“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources
Aims As ammonium (NH 4 + ) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.), the predominant supply of NH 4 + has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the 15 N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the 15 N recovery by sugarcane as affected by 15 N-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2018-08, Vol.429 (1-2), p.253-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 269 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 253 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 429 |
creator | Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro Mariano, Eduardo Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze |
description | Aims
As ammonium (NH
4
+
) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane (
Saccharum
spp.), the predominant supply of NH
4
+
has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the
15
N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the
15
N recovery by sugarcane as affected by
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
addition.
Methods
Under field conditions,
15
N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as
15
NH
4
NO
3
(
15
N-NH
4
+
) and NH
4
15
NO
3
(
15
N-NO
3
−
)] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha
−1
. Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received
15
N-NH
4
+
or
15
N-NO
3
−
(as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate
15
N recovery.
Results
Under field conditions, the
15
N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
supply. Under controlled conditions, however,
15
N-NH
4
+
resulted in higher
15
N recovery than
15
N-NO
3
−
until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as
15
N-NH
4
+
became depleted in the nutrient solution,
15
N-NO
3
−
was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest
15
N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under
15
N-NO
3
−
supply.
Conclusions
Although uptake of NH
4
+
is faster than NO
3
−
, the so-called “preference” for NH
4
+
by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher
15
N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2045820631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2045820631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfGcWI7S1TxJ1XAAiR2luNM2pQmKXaC1K56ELhcT4KrILFiNRrpvTfzPkLOGVwyAHnlGWOQRMBUxIWMo80BGbFU8igFLg7JCIDHEcjs7ZiceL-A_c7EiMx3269nhyU6bLrKLHfbb2rqum2qvqb9qjPvSPM19f3MOGsapEWLnjZtR6vGOjQeaTdHytJH6tC2n-jWtC1pyOuqZbVBR33bO4v-lByVZunx7HeOyevtzcvkPpo-3T1MrqeRjRPRRYLnWCSxSSQymeYqK7CMSyPTRIKEJEPJQCooLaiUSxBSWSVUnksuGJRFxsfkYshdufajR9_pRXigCSd1DEmqYhCcBRUbVNa13of-euWq2ri1ZqD3QPUAVAegeg9Ub4InHjw-aJsZur_k_00_f0F7Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2045820631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro ; Mariano, Eduardo ; Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creator><creatorcontrib>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro ; Mariano, Eduardo ; Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
As ammonium (NH
4
+
) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane (
Saccharum
spp.), the predominant supply of NH
4
+
has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the
15
N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the
15
N recovery by sugarcane as affected by
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
addition.
Methods
Under field conditions,
15
N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as
15
NH
4
NO
3
(
15
N-NH
4
+
) and NH
4
15
NO
3
(
15
N-NO
3
−
)] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha
−1
. Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received
15
N-NH
4
+
or
15
N-NO
3
−
(as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate
15
N recovery.
Results
Under field conditions, the
15
N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
supply. Under controlled conditions, however,
15
N-NH
4
+
resulted in higher
15
N recovery than
15
N-NO
3
−
until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as
15
N-NH
4
+
became depleted in the nutrient solution,
15
N-NO
3
−
was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest
15
N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under
15
N-NO
3
−
supply.
Conclusions
Although uptake of NH
4
+
is faster than NO
3
−
, the so-called “preference” for NH
4
+
by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher
15
N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Ammonium ; Ammonium nitrate ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Controlled conditions ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Ecology ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Hydroponics ; Life Sciences ; Nitrates ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Recovery ; Regular Article ; Saccharum ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Sugarcane ; Urea ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2018-08, Vol.429 (1-2), p.253-269</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Plant and Soil is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creatorcontrib><title>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Aims
As ammonium (NH
4
+
) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane (
Saccharum
spp.), the predominant supply of NH
4
+
has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the
15
N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the
15
N recovery by sugarcane as affected by
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
addition.
Methods
Under field conditions,
15
N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as
15
NH
4
NO
3
(
15
N-NH
4
+
) and NH
4
15
NO
3
(
15
N-NO
3
−
)] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha
−1
. Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received
15
N-NH
4
+
or
15
N-NO
3
−
(as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate
15
N recovery.
Results
Under field conditions, the
15
N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
supply. Under controlled conditions, however,
15
N-NH
4
+
resulted in higher
15
N recovery than
15
N-NO
3
−
until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as
15
N-NH
4
+
became depleted in the nutrient solution,
15
N-NO
3
−
was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest
15
N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under
15
N-NO
3
−
supply.
Conclusions
Although uptake of NH
4
+
is faster than NO
3
−
, the so-called “preference” for NH
4
+
by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher
15
N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium nitrate</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Controlled conditions</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Hydroponics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Saccharum</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfGcWI7S1TxJ1XAAiR2luNM2pQmKXaC1K56ELhcT4KrILFiNRrpvTfzPkLOGVwyAHnlGWOQRMBUxIWMo80BGbFU8igFLg7JCIDHEcjs7ZiceL-A_c7EiMx3269nhyU6bLrKLHfbb2rqum2qvqb9qjPvSPM19f3MOGsapEWLnjZtR6vGOjQeaTdHytJH6tC2n-jWtC1pyOuqZbVBR33bO4v-lByVZunx7HeOyevtzcvkPpo-3T1MrqeRjRPRRYLnWCSxSSQymeYqK7CMSyPTRIKEJEPJQCooLaiUSxBSWSVUnksuGJRFxsfkYshdufajR9_pRXigCSd1DEmqYhCcBRUbVNa13of-euWq2ri1ZqD3QPUAVAegeg9Ub4InHjw-aJsZur_k_00_f0F7Jw</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</creator><creator>Mariano, Eduardo</creator><creator>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</title><author>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro ; Mariano, Eduardo ; Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-63bed42a47e175b89def2fa754707049e710780fc085370678c868bb73610fd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium nitrate</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Controlled conditions</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Hydroponics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Saccharum</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariano, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boschiero, Beatriz Nastaro</au><au>Mariano, Eduardo</au><au>Trivelin, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>429</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>253-269</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Aims
As ammonium (NH
4
+
) has been reported as the “preferred” mineral N source for sugarcane (
Saccharum
spp.), the predominant supply of NH
4
+
has been hypothesized as a means of increasing the
15
N recovery and crop yield. We aimed to evaluate the
15
N recovery by sugarcane as affected by
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
addition.
Methods
Under field conditions,
15
N-labeled ammonium nitrate [labeling as
15
NH
4
NO
3
(
15
N-NH
4
+
) and NH
4
15
NO
3
(
15
N-NO
3
−
)] and urea were surface-applied at a rate of 100 kg N ha
−1
. Under controlled conditions, sugarcane was grown in hydroponic medium (containing unlabeled N) until the maximum N demand period. Subsequently, plants received
15
N-NH
4
+
or
15
N-NO
3
−
(as ammonium nitrate). Plants were then sampled at 1, 3, 7, and 15 d after fertilization (DAF) to estimate
15
N recovery.
Results
Under field conditions, the
15
N recovery for urea was lower than that for ammonium nitrate, partly explained by ammonia volatilization, but there was no difference in N use efficiency between the two fertilizer N sources, as well as between
15
N-NH
4
+
and
15
N-NO
3
−
supply. Under controlled conditions, however,
15
N-NH
4
+
resulted in higher
15
N recovery than
15
N-NO
3
−
until 7 DAF. Nevertheless, as
15
N-NH
4
+
became depleted in the nutrient solution,
15
N-NO
3
−
was taken up more intensely by the crop. At 15 DAF, highest
15
N recovery was detected in the roots and whole plant under
15
N-NO
3
−
supply.
Conclusions
Although uptake of NH
4
+
is faster than NO
3
−
, the so-called “preference” for NH
4
+
by the crop did not necessarily translate into higher
15
N recovery. Therefore, we suggest that the term “preference” should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 2018-08, Vol.429 (1-2), p.253-269 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2045820631 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Ammonia Ammonium Ammonium nitrate Biomedical and Life Sciences Controlled conditions Crop yield Crops Ecology Fertilization Fertilizers Hydroponics Life Sciences Nitrates Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Recovery Regular Article Saccharum Soil Science & Conservation Sugarcane Urea Volatilization |
title | “Preferential” ammonium uptake by sugarcane does not increase the 15N recovery of fertilizer sources |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A11%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CPreferential%E2%80%9D%20ammonium%20uptake%20by%20sugarcane%20does%20not%20increase%20the%2015N%20recovery%20of%20fertilizer%20sources&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Boschiero,%20Beatriz%20Nastaro&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=429&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=253-269&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-018-3672-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2045820631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2045820631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |