Zwischen Wort und Zeichen: Die graphische Markierung suprasegmentaler Einheiten in der Frühen Neuzeit
Variation is an essential feature of Early New High German orthography. I attribute this phenomenon to the exhortation to pursue stylistic diversification, a striving for which rhetoricians like Erasmus expressed support. The segmentation and transformation of written words in the 16th century shows...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 2009, Vol.37 (1), p.1-14 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | VOESTE, Anja |
description | Variation is an essential feature of Early New High German orthography. I attribute this phenomenon to the exhortation to pursue stylistic diversification, a striving for which rhetoricians like Erasmus expressed support. The segmentation and transformation of written words in the 16th century shows that variation led to conditions favorable for an analysis that contributed to the establishment of new morphological and syllabic principles for spelling words. Examples such as (instead of ) and (instead of ) demonstrate morphological segmentation of the written word form. Distinctive syllabic features in historically unfounded spellings like and call attention to a syllabic analysis. Both new spelling principles document a process of turning away from the segmental-phonographic practice that had prevailed prior to that time. These new spellings refer to a fundamental change in how the written word was perceived. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204406390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1825177141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p570-ec129384b2d45c1ac1d0fb9e764076bd4403c7ba5e12da44b46c1c1b84b183a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjdFKwzAUhoMoOKfvEAQvCzlJmq7eydycMPVmIOympOnpltmlNWkRfTbvfDEz3dWB___-75yQESgQCVNcnZIREwwSwXN5Ti5C2DEGMoN8ROr1hw1mi46-tr6ng6voGu0huKX3FunG6277R9An7d8s-sFtaBg6rwNu9uh63aCnM-u2aPuosY5WMZj7n--D9RmHr1hckrNaNwGvjndMVvPZarpIli8Pj9O7ZdKlGUvQAM_FRJa8kqkBbaBidZljpiTLVFlJyYTJSp0i8EpLWUplwEAZFzAReiLG5Ppf2_n2fcDQF7t28C5-LDiLayVyFqGbI6SD0U3ttTM2FJ23e-0_C84F5FKm4hdLPGEe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204406390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zwischen Wort und Zeichen: Die graphische Markierung suprasegmentaler Einheiten in der Frühen Neuzeit</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>VOESTE, Anja</creator><creatorcontrib>VOESTE, Anja</creatorcontrib><description>Variation is an essential feature of Early New High German orthography. I attribute this phenomenon to the exhortation to pursue stylistic diversification, a striving for which rhetoricians like Erasmus expressed support. The segmentation and transformation of written words in the 16th century shows that variation led to conditions favorable for an analysis that contributed to the establishment of new morphological and syllabic principles for spelling words. Examples such as (instead of ) and (instead of ) demonstrate morphological segmentation of the written word form. Distinctive syllabic features in historically unfounded spellings like and call attention to a syllabic analysis. Both new spelling principles document a process of turning away from the segmental-phonographic practice that had prevailed prior to that time. These new spellings refer to a fundamental change in how the written word was perceived. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-3294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-0626</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Diversification ; German language ; Linguistics ; Morphological analysis ; Orthography ; Rhetoric ; Segmentation ; Spelling</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 2009, Vol.37 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Walter De Gruyter & Company 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22319445$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VOESTE, Anja</creatorcontrib><title>Zwischen Wort und Zeichen: Die graphische Markierung suprasegmentaler Einheiten in der Frühen Neuzeit</title><title>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</title><description>Variation is an essential feature of Early New High German orthography. I attribute this phenomenon to the exhortation to pursue stylistic diversification, a striving for which rhetoricians like Erasmus expressed support. The segmentation and transformation of written words in the 16th century shows that variation led to conditions favorable for an analysis that contributed to the establishment of new morphological and syllabic principles for spelling words. Examples such as (instead of ) and (instead of ) demonstrate morphological segmentation of the written word form. Distinctive syllabic features in historically unfounded spellings like and call attention to a syllabic analysis. Both new spelling principles document a process of turning away from the segmental-phonographic practice that had prevailed prior to that time. These new spellings refer to a fundamental change in how the written word was perceived. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>German language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Morphological analysis</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><issn>0301-3294</issn><issn>1613-0626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNotjdFKwzAUhoMoOKfvEAQvCzlJmq7eydycMPVmIOympOnpltmlNWkRfTbvfDEz3dWB___-75yQESgQCVNcnZIREwwSwXN5Ti5C2DEGMoN8ROr1hw1mi46-tr6ng6voGu0huKX3FunG6277R9An7d8s-sFtaBg6rwNu9uh63aCnM-u2aPuosY5WMZj7n--D9RmHr1hckrNaNwGvjndMVvPZarpIli8Pj9O7ZdKlGUvQAM_FRJa8kqkBbaBidZljpiTLVFlJyYTJSp0i8EpLWUplwEAZFzAReiLG5Ppf2_n2fcDQF7t28C5-LDiLayVyFqGbI6SD0U3ttTM2FJ23e-0_C84F5FKm4hdLPGEe</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>VOESTE, Anja</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Zwischen Wort und Zeichen: Die graphische Markierung suprasegmentaler Einheiten in der Frühen Neuzeit</title><author>VOESTE, Anja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p570-ec129384b2d45c1ac1d0fb9e764076bd4403c7ba5e12da44b46c1c1b84b183a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>German language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Morphological analysis</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VOESTE, Anja</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VOESTE, Anja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zwischen Wort und Zeichen: Die graphische Markierung suprasegmentaler Einheiten in der Frühen Neuzeit</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0301-3294</issn><eissn>1613-0626</eissn><abstract>Variation is an essential feature of Early New High German orthography. I attribute this phenomenon to the exhortation to pursue stylistic diversification, a striving for which rhetoricians like Erasmus expressed support. The segmentation and transformation of written words in the 16th century shows that variation led to conditions favorable for an analysis that contributed to the establishment of new morphological and syllabic principles for spelling words. Examples such as (instead of ) and (instead of ) demonstrate morphological segmentation of the written word form. Distinctive syllabic features in historically unfounded spellings like and call attention to a syllabic analysis. Both new spelling principles document a process of turning away from the segmental-phonographic practice that had prevailed prior to that time. These new spellings refer to a fundamental change in how the written word was perceived. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-3294 |
ispartof | Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 2009, Vol.37 (1), p.1-14 |
issn | 0301-3294 1613-0626 |
language | ger |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204406390 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Diversification German language Linguistics Morphological analysis Orthography Rhetoric Segmentation Spelling |
title | Zwischen Wort und Zeichen: Die graphische Markierung suprasegmentaler Einheiten in der Frühen Neuzeit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T16%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zwischen%20Wort%20und%20Zeichen:%20Die%20graphische%20Markierung%20suprasegmentaler%20Einheiten%20in%20der%20Fr%C3%BChen%20Neuzeit&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20germanistische%20Linguistik&rft.au=VOESTE,%20Anja&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0301-3294&rft.eissn=1613-0626&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1825177141%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204406390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |