Economics & carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide – power-to-methanol

The synthesis of sustainable methanol based on renewable electricity generation, sustainable hydrogen (H 2 ) and recycled carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) represents an interesting sustainable solution to integrated renewable energy storage and platform chemical production. However, the business case for this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainable energy & fuels 2018, Vol.2 (6), p.1244-1261
Hauptverfasser: Hank, Christoph, Gelpke, Svenja, Schnabl, Andrea, White, Robin J., Full, Johannes, Wiebe, Nikolai, Smolinka, Tom, Schaadt, Achim, Henning, Hans-Martin, Hebling, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1261
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1244
container_title Sustainable energy & fuels
container_volume 2
creator Hank, Christoph
Gelpke, Svenja
Schnabl, Andrea
White, Robin J.
Full, Johannes
Wiebe, Nikolai
Smolinka, Tom
Schaadt, Achim
Henning, Hans-Martin
Hebling, Christopher
description The synthesis of sustainable methanol based on renewable electricity generation, sustainable hydrogen (H 2 ) and recycled carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) represents an interesting sustainable solution to integrated renewable energy storage and platform chemical production. However, the business case for this electricity based product (denoted hereafter as eMeOH) under current market conditions ( e.g. vs. conventional fossil methanol (fMeOH) production cost) and the appropriate implementation scenarios to increase platform attractiveness and adoption have to be highlighted. The aim of the following study was to perform a dynamic simulation and calculation of the cost of eMeOH production (where electricity is generated at a wind park in Germany), with comparison made to grid connected scenarios. Consideration of these scenarios is made with particular respect to the German energy market and potential for the reduction in fees/taxes ( i.e. for electrolyser systems). This evaluation and indeed the results can be viewed in light of European Union efforts to support the implementation of such technologies. In this context, CO 2 is sourced from EU relevant sources, namely a biogas or ammonia plant, the latter profiting from the resulting credit arising from CO 2 certificate trading. Variation in electricity cost and the CO 2 certificate price (in the presented sensitivity study) demonstrate a high cost reduction potential. Under the energy market conditions of Germany it is found that eMeOH production costs vary between €608 and 1453 per tonne based on a purely grid driven scenario, whilst a purely wind park supplied scenario results in €1028–1067 per tonne. The reported results indicate that the eMeOH production cost in Germany is still above the present (although variable) market price, with the economical evaluation indicating that electrolyser and H 2 storage represent the lion share of investment and operational cost. Substitution of fMeOH results in CO 2 avoidance costs between €365 and 430 per tonne of CO 2eq avoided for green methanol produced in Germany. The presented assessment indicates that the eMeOH production cost in Germany will reach market parity in ca. 2030–2035 with the price for the avoidance of CO 2eq turning from a cost to a benefit at around the same time. Optimistically, the cost is predominantly influenced by rapidly reducing renewable electricity costs as is already the case in South American and Arabic countries offering the potential for methan
doi_str_mv 10.1039/C8SE00032H
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046962668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046962668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-de6cbf55c7f917f26c9a4046ec1ec88465aea1fc40f366ef5f0ebbd5c3c792123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkFA8CCsZpPd7O5RSrVCwYN6XrKTid2yTWqytfbmE3jxDX0SI1UUT_MzfHzD_IQcp-w8ZaK6GJd3E8aY4NM9MuCiKpOsYnz_Tz4koxAWkeEpz3heDMjbBJx1yxYCPaWgfOMs1a17aTVS9exarSwgBRd66gxdYj9X1nV05Z1eQ99GulEBNY3Bo8WNajqk86327hEtVVbHNWyhi8g_-8frO125Dfqkd8mP-IgcGNUFHH3PIXm4mtyPp8ns9vpmfDlLQGRln2iU0Jg8h8JUaWG4hEplLJMIKUJZZjJXqFIDGTNCSjS5Ydg0OgcBRRV_F0NysvPGR57WGPp64dbexpM1j55KcinLSJ3tKPAuBI-mXvl2qfy2Tln9VXn9W7n4BI_ydx4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046962668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economics &amp; carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide – power-to-methanol</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hank, Christoph ; Gelpke, Svenja ; Schnabl, Andrea ; White, Robin J. ; Full, Johannes ; Wiebe, Nikolai ; Smolinka, Tom ; Schaadt, Achim ; Henning, Hans-Martin ; Hebling, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Hank, Christoph ; Gelpke, Svenja ; Schnabl, Andrea ; White, Robin J. ; Full, Johannes ; Wiebe, Nikolai ; Smolinka, Tom ; Schaadt, Achim ; Henning, Hans-Martin ; Hebling, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>The synthesis of sustainable methanol based on renewable electricity generation, sustainable hydrogen (H 2 ) and recycled carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) represents an interesting sustainable solution to integrated renewable energy storage and platform chemical production. However, the business case for this electricity based product (denoted hereafter as eMeOH) under current market conditions ( e.g. vs. conventional fossil methanol (fMeOH) production cost) and the appropriate implementation scenarios to increase platform attractiveness and adoption have to be highlighted. The aim of the following study was to perform a dynamic simulation and calculation of the cost of eMeOH production (where electricity is generated at a wind park in Germany), with comparison made to grid connected scenarios. Consideration of these scenarios is made with particular respect to the German energy market and potential for the reduction in fees/taxes ( i.e. for electrolyser systems). This evaluation and indeed the results can be viewed in light of European Union efforts to support the implementation of such technologies. In this context, CO 2 is sourced from EU relevant sources, namely a biogas or ammonia plant, the latter profiting from the resulting credit arising from CO 2 certificate trading. Variation in electricity cost and the CO 2 certificate price (in the presented sensitivity study) demonstrate a high cost reduction potential. Under the energy market conditions of Germany it is found that eMeOH production costs vary between €608 and 1453 per tonne based on a purely grid driven scenario, whilst a purely wind park supplied scenario results in €1028–1067 per tonne. The reported results indicate that the eMeOH production cost in Germany is still above the present (although variable) market price, with the economical evaluation indicating that electrolyser and H 2 storage represent the lion share of investment and operational cost. Substitution of fMeOH results in CO 2 avoidance costs between €365 and 430 per tonne of CO 2eq avoided for green methanol produced in Germany. The presented assessment indicates that the eMeOH production cost in Germany will reach market parity in ca. 2030–2035 with the price for the avoidance of CO 2eq turning from a cost to a benefit at around the same time. Optimistically, the cost is predominantly influenced by rapidly reducing renewable electricity costs as is already the case in South American and Arabic countries offering the potential for methanol production at a cost of &lt;€500 per tonne.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2398-4902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-4902</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/C8SE00032H</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Ammonia ; Avoidance ; Biogas ; Carbon dioxide ; Chemical industry ; Costs ; Economic conditions ; Electricity ; Electricity pricing ; Energy costs ; Energy industry ; Energy storage ; Evaluation ; Hydrogen storage ; Industrial engineering ; Manufacturing engineering ; Marketing ; Markets ; Mathematical analysis ; Methanol ; Production costs ; Reduction ; Renewable energy ; Sustainability ; Systems analysis ; Taxation ; Taxes ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Sustainable energy &amp; fuels, 2018, Vol.2 (6), p.1244-1261</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-de6cbf55c7f917f26c9a4046ec1ec88465aea1fc40f366ef5f0ebbd5c3c792123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-de6cbf55c7f917f26c9a4046ec1ec88465aea1fc40f366ef5f0ebbd5c3c792123</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7859-2980 ; 0000-0001-5171-2217 ; 0000-0003-0393-3001 ; 0000-0001-8895-6303 ; 0000-0003-1265-7301 ; 0000-0002-6827-2999 ; 0000-0003-1859-652X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hank, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelpke, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnabl, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Full, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolinka, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaadt, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henning, Hans-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebling, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Economics &amp; carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide – power-to-methanol</title><title>Sustainable energy &amp; fuels</title><description>The synthesis of sustainable methanol based on renewable electricity generation, sustainable hydrogen (H 2 ) and recycled carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) represents an interesting sustainable solution to integrated renewable energy storage and platform chemical production. However, the business case for this electricity based product (denoted hereafter as eMeOH) under current market conditions ( e.g. vs. conventional fossil methanol (fMeOH) production cost) and the appropriate implementation scenarios to increase platform attractiveness and adoption have to be highlighted. The aim of the following study was to perform a dynamic simulation and calculation of the cost of eMeOH production (where electricity is generated at a wind park in Germany), with comparison made to grid connected scenarios. Consideration of these scenarios is made with particular respect to the German energy market and potential for the reduction in fees/taxes ( i.e. for electrolyser systems). This evaluation and indeed the results can be viewed in light of European Union efforts to support the implementation of such technologies. In this context, CO 2 is sourced from EU relevant sources, namely a biogas or ammonia plant, the latter profiting from the resulting credit arising from CO 2 certificate trading. Variation in electricity cost and the CO 2 certificate price (in the presented sensitivity study) demonstrate a high cost reduction potential. Under the energy market conditions of Germany it is found that eMeOH production costs vary between €608 and 1453 per tonne based on a purely grid driven scenario, whilst a purely wind park supplied scenario results in €1028–1067 per tonne. The reported results indicate that the eMeOH production cost in Germany is still above the present (although variable) market price, with the economical evaluation indicating that electrolyser and H 2 storage represent the lion share of investment and operational cost. Substitution of fMeOH results in CO 2 avoidance costs between €365 and 430 per tonne of CO 2eq avoided for green methanol produced in Germany. The presented assessment indicates that the eMeOH production cost in Germany will reach market parity in ca. 2030–2035 with the price for the avoidance of CO 2eq turning from a cost to a benefit at around the same time. Optimistically, the cost is predominantly influenced by rapidly reducing renewable electricity costs as is already the case in South American and Arabic countries offering the potential for methanol production at a cost of &lt;€500 per tonne.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Avoidance</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Hydrogen storage</subject><subject>Industrial engineering</subject><subject>Manufacturing engineering</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Methanol</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>2398-4902</issn><issn>2398-4902</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkFA8CCsZpPd7O5RSrVCwYN6XrKTid2yTWqytfbmE3jxDX0SI1UUT_MzfHzD_IQcp-w8ZaK6GJd3E8aY4NM9MuCiKpOsYnz_Tz4koxAWkeEpz3heDMjbBJx1yxYCPaWgfOMs1a17aTVS9exarSwgBRd66gxdYj9X1nV05Z1eQ99GulEBNY3Bo8WNajqk86327hEtVVbHNWyhi8g_-8frO125Dfqkd8mP-IgcGNUFHH3PIXm4mtyPp8ns9vpmfDlLQGRln2iU0Jg8h8JUaWG4hEplLJMIKUJZZjJXqFIDGTNCSjS5Ydg0OgcBRRV_F0NysvPGR57WGPp64dbexpM1j55KcinLSJ3tKPAuBI-mXvl2qfy2Tln9VXn9W7n4BI_ydx4</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Hank, Christoph</creator><creator>Gelpke, Svenja</creator><creator>Schnabl, Andrea</creator><creator>White, Robin J.</creator><creator>Full, Johannes</creator><creator>Wiebe, Nikolai</creator><creator>Smolinka, Tom</creator><creator>Schaadt, Achim</creator><creator>Henning, Hans-Martin</creator><creator>Hebling, Christopher</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-2980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-2217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-3001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8895-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-7301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6827-2999</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-652X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Economics &amp; carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide – power-to-methanol</title><author>Hank, Christoph ; Gelpke, Svenja ; Schnabl, Andrea ; White, Robin J. ; Full, Johannes ; Wiebe, Nikolai ; Smolinka, Tom ; Schaadt, Achim ; Henning, Hans-Martin ; Hebling, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-de6cbf55c7f917f26c9a4046ec1ec88465aea1fc40f366ef5f0ebbd5c3c792123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Avoidance</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Hydrogen storage</topic><topic>Industrial engineering</topic><topic>Manufacturing engineering</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Methanol</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hank, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelpke, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnabl, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Full, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolinka, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaadt, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henning, Hans-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebling, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable energy &amp; fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hank, Christoph</au><au>Gelpke, Svenja</au><au>Schnabl, Andrea</au><au>White, Robin J.</au><au>Full, Johannes</au><au>Wiebe, Nikolai</au><au>Smolinka, Tom</au><au>Schaadt, Achim</au><au>Henning, Hans-Martin</au><au>Hebling, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economics &amp; carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide – power-to-methanol</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable energy &amp; fuels</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1244</spage><epage>1261</epage><pages>1244-1261</pages><issn>2398-4902</issn><eissn>2398-4902</eissn><abstract>The synthesis of sustainable methanol based on renewable electricity generation, sustainable hydrogen (H 2 ) and recycled carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) represents an interesting sustainable solution to integrated renewable energy storage and platform chemical production. However, the business case for this electricity based product (denoted hereafter as eMeOH) under current market conditions ( e.g. vs. conventional fossil methanol (fMeOH) production cost) and the appropriate implementation scenarios to increase platform attractiveness and adoption have to be highlighted. The aim of the following study was to perform a dynamic simulation and calculation of the cost of eMeOH production (where electricity is generated at a wind park in Germany), with comparison made to grid connected scenarios. Consideration of these scenarios is made with particular respect to the German energy market and potential for the reduction in fees/taxes ( i.e. for electrolyser systems). This evaluation and indeed the results can be viewed in light of European Union efforts to support the implementation of such technologies. In this context, CO 2 is sourced from EU relevant sources, namely a biogas or ammonia plant, the latter profiting from the resulting credit arising from CO 2 certificate trading. Variation in electricity cost and the CO 2 certificate price (in the presented sensitivity study) demonstrate a high cost reduction potential. Under the energy market conditions of Germany it is found that eMeOH production costs vary between €608 and 1453 per tonne based on a purely grid driven scenario, whilst a purely wind park supplied scenario results in €1028–1067 per tonne. The reported results indicate that the eMeOH production cost in Germany is still above the present (although variable) market price, with the economical evaluation indicating that electrolyser and H 2 storage represent the lion share of investment and operational cost. Substitution of fMeOH results in CO 2 avoidance costs between €365 and 430 per tonne of CO 2eq avoided for green methanol produced in Germany. The presented assessment indicates that the eMeOH production cost in Germany will reach market parity in ca. 2030–2035 with the price for the avoidance of CO 2eq turning from a cost to a benefit at around the same time. Optimistically, the cost is predominantly influenced by rapidly reducing renewable electricity costs as is already the case in South American and Arabic countries offering the potential for methanol production at a cost of &lt;€500 per tonne.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/C8SE00032H</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-2980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-2217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-3001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8895-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-7301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6827-2999</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-652X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2398-4902
ispartof Sustainable energy & fuels, 2018, Vol.2 (6), p.1244-1261
issn 2398-4902
2398-4902
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2046962668
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Alternative energy sources
Ammonia
Avoidance
Biogas
Carbon dioxide
Chemical industry
Costs
Economic conditions
Electricity
Electricity pricing
Energy costs
Energy industry
Energy storage
Evaluation
Hydrogen storage
Industrial engineering
Manufacturing engineering
Marketing
Markets
Mathematical analysis
Methanol
Production costs
Reduction
Renewable energy
Sustainability
Systems analysis
Taxation
Taxes
Wind
title Economics & carbon dioxide avoidance cost of methanol production based on renewable hydrogen and recycled carbon dioxide – power-to-methanol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A51%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economics%20&%20carbon%20dioxide%20avoidance%20cost%20of%20methanol%20production%20based%20on%20renewable%20hydrogen%20and%20recycled%20carbon%20dioxide%20%E2%80%93%20power-to-methanol&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Hank,%20Christoph&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1244&rft.epage=1261&rft.pages=1244-1261&rft.issn=2398-4902&rft.eissn=2398-4902&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/C8SE00032H&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2046962668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046962668&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true