Fecal Egg Counts and Performance of Stocker Calves Treated with Various Anthelmintics

Treatment against gastrointestinal parasites have been reported to increase cattle growth; however, effects of long-acting eprinomectin (LAE) on stocker growth and performance has not been widely evaluated. Therefore, objectives of this study were to determine differences in fecal egg counts (FEC) a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2018-03, Vol.96, p.58-58
Hauptverfasser: Hooks, C A, Denney, N R, Hovey, M R, Papajeski, B M, Robertson, J C, Backes, E A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 58
container_issue
container_start_page 58
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 96
creator Hooks, C A
Denney, N R
Hovey, M R
Papajeski, B M
Robertson, J C
Backes, E A
description Treatment against gastrointestinal parasites have been reported to increase cattle growth; however, effects of long-acting eprinomectin (LAE) on stocker growth and performance has not been widely evaluated. Therefore, objectives of this study were to determine differences in fecal egg counts (FEC) and performance of stockers receiving dual oxfendazole/moxidectin treatment (Co-Trt) and LAE. Newly received Angus based crossbred steers (n=59; BW = 284.26 ± 5.79 kg) were stratified by FEC, BW, and BCS and randomly allocated to treatments: Control (CON; n=14), long-acting eprinomectin (LAE; n=15), oxfendazole and moxidectin on d 0 (COMBO; n=15), and oxfendazole d 0 plus moxidectin d 45 (O+M; n=15). Steers were commingled and allowed to graze bermudagrass paddocks using a management intensive grazing system (42,243.46 kg/ha). Fecal samples were collected and BW, BCS, and hair coat scores (HCS) determined on d 0, 15, 31, 63, and 92. Fly counts were collected on d 0, 16, 32, 44, 64, and 93. Statistical analysis was performed using the MIXED procedure of SAS and three orthogonal contrasts were used: 1) CON vs treated steers, 2) LAE vs Co-Trt, and 3) COMBO vs O+M. A treatment*day interaction (P < 0.01) was observed for FEC with COMBO having the lowest FEC on d 15 but the greatest FEC on d 63 compared with all other treatment and d combinations. Body weight on d 0, 15, 31, and 63 did not differ (P≤0.24); however, BW tended (P=0.09) to be greater for LAE steers compared with Co-Trt steers on d 93. Steer BCS did not differ (P≤0.22) across treatments on d 15, 31, and 63, but was greater (P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046698122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046698122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20466981223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjrsOgjAUQBujifj4h5s4k7RFCIyGQBxNRFfSlMtLaLUt-vsy-AFOZzhnOAvisZCHfsCiYEk8Sjnz45jxNdlY21PKeJiEHrnlKMUAWdNAqiflLAhVwQVNrc0olETQNVydlg80kIrhjRYKg8JhBZ_OtXAXptOThZNyLQ5jp1wn7Y6sajFY3P-4JYc8K9Kz_zT6NaF1Za8no2ZVcnqMomQe48F_1RdtVUGe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046698122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fecal Egg Counts and Performance of Stocker Calves Treated with Various Anthelmintics</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hooks, C A ; Denney, N R ; Hovey, M R ; Papajeski, B M ; Robertson, J C ; Backes, E A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C A ; Denney, N R ; Hovey, M R ; Papajeski, B M ; Robertson, J C ; Backes, E A</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment against gastrointestinal parasites have been reported to increase cattle growth; however, effects of long-acting eprinomectin (LAE) on stocker growth and performance has not been widely evaluated. Therefore, objectives of this study were to determine differences in fecal egg counts (FEC) and performance of stockers receiving dual oxfendazole/moxidectin treatment (Co-Trt) and LAE. Newly received Angus based crossbred steers (n=59; BW = 284.26 ± 5.79 kg) were stratified by FEC, BW, and BCS and randomly allocated to treatments: Control (CON; n=14), long-acting eprinomectin (LAE; n=15), oxfendazole and moxidectin on d 0 (COMBO; n=15), and oxfendazole d 0 plus moxidectin d 45 (O+M; n=15). Steers were commingled and allowed to graze bermudagrass paddocks using a management intensive grazing system (42,243.46 kg/ha). Fecal samples were collected and BW, BCS, and hair coat scores (HCS) determined on d 0, 15, 31, 63, and 92. Fly counts were collected on d 0, 16, 32, 44, 64, and 93. Statistical analysis was performed using the MIXED procedure of SAS and three orthogonal contrasts were used: 1) CON vs treated steers, 2) LAE vs Co-Trt, and 3) COMBO vs O+M. A treatment*day interaction (P &lt; 0.01) was observed for FEC with COMBO having the lowest FEC on d 15 but the greatest FEC on d 63 compared with all other treatment and d combinations. Body weight on d 0, 15, 31, and 63 did not differ (P≤0.24); however, BW tended (P=0.09) to be greater for LAE steers compared with Co-Trt steers on d 93. Steer BCS did not differ (P≤0.22) across treatments on d 15, 31, and 63, but was greater (P&lt;0.01) for O+M versus COMBO and tended (P=0.06) to be greater for LAE versus Co-Trt steers on d 93. Treated steers had greater (P&lt;0.01) ADG compared to CON from d 31 to 63 and ADG was greater (P=0.03) in LAE compared to Co-Trt steers from d 63 to 92 and overall. Steer ADG was greater (P≤0.05) for O+M compared with COMBO on d 0 to 15, 31 to 63 and overall. Hair coat scores were greater (P&lt;0.01) from Co-Trt steers compared with LAE. Also, COMBO steers had greater (P=0.05) HCS compared with O+M on d 92. No differences were found between treatments for fly counts (P=0.59). Data suggests anthelmintic use may improve performance of stocker steers and that delayed versus simultaneous Co-Trt administration may improve FEC, growth, and HCS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anthelmintic agents ; Body weight ; Calves ; Cattle ; Hair ; Medical treatment ; Oxfendazole ; Parasites ; Pasture management ; Performance enhancement ; Physical growth ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-03, Vol.96, p.58-58</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denney, N R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovey, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papajeski, B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backes, E A</creatorcontrib><title>Fecal Egg Counts and Performance of Stocker Calves Treated with Various Anthelmintics</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Treatment against gastrointestinal parasites have been reported to increase cattle growth; however, effects of long-acting eprinomectin (LAE) on stocker growth and performance has not been widely evaluated. Therefore, objectives of this study were to determine differences in fecal egg counts (FEC) and performance of stockers receiving dual oxfendazole/moxidectin treatment (Co-Trt) and LAE. Newly received Angus based crossbred steers (n=59; BW = 284.26 ± 5.79 kg) were stratified by FEC, BW, and BCS and randomly allocated to treatments: Control (CON; n=14), long-acting eprinomectin (LAE; n=15), oxfendazole and moxidectin on d 0 (COMBO; n=15), and oxfendazole d 0 plus moxidectin d 45 (O+M; n=15). Steers were commingled and allowed to graze bermudagrass paddocks using a management intensive grazing system (42,243.46 kg/ha). Fecal samples were collected and BW, BCS, and hair coat scores (HCS) determined on d 0, 15, 31, 63, and 92. Fly counts were collected on d 0, 16, 32, 44, 64, and 93. Statistical analysis was performed using the MIXED procedure of SAS and three orthogonal contrasts were used: 1) CON vs treated steers, 2) LAE vs Co-Trt, and 3) COMBO vs O+M. A treatment*day interaction (P &lt; 0.01) was observed for FEC with COMBO having the lowest FEC on d 15 but the greatest FEC on d 63 compared with all other treatment and d combinations. Body weight on d 0, 15, 31, and 63 did not differ (P≤0.24); however, BW tended (P=0.09) to be greater for LAE steers compared with Co-Trt steers on d 93. Steer BCS did not differ (P≤0.22) across treatments on d 15, 31, and 63, but was greater (P&lt;0.01) for O+M versus COMBO and tended (P=0.06) to be greater for LAE versus Co-Trt steers on d 93. Treated steers had greater (P&lt;0.01) ADG compared to CON from d 31 to 63 and ADG was greater (P=0.03) in LAE compared to Co-Trt steers from d 63 to 92 and overall. Steer ADG was greater (P≤0.05) for O+M compared with COMBO on d 0 to 15, 31 to 63 and overall. Hair coat scores were greater (P&lt;0.01) from Co-Trt steers compared with LAE. Also, COMBO steers had greater (P=0.05) HCS compared with O+M on d 92. No differences were found between treatments for fly counts (P=0.59). Data suggests anthelmintic use may improve performance of stocker steers and that delayed versus simultaneous Co-Trt administration may improve FEC, growth, and HCS.</description><subject>Anthelmintic agents</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Calves</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Hair</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Oxfendazole</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Pasture management</subject><subject>Performance enhancement</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjrsOgjAUQBujifj4h5s4k7RFCIyGQBxNRFfSlMtLaLUt-vsy-AFOZzhnOAvisZCHfsCiYEk8Sjnz45jxNdlY21PKeJiEHrnlKMUAWdNAqiflLAhVwQVNrc0olETQNVydlg80kIrhjRYKg8JhBZ_OtXAXptOThZNyLQ5jp1wn7Y6sajFY3P-4JYc8K9Kz_zT6NaF1Za8no2ZVcnqMomQe48F_1RdtVUGe</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Hooks, C A</creator><creator>Denney, N R</creator><creator>Hovey, M R</creator><creator>Papajeski, B M</creator><creator>Robertson, J C</creator><creator>Backes, E A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Fecal Egg Counts and Performance of Stocker Calves Treated with Various Anthelmintics</title><author>Hooks, C A ; Denney, N R ; Hovey, M R ; Papajeski, B M ; Robertson, J C ; Backes, E A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20466981223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anthelmintic agents</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Calves</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Hair</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Oxfendazole</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Pasture management</topic><topic>Performance enhancement</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hooks, C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denney, N R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovey, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papajeski, B M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backes, E A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hooks, C A</au><au>Denney, N R</au><au>Hovey, M R</au><au>Papajeski, B M</au><au>Robertson, J C</au><au>Backes, E A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fecal Egg Counts and Performance of Stocker Calves Treated with Various Anthelmintics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>58</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>58-58</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Treatment against gastrointestinal parasites have been reported to increase cattle growth; however, effects of long-acting eprinomectin (LAE) on stocker growth and performance has not been widely evaluated. Therefore, objectives of this study were to determine differences in fecal egg counts (FEC) and performance of stockers receiving dual oxfendazole/moxidectin treatment (Co-Trt) and LAE. Newly received Angus based crossbred steers (n=59; BW = 284.26 ± 5.79 kg) were stratified by FEC, BW, and BCS and randomly allocated to treatments: Control (CON; n=14), long-acting eprinomectin (LAE; n=15), oxfendazole and moxidectin on d 0 (COMBO; n=15), and oxfendazole d 0 plus moxidectin d 45 (O+M; n=15). Steers were commingled and allowed to graze bermudagrass paddocks using a management intensive grazing system (42,243.46 kg/ha). Fecal samples were collected and BW, BCS, and hair coat scores (HCS) determined on d 0, 15, 31, 63, and 92. Fly counts were collected on d 0, 16, 32, 44, 64, and 93. Statistical analysis was performed using the MIXED procedure of SAS and three orthogonal contrasts were used: 1) CON vs treated steers, 2) LAE vs Co-Trt, and 3) COMBO vs O+M. A treatment*day interaction (P &lt; 0.01) was observed for FEC with COMBO having the lowest FEC on d 15 but the greatest FEC on d 63 compared with all other treatment and d combinations. Body weight on d 0, 15, 31, and 63 did not differ (P≤0.24); however, BW tended (P=0.09) to be greater for LAE steers compared with Co-Trt steers on d 93. Steer BCS did not differ (P≤0.22) across treatments on d 15, 31, and 63, but was greater (P&lt;0.01) for O+M versus COMBO and tended (P=0.06) to be greater for LAE versus Co-Trt steers on d 93. Treated steers had greater (P&lt;0.01) ADG compared to CON from d 31 to 63 and ADG was greater (P=0.03) in LAE compared to Co-Trt steers from d 63 to 92 and overall. Steer ADG was greater (P≤0.05) for O+M compared with COMBO on d 0 to 15, 31 to 63 and overall. Hair coat scores were greater (P&lt;0.01) from Co-Trt steers compared with LAE. Also, COMBO steers had greater (P=0.05) HCS compared with O+M on d 92. No differences were found between treatments for fly counts (P=0.59). Data suggests anthelmintic use may improve performance of stocker steers and that delayed versus simultaneous Co-Trt administration may improve FEC, growth, and HCS.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2018-03, Vol.96, p.58-58
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2046698122
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Anthelmintic agents
Body weight
Calves
Cattle
Hair
Medical treatment
Oxfendazole
Parasites
Pasture management
Performance enhancement
Physical growth
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
title Fecal Egg Counts and Performance of Stocker Calves Treated with Various Anthelmintics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A45%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fecal%20Egg%20Counts%20and%20Performance%20of%20Stocker%20Calves%20Treated%20with%20Various%20Anthelmintics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Hooks,%20C%20A&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=58-58&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046698122%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046698122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true