Comparison of intestinal goblet cell staining methods in turkey poults
This study compared the intestinal goblet cell density of turkey poults at two different ages using Alcian blue-Periodic acid shiff (AB-PAS) and Mucicarmine stains. Neutral mucins are stained with PAS while acidic mucins are stained with AB. Mucicarmine is specific to the mucins of epithelial origin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2016-10, Vol.94, p.211-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Osho, S O Wang, T Horn, N L Adeola, O |
description | This study compared the intestinal goblet cell density of turkey poults at two different ages using Alcian blue-Periodic acid shiff (AB-PAS) and Mucicarmine stains. Neutral mucins are stained with PAS while acidic mucins are stained with AB. Mucicarmine is specific to the mucins of epithelial origin and it is currently used for human samples, Mucicarmine may have advantages for use in animals as a result of the methodological simplicity of staining as compared with AB-PAS. Jejunum samples were taken from 80 turkey poults at 21 and 28 d, and were assigned to two treatments which consisted of AB-PAS and Mucicarmine stains in a completely randomized design. A mid-section of jejunum from each bird was taken and placed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 h, dehydrated with ethanol, cleared with Sub-X and placed in a paraffin, prepared on two slides, and then tissues were briefly cleared and hydrated. Each slide was stained with either AB-PAS reagents or Mucicarmine reagents. Goblet cell counts were taken from four villi per slide and the villi height was measured and averaged. There was no difference in the goblet cell density between the staining methods AB-PAS and Mucicarmine at 21 or 28 d post-hatching. These results show that both staining methods are viable for assessment of goblet cell density in turkey poults. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jam2016-0439 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046741687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046741687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20467416873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzLsOgjAYQOHGaCJeNh-giTPaCy0wE40P4E6qFiyWFvuXwbeXwQdwOsuXg9COkgMTLD92qmeEypRkvJyhhAomUk4ln6OEEEbToqBsiVYAHSGUiVIk6Fz5flDBgHfYN9i4qCEapyxu_c3qiO_aWgxRGWdci3sdn_4Bk8NxDC_9wYMfbYQNWjTKgt7-ukb78-laXdIh-Pc4LevOj2HaQs1IJvOMyiLn_6kv28FB1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046741687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of intestinal goblet cell staining methods in turkey poults</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Osho, S O ; Wang, T ; Horn, N L ; Adeola, O</creator><creatorcontrib>Osho, S O ; Wang, T ; Horn, N L ; Adeola, O</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the intestinal goblet cell density of turkey poults at two different ages using Alcian blue-Periodic acid shiff (AB-PAS) and Mucicarmine stains. Neutral mucins are stained with PAS while acidic mucins are stained with AB. Mucicarmine is specific to the mucins of epithelial origin and it is currently used for human samples, Mucicarmine may have advantages for use in animals as a result of the methodological simplicity of staining as compared with AB-PAS. Jejunum samples were taken from 80 turkey poults at 21 and 28 d, and were assigned to two treatments which consisted of AB-PAS and Mucicarmine stains in a completely randomized design. A mid-section of jejunum from each bird was taken and placed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 h, dehydrated with ethanol, cleared with Sub-X and placed in a paraffin, prepared on two slides, and then tissues were briefly cleared and hydrated. Each slide was stained with either AB-PAS reagents or Mucicarmine reagents. Goblet cell counts were taken from four villi per slide and the villi height was measured and averaged. There was no difference in the goblet cell density between the staining methods AB-PAS and Mucicarmine at 21 or 28 d post-hatching. These results show that both staining methods are viable for assessment of goblet cell density in turkey poults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jam2016-0439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cell density ; Cells ; Dehydration ; Density ; Ethanol ; Hatching ; Intestine ; Jejunum ; Mucin ; Mucins ; Paraffin ; Reagents ; Staining ; Studies ; Wildfowl</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.211-211</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osho, S O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, N L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adeola, O</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of intestinal goblet cell staining methods in turkey poults</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>This study compared the intestinal goblet cell density of turkey poults at two different ages using Alcian blue-Periodic acid shiff (AB-PAS) and Mucicarmine stains. Neutral mucins are stained with PAS while acidic mucins are stained with AB. Mucicarmine is specific to the mucins of epithelial origin and it is currently used for human samples, Mucicarmine may have advantages for use in animals as a result of the methodological simplicity of staining as compared with AB-PAS. Jejunum samples were taken from 80 turkey poults at 21 and 28 d, and were assigned to two treatments which consisted of AB-PAS and Mucicarmine stains in a completely randomized design. A mid-section of jejunum from each bird was taken and placed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 h, dehydrated with ethanol, cleared with Sub-X and placed in a paraffin, prepared on two slides, and then tissues were briefly cleared and hydrated. Each slide was stained with either AB-PAS reagents or Mucicarmine reagents. Goblet cell counts were taken from four villi per slide and the villi height was measured and averaged. There was no difference in the goblet cell density between the staining methods AB-PAS and Mucicarmine at 21 or 28 d post-hatching. These results show that both staining methods are viable for assessment of goblet cell density in turkey poults.</description><subject>Cell density</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Dehydration</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Jejunum</subject><subject>Mucin</subject><subject>Mucins</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Staining</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzLsOgjAYQOHGaCJeNh-giTPaCy0wE40P4E6qFiyWFvuXwbeXwQdwOsuXg9COkgMTLD92qmeEypRkvJyhhAomUk4ln6OEEEbToqBsiVYAHSGUiVIk6Fz5flDBgHfYN9i4qCEapyxu_c3qiO_aWgxRGWdci3sdn_4Bk8NxDC_9wYMfbYQNWjTKgt7-ukb78-laXdIh-Pc4LevOj2HaQs1IJvOMyiLn_6kv28FB1g</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Osho, S O</creator><creator>Wang, T</creator><creator>Horn, N L</creator><creator>Adeola, O</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Comparison of intestinal goblet cell staining methods in turkey poults</title><author>Osho, S O ; Wang, T ; Horn, N L ; Adeola, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467416873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cell density</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Dehydration</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Jejunum</topic><topic>Mucin</topic><topic>Mucins</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Staining</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osho, S O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, N L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adeola, O</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osho, S O</au><au>Wang, T</au><au>Horn, N L</au><au>Adeola, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of intestinal goblet cell staining methods in turkey poults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>211</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>211-211</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>This study compared the intestinal goblet cell density of turkey poults at two different ages using Alcian blue-Periodic acid shiff (AB-PAS) and Mucicarmine stains. Neutral mucins are stained with PAS while acidic mucins are stained with AB. Mucicarmine is specific to the mucins of epithelial origin and it is currently used for human samples, Mucicarmine may have advantages for use in animals as a result of the methodological simplicity of staining as compared with AB-PAS. Jejunum samples were taken from 80 turkey poults at 21 and 28 d, and were assigned to two treatments which consisted of AB-PAS and Mucicarmine stains in a completely randomized design. A mid-section of jejunum from each bird was taken and placed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 h, dehydrated with ethanol, cleared with Sub-X and placed in a paraffin, prepared on two slides, and then tissues were briefly cleared and hydrated. Each slide was stained with either AB-PAS reagents or Mucicarmine reagents. Goblet cell counts were taken from four villi per slide and the villi height was measured and averaged. There was no difference in the goblet cell density between the staining methods AB-PAS and Mucicarmine at 21 or 28 d post-hatching. These results show that both staining methods are viable for assessment of goblet cell density in turkey poults.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jam2016-0439</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.211-211 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2046741687 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Cell density Cells Dehydration Density Ethanol Hatching Intestine Jejunum Mucin Mucins Paraffin Reagents Staining Studies Wildfowl |
title | Comparison of intestinal goblet cell staining methods in turkey poults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A05%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20intestinal%20goblet%20cell%20staining%20methods%20in%20turkey%20poults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Osho,%20S%20O&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=211-211&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jam2016-0439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046741687%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046741687&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |