Effects of growing system and silage type on feedlot growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibility of beef steers

The effects of beef cattle growing systems (grazing vs. bunk) and silage type (corn vs. sorghum) on finishing phase growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibilities were evaluated. Steers (n = 128; BW = 394 ± 21 kg) were backgrounded by either grazing (forage sorghum AF7401,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2016-10, Vol.94, p.691-691
Hauptverfasser: Campanili, P R B, Sarturi, J O, Trojan, S J, Ballou, M A, Lemos, B J M, Ovinge, L A, Mayorquin, J B G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 691
container_issue
container_start_page 691
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 94
creator Campanili, P R B
Sarturi, J O
Trojan, S J
Ballou, M A
Lemos, B J M
Ovinge, L A
Mayorquin, J B G
description The effects of beef cattle growing systems (grazing vs. bunk) and silage type (corn vs. sorghum) on finishing phase growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibilities were evaluated. Steers (n = 128; BW = 394 ± 21 kg) were backgrounded by either grazing (forage sorghum AF7401, 104 d) or bunk fed (65% concentrate diet, 85 d). Following the backgrouding period, animals were blocked by BW, and randomly allocated to one of the two dietary treatments, corn (BH8895) or sorghum (AF7401) silage at 20%, DM basis, in a randomized complete block design. During the finishing phase, steers were fed once daily at approximately 0800 h. A 5-d spot fecal collection (twice daily) and acid insoluble ash were used to estimate total tract apparent digestibility. Slaughter was performed on 132, 146, or 174 d on feed. Data were analyzed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, using pen as the experimental unit. No interaction (growing system x silage type) was observed (P > 0.16), except for a tendency (P = 0.06) of bunk backgrounded steers to consume more sorghum than corn silage diet, compared with grazing backgrounded steers. Steers that grazed forage sorghum had greater ADG (25%), DMI (23%), and greater gain:feed (5%) during the finishing phase, compared with bunk backgrounded steers (P < 0.01). A greater HCW (7.8%), lower dressing percent (0.8% unit), and lower fat thickness (18%) were observed for steers grown under sorghum grazing conditions compared to backgrounded bunk fed steers (P < 0.01). Steers fed the corn silage diet had lower DMI (7%), greater ADG (5%), and consequently greater gain:feed (10%) compared with steers fed sorghum silage diet (P < 0.01). A 0.5% unit greater (P = 0.03) dressing percent and 0.1% unit greater (P = 0.04) KPH were observed for steers fed corn silage compared to those fed sorghum silage. Steers fed the corn silage diet also had greater (P < 0.01) DM (11%), CP (9%), EE (1.9%), and starch (8%) digestibilities compared to steers fed sorghum silage diet. Digestibility of fiber components were not affected (P = 0.12) by silage type or growing system. Sorghum grazing backgrounded steers positively affected finishing phase, but such strategies must be further be evaluated considering economical aspects and water use. Replacing corn silage with sorghum silage in beef finishing diets even at low roughage inclusion requires adjustments to balance dietary energy.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jam2016-1425
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046734531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046734531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20467345313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjU1OwzAUhC0EEuFnxwGexLYB24nTskZFHIB95TrPqaPEDn4vQjkDlyZUHIDVSDPfzAjxoOSTNnr73NtRS9WUqtbmQhTKaFNWqqkuRSGlVuVup_S1uCHqpVTavJhCfO-9R8cEyUOX01eIHdBCjCPY2AKFwXYIvEwIKYJHbIfEZ5JPMGH2KY82OtyAs9lZInAnm61jzIE4ONqcd-LMOWBkaEOHq38MQ-Dl9_SI6GH9w0x34srbgfD-T2_F49v-4_W9nHL6nNfaoU9zjmt00LJutlVtKlX9j_oB2UJbiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046734531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of growing system and silage type on feedlot growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibility of beef steers</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Campanili, P R B ; Sarturi, J O ; Trojan, S J ; Ballou, M A ; Lemos, B J M ; Ovinge, L A ; Mayorquin, J B G</creator><creatorcontrib>Campanili, P R B ; Sarturi, J O ; Trojan, S J ; Ballou, M A ; Lemos, B J M ; Ovinge, L A ; Mayorquin, J B G</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of beef cattle growing systems (grazing vs. bunk) and silage type (corn vs. sorghum) on finishing phase growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibilities were evaluated. Steers (n = 128; BW = 394 ± 21 kg) were backgrounded by either grazing (forage sorghum AF7401, 104 d) or bunk fed (65% concentrate diet, 85 d). Following the backgrouding period, animals were blocked by BW, and randomly allocated to one of the two dietary treatments, corn (BH8895) or sorghum (AF7401) silage at 20%, DM basis, in a randomized complete block design. During the finishing phase, steers were fed once daily at approximately 0800 h. A 5-d spot fecal collection (twice daily) and acid insoluble ash were used to estimate total tract apparent digestibility. Slaughter was performed on 132, 146, or 174 d on feed. Data were analyzed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, using pen as the experimental unit. No interaction (growing system x silage type) was observed (P &gt; 0.16), except for a tendency (P = 0.06) of bunk backgrounded steers to consume more sorghum than corn silage diet, compared with grazing backgrounded steers. Steers that grazed forage sorghum had greater ADG (25%), DMI (23%), and greater gain:feed (5%) during the finishing phase, compared with bunk backgrounded steers (P &lt; 0.01). A greater HCW (7.8%), lower dressing percent (0.8% unit), and lower fat thickness (18%) were observed for steers grown under sorghum grazing conditions compared to backgrounded bunk fed steers (P &lt; 0.01). Steers fed the corn silage diet had lower DMI (7%), greater ADG (5%), and consequently greater gain:feed (10%) compared with steers fed sorghum silage diet (P &lt; 0.01). A 0.5% unit greater (P = 0.03) dressing percent and 0.1% unit greater (P = 0.04) KPH were observed for steers fed corn silage compared to those fed sorghum silage. Steers fed the corn silage diet also had greater (P &lt; 0.01) DM (11%), CP (9%), EE (1.9%), and starch (8%) digestibilities compared to steers fed sorghum silage diet. Digestibility of fiber components were not affected (P = 0.12) by silage type or growing system. Sorghum grazing backgrounded steers positively affected finishing phase, but such strategies must be further be evaluated considering economical aspects and water use. Replacing corn silage with sorghum silage in beef finishing diets even at low roughage inclusion requires adjustments to balance dietary energy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jam2016-1425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal sciences ; Beef ; Cattle ; Corn ; Corn silage ; Data processing ; Diet ; Digestibility ; Finishing ; Grazing ; Nutrient deficiency ; Nutrients ; Roughage ; Silage ; Sorghum ; Starch ; Water use</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.691-691</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campanili, P R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarturi, J O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trojan, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballou, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, B J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovinge, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayorquin, J B G</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of growing system and silage type on feedlot growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibility of beef steers</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>The effects of beef cattle growing systems (grazing vs. bunk) and silage type (corn vs. sorghum) on finishing phase growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibilities were evaluated. Steers (n = 128; BW = 394 ± 21 kg) were backgrounded by either grazing (forage sorghum AF7401, 104 d) or bunk fed (65% concentrate diet, 85 d). Following the backgrouding period, animals were blocked by BW, and randomly allocated to one of the two dietary treatments, corn (BH8895) or sorghum (AF7401) silage at 20%, DM basis, in a randomized complete block design. During the finishing phase, steers were fed once daily at approximately 0800 h. A 5-d spot fecal collection (twice daily) and acid insoluble ash were used to estimate total tract apparent digestibility. Slaughter was performed on 132, 146, or 174 d on feed. Data were analyzed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, using pen as the experimental unit. No interaction (growing system x silage type) was observed (P &gt; 0.16), except for a tendency (P = 0.06) of bunk backgrounded steers to consume more sorghum than corn silage diet, compared with grazing backgrounded steers. Steers that grazed forage sorghum had greater ADG (25%), DMI (23%), and greater gain:feed (5%) during the finishing phase, compared with bunk backgrounded steers (P &lt; 0.01). A greater HCW (7.8%), lower dressing percent (0.8% unit), and lower fat thickness (18%) were observed for steers grown under sorghum grazing conditions compared to backgrounded bunk fed steers (P &lt; 0.01). Steers fed the corn silage diet had lower DMI (7%), greater ADG (5%), and consequently greater gain:feed (10%) compared with steers fed sorghum silage diet (P &lt; 0.01). A 0.5% unit greater (P = 0.03) dressing percent and 0.1% unit greater (P = 0.04) KPH were observed for steers fed corn silage compared to those fed sorghum silage. Steers fed the corn silage diet also had greater (P &lt; 0.01) DM (11%), CP (9%), EE (1.9%), and starch (8%) digestibilities compared to steers fed sorghum silage diet. Digestibility of fiber components were not affected (P = 0.12) by silage type or growing system. Sorghum grazing backgrounded steers positively affected finishing phase, but such strategies must be further be evaluated considering economical aspects and water use. Replacing corn silage with sorghum silage in beef finishing diets even at low roughage inclusion requires adjustments to balance dietary energy.</description><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Corn silage</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Finishing</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Roughage</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjU1OwzAUhC0EEuFnxwGexLYB24nTskZFHIB95TrPqaPEDn4vQjkDlyZUHIDVSDPfzAjxoOSTNnr73NtRS9WUqtbmQhTKaFNWqqkuRSGlVuVup_S1uCHqpVTavJhCfO-9R8cEyUOX01eIHdBCjCPY2AKFwXYIvEwIKYJHbIfEZ5JPMGH2KY82OtyAs9lZInAnm61jzIE4ONqcd-LMOWBkaEOHq38MQ-Dl9_SI6GH9w0x34srbgfD-T2_F49v-4_W9nHL6nNfaoU9zjmt00LJutlVtKlX9j_oB2UJbiQ</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Campanili, P R B</creator><creator>Sarturi, J O</creator><creator>Trojan, S J</creator><creator>Ballou, M A</creator><creator>Lemos, B J M</creator><creator>Ovinge, L A</creator><creator>Mayorquin, J B G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Effects of growing system and silage type on feedlot growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibility of beef steers</title><author>Campanili, P R B ; Sarturi, J O ; Trojan, S J ; Ballou, M A ; Lemos, B J M ; Ovinge, L A ; Mayorquin, J B G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467345313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Corn silage</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Finishing</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Roughage</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campanili, P R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarturi, J O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trojan, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballou, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, B J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovinge, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayorquin, J B G</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campanili, P R B</au><au>Sarturi, J O</au><au>Trojan, S J</au><au>Ballou, M A</au><au>Lemos, B J M</au><au>Ovinge, L A</au><au>Mayorquin, J B G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of growing system and silage type on feedlot growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibility of beef steers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>691</spage><epage>691</epage><pages>691-691</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The effects of beef cattle growing systems (grazing vs. bunk) and silage type (corn vs. sorghum) on finishing phase growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibilities were evaluated. Steers (n = 128; BW = 394 ± 21 kg) were backgrounded by either grazing (forage sorghum AF7401, 104 d) or bunk fed (65% concentrate diet, 85 d). Following the backgrouding period, animals were blocked by BW, and randomly allocated to one of the two dietary treatments, corn (BH8895) or sorghum (AF7401) silage at 20%, DM basis, in a randomized complete block design. During the finishing phase, steers were fed once daily at approximately 0800 h. A 5-d spot fecal collection (twice daily) and acid insoluble ash were used to estimate total tract apparent digestibility. Slaughter was performed on 132, 146, or 174 d on feed. Data were analyzed using the Glimmix procedure of SAS, using pen as the experimental unit. No interaction (growing system x silage type) was observed (P &gt; 0.16), except for a tendency (P = 0.06) of bunk backgrounded steers to consume more sorghum than corn silage diet, compared with grazing backgrounded steers. Steers that grazed forage sorghum had greater ADG (25%), DMI (23%), and greater gain:feed (5%) during the finishing phase, compared with bunk backgrounded steers (P &lt; 0.01). A greater HCW (7.8%), lower dressing percent (0.8% unit), and lower fat thickness (18%) were observed for steers grown under sorghum grazing conditions compared to backgrounded bunk fed steers (P &lt; 0.01). Steers fed the corn silage diet had lower DMI (7%), greater ADG (5%), and consequently greater gain:feed (10%) compared with steers fed sorghum silage diet (P &lt; 0.01). A 0.5% unit greater (P = 0.03) dressing percent and 0.1% unit greater (P = 0.04) KPH were observed for steers fed corn silage compared to those fed sorghum silage. Steers fed the corn silage diet also had greater (P &lt; 0.01) DM (11%), CP (9%), EE (1.9%), and starch (8%) digestibilities compared to steers fed sorghum silage diet. Digestibility of fiber components were not affected (P = 0.12) by silage type or growing system. Sorghum grazing backgrounded steers positively affected finishing phase, but such strategies must be further be evaluated considering economical aspects and water use. Replacing corn silage with sorghum silage in beef finishing diets even at low roughage inclusion requires adjustments to balance dietary energy.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jam2016-1425</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.691-691
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2046734531
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animal sciences
Beef
Cattle
Corn
Corn silage
Data processing
Diet
Digestibility
Finishing
Grazing
Nutrient deficiency
Nutrients
Roughage
Silage
Sorghum
Starch
Water use
title Effects of growing system and silage type on feedlot growth performance, carcass characteristics, and nutrient digestibility of beef steers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A07%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20growing%20system%20and%20silage%20type%20on%20feedlot%20growth%20performance,%20carcass%20characteristics,%20and%20nutrient%20digestibility%20of%20beef%20steers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Campanili,%20P%20R%20B&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=691&rft.pages=691-691&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jam2016-1425&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046734531%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046734531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true