Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage
Sociolinguistic variation in Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland has traditionally been described in very different terms. In Austria, the linguistic range between the standard language and the local dialects has been referred to as a ‘standard-dialect-continuum’, whereas the German-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 2009-09, Vol.37 (2), p.266-295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 266 |
container_title | Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Ender, Andrea Kaiser, Irmtraud |
description | Sociolinguistic variation in Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland has traditionally been described in very different terms. In Austria, the linguistic range between the standard language and the local dialects has been referred to as a ‘standard-dialect-continuum’, whereas the German-speaking part of Switzerland has often been cited as the typical example of a ‘diglossic’ language community. The sociolinguistic situation in the Austrian state of Vorarlberg, which is part of a primarily Bavarian-speaking country but also of the Alemannic dialect region, has not been thoroughly examined in any studies up to date. In this paper, we present results from an online-survey in Austria and Switzerland on the everyday use of dialect and the standard language. According to our informants' estimates, the sociolinguistic situation in both Austria and German-speaking Switzerland is characterised by a significant percentage of dialect use. Still, the standard language is regarded quite differently in the two countries. A considerable proportion of the Swiss informants perceive the standard language as a ‘foreign language’. However, this does not seem to be a common attitude among the Austrian informants. The main difference between the two countries lies in the observation that Austrians feel they use an intermediate form between dialect and the standard language, a so-called ‘Umgangssprache’, in many situations, whereas the Swiss indicate that they speak their local dialect or the standard language under specific communicative circumstances. However, the German-speaking Swiss population, as well as the informants from Vorarlberg, do not seem to use an intermediate form. The situation in Vorarlberg is particularly interesting. On the one hand, as far as the status of dialect and the dichotomy of dialect and standard are concerned, Vorarlberg patterns similarly to the German-speaking part of Switzerland. On the other hand, people from Vorarlberg have to adapt to their Bavarian-speaking fellow countrymen and women and switch to standard German in intra-national communication (e.g. at the workplace or on national help lines). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/ZGL.2009.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204410909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1872899681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1966-f5810d9093794165d6088e0294c9459ef510319b77a19063710775e3851ae9763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9u1DAQxi0EEsvCjQewOJNlJo7tmFvVfyBtVRDbSy-Wm0x23WaTYiddyol34F14gb4JT1KvguDCaUb6vvm-0Y-x1wgLlCjfXZ4uFzmAWQCWT9gMFYoMVK6eshkIwEzkpnjOXsR4DYCFRjNj_eW45V8GalvqdhQGftd3_Mi7lm4GPnZ10lxXu1Bzv-UPv-JAIZCvNj5WG-omR7XZkf9OgR-07eDW_PePn_w4rOmq8zESJ98l7WLbBLeml-xZ49pIr_7MObs4OV4dfsiW56cfDw-WWYVGqayRJUJtwAhtClSyVlCWBOn_yhTSUCMRBJorrR0aUEIjaC1JlBIdGa3EnL2Zcm9D_3WkONjrfgxdqrQ5FAXCPnvO3k6mKvQxBmrsbfBbF-4tgt0TtYmo3RO1iWiyv5_sO9cmDjWtw3ifln_R_z3Tea72D2XTsU8Mv_0tcuHGKi20tJ9XhT0z5cmn5QrtkXgEKqiKxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204410909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Ender, Andrea ; Kaiser, Irmtraud</creator><contributor>Ender, Andrea ; Kaiser, Irmtraud</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ender, Andrea ; Kaiser, Irmtraud ; Ender, Andrea ; Kaiser, Irmtraud</creatorcontrib><description>Sociolinguistic variation in Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland has traditionally been described in very different terms. In Austria, the linguistic range between the standard language and the local dialects has been referred to as a ‘standard-dialect-continuum’, whereas the German-speaking part of Switzerland has often been cited as the typical example of a ‘diglossic’ language community. The sociolinguistic situation in the Austrian state of Vorarlberg, which is part of a primarily Bavarian-speaking country but also of the Alemannic dialect region, has not been thoroughly examined in any studies up to date. In this paper, we present results from an online-survey in Austria and Switzerland on the everyday use of dialect and the standard language. According to our informants' estimates, the sociolinguistic situation in both Austria and German-speaking Switzerland is characterised by a significant percentage of dialect use. Still, the standard language is regarded quite differently in the two countries. A considerable proportion of the Swiss informants perceive the standard language as a ‘foreign language’. However, this does not seem to be a common attitude among the Austrian informants. The main difference between the two countries lies in the observation that Austrians feel they use an intermediate form between dialect and the standard language, a so-called ‘Umgangssprache’, in many situations, whereas the Swiss indicate that they speak their local dialect or the standard language under specific communicative circumstances. However, the German-speaking Swiss population, as well as the informants from Vorarlberg, do not seem to use an intermediate form. The situation in Vorarlberg is particularly interesting. On the one hand, as far as the status of dialect and the dichotomy of dialect and standard are concerned, Vorarlberg patterns similarly to the German-speaking part of Switzerland. On the other hand, people from Vorarlberg have to adapt to their Bavarian-speaking fellow countrymen and women and switch to standard German in intra-national communication (e.g. at the workplace or on national help lines).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-3294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-0626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ZGL.2009.018</identifier><language>eng ; ger</language><publisher>Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG</publisher><subject>Cross cultural studies ; Dialects ; German language ; Language attitudes ; Linguistics ; Regional dialects ; Respondents ; Sociolinguistics ; Standard dialects</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 2009-09, Vol.37 (2), p.266-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright Walter De Gruyter & Company 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1966-f5810d9093794165d6088e0294c9459ef510319b77a19063710775e3851ae9763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ZGL.2009.018/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ZGL.2009.018/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,66754,68538</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Ender, Andrea</contributor><contributor>Kaiser, Irmtraud</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ender, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Irmtraud</creatorcontrib><title>Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage</title><title>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</title><addtitle>Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik</addtitle><description>Sociolinguistic variation in Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland has traditionally been described in very different terms. In Austria, the linguistic range between the standard language and the local dialects has been referred to as a ‘standard-dialect-continuum’, whereas the German-speaking part of Switzerland has often been cited as the typical example of a ‘diglossic’ language community. The sociolinguistic situation in the Austrian state of Vorarlberg, which is part of a primarily Bavarian-speaking country but also of the Alemannic dialect region, has not been thoroughly examined in any studies up to date. In this paper, we present results from an online-survey in Austria and Switzerland on the everyday use of dialect and the standard language. According to our informants' estimates, the sociolinguistic situation in both Austria and German-speaking Switzerland is characterised by a significant percentage of dialect use. Still, the standard language is regarded quite differently in the two countries. A considerable proportion of the Swiss informants perceive the standard language as a ‘foreign language’. However, this does not seem to be a common attitude among the Austrian informants. The main difference between the two countries lies in the observation that Austrians feel they use an intermediate form between dialect and the standard language, a so-called ‘Umgangssprache’, in many situations, whereas the Swiss indicate that they speak their local dialect or the standard language under specific communicative circumstances. However, the German-speaking Swiss population, as well as the informants from Vorarlberg, do not seem to use an intermediate form. The situation in Vorarlberg is particularly interesting. On the one hand, as far as the status of dialect and the dichotomy of dialect and standard are concerned, Vorarlberg patterns similarly to the German-speaking part of Switzerland. On the other hand, people from Vorarlberg have to adapt to their Bavarian-speaking fellow countrymen and women and switch to standard German in intra-national communication (e.g. at the workplace or on national help lines).</description><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Dialects</subject><subject>German language</subject><subject>Language attitudes</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Regional dialects</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><subject>Standard dialects</subject><issn>0301-3294</issn><issn>1613-0626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9u1DAQxi0EEsvCjQewOJNlJo7tmFvVfyBtVRDbSy-Wm0x23WaTYiddyol34F14gb4JT1KvguDCaUb6vvm-0Y-x1wgLlCjfXZ4uFzmAWQCWT9gMFYoMVK6eshkIwEzkpnjOXsR4DYCFRjNj_eW45V8GalvqdhQGftd3_Mi7lm4GPnZ10lxXu1Bzv-UPv-JAIZCvNj5WG-omR7XZkf9OgR-07eDW_PePn_w4rOmq8zESJ98l7WLbBLeml-xZ49pIr_7MObs4OV4dfsiW56cfDw-WWYVGqayRJUJtwAhtClSyVlCWBOn_yhTSUCMRBJorrR0aUEIjaC1JlBIdGa3EnL2Zcm9D_3WkONjrfgxdqrQ5FAXCPnvO3k6mKvQxBmrsbfBbF-4tgt0TtYmo3RO1iWiyv5_sO9cmDjWtw3ifln_R_z3Tea72D2XTsU8Mv_0tcuHGKi20tJ9XhT0z5cmn5QrtkXgEKqiKxQ</recordid><startdate>200909</startdate><enddate>200909</enddate><creator>Ender, Andrea</creator><creator>Kaiser, Irmtraud</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200909</creationdate><title>Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage</title><author>Ender, Andrea ; Kaiser, Irmtraud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1966-f5810d9093794165d6088e0294c9459ef510319b77a19063710775e3851ae9763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ger</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Dialects</topic><topic>German language</topic><topic>Language attitudes</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Regional dialects</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><topic>Standard dialects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ender, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Irmtraud</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ender, Andrea</au><au>Kaiser, Irmtraud</au><au>Ender, Andrea</au><au>Kaiser, Irmtraud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</jtitle><addtitle>Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik</addtitle><date>2009-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>266-295</pages><issn>0301-3294</issn><eissn>1613-0626</eissn><abstract>Sociolinguistic variation in Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland has traditionally been described in very different terms. In Austria, the linguistic range between the standard language and the local dialects has been referred to as a ‘standard-dialect-continuum’, whereas the German-speaking part of Switzerland has often been cited as the typical example of a ‘diglossic’ language community. The sociolinguistic situation in the Austrian state of Vorarlberg, which is part of a primarily Bavarian-speaking country but also of the Alemannic dialect region, has not been thoroughly examined in any studies up to date. In this paper, we present results from an online-survey in Austria and Switzerland on the everyday use of dialect and the standard language. According to our informants' estimates, the sociolinguistic situation in both Austria and German-speaking Switzerland is characterised by a significant percentage of dialect use. Still, the standard language is regarded quite differently in the two countries. A considerable proportion of the Swiss informants perceive the standard language as a ‘foreign language’. However, this does not seem to be a common attitude among the Austrian informants. The main difference between the two countries lies in the observation that Austrians feel they use an intermediate form between dialect and the standard language, a so-called ‘Umgangssprache’, in many situations, whereas the Swiss indicate that they speak their local dialect or the standard language under specific communicative circumstances. However, the German-speaking Swiss population, as well as the informants from Vorarlberg, do not seem to use an intermediate form. The situation in Vorarlberg is particularly interesting. On the one hand, as far as the status of dialect and the dichotomy of dialect and standard are concerned, Vorarlberg patterns similarly to the German-speaking part of Switzerland. On the other hand, people from Vorarlberg have to adapt to their Bavarian-speaking fellow countrymen and women and switch to standard German in intra-national communication (e.g. at the workplace or on national help lines).</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG</pub><doi>10.1515/ZGL.2009.018</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-3294 |
ispartof | Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 2009-09, Vol.37 (2), p.266-295 |
issn | 0301-3294 1613-0626 |
language | eng ; ger |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204410909 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Cross cultural studies Dialects German language Language attitudes Linguistics Regional dialects Respondents Sociolinguistics Standard dialects |
title | Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A25%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zum%20Stellenwert%20von%20Dialekt%20und%20Standard%20im%20%C3%B6sterreichischen%20und%20Schweizer%20Alltag%20%E2%80%93%20Ergebnisse%20einer%20Umfrage&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20germanistische%20Linguistik&rft.au=Ender,%20Andrea&rft.date=2009-09&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=266-295&rft.issn=0301-3294&rft.eissn=1613-0626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ZGL.2009.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1872899681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204410909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |