“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources

Aims As ammonium (NH 4 + ) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.), the predominant supply of NH 4 + has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the 15 N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the 15 N recovery by sugarcane as affected by 15 N-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant and soil 2018-08, Vol.429 (1-2), p.253-269
Hauptverfasser: Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro, Mariano, Eduardo, Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 253
container_title Plant and soil
container_volume 429
creator Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro
Mariano, Eduardo
Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze
description Aims As ammonium (NH 4 + ) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.), the predominant supply of NH 4 + has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the 15 N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the 15 N recovery by sugarcane as affected by 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − addition. Methods Under field conditions, 15 N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as 15 NH 4 NO 3 ( 15 N-NH 4 + ) and NH 4 15 NO 3 ( 15 N-NO 3 − )] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha −1 . Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received 15 N-NH 4 + or 15 N-NO 3 − (as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate 15 N recovery. Results Under field conditions, the 15 N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Under controlled conditions, however, 15 N-NH 4 + resulted in higher 15 N recovery than 15 N-NO 3 − until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as 15 N-NH 4 + became depleted in the nutrient solution, 15 N-NO 3 − was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest 15 N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Conclusions Although uptake of NH 4 + is faster than NO 3 − , the so-called “preference” for NH 4 + by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher 15 N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2045820631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2045820631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfGcWI7S1TxJ1XAAiR2luNM2pQmKXaC1K56ELhcT4KrILFiNRrpvTfzPkLOGVwyAHnlGWOQRMBUxIWMo80BGbFU8igFLg7JCIDHEcjs7ZiceL-A_c7EiMx3269nhyU6bLrKLHfbb2rqum2qvqb9qjPvSPM19f3MOGsapEWLnjZtR6vGOjQeaTdHytJH6tC2n-jWtC1pyOuqZbVBR33bO4v-lByVZunx7HeOyevtzcvkPpo-3T1MrqeRjRPRRYLnWCSxSSQymeYqK7CMSyPTRIKEJEPJQCooLaiUSxBSWSVUnksuGJRFxsfkYshdufajR9_pRXigCSd1DEmqYhCcBRUbVNa13of-euWq2ri1ZqD3QPUAVAegeg9Ub4InHjw-aJsZur_k_00_f0F7Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2045820631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro ; Mariano, Eduardo ; Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creator><creatorcontrib>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro ; Mariano, Eduardo ; Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creatorcontrib><description>Aims As ammonium (NH 4 + ) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.), the predominant supply of NH 4 + has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the 15 N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the 15 N recovery by sugarcane as affected by 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − addition. Methods Under field conditions, 15 N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as 15 NH 4 NO 3 ( 15 N-NH 4 + ) and NH 4 15 NO 3 ( 15 N-NO 3 − )] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha −1 . Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received 15 N-NH 4 + or 15 N-NO 3 − (as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate 15 N recovery. Results Under field conditions, the 15 N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Under controlled conditions, however, 15 N-NH 4 + resulted in higher 15 N recovery than 15 N-NO 3 − until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as 15 N-NH 4 + became depleted in the nutrient solution, 15 N-NO 3 − was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest 15 N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Conclusions Although uptake of NH 4 + is faster than NO 3 − , the so-called “preference” for NH 4 + by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher 15 N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Ammonium ; Ammonium nitrate ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Controlled conditions ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Ecology ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Hydroponics ; Life Sciences ; Nitrates ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Recovery ; Regular Article ; Saccharum ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Sugarcane ; Urea ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2018-08, Vol.429 (1-2), p.253-269</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Plant and Soil is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creatorcontrib><title>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Aims As ammonium (NH 4 + ) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.), the predominant supply of NH 4 + has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the 15 N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the 15 N recovery by sugarcane as affected by 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − addition. Methods Under field conditions, 15 N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as 15 NH 4 NO 3 ( 15 N-NH 4 + ) and NH 4 15 NO 3 ( 15 N-NO 3 − )] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha −1 . Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received 15 N-NH 4 + or 15 N-NO 3 − (as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate 15 N recovery. Results Under field conditions, the 15 N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Under controlled conditions, however, 15 N-NH 4 + resulted in higher 15 N recovery than 15 N-NO 3 − until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as 15 N-NH 4 + became depleted in the nutrient solution, 15 N-NO 3 − was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest 15 N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Conclusions Although uptake of NH 4 + is faster than NO 3 − , the so-called “preference” for NH 4 + by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher 15 N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium nitrate</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Controlled conditions</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Hydroponics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Saccharum</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfGcWI7S1TxJ1XAAiR2luNM2pQmKXaC1K56ELhcT4KrILFiNRrpvTfzPkLOGVwyAHnlGWOQRMBUxIWMo80BGbFU8igFLg7JCIDHEcjs7ZiceL-A_c7EiMx3269nhyU6bLrKLHfbb2rqum2qvqb9qjPvSPM19f3MOGsapEWLnjZtR6vGOjQeaTdHytJH6tC2n-jWtC1pyOuqZbVBR33bO4v-lByVZunx7HeOyevtzcvkPpo-3T1MrqeRjRPRRYLnWCSxSSQymeYqK7CMSyPTRIKEJEPJQCooLaiUSxBSWSVUnksuGJRFxsfkYshdufajR9_pRXigCSd1DEmqYhCcBRUbVNa13of-euWq2ri1ZqD3QPUAVAegeg9Ub4InHjw-aJsZur_k_00_f0F7Jw</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</creator><creator>Mariano, Eduardo</creator><creator>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</title><author>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro ; Mariano, Eduardo ; Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium nitrate</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Controlled conditions</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Hydroponics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Saccharum</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</au><au>Mariano, Eduardo</au><au>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>429</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>253-269</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Aims As ammonium (NH 4 + ) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.), the predominant supply of NH 4 + has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the 15 N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the 15 N recovery by sugarcane as affected by 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − addition. Methods Under field conditions, 15 N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as 15 NH 4 NO 3 ( 15 N-NH 4 + ) and NH 4 15 NO 3 ( 15 N-NO 3 − )] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha −1 . Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received 15 N-NH 4 + or 15 N-NO 3 − (as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate 15 N recovery. Results Under field conditions, the 15 N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between 15 N-NH 4 + and 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Under controlled conditions, however, 15 N-NH 4 + resulted in higher 15 N recovery than 15 N-NO 3 − until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as 15 N-NH 4 + became depleted in the nutrient solution, 15 N-NO 3 − was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest 15 N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under 15 N-NO 3 − supply. Conclusions Although uptake of NH 4 + is faster than NO 3 − , the so-called “preference” for NH 4 + by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher 15 N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-079X
ispartof Plant and soil, 2018-08, Vol.429 (1-2), p.253-269
issn 0032-079X
1573-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2045820631
source SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Ammonia
Ammonium
Ammonium nitrate
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Controlled conditions
Crop yield
Crops
Ecology
Fertilization
Fertilizers
Hydroponics
Life Sciences
Nitrates
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Recovery
Regular Article
Saccharum
Soil Science & Conservation
Sugarcane
Urea
Volatilization
title “Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A11%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CPreferential%E2%80%9D%20ammonium%20uptake%20by%20sugarcane%20does%20not%20increase%20the%2015N%20recovery%20of%20fertilizer%20sources&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Boschiero,%20Beatriz%20Nastaro&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=429&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=253-269&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2045820631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2045820631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true