Testing the moss layer transfer technique on mineral well pads constructed in peatlands
Peatlands are abundant in the boreal region of Canada but little is known about their restoration on oil sands well pads. The goal of this study is to compare the reintroduction of different peatland plant communities and substrate amendments/decompaction in order to rehabilitate peatland vegetation...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Wetlands ecology and management 2018-08, Vol.26 (4), p.475-487 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 487 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 475 |
| container_title | Wetlands ecology and management |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Gauthier, Marie-Eve Rochefort, Line Nadeau, Leonie Hugron, Sandrine Xu, Bin |
| description | Peatlands are abundant in the boreal region of Canada but little is known about their restoration on oil sands well pads. The goal of this study is to compare the reintroduction of different peatland plant communities and substrate amendments/decompaction in order to rehabilitate peatland vegetation on former in situ well pads constructed in wetlands. One field experiment tested which peatland plant communities (Shrubby Rich Fen, Treed Rich Fen) would best colonize different substrates (sawdust, clay loam, mix sawdust-clay, peat, surface roughness). We found that the moss layer transfer technique (MLTT) facilitated the establishment of peatland communities on residual mineral soil used to construct the pad, when shaved back to an average water level of the surrounding wetland. The choice of peatland plant community is key to the introduction of bryophytes. Peat amendment facilitated the establishment of plants, whereas soil decompaction had no effect. The MLTT is a promising approach to restore fen plants on well pads. We recommend a scale-up experiment for a whole well site to test the validity of MLTT along different pad removal techniques. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11273-017-9532-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2045818825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2045818825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5972f125d4b799b99d26d56da45f2d4045f8e7edcf6340bd9a6cd5240dc9acad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdTTPmclSii8ouKm4DGlyp50yzYxJivTfmzKCK1fnLs537r0HoVtG7xml9UNijNeCUFYTrQQn8gzNmKo50Y2Q52hGNRdENhW7RFcp7SgtlGYz9LmClLuwwXkLeD-khHt7hIhztCG1pwHcNnRfB8BDwPsuQLQ9_oa-x6P1CbshpBwPLoPHXcAj2Nzb4NM1umhtn-DmV-fo4_lptXgly_eXt8XjkjjBqkyUrnnLuPJyXWu91trzyqvKW6la7iUt0kAN3rWVkHTtta2cV1xS77R11os5uptyxziUI1M2u-EQQ1lpeKEb1jRcFRebXC6WFyO0Zozd3sajYdSc-jNTf6b0Z079GVkYPjGpeMMG4l_y_9APeOZ0EA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2045818825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the moss layer transfer technique on mineral well pads constructed in peatlands</title><source>Springer Online Journals【Remote access available】</source><creator>Gauthier, Marie-Eve ; Rochefort, Line ; Nadeau, Leonie ; Hugron, Sandrine ; Xu, Bin</creator><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Marie-Eve ; Rochefort, Line ; Nadeau, Leonie ; Hugron, Sandrine ; Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><description>Peatlands are abundant in the boreal region of Canada but little is known about their restoration on oil sands well pads. The goal of this study is to compare the reintroduction of different peatland plant communities and substrate amendments/decompaction in order to rehabilitate peatland vegetation on former in situ well pads constructed in wetlands. One field experiment tested which peatland plant communities (Shrubby Rich Fen, Treed Rich Fen) would best colonize different substrates (sawdust, clay loam, mix sawdust-clay, peat, surface roughness). We found that the moss layer transfer technique (MLTT) facilitated the establishment of peatland communities on residual mineral soil used to construct the pad, when shaved back to an average water level of the surrounding wetland. The choice of peatland plant community is key to the introduction of bryophytes. Peat amendment facilitated the establishment of plants, whereas soil decompaction had no effect. The MLTT is a promising approach to restore fen plants on well pads. We recommend a scale-up experiment for a whole well site to test the validity of MLTT along different pad removal techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11273-017-9532-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Artificial wetlands ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bryophytes ; Clay ; Clay loam ; Clay minerals ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Fens ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Mosses ; Oil sands ; Original Paper ; Peat ; Peatlands ; Plant communities ; Reintroduction ; Removal ; Restoration ; Sawdust ; Soil ; Substrates ; Surface roughness ; Water levels ; Water Quality/Water Pollution ; Well construction ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands ecology and management, 2018-08, Vol.26 (4), p.475-487</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017. corrected publication 2018</rights><rights>Wetlands Ecology and Management is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5972f125d4b799b99d26d56da45f2d4045f8e7edcf6340bd9a6cd5240dc9acad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5972f125d4b799b99d26d56da45f2d4045f8e7edcf6340bd9a6cd5240dc9acad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8450-0376</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11273-017-9532-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11273-017-9532-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Marie-Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochefort, Line</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Leonie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugron, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the moss layer transfer technique on mineral well pads constructed in peatlands</title><title>Wetlands ecology and management</title><addtitle>Wetlands Ecol Manage</addtitle><description>Peatlands are abundant in the boreal region of Canada but little is known about their restoration on oil sands well pads. The goal of this study is to compare the reintroduction of different peatland plant communities and substrate amendments/decompaction in order to rehabilitate peatland vegetation on former in situ well pads constructed in wetlands. One field experiment tested which peatland plant communities (Shrubby Rich Fen, Treed Rich Fen) would best colonize different substrates (sawdust, clay loam, mix sawdust-clay, peat, surface roughness). We found that the moss layer transfer technique (MLTT) facilitated the establishment of peatland communities on residual mineral soil used to construct the pad, when shaved back to an average water level of the surrounding wetland. The choice of peatland plant community is key to the introduction of bryophytes. Peat amendment facilitated the establishment of plants, whereas soil decompaction had no effect. The MLTT is a promising approach to restore fen plants on well pads. We recommend a scale-up experiment for a whole well site to test the validity of MLTT along different pad removal techniques.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Artificial wetlands</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bryophytes</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay loam</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Fens</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Oil sands</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Reintroduction</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Sawdust</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><subject>Well construction</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0923-4861</issn><issn>1572-9834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AdTTPmclSii8ouKm4DGlyp50yzYxJivTfmzKCK1fnLs537r0HoVtG7xml9UNijNeCUFYTrQQn8gzNmKo50Y2Q52hGNRdENhW7RFcp7SgtlGYz9LmClLuwwXkLeD-khHt7hIhztCG1pwHcNnRfB8BDwPsuQLQ9_oa-x6P1CbshpBwPLoPHXcAj2Nzb4NM1umhtn-DmV-fo4_lptXgly_eXt8XjkjjBqkyUrnnLuPJyXWu91trzyqvKW6la7iUt0kAN3rWVkHTtta2cV1xS77R11os5uptyxziUI1M2u-EQQ1lpeKEb1jRcFRebXC6WFyO0Zozd3sajYdSc-jNTf6b0Z079GVkYPjGpeMMG4l_y_9APeOZ0EA</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Gauthier, Marie-Eve</creator><creator>Rochefort, Line</creator><creator>Nadeau, Leonie</creator><creator>Hugron, Sandrine</creator><creator>Xu, Bin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-0376</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Testing the moss layer transfer technique on mineral well pads constructed in peatlands</title><author>Gauthier, Marie-Eve ; Rochefort, Line ; Nadeau, Leonie ; Hugron, Sandrine ; Xu, Bin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5972f125d4b799b99d26d56da45f2d4045f8e7edcf6340bd9a6cd5240dc9acad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Artificial wetlands</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bryophytes</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay loam</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Fens</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Oil sands</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Reintroduction</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Sawdust</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><topic>Well construction</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Marie-Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochefort, Line</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Leonie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugron, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gauthier, Marie-Eve</au><au>Rochefort, Line</au><au>Nadeau, Leonie</au><au>Hugron, Sandrine</au><au>Xu, Bin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the moss layer transfer technique on mineral well pads constructed in peatlands</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle><stitle>Wetlands Ecol Manage</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>475-487</pages><issn>0923-4861</issn><eissn>1572-9834</eissn><abstract>Peatlands are abundant in the boreal region of Canada but little is known about their restoration on oil sands well pads. The goal of this study is to compare the reintroduction of different peatland plant communities and substrate amendments/decompaction in order to rehabilitate peatland vegetation on former in situ well pads constructed in wetlands. One field experiment tested which peatland plant communities (Shrubby Rich Fen, Treed Rich Fen) would best colonize different substrates (sawdust, clay loam, mix sawdust-clay, peat, surface roughness). We found that the moss layer transfer technique (MLTT) facilitated the establishment of peatland communities on residual mineral soil used to construct the pad, when shaved back to an average water level of the surrounding wetland. The choice of peatland plant community is key to the introduction of bryophytes. Peat amendment facilitated the establishment of plants, whereas soil decompaction had no effect. The MLTT is a promising approach to restore fen plants on well pads. We recommend a scale-up experiment for a whole well site to test the validity of MLTT along different pad removal techniques.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11273-017-9532-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-0376</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0923-4861 |
| ispartof | Wetlands ecology and management, 2018-08, Vol.26 (4), p.475-487 |
| issn | 0923-4861 1572-9834 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2045818825 |
| source | Springer Online Journals【Remote access available】 |
| subjects | Aquatic plants Artificial wetlands Biomedical and Life Sciences Bryophytes Clay Clay loam Clay minerals Conservation Biology/Ecology Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Fens Freshwater & Marine Ecology Hydrology/Water Resources Life Sciences Marine & Freshwater Sciences Mosses Oil sands Original Paper Peat Peatlands Plant communities Reintroduction Removal Restoration Sawdust Soil Substrates Surface roughness Water levels Water Quality/Water Pollution Well construction Wetlands |
| title | Testing the moss layer transfer technique on mineral well pads constructed in peatlands |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20moss%20layer%20transfer%20technique%20on%20mineral%20well%20pads%20constructed%20in%20peatlands&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Gauthier,%20Marie-Eve&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=475-487&rft.issn=0923-4861&rft.eissn=1572-9834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11273-017-9532-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2045818825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2045818825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |