Subclinical ketosis in the oocyte donors of Holstein × Gir cows
In Brazil, the prevalence of subclinical ketosis in F1 Holstein × Gir oocyte donors has never been assessed in published literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of subclinical ketosis (SK) in F1 Holstein x Gir embryo donors and the effects of this syndrome on reproductive an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2016-10, Vol.94, p.181-181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 181 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | de Souza, R C Souza, R C Reginaldo, B C M V da Silva, G C M V Pellegrino, C A G Melo, M I V Lustosa, J P Pereira, A B D |
description | In Brazil, the prevalence of subclinical ketosis in F1 Holstein × Gir oocyte donors has never been assessed in published literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of subclinical ketosis (SK) in F1 Holstein x Gir embryo donors and the effects of this syndrome on reproductive and economic efficiency. Data was collected from several farms in Minas Gerais, Brazil, from May to August 2015. Twenty-eight lactating F1 Holstein x Gir cows were used as oocyte donors. The dosage of ketone bodies was performed using the handset Ketovet (Ketovet Brazil, TaiDoc technology, Taiwan). Cows with blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) above 1.2 mmol/dL in the blood were considered as with SK. Donor cows were aspirated for follicules, which were then taken to the laboratory and classified into viable, non-viable and irregular, according to the methodology recommended by the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS, 2010). Economic analysis was performed considering the following: average price of one follicular aspiration ($75.00), in vitro production of one embryo ($17.75) and cost of each embryo transfer ($12.75). The experiment was analyzed as a complete randomized block design, and means were compared by the Tukey test with significance declared as P < 0.05. Results show that each cow produced an average of 20 oocytes, with only 6 oocytes converted into embryos with a final ratio of 3.5: 1 (oocytes:embryos). Two embryos were required to result in 1 pregnancy. Of the 28 donors evaluated, 17 were healthy and 11 had SK, resulting in a disease prevalence of 39.3%. Specifically, the prevalence of SK was higher in primiparous cows (71.4%) compared with multiparous cows (28.6%, P < 0.05). Cows with SK produced less total oocytes (11.5 vs. 26.1; P = 0.014); less non-viable oocytes (2.09 vs. 10.65; P = 0.004), less viable oocytes (6.45 vs. 15.41; P = 0.005) and fewer embryos (1.82 vs. 5.41; P = 0.038) when compared with healthy cows. The total cost of pregnancy in cows with SK was $142.41, whereas, for healthy cows, was $87.25. In summary, oocyte donors with SK were less efficient as embryo donors. High prevalence of SK observed in this study had a negative effect in the economic efficiency of embryo transfer, causing this technology to be 60% more costly when compared with the same technology used in healthy cows. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jam2016-0374 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046728366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046728366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20467283663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyjFuwjAUgGELUamBdusBnsQcsJ9jJ2xICMgOOwrBqE7TPMhzhDgJB-JiZOAATP_w_UL8KDlFg-msKv5RKhtLnSYDESmDJtbK6qGIpEQVZ5nCTzFirqRUaOYmEottdyhr3_iyqOHPBWLP4BsIvw6IyltwcKSGWgY6QU41B9fr4w4b30JJV_4SH6eiZvf96lhM1qvdMo_PLV06x2FfUdc2Pe1RJjbFTFur37ueAI8_Lw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046728366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subclinical ketosis in the oocyte donors of Holstein × Gir cows</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>de Souza, R C ; Souza, R C ; Reginaldo, B C M V ; da Silva, G C M V ; Pellegrino, C A G ; Melo, M I V ; Lustosa, J P ; Pereira, A B D</creator><creatorcontrib>de Souza, R C ; Souza, R C ; Reginaldo, B C M V ; da Silva, G C M V ; Pellegrino, C A G ; Melo, M I V ; Lustosa, J P ; Pereira, A B D</creatorcontrib><description>In Brazil, the prevalence of subclinical ketosis in F1 Holstein × Gir oocyte donors has never been assessed in published literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of subclinical ketosis (SK) in F1 Holstein x Gir embryo donors and the effects of this syndrome on reproductive and economic efficiency. Data was collected from several farms in Minas Gerais, Brazil, from May to August 2015. Twenty-eight lactating F1 Holstein x Gir cows were used as oocyte donors. The dosage of ketone bodies was performed using the handset Ketovet (Ketovet Brazil, TaiDoc technology, Taiwan). Cows with blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) above 1.2 mmol/dL in the blood were considered as with SK. Donor cows were aspirated for follicules, which were then taken to the laboratory and classified into viable, non-viable and irregular, according to the methodology recommended by the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS, 2010). Economic analysis was performed considering the following: average price of one follicular aspiration ($75.00), in vitro production of one embryo ($17.75) and cost of each embryo transfer ($12.75). The experiment was analyzed as a complete randomized block design, and means were compared by the Tukey test with significance declared as P < 0.05. Results show that each cow produced an average of 20 oocytes, with only 6 oocytes converted into embryos with a final ratio of 3.5: 1 (oocytes:embryos). Two embryos were required to result in 1 pregnancy. Of the 28 donors evaluated, 17 were healthy and 11 had SK, resulting in a disease prevalence of 39.3%. Specifically, the prevalence of SK was higher in primiparous cows (71.4%) compared with multiparous cows (28.6%, P < 0.05). Cows with SK produced less total oocytes (11.5 vs. 26.1; P = 0.014); less non-viable oocytes (2.09 vs. 10.65; P = 0.004), less viable oocytes (6.45 vs. 15.41; P = 0.005) and fewer embryos (1.82 vs. 5.41; P = 0.038) when compared with healthy cows. The total cost of pregnancy in cows with SK was $142.41, whereas, for healthy cows, was $87.25. In summary, oocyte donors with SK were less efficient as embryo donors. High prevalence of SK observed in this study had a negative effect in the economic efficiency of embryo transfer, causing this technology to be 60% more costly when compared with the same technology used in healthy cows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jam2016-0374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Animal reproduction ; Blood ; Cattle ; Cost analysis ; Economic analysis ; Embryo transfer ; Embryos ; Farms ; Ketones ; Ketosis ; Metabolism ; Oocytes ; Pregnancy ; Technology transfer</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.181-181</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Souza, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reginaldo, B C M V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, G C M V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrino, C A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, M I V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustosa, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, A B D</creatorcontrib><title>Subclinical ketosis in the oocyte donors of Holstein × Gir cows</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>In Brazil, the prevalence of subclinical ketosis in F1 Holstein × Gir oocyte donors has never been assessed in published literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of subclinical ketosis (SK) in F1 Holstein x Gir embryo donors and the effects of this syndrome on reproductive and economic efficiency. Data was collected from several farms in Minas Gerais, Brazil, from May to August 2015. Twenty-eight lactating F1 Holstein x Gir cows were used as oocyte donors. The dosage of ketone bodies was performed using the handset Ketovet (Ketovet Brazil, TaiDoc technology, Taiwan). Cows with blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) above 1.2 mmol/dL in the blood were considered as with SK. Donor cows were aspirated for follicules, which were then taken to the laboratory and classified into viable, non-viable and irregular, according to the methodology recommended by the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS, 2010). Economic analysis was performed considering the following: average price of one follicular aspiration ($75.00), in vitro production of one embryo ($17.75) and cost of each embryo transfer ($12.75). The experiment was analyzed as a complete randomized block design, and means were compared by the Tukey test with significance declared as P < 0.05. Results show that each cow produced an average of 20 oocytes, with only 6 oocytes converted into embryos with a final ratio of 3.5: 1 (oocytes:embryos). Two embryos were required to result in 1 pregnancy. Of the 28 donors evaluated, 17 were healthy and 11 had SK, resulting in a disease prevalence of 39.3%. Specifically, the prevalence of SK was higher in primiparous cows (71.4%) compared with multiparous cows (28.6%, P < 0.05). Cows with SK produced less total oocytes (11.5 vs. 26.1; P = 0.014); less non-viable oocytes (2.09 vs. 10.65; P = 0.004), less viable oocytes (6.45 vs. 15.41; P = 0.005) and fewer embryos (1.82 vs. 5.41; P = 0.038) when compared with healthy cows. The total cost of pregnancy in cows with SK was $142.41, whereas, for healthy cows, was $87.25. In summary, oocyte donors with SK were less efficient as embryo donors. High prevalence of SK observed in this study had a negative effect in the economic efficiency of embryo transfer, causing this technology to be 60% more costly when compared with the same technology used in healthy cows.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Embryo transfer</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Ketosis</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyjFuwjAUgGELUamBdusBnsQcsJ9jJ2xICMgOOwrBqE7TPMhzhDgJB-JiZOAATP_w_UL8KDlFg-msKv5RKhtLnSYDESmDJtbK6qGIpEQVZ5nCTzFirqRUaOYmEottdyhr3_iyqOHPBWLP4BsIvw6IyltwcKSGWgY6QU41B9fr4w4b30JJV_4SH6eiZvf96lhM1qvdMo_PLV06x2FfUdc2Pe1RJjbFTFur37ueAI8_Lw</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>de Souza, R C</creator><creator>Souza, R C</creator><creator>Reginaldo, B C M V</creator><creator>da Silva, G C M V</creator><creator>Pellegrino, C A G</creator><creator>Melo, M I V</creator><creator>Lustosa, J P</creator><creator>Pereira, A B D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Subclinical ketosis in the oocyte donors of Holstein × Gir cows</title><author>de Souza, R C ; Souza, R C ; Reginaldo, B C M V ; da Silva, G C M V ; Pellegrino, C A G ; Melo, M I V ; Lustosa, J P ; Pereira, A B D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467283663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Embryo transfer</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Ketosis</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Souza, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reginaldo, B C M V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, G C M V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrino, C A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, M I V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustosa, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, A B D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Souza, R C</au><au>Souza, R C</au><au>Reginaldo, B C M V</au><au>da Silva, G C M V</au><au>Pellegrino, C A G</au><au>Melo, M I V</au><au>Lustosa, J P</au><au>Pereira, A B D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subclinical ketosis in the oocyte donors of Holstein × Gir cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>181</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>181-181</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>In Brazil, the prevalence of subclinical ketosis in F1 Holstein × Gir oocyte donors has never been assessed in published literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of subclinical ketosis (SK) in F1 Holstein x Gir embryo donors and the effects of this syndrome on reproductive and economic efficiency. Data was collected from several farms in Minas Gerais, Brazil, from May to August 2015. Twenty-eight lactating F1 Holstein x Gir cows were used as oocyte donors. The dosage of ketone bodies was performed using the handset Ketovet (Ketovet Brazil, TaiDoc technology, Taiwan). Cows with blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) above 1.2 mmol/dL in the blood were considered as with SK. Donor cows were aspirated for follicules, which were then taken to the laboratory and classified into viable, non-viable and irregular, according to the methodology recommended by the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS, 2010). Economic analysis was performed considering the following: average price of one follicular aspiration ($75.00), in vitro production of one embryo ($17.75) and cost of each embryo transfer ($12.75). The experiment was analyzed as a complete randomized block design, and means were compared by the Tukey test with significance declared as P < 0.05. Results show that each cow produced an average of 20 oocytes, with only 6 oocytes converted into embryos with a final ratio of 3.5: 1 (oocytes:embryos). Two embryos were required to result in 1 pregnancy. Of the 28 donors evaluated, 17 were healthy and 11 had SK, resulting in a disease prevalence of 39.3%. Specifically, the prevalence of SK was higher in primiparous cows (71.4%) compared with multiparous cows (28.6%, P < 0.05). Cows with SK produced less total oocytes (11.5 vs. 26.1; P = 0.014); less non-viable oocytes (2.09 vs. 10.65; P = 0.004), less viable oocytes (6.45 vs. 15.41; P = 0.005) and fewer embryos (1.82 vs. 5.41; P = 0.038) when compared with healthy cows. The total cost of pregnancy in cows with SK was $142.41, whereas, for healthy cows, was $87.25. In summary, oocyte donors with SK were less efficient as embryo donors. High prevalence of SK observed in this study had a negative effect in the economic efficiency of embryo transfer, causing this technology to be 60% more costly when compared with the same technology used in healthy cows.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jam2016-0374</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.181-181 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2046728366 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Agricultural economics Animal reproduction Blood Cattle Cost analysis Economic analysis Embryo transfer Embryos Farms Ketones Ketosis Metabolism Oocytes Pregnancy Technology transfer |
title | Subclinical ketosis in the oocyte donors of Holstein × Gir cows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A48%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subclinical%20ketosis%20in%20the%20oocyte%20donors%20of%20Holstein%20%C3%97%20Gir%20cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=de%20Souza,%20R%20C&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=181-181&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jam2016-0374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046728366%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046728366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |