PWE-391 Post-operative complications following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elape): a retrospective audit
Introduction To determine the nature and frequency of general and perineal wound complications following ELAPE using biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Method This single-centre retrospective audit included 14 consecutive patients from Nov 2012 to Sept 2014. All patients underwent E...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2015-06, Vol.64 (Suppl 1), p.A382-A382 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A382 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A382 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Ewan, LC Shaw, S Rai, S |
description | Introduction To determine the nature and frequency of general and perineal wound complications following ELAPE using biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Method This single-centre retrospective audit included 14 consecutive patients from Nov 2012 to Sept 2014. All patients underwent ELAPE for low rectal tumours and had primary pelvic floor reconstruction using Strattice biological mesh. Data collected included tumour staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and post-operative complications. Results 14 patients included (M:F ratio 4:1) had a mean age of 65yrs (47-83yrs). All received long-course (n = 12) or short-course (n = 2) radiotherapy. Post-op resection margins were R0 (n = 13) and R2 in 1 case. Tumours were staged at T1 (n = 3), T2 (n = 6) or T3 (n = 5) prior to radiotherapy. General complications included one death due to a urethral injury and subsequent urosepsis. Two patients developed post-operative ileus, one requiring TPN. There were 3 abdominal wound infections treated at the bedside. 12 perineal wounds healed without surgical or radiological intervention with any complications being treated on an outpatient basis. A pelvic collection required percutaneous drainage and 2 superficial wound infections were treated with antibiotics. Wound dehiscence occurred in 6 patients (3 superficial without infection, 1 superficial with infection, 1complete dehiscence with infection and1due to ureto-cutaneous fistula). Chronic perineal pain developed in 1 patient. 5 patients had no perineal wound complications. Conclusion Overall 12 patients recovered well with no further intervention. Perineal wound complications were managed on an outpatient basis with no long-term problem with pelvic sepsis or wound healing. No mesh infections have been observed to date. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, et al. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):1052-1059 Biologics. 2014;8:83-90. Published online Mar 10, 2014. 10.2147/BTT. S46469PMCID: PMC3956623Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status Selzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdomi- noperineal excision in rectal cancer-a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1227-1240 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.837 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2043387536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2043387536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c756-a36b7d5f29fab52a96419c6624c808eed89064ee99335050c87927bb942ec58b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwBRSJDSxc_BM7NjuEyo9UiS4qsbQcd1KlcuNgJwVuw1k4GSlhNRrNe2-ePoQuKZlRyuXtpu-2jceMUIE50UrSmeLFEZrQXCrMmVLHaEIILbAocn2KzlLaEkKU0nSC9su3Oeaa_nwvQ-pwaCHart5D5sKu9bUbltCkrAreh4-62WTw2UWLPextF2Jmy3XY1c3BVjdg_XB2dRos2TV428LNXWazCF0MqQX3F2z7dd2do5PK-gQX_3OKVo_z1cMzXrw-vTzcL7ArhMSWy7JYi4rpypaCWS1zqp2ULHeKKIC10kTmAFpzLoggThWaFWWpcwZOqJJP0dUY28bw3kPqzDb0sRk-GkZyzlUhuBxUclS5oWaKUJk21jsbvwwl5oDYjIjNAbEZEZsBMf8FKQpzZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043387536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PWE-391 Post-operative complications following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elape): a retrospective audit</title><source>BMJ Journals Online Archive</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ewan, LC ; Shaw, S ; Rai, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Ewan, LC ; Shaw, S ; Rai, S</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction To determine the nature and frequency of general and perineal wound complications following ELAPE using biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Method This single-centre retrospective audit included 14 consecutive patients from Nov 2012 to Sept 2014. All patients underwent ELAPE for low rectal tumours and had primary pelvic floor reconstruction using Strattice biological mesh. Data collected included tumour staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and post-operative complications. Results 14 patients included (M:F ratio 4:1) had a mean age of 65yrs (47-83yrs). All received long-course (n = 12) or short-course (n = 2) radiotherapy. Post-op resection margins were R0 (n = 13) and R2 in 1 case. Tumours were staged at T1 (n = 3), T2 (n = 6) or T3 (n = 5) prior to radiotherapy. General complications included one death due to a urethral injury and subsequent urosepsis. Two patients developed post-operative ileus, one requiring TPN. There were 3 abdominal wound infections treated at the bedside. 12 perineal wounds healed without surgical or radiological intervention with any complications being treated on an outpatient basis. A pelvic collection required percutaneous drainage and 2 superficial wound infections were treated with antibiotics. Wound dehiscence occurred in 6 patients (3 superficial without infection, 1 superficial with infection, 1complete dehiscence with infection and1due to ureto-cutaneous fistula). Chronic perineal pain developed in 1 patient. 5 patients had no perineal wound complications. Conclusion Overall 12 patients recovered well with no further intervention. Perineal wound complications were managed on an outpatient basis with no long-term problem with pelvic sepsis or wound healing. No mesh infections have been observed to date. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, et al. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):1052-1059 Biologics. 2014;8:83-90. Published online Mar 10, 2014. 10.2147/BTT. S46469PMCID: PMC3956623Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status Selzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdomi- noperineal excision in rectal cancer-a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1227-1240</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.837</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chronic infection ; Chronic pain ; Colorectal cancer ; Dehiscence ; Dermis ; Fistulae ; Infections ; Perineum ; Radiation therapy ; Rectum ; Sepsis ; Tumors ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2015-06, Vol.64 (Suppl 1), p.A382-A382</ispartof><rights>Copyright: 2015 © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3196,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ewan, LC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, S</creatorcontrib><title>PWE-391 Post-operative complications following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elape): a retrospective audit</title><title>Gut</title><description>Introduction To determine the nature and frequency of general and perineal wound complications following ELAPE using biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Method This single-centre retrospective audit included 14 consecutive patients from Nov 2012 to Sept 2014. All patients underwent ELAPE for low rectal tumours and had primary pelvic floor reconstruction using Strattice biological mesh. Data collected included tumour staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and post-operative complications. Results 14 patients included (M:F ratio 4:1) had a mean age of 65yrs (47-83yrs). All received long-course (n = 12) or short-course (n = 2) radiotherapy. Post-op resection margins were R0 (n = 13) and R2 in 1 case. Tumours were staged at T1 (n = 3), T2 (n = 6) or T3 (n = 5) prior to radiotherapy. General complications included one death due to a urethral injury and subsequent urosepsis. Two patients developed post-operative ileus, one requiring TPN. There were 3 abdominal wound infections treated at the bedside. 12 perineal wounds healed without surgical or radiological intervention with any complications being treated on an outpatient basis. A pelvic collection required percutaneous drainage and 2 superficial wound infections were treated with antibiotics. Wound dehiscence occurred in 6 patients (3 superficial without infection, 1 superficial with infection, 1complete dehiscence with infection and1due to ureto-cutaneous fistula). Chronic perineal pain developed in 1 patient. 5 patients had no perineal wound complications. Conclusion Overall 12 patients recovered well with no further intervention. Perineal wound complications were managed on an outpatient basis with no long-term problem with pelvic sepsis or wound healing. No mesh infections have been observed to date. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, et al. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):1052-1059 Biologics. 2014;8:83-90. Published online Mar 10, 2014. 10.2147/BTT. S46469PMCID: PMC3956623Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status Selzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdomi- noperineal excision in rectal cancer-a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1227-1240</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chronic infection</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Dehiscence</subject><subject>Dermis</subject><subject>Fistulae</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Perineum</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwBRSJDSxc_BM7NjuEyo9UiS4qsbQcd1KlcuNgJwVuw1k4GSlhNRrNe2-ePoQuKZlRyuXtpu-2jceMUIE50UrSmeLFEZrQXCrMmVLHaEIILbAocn2KzlLaEkKU0nSC9su3Oeaa_nwvQ-pwaCHart5D5sKu9bUbltCkrAreh4-62WTw2UWLPextF2Jmy3XY1c3BVjdg_XB2dRos2TV428LNXWazCF0MqQX3F2z7dd2do5PK-gQX_3OKVo_z1cMzXrw-vTzcL7ArhMSWy7JYi4rpypaCWS1zqp2ULHeKKIC10kTmAFpzLoggThWaFWWpcwZOqJJP0dUY28bw3kPqzDb0sRk-GkZyzlUhuBxUclS5oWaKUJk21jsbvwwl5oDYjIjNAbEZEZsBMf8FKQpzZw</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Ewan, LC</creator><creator>Shaw, S</creator><creator>Rai, S</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>PWE-391 Post-operative complications following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elape): a retrospective audit</title><author>Ewan, LC ; Shaw, S ; Rai, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c756-a36b7d5f29fab52a96419c6624c808eed89064ee99335050c87927bb942ec58b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chronic infection</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Dehiscence</topic><topic>Dermis</topic><topic>Fistulae</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Perineum</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ewan, LC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ewan, LC</au><au>Shaw, S</au><au>Rai, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PWE-391 Post-operative complications following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elape): a retrospective audit</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A382</spage><epage>A382</epage><pages>A382-A382</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>Introduction To determine the nature and frequency of general and perineal wound complications following ELAPE using biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Method This single-centre retrospective audit included 14 consecutive patients from Nov 2012 to Sept 2014. All patients underwent ELAPE for low rectal tumours and had primary pelvic floor reconstruction using Strattice biological mesh. Data collected included tumour staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and post-operative complications. Results 14 patients included (M:F ratio 4:1) had a mean age of 65yrs (47-83yrs). All received long-course (n = 12) or short-course (n = 2) radiotherapy. Post-op resection margins were R0 (n = 13) and R2 in 1 case. Tumours were staged at T1 (n = 3), T2 (n = 6) or T3 (n = 5) prior to radiotherapy. General complications included one death due to a urethral injury and subsequent urosepsis. Two patients developed post-operative ileus, one requiring TPN. There were 3 abdominal wound infections treated at the bedside. 12 perineal wounds healed without surgical or radiological intervention with any complications being treated on an outpatient basis. A pelvic collection required percutaneous drainage and 2 superficial wound infections were treated with antibiotics. Wound dehiscence occurred in 6 patients (3 superficial without infection, 1 superficial with infection, 1complete dehiscence with infection and1due to ureto-cutaneous fistula). Chronic perineal pain developed in 1 patient. 5 patients had no perineal wound complications. Conclusion Overall 12 patients recovered well with no further intervention. Perineal wound complications were managed on an outpatient basis with no long-term problem with pelvic sepsis or wound healing. No mesh infections have been observed to date. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, et al. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):1052-1059 Biologics. 2014;8:83-90. Published online Mar 10, 2014. 10.2147/BTT. S46469PMCID: PMC3956623Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status Selzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdomi- noperineal excision in rectal cancer-a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1227-1240</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.837</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2015-06, Vol.64 (Suppl 1), p.A382-A382 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2043387536 |
source | BMJ Journals Online Archive; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibiotics Chemoradiotherapy Chronic infection Chronic pain Colorectal cancer Dehiscence Dermis Fistulae Infections Perineum Radiation therapy Rectum Sepsis Tumors Wound healing |
title | PWE-391 Post-operative complications following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (elape): a retrospective audit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A22%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PWE-391%C2%A0Post-operative%20complications%20following%20extra-levator%20abdominoperineal%20excision%20(elape):%20a%20retrospective%20audit&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Ewan,%20LC&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A382&rft.epage=A382&rft.pages=A382-A382&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2043387536%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043387536&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |