Developers pay developer charges

Conversion of land to more intensive uses often comes with charges known as impact fees, or developer charges (DCs). Town planning practitioners typically view these charges as economically benign but there remains an academic debate about whether they can increase prices and depress sales volumes....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cities 2018-04, Vol.74, p.1-6
1. Verfasser: Murray, Cameron K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Cities
container_volume 74
creator Murray, Cameron K.
description Conversion of land to more intensive uses often comes with charges known as impact fees, or developer charges (DCs). Town planning practitioners typically view these charges as economically benign but there remains an academic debate about whether they can increase prices and depress sales volumes. Existing empirical studies of the price and quantity effects of DCs are limited by a lack of naturally occurring variation in the DC size. It is therefore difficult to isolate behavioural effects from the mechanical relationship of DC and price arising from larger dwellings being levied with higher DCs. To overcome this identification problem we use data that incorporates a surprise policy change in Queensland, Australia, that introduced a cap on DCs. Councils responded by changing DCs, both upwards and downwards, for different dwelling types in different local council areas. Our model estimation shows that there are no measurable effects on price or quantity of new dwellings from DCs, supporting the planning practitioner's view of the charge being economically benign and fully incident on the landowner, even when the landowner is a property developer. When we instead include the baseline DC for each sale prior to the policy change, the problem of capturing only the mechanical effect arises once again. Model results using this baseline DC are similar to previous studies that claimed large behavioural price effects from DCs. The results are consistent with a real options view of the developer's economic situation, a view that also predicts that increases in DCs can increase the quantity of new dwelling sales, a pattern also found in the Queensland data. •Developer charges (impact fees) correlate mechanically with new home prices.•Natural experimental conditions are used to isolate the true price effect of developer charges.•Using this identification strategy there are zero price effects, and positive quantity effects.•Real options theory is the appropriate framework to understand these effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2044640162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264275117301051</els_id><sourcerecordid>2044640162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bdaeb985d553c41997bf21506127e91376803ca41861770119f3ba0fdff097153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouK7-Aw8Fz60zTZo0F0FWV4UFL3oObTrRlHVbk-7C_ntbqldPwwzvvZn5GLtGyBBQ3raZ9YOnmOWAahxlgPqELbBUPJVQilO2gFyKNFcFnrOLGFsAEFLAgiUPdKBt11OISV8dk-avTexnFT4oXrIzV20jXf3WJXtfP76tntPN69PL6n6TWs7FkNZNRbUui6YouBWotapdjgVIzBVp5EqWwG0lsJSoFCBqx-sKXOMcaIUFX7KbObcP3fee4mDabh9240qTg5iORZmPKjGrbOhiDORMH_xXFY4GwUwsTGtmFmZiMU1HFqPtbrbR-MHBUzDRetpZanwgO5im8_8H_ACm7Wbq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2044640162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developers pay developer charges</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Murray, Cameron K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Cameron K.</creatorcontrib><description>Conversion of land to more intensive uses often comes with charges known as impact fees, or developer charges (DCs). Town planning practitioners typically view these charges as economically benign but there remains an academic debate about whether they can increase prices and depress sales volumes. Existing empirical studies of the price and quantity effects of DCs are limited by a lack of naturally occurring variation in the DC size. It is therefore difficult to isolate behavioural effects from the mechanical relationship of DC and price arising from larger dwellings being levied with higher DCs. To overcome this identification problem we use data that incorporates a surprise policy change in Queensland, Australia, that introduced a cap on DCs. Councils responded by changing DCs, both upwards and downwards, for different dwelling types in different local council areas. Our model estimation shows that there are no measurable effects on price or quantity of new dwellings from DCs, supporting the planning practitioner's view of the charge being economically benign and fully incident on the landowner, even when the landowner is a property developer. When we instead include the baseline DC for each sale prior to the policy change, the problem of capturing only the mechanical effect arises once again. Model results using this baseline DC are similar to previous studies that claimed large behavioural price effects from DCs. The results are consistent with a real options view of the developer's economic situation, a view that also predicts that increases in DCs can increase the quantity of new dwelling sales, a pattern also found in the Queensland data. •Developer charges (impact fees) correlate mechanically with new home prices.•Natural experimental conditions are used to isolate the true price effect of developer charges.•Using this identification strategy there are zero price effects, and positive quantity effects.•Real options theory is the appropriate framework to understand these effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-2751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Conversion ; Councils ; Developer charges ; Estimation ; Fees &amp; charges ; Homesteading ; Identification ; Impact fees ; Land ; Landowners ; Natural experiment ; Policy making ; Prices ; Property ; Reforms ; Sales ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Cities, 2018-04, Vol.74, p.1-6</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bdaeb985d553c41997bf21506127e91376803ca41861770119f3ba0fdff097153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bdaeb985d553c41997bf21506127e91376803ca41861770119f3ba0fdff097153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275117301051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Cameron K.</creatorcontrib><title>Developers pay developer charges</title><title>Cities</title><description>Conversion of land to more intensive uses often comes with charges known as impact fees, or developer charges (DCs). Town planning practitioners typically view these charges as economically benign but there remains an academic debate about whether they can increase prices and depress sales volumes. Existing empirical studies of the price and quantity effects of DCs are limited by a lack of naturally occurring variation in the DC size. It is therefore difficult to isolate behavioural effects from the mechanical relationship of DC and price arising from larger dwellings being levied with higher DCs. To overcome this identification problem we use data that incorporates a surprise policy change in Queensland, Australia, that introduced a cap on DCs. Councils responded by changing DCs, both upwards and downwards, for different dwelling types in different local council areas. Our model estimation shows that there are no measurable effects on price or quantity of new dwellings from DCs, supporting the planning practitioner's view of the charge being economically benign and fully incident on the landowner, even when the landowner is a property developer. When we instead include the baseline DC for each sale prior to the policy change, the problem of capturing only the mechanical effect arises once again. Model results using this baseline DC are similar to previous studies that claimed large behavioural price effects from DCs. The results are consistent with a real options view of the developer's economic situation, a view that also predicts that increases in DCs can increase the quantity of new dwelling sales, a pattern also found in the Queensland data. •Developer charges (impact fees) correlate mechanically with new home prices.•Natural experimental conditions are used to isolate the true price effect of developer charges.•Using this identification strategy there are zero price effects, and positive quantity effects.•Real options theory is the appropriate framework to understand these effects.</description><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Developer charges</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Homesteading</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Impact fees</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Natural experiment</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0264-2751</issn><issn>1873-6084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhYMouK7-Aw8Fz60zTZo0F0FWV4UFL3oObTrRlHVbk-7C_ntbqldPwwzvvZn5GLtGyBBQ3raZ9YOnmOWAahxlgPqELbBUPJVQilO2gFyKNFcFnrOLGFsAEFLAgiUPdKBt11OISV8dk-avTexnFT4oXrIzV20jXf3WJXtfP76tntPN69PL6n6TWs7FkNZNRbUui6YouBWotapdjgVIzBVp5EqWwG0lsJSoFCBqx-sKXOMcaIUFX7KbObcP3fee4mDabh9240qTg5iORZmPKjGrbOhiDORMH_xXFY4GwUwsTGtmFmZiMU1HFqPtbrbR-MHBUzDRetpZanwgO5im8_8H_ACm7Wbq</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Murray, Cameron K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Developers pay developer charges</title><author>Murray, Cameron K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bdaeb985d553c41997bf21506127e91376803ca41861770119f3ba0fdff097153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Developer charges</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Homesteading</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Impact fees</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Natural experiment</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Cameron K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Cities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Cameron K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developers pay developer charges</atitle><jtitle>Cities</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>74</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0264-2751</issn><eissn>1873-6084</eissn><abstract>Conversion of land to more intensive uses often comes with charges known as impact fees, or developer charges (DCs). Town planning practitioners typically view these charges as economically benign but there remains an academic debate about whether they can increase prices and depress sales volumes. Existing empirical studies of the price and quantity effects of DCs are limited by a lack of naturally occurring variation in the DC size. It is therefore difficult to isolate behavioural effects from the mechanical relationship of DC and price arising from larger dwellings being levied with higher DCs. To overcome this identification problem we use data that incorporates a surprise policy change in Queensland, Australia, that introduced a cap on DCs. Councils responded by changing DCs, both upwards and downwards, for different dwelling types in different local council areas. Our model estimation shows that there are no measurable effects on price or quantity of new dwellings from DCs, supporting the planning practitioner's view of the charge being economically benign and fully incident on the landowner, even when the landowner is a property developer. When we instead include the baseline DC for each sale prior to the policy change, the problem of capturing only the mechanical effect arises once again. Model results using this baseline DC are similar to previous studies that claimed large behavioural price effects from DCs. The results are consistent with a real options view of the developer's economic situation, a view that also predicts that increases in DCs can increase the quantity of new dwelling sales, a pattern also found in the Queensland data. •Developer charges (impact fees) correlate mechanically with new home prices.•Natural experimental conditions are used to isolate the true price effect of developer charges.•Using this identification strategy there are zero price effects, and positive quantity effects.•Real options theory is the appropriate framework to understand these effects.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.019</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-2751
ispartof Cities, 2018-04, Vol.74, p.1-6
issn 0264-2751
1873-6084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2044640162
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Conversion
Councils
Developer charges
Estimation
Fees & charges
Homesteading
Identification
Impact fees
Land
Landowners
Natural experiment
Policy making
Prices
Property
Reforms
Sales
Urban planning
title Developers pay developer charges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developers%20pay%20developer%20charges&rft.jtitle=Cities&rft.au=Murray,%20Cameron%20K.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=74&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0264-2751&rft.eissn=1873-6084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2044640162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2044640162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264275117301051&rfr_iscdi=true