Field isolates of fowlpox virus contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used to examine samples from field cases of fowlpox for the presence of reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV). The S-strain fowlpox vaccine, known to be contaminated with REV, served as a positive control. Fowlpox virus was grown from field samples and vacc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Avian pathology 1998-02, Vol.27 (1), p.60-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 66 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | Avian pathology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Diallo, I. S. MacKenzie, M. A. Spradbrow, P. B. Robinson, W. F. |
description | The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used to examine samples from field cases of fowlpox for the presence of reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV). The S-strain fowlpox vaccine, known to be contaminated with REV, served as a positive control. Fowlpox virus was grown from field samples and vaccines by inoculation of embryonated hen eggs by the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) route. DNA was extracted from the CAM lesions and examined for REV proviral sequences using primers specific for the long terminal repeats of REV. Amplicons of the expected length were detected in all the 45 field samples from poultry and in the S strain vaccine. Two other vaccines and two isolates from wild birds contained no detectable REV sequences. The PCR products from the vaccine and one field isolate were sequenced and were identical. These products showed 81 to 87.5% homology with the published sequences for the long terminal repeats of REV. It was not determined whether the REV proviral DNA was integrated with cellular DNA, fowlpox DNA or both. Inoculation of day-old chickens with the S-strain vaccine resulted not only in the production of fowlpox lesions but also feathering defects and proventriculitis. This suggests that the REV present in the vaccine is replication competent. Problems being encountered with protection from fowlpox following vaccination in Australia might be attributed to simultaneous challenge with fowlpox virus and REV. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03079459808419275 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204719222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27731238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9b412a1eb32edc8ea986d9aef799fa6dec26ab60d6239d76089b3f102a4b8c593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtrGzEUhUVJaJy0P6CbMGST1TR6jR7QTTFxWnDIJl0LjR5EQTNyJU0d__tMsCFQQ7u6i_N9h8sB4AuCXxEU8AYSyCXtpICCIol59wEsEGVdSwgRJ2DxlrczwM_AeSnPEELWdfgjOEOCCiJZtwD3q-CibUJJUVdXmuQbn7Zxk16aPyFPpTFprHoI45zaZhvqU5NdDWaKyY021ScXQyqh7OlP4NTrWNznw70Av1a3j8sf7frh7ufy-7o1FLPayp4irJHrCXbWCKelYFZq57mUXjPrDGa6Z9AyTKTlDArZE48g1rQXppPkAlzvezc5_Z5cqWoIxbgY9ejSVBQnFAuGOJnJq7_I5zTlcX5OYUj5vBrGM4T2kMmplOy82uQw6LxTCKq3pdXR0rNzeSie-sHZd-Mw7Qx82wNh9CkPeptytKrqXUzZZz2aUBT5Vz__r35kqfpSySt-IJ9B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204719222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field isolates of fowlpox virus contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Diallo, I. S. ; MacKenzie, M. A. ; Spradbrow, P. B. ; Robinson, W. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Diallo, I. S. ; MacKenzie, M. A. ; Spradbrow, P. B. ; Robinson, W. F.</creatorcontrib><description>The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used to examine samples from field cases of fowlpox for the presence of reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV). The S-strain fowlpox vaccine, known to be contaminated with REV, served as a positive control. Fowlpox virus was grown from field samples and vaccines by inoculation of embryonated hen eggs by the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) route. DNA was extracted from the CAM lesions and examined for REV proviral sequences using primers specific for the long terminal repeats of REV. Amplicons of the expected length were detected in all the 45 field samples from poultry and in the S strain vaccine. Two other vaccines and two isolates from wild birds contained no detectable REV sequences. The PCR products from the vaccine and one field isolate were sequenced and were identical. These products showed 81 to 87.5% homology with the published sequences for the long terminal repeats of REV. It was not determined whether the REV proviral DNA was integrated with cellular DNA, fowlpox DNA or both. Inoculation of day-old chickens with the S-strain vaccine resulted not only in the production of fowlpox lesions but also feathering defects and proventriculitis. This suggests that the REV present in the vaccine is replication competent. Problems being encountered with protection from fowlpox following vaccination in Australia might be attributed to simultaneous challenge with fowlpox virus and REV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03079459808419275</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18483965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Birds ; Pathology ; Vaccines ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Avian pathology, 1998-02, Vol.27 (1), p.60-66</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1998</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Feb 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9b412a1eb32edc8ea986d9aef799fa6dec26ab60d6239d76089b3f102a4b8c593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9b412a1eb32edc8ea986d9aef799fa6dec26ab60d6239d76089b3f102a4b8c593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18483965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diallo, I. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spradbrow, P. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, W. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Field isolates of fowlpox virus contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus</title><title>Avian pathology</title><addtitle>Avian Pathol</addtitle><description>The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used to examine samples from field cases of fowlpox for the presence of reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV). The S-strain fowlpox vaccine, known to be contaminated with REV, served as a positive control. Fowlpox virus was grown from field samples and vaccines by inoculation of embryonated hen eggs by the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) route. DNA was extracted from the CAM lesions and examined for REV proviral sequences using primers specific for the long terminal repeats of REV. Amplicons of the expected length were detected in all the 45 field samples from poultry and in the S strain vaccine. Two other vaccines and two isolates from wild birds contained no detectable REV sequences. The PCR products from the vaccine and one field isolate were sequenced and were identical. These products showed 81 to 87.5% homology with the published sequences for the long terminal repeats of REV. It was not determined whether the REV proviral DNA was integrated with cellular DNA, fowlpox DNA or both. Inoculation of day-old chickens with the S-strain vaccine resulted not only in the production of fowlpox lesions but also feathering defects and proventriculitis. This suggests that the REV present in the vaccine is replication competent. Problems being encountered with protection from fowlpox following vaccination in Australia might be attributed to simultaneous challenge with fowlpox virus and REV.</description><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0307-9457</issn><issn>1465-3338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtrGzEUhUVJaJy0P6CbMGST1TR6jR7QTTFxWnDIJl0LjR5EQTNyJU0d__tMsCFQQ7u6i_N9h8sB4AuCXxEU8AYSyCXtpICCIol59wEsEGVdSwgRJ2DxlrczwM_AeSnPEELWdfgjOEOCCiJZtwD3q-CibUJJUVdXmuQbn7Zxk16aPyFPpTFprHoI45zaZhvqU5NdDWaKyY021ScXQyqh7OlP4NTrWNznw70Av1a3j8sf7frh7ufy-7o1FLPayp4irJHrCXbWCKelYFZq57mUXjPrDGa6Z9AyTKTlDArZE48g1rQXppPkAlzvezc5_Z5cqWoIxbgY9ejSVBQnFAuGOJnJq7_I5zTlcX5OYUj5vBrGM4T2kMmplOy82uQw6LxTCKq3pdXR0rNzeSie-sHZd-Mw7Qx82wNh9CkPeptytKrqXUzZZz2aUBT5Vz__r35kqfpSySt-IJ9B</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>Diallo, I. S.</creator><creator>MacKenzie, M. A.</creator><creator>Spradbrow, P. B.</creator><creator>Robinson, W. F.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>Field isolates of fowlpox virus contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus</title><author>Diallo, I. S. ; MacKenzie, M. A. ; Spradbrow, P. B. ; Robinson, W. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-9b412a1eb32edc8ea986d9aef799fa6dec26ab60d6239d76089b3f102a4b8c593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diallo, I. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spradbrow, P. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, W. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Avian pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diallo, I. S.</au><au>MacKenzie, M. A.</au><au>Spradbrow, P. B.</au><au>Robinson, W. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field isolates of fowlpox virus contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus</atitle><jtitle>Avian pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Avian Pathol</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>60-66</pages><issn>0307-9457</issn><eissn>1465-3338</eissn><abstract>The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used to examine samples from field cases of fowlpox for the presence of reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV). The S-strain fowlpox vaccine, known to be contaminated with REV, served as a positive control. Fowlpox virus was grown from field samples and vaccines by inoculation of embryonated hen eggs by the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) route. DNA was extracted from the CAM lesions and examined for REV proviral sequences using primers specific for the long terminal repeats of REV. Amplicons of the expected length were detected in all the 45 field samples from poultry and in the S strain vaccine. Two other vaccines and two isolates from wild birds contained no detectable REV sequences. The PCR products from the vaccine and one field isolate were sequenced and were identical. These products showed 81 to 87.5% homology with the published sequences for the long terminal repeats of REV. It was not determined whether the REV proviral DNA was integrated with cellular DNA, fowlpox DNA or both. Inoculation of day-old chickens with the S-strain vaccine resulted not only in the production of fowlpox lesions but also feathering defects and proventriculitis. This suggests that the REV present in the vaccine is replication competent. Problems being encountered with protection from fowlpox following vaccination in Australia might be attributed to simultaneous challenge with fowlpox virus and REV.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>18483965</pmid><doi>10.1080/03079459808419275</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-9457 |
ispartof | Avian pathology, 1998-02, Vol.27 (1), p.60-66 |
issn | 0307-9457 1465-3338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204719222 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Birds Pathology Vaccines Viruses |
title | Field isolates of fowlpox virus contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20isolates%20of%20fowlpox%20virus%20contaminated%20with%20reticuloendotheliosis%20virus&rft.jtitle=Avian%20pathology&rft.au=Diallo,%20I.%20S.&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=60-66&rft.issn=0307-9457&rft.eissn=1465-3338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03079459808419275&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E27731238%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204719222&rft_id=info:pmid/18483965&rfr_iscdi=true |