seunggi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sinyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Research journal of pharmacy and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Kwanghyun</au><au>Choi, Joonkoo</au><au>Kim, Ghajung</au><au>Joongseok, Go</au><au>Kim, Seunggi</au><au>Yu, Sinyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of Energy Level in Abdominal Organs with Single-Source Dual Energy CT</atitle><jtitle>Research journal of pharmacy and technology</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>353-358</pages><issn>0974-3618</issn><eissn>0974-360X</eissn><eissn>0974-306X</eissn><abstract>Dual energy CT (DECT) is one of the most popular imaging technologies with potential clinical applications. Since the first introduction of DECT in 2006, it has been introduced various abdominal clinical applications such as imaging of renal tumors, components of urinary stone, imaging of adrenal adenoma, evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm, evaluation of small intestine and liver, and imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.1,2 DECT has several major advantages over traditional conventional single-source CT (CSCT) systems.3 First, arbitrary energy can be selected to obtain a virtual monochromatic energy level (keV) image. [...]of evaluating the changes of CNR and SNR for each substance inserted into the phantom, HU decreased trend with increasing keV in Adipose, Breast, Solid Water, Brain, Liver and Inner Bone which are close material to 0 of CNR and SNR, but the rate of decline was insignificant. A dataset of 80 kVp produces more noise than an image obtained at 120 kVp or 140 kVp. Because SSDE CT uses both low energy of 80 kVp and high energy of 140 kVp, it is necessary to evaluate and eliminate the noise generated in the low energy region. [...]after the injection of the contrast agent, the keV of the tissue according to the increase and decrease of the enhancement of the image obtained by the multiphase inspection was not measured and evaluated. Since the change of keV according to the injection rate of the contrast agent was applied to a total of 62 subjects, the error caused by the lack of the number of measurements cannot be excluded.</abstract><cop>Raipur</cop><pub>A&amp;V Publications</pub><doi>10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00064.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0974-3618
ispartof Research journal of pharmacy and technology, 2018, Vol.11 (1), p.353-358
issn 0974-3618
0974-360X
0974-306X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2048057305
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Abdomen
Energy
Medical imaging
Noise
Statistics
Work stations
X-rays
title Optimization of Energy Level in Abdominal Organs with Single-Source Dual Energy CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A50%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20Energy%20Level%20in%20Abdominal%20Organs%20with%20Single-Source%20Dual%20Energy%20CT&rft.jtitle=Research%20journal%20of%20pharmacy%20and%20technology&rft.au=Chang,%20Kwanghyun&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=353-358&rft.issn=0974-3618&rft.eissn=0974-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00064.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2048057305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048057305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true