Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama
PROLOGUE Enter AUTHOR (sweeping stage): Let's get it over with, the SEL review opening gambit: humility (with feeling) before the range and quality of this year's scholarship, art which well exceeds my scope; surprise (muted at the overwhelming preponderance of work on Shakespeare to the n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in English literature, 1500-1900 1500-1900, 2002-04, Vol.42 (2), p.399-448 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 448 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Studies in English literature, 1500-1900 |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Worthen, W. B. |
description | PROLOGUE Enter AUTHOR (sweeping stage): Let's get it over with, the SEL review opening gambit: humility (with feeling) before the range and quality of this year's scholarship, art which well exceeds my scope; surprise (muted at the overwhelming preponderance of work on Shakespeare to the near exclusion of his contemporaries; surprise (more muted) at the absence of important new fault lines or factions emerging; and (sincerely) a slight readerly fatigue. [...]the Ghost poses a number of contradictions typical of purgatorial spirits, which emerge with fresh energy against the rich texture of Purgatory that Greenblatt has exfoliated here: the Ghost calls not for prayer but vengeance; he seems to arouse the suspicion of trickery (suspicion that can be resolved only with another transparently ambiguous device, the play-within-the-play); and he paradoxically seems to drive Hamlet even farther into a kind of Protestant contemplation of corruption and mortality. Greenblatt launches into a brief but superb reading of the toxicity of incorporation in Hamlet, the king making his progress through the guts of a beggar, the recycling of the funeral baked meats, and the many tropes by which alimentation signifies the inevitable and alarming end of mortality-to this favor we must come. Greenblatt returns to an old question with elegant historical and critical sophistication: this vivid encounter with the poetics of Purgatory and with the emotional and psychological crises it mediates sustains a genuine, and genuinely provocative reading of Hamlet and its culture, and an account of the ambivalent solace of fiction as well. In the course of the book, Peters treats a compelling range of issues: the development of the mise-en-page of the play, and the consequences of various experiments in design and layout; the different uses of printed drama by theater companies; the durability of manuscript publication of drama well into the print era; the rise of printed drama and its well-known tension with modes of literary publication; the tribulations of dramatic authorship; the utility of printed materials in recording and determining architectural spaces and performing conventions; the changing relationship between playhouses and the publishing industry; theatrical orality and its preservation in print; print's role in inspiring and recording scenic illusion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/sel.2002.0022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204339084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1556121</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1556121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-36d7e29aa61bca3ef2f5829c76fab5474b4d95e353665d90b9dddd2af354fe6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEQx4MoWB9Hbx4WT162JpPHbo5Sn1AQbD2H7GYCXdrdmmQPfnuzVOzAMBD-j_Aj5IbROeOSP0TczoFSmOeFEzJjEqDUUNFTMqOU65IrWZ2Tixg7mocxOiP3n9hin4pVGt0GY7Hpi_XohlDY3k2PNqTiKdidvSJn3m4jXv_dS_L18rxevJXLj9f3xeOybKGWKVe4CkFbq1jTWo4evKxBt5XytpGiEo1wWmL-rlLSadpolwes51J4VJZfkrtD7j4M3yPGZLphDH2uNEAF55rWIovKg6gNQ4wBvdmHzc6GH8OomViYzMJMLMzEIuv5f2iHbdqNEY-5nDGhzGrCNdHKhgxL19l1e3B1MQ3hWCGlYsD4LxleaZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204339084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Worthen, W. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Worthen, W. B.</creatorcontrib><description>PROLOGUE Enter AUTHOR (sweeping stage): Let's get it over with, the SEL review opening gambit: humility (with feeling) before the range and quality of this year's scholarship, art which well exceeds my scope; surprise (muted at the overwhelming preponderance of work on Shakespeare to the near exclusion of his contemporaries; surprise (more muted) at the absence of important new fault lines or factions emerging; and (sincerely) a slight readerly fatigue. [...]the Ghost poses a number of contradictions typical of purgatorial spirits, which emerge with fresh energy against the rich texture of Purgatory that Greenblatt has exfoliated here: the Ghost calls not for prayer but vengeance; he seems to arouse the suspicion of trickery (suspicion that can be resolved only with another transparently ambiguous device, the play-within-the-play); and he paradoxically seems to drive Hamlet even farther into a kind of Protestant contemplation of corruption and mortality. Greenblatt launches into a brief but superb reading of the toxicity of incorporation in Hamlet, the king making his progress through the guts of a beggar, the recycling of the funeral baked meats, and the many tropes by which alimentation signifies the inevitable and alarming end of mortality-to this favor we must come. Greenblatt returns to an old question with elegant historical and critical sophistication: this vivid encounter with the poetics of Purgatory and with the emotional and psychological crises it mediates sustains a genuine, and genuinely provocative reading of Hamlet and its culture, and an account of the ambivalent solace of fiction as well. In the course of the book, Peters treats a compelling range of issues: the development of the mise-en-page of the play, and the consequences of various experiments in design and layout; the different uses of printed drama by theater companies; the durability of manuscript publication of drama well into the print era; the rise of printed drama and its well-known tension with modes of literary publication; the tribulations of dramatic authorship; the utility of printed materials in recording and determining architectural spaces and performing conventions; the changing relationship between playhouses and the publishing industry; theatrical orality and its preservation in print; print's role in inspiring and recording scenic illusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3657</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1522-9270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/sel.2002.0022</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STELBD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Rice University</publisher><subject>Anthologies ; British literature ; Literary criticism ; Masques ; Narratives ; Poetry ; Purgatory ; Textual criticism ; Theater ; Theater criticism</subject><ispartof>Studies in English literature, 1500-1900, 2002-04, Vol.42 (2), p.399-448</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 William Marsh Rice University</rights><rights>Copyright © 2002 William Marsh Rice University.</rights><rights>Copyright Studies in English Literature c/o Rice University Spring 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1556121$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1556121$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worthen, W. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama</title><title>Studies in English literature, 1500-1900</title><description>PROLOGUE Enter AUTHOR (sweeping stage): Let's get it over with, the SEL review opening gambit: humility (with feeling) before the range and quality of this year's scholarship, art which well exceeds my scope; surprise (muted at the overwhelming preponderance of work on Shakespeare to the near exclusion of his contemporaries; surprise (more muted) at the absence of important new fault lines or factions emerging; and (sincerely) a slight readerly fatigue. [...]the Ghost poses a number of contradictions typical of purgatorial spirits, which emerge with fresh energy against the rich texture of Purgatory that Greenblatt has exfoliated here: the Ghost calls not for prayer but vengeance; he seems to arouse the suspicion of trickery (suspicion that can be resolved only with another transparently ambiguous device, the play-within-the-play); and he paradoxically seems to drive Hamlet even farther into a kind of Protestant contemplation of corruption and mortality. Greenblatt launches into a brief but superb reading of the toxicity of incorporation in Hamlet, the king making his progress through the guts of a beggar, the recycling of the funeral baked meats, and the many tropes by which alimentation signifies the inevitable and alarming end of mortality-to this favor we must come. Greenblatt returns to an old question with elegant historical and critical sophistication: this vivid encounter with the poetics of Purgatory and with the emotional and psychological crises it mediates sustains a genuine, and genuinely provocative reading of Hamlet and its culture, and an account of the ambivalent solace of fiction as well. In the course of the book, Peters treats a compelling range of issues: the development of the mise-en-page of the play, and the consequences of various experiments in design and layout; the different uses of printed drama by theater companies; the durability of manuscript publication of drama well into the print era; the rise of printed drama and its well-known tension with modes of literary publication; the tribulations of dramatic authorship; the utility of printed materials in recording and determining architectural spaces and performing conventions; the changing relationship between playhouses and the publishing industry; theatrical orality and its preservation in print; print's role in inspiring and recording scenic illusion.</description><subject>Anthologies</subject><subject>British literature</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Masques</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Purgatory</subject><subject>Textual criticism</subject><subject>Theater</subject><subject>Theater criticism</subject><issn>0039-3657</issn><issn>1522-9270</issn><issn>1522-9270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEQx4MoWB9Hbx4WT162JpPHbo5Sn1AQbD2H7GYCXdrdmmQPfnuzVOzAMBD-j_Aj5IbROeOSP0TczoFSmOeFEzJjEqDUUNFTMqOU65IrWZ2Tixg7mocxOiP3n9hin4pVGt0GY7Hpi_XohlDY3k2PNqTiKdidvSJn3m4jXv_dS_L18rxevJXLj9f3xeOybKGWKVe4CkFbq1jTWo4evKxBt5XytpGiEo1wWmL-rlLSadpolwes51J4VJZfkrtD7j4M3yPGZLphDH2uNEAF55rWIovKg6gNQ4wBvdmHzc6GH8OomViYzMJMLMzEIuv5f2iHbdqNEY-5nDGhzGrCNdHKhgxL19l1e3B1MQ3hWCGlYsD4LxleaZY</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Worthen, W. B.</creator><general>Rice University</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama</title><author>Worthen, W. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-36d7e29aa61bca3ef2f5829c76fab5474b4d95e353665d90b9dddd2af354fe6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Anthologies</topic><topic>British literature</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Masques</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Purgatory</topic><topic>Textual criticism</topic><topic>Theater</topic><topic>Theater criticism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worthen, W. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Studies in English literature, 1500-1900</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worthen, W. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama</atitle><jtitle>Studies in English literature, 1500-1900</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>448</epage><pages>399-448</pages><issn>0039-3657</issn><issn>1522-9270</issn><eissn>1522-9270</eissn><coden>STELBD</coden><abstract>PROLOGUE Enter AUTHOR (sweeping stage): Let's get it over with, the SEL review opening gambit: humility (with feeling) before the range and quality of this year's scholarship, art which well exceeds my scope; surprise (muted at the overwhelming preponderance of work on Shakespeare to the near exclusion of his contemporaries; surprise (more muted) at the absence of important new fault lines or factions emerging; and (sincerely) a slight readerly fatigue. [...]the Ghost poses a number of contradictions typical of purgatorial spirits, which emerge with fresh energy against the rich texture of Purgatory that Greenblatt has exfoliated here: the Ghost calls not for prayer but vengeance; he seems to arouse the suspicion of trickery (suspicion that can be resolved only with another transparently ambiguous device, the play-within-the-play); and he paradoxically seems to drive Hamlet even farther into a kind of Protestant contemplation of corruption and mortality. Greenblatt launches into a brief but superb reading of the toxicity of incorporation in Hamlet, the king making his progress through the guts of a beggar, the recycling of the funeral baked meats, and the many tropes by which alimentation signifies the inevitable and alarming end of mortality-to this favor we must come. Greenblatt returns to an old question with elegant historical and critical sophistication: this vivid encounter with the poetics of Purgatory and with the emotional and psychological crises it mediates sustains a genuine, and genuinely provocative reading of Hamlet and its culture, and an account of the ambivalent solace of fiction as well. In the course of the book, Peters treats a compelling range of issues: the development of the mise-en-page of the play, and the consequences of various experiments in design and layout; the different uses of printed drama by theater companies; the durability of manuscript publication of drama well into the print era; the rise of printed drama and its well-known tension with modes of literary publication; the tribulations of dramatic authorship; the utility of printed materials in recording and determining architectural spaces and performing conventions; the changing relationship between playhouses and the publishing industry; theatrical orality and its preservation in print; print's role in inspiring and recording scenic illusion.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Rice University</pub><doi>10.1353/sel.2002.0022</doi><tpages>50</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-3657 |
ispartof | Studies in English literature, 1500-1900, 2002-04, Vol.42 (2), p.399-448 |
issn | 0039-3657 1522-9270 1522-9270 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204339084 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Anthologies British literature Literary criticism Masques Narratives Poetry Purgatory Textual criticism Theater Theater criticism |
title | Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20Studies%20in%20Tudor%20and%20Stuart%20Drama&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20English%20literature,%201500-1900&rft.au=Worthen,%20W.%20B.&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=448&rft.pages=399-448&rft.issn=0039-3657&rft.eissn=1522-9270&rft.coden=STELBD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/sel.2002.0022&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1556121%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204339084&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1556121&rfr_iscdi=true |