Measuring Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Review of Current Practices and Recommendations for Researchers

Women’s empowerment is an intrinsic human rights goal that has implications for the health and well-being of women and their children. Poor measurement hampers current research efforts, and improving empowerment measurement is a frequently identified research priority. However, a discussion of speci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social indicators research 2018-06, Vol.137 (2), p.539-557
1. Verfasser: Richardson, Robin A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 557
container_issue 2
container_start_page 539
container_title Social indicators research
container_volume 137
creator Richardson, Robin A.
description Women’s empowerment is an intrinsic human rights goal that has implications for the health and well-being of women and their children. Poor measurement hampers current research efforts, and improving empowerment measurement is a frequently identified research priority. However, a discussion of specific steps researchers can take to improve upon common measurement practices is lacking. The purpose of this paper is to provide quantitative researchers recommendations to measure women’s empowerment in a theory-based, precise, and comprehensive way. This paper reviewed key theoretical concepts of women’s empowerment and critically reviewed common measurement approaches. Three broad recommendations for measuring empowerment emerged from this critical review, and specific suggestions to meet these recommendations are discussed. First, researchers should draw upon theory to construct measurement models (e.g., using theory to construct dimensions of empowerment and selection of indicators). Second, researchers should use analytic methods that minimize implicit judgments and bias (e.g., not classifying women as empowered using specific criteria). Third, researchers should collect comprehensive empowerment information (e.g., supplementing quantitative measures with qualitative interviews to learn how and why changes took place). Measuring empowerment poses a number of challenges, and this review provides researchers suggestions to improve upon common measurement practices. Improved measurement will strengthen research efforts on the causes and consequences of poor empowerment, which has the potential to improve the well-being of women and their children.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11205-017-1622-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2047858601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48715366</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48715366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-a698f1b40e8efde3f2afe4754370dc6a4e00113ae678739a5d4efefaba88b73c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKA0EQRRtRMEY_wIUYcN1a1e9ZSogPiLhRXDY9k2pJMJmxewZx52_4e36JE0Z056ooqHMvdRg7RjhHAHuREQVoDmg5GiG42mEj1FZyKATushFIkNxJgH12kPMKALTSasRO7yjkLi03z5Onek2br4_PPJmtm_qNUr-2h2wvhpdMRz9zzB6vZg_TGz6_v76dXs55JS22PJjCRSwVkKO4IBlFiKSsVtLCojJBEQCiDGSss7IIeqEoUgxlcK60spJjdjbkNql-7Si3flV3adNXegHKOu0MYH-Fw1WV6pwTRd-k5Tqkd4_gtx784MH3HvzWg1c9IwYmN9s3Kf0l_wedDNAqt3X6bVHOopbGyG8RiWll</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047858601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Review of Current Practices and Recommendations for Researchers</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Richardson, Robin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><description>Women’s empowerment is an intrinsic human rights goal that has implications for the health and well-being of women and their children. Poor measurement hampers current research efforts, and improving empowerment measurement is a frequently identified research priority. However, a discussion of specific steps researchers can take to improve upon common measurement practices is lacking. The purpose of this paper is to provide quantitative researchers recommendations to measure women’s empowerment in a theory-based, precise, and comprehensive way. This paper reviewed key theoretical concepts of women’s empowerment and critically reviewed common measurement approaches. Three broad recommendations for measuring empowerment emerged from this critical review, and specific suggestions to meet these recommendations are discussed. First, researchers should draw upon theory to construct measurement models (e.g., using theory to construct dimensions of empowerment and selection of indicators). Second, researchers should use analytic methods that minimize implicit judgments and bias (e.g., not classifying women as empowered using specific criteria). Third, researchers should collect comprehensive empowerment information (e.g., supplementing quantitative measures with qualitative interviews to learn how and why changes took place). Measuring empowerment poses a number of challenges, and this review provides researchers suggestions to improve upon common measurement practices. Improved measurement will strengthen research efforts on the causes and consequences of poor empowerment, which has the potential to improve the well-being of women and their children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-017-1622-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Bias ; Children ; Empowerment ; Females ; Human Geography ; Human rights ; Intrinsic motivation ; Measurement ; Microeconomics ; Mothers ; Public Health ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative analysis ; Quantitative research ; Researchers ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Theory ; Well being ; Women</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2018-06, Vol.137 (2), p.539-557</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2017</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>Social Indicators Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-a698f1b40e8efde3f2afe4754370dc6a4e00113ae678739a5d4efefaba88b73c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-a698f1b40e8efde3f2afe4754370dc6a4e00113ae678739a5d4efefaba88b73c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0182-455X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48715366$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48715366$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Review of Current Practices and Recommendations for Researchers</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>Women’s empowerment is an intrinsic human rights goal that has implications for the health and well-being of women and their children. Poor measurement hampers current research efforts, and improving empowerment measurement is a frequently identified research priority. However, a discussion of specific steps researchers can take to improve upon common measurement practices is lacking. The purpose of this paper is to provide quantitative researchers recommendations to measure women’s empowerment in a theory-based, precise, and comprehensive way. This paper reviewed key theoretical concepts of women’s empowerment and critically reviewed common measurement approaches. Three broad recommendations for measuring empowerment emerged from this critical review, and specific suggestions to meet these recommendations are discussed. First, researchers should draw upon theory to construct measurement models (e.g., using theory to construct dimensions of empowerment and selection of indicators). Second, researchers should use analytic methods that minimize implicit judgments and bias (e.g., not classifying women as empowered using specific criteria). Third, researchers should collect comprehensive empowerment information (e.g., supplementing quantitative measures with qualitative interviews to learn how and why changes took place). Measuring empowerment poses a number of challenges, and this review provides researchers suggestions to improve upon common measurement practices. Improved measurement will strengthen research efforts on the causes and consequences of poor empowerment, which has the potential to improve the well-being of women and their children.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Intrinsic motivation</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Quantitative research</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKA0EQRRtRMEY_wIUYcN1a1e9ZSogPiLhRXDY9k2pJMJmxewZx52_4e36JE0Z056ooqHMvdRg7RjhHAHuREQVoDmg5GiG42mEj1FZyKATushFIkNxJgH12kPMKALTSasRO7yjkLi03z5Onek2br4_PPJmtm_qNUr-2h2wvhpdMRz9zzB6vZg_TGz6_v76dXs55JS22PJjCRSwVkKO4IBlFiKSsVtLCojJBEQCiDGSss7IIeqEoUgxlcK60spJjdjbkNql-7Si3flV3adNXegHKOu0MYH-Fw1WV6pwTRd-k5Tqkd4_gtx784MH3HvzWg1c9IwYmN9s3Kf0l_wedDNAqt3X6bVHOopbGyG8RiWll</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Richardson, Robin A.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0182-455X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Measuring Women’s Empowerment</title><author>Richardson, Robin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-a698f1b40e8efde3f2afe4754370dc6a4e00113ae678739a5d4efefaba88b73c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Intrinsic motivation</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Quantitative research</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Robin A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Robin A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Review of Current Practices and Recommendations for Researchers</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>539-557</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><abstract>Women’s empowerment is an intrinsic human rights goal that has implications for the health and well-being of women and their children. Poor measurement hampers current research efforts, and improving empowerment measurement is a frequently identified research priority. However, a discussion of specific steps researchers can take to improve upon common measurement practices is lacking. The purpose of this paper is to provide quantitative researchers recommendations to measure women’s empowerment in a theory-based, precise, and comprehensive way. This paper reviewed key theoretical concepts of women’s empowerment and critically reviewed common measurement approaches. Three broad recommendations for measuring empowerment emerged from this critical review, and specific suggestions to meet these recommendations are discussed. First, researchers should draw upon theory to construct measurement models (e.g., using theory to construct dimensions of empowerment and selection of indicators). Second, researchers should use analytic methods that minimize implicit judgments and bias (e.g., not classifying women as empowered using specific criteria). Third, researchers should collect comprehensive empowerment information (e.g., supplementing quantitative measures with qualitative interviews to learn how and why changes took place). Measuring empowerment poses a number of challenges, and this review provides researchers suggestions to improve upon common measurement practices. Improved measurement will strengthen research efforts on the causes and consequences of poor empowerment, which has the potential to improve the well-being of women and their children.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-017-1622-4</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0182-455X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-8300
ispartof Social indicators research, 2018-06, Vol.137 (2), p.539-557
issn 0303-8300
1573-0921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2047858601
source Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Bias
Children
Empowerment
Females
Human Geography
Human rights
Intrinsic motivation
Measurement
Microeconomics
Mothers
Public Health
Quality of Life Research
Quantitative analysis
Quantitative research
Researchers
Social research
Social Sciences
Sociology
Theory
Well being
Women
title Measuring Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Review of Current Practices and Recommendations for Researchers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A48%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Women%E2%80%99s%20Empowerment:%20A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20Current%20Practices%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Researchers&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Richardson,%20Robin%20A.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=539-557&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-017-1622-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48715366%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047858601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48715366&rfr_iscdi=true