OC-004 Effect of hookworm treatment on active Crohn's disease
IntroductionParasites are under consideration as therapy for Crohn's disease and hookworm treatment is marketed for this purpose, despite a lack of controlled evidence. We therefore conducted a study of the effects of the hookworm Necator americanus on patients with mild to moderately active Cr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2010-04, Vol.59 (Suppl 1), p.A2-A2 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A2 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A2 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Fortun, P Shepherd, V Moroz, V Pritchard, D Hawkey, C J |
description | IntroductionParasites are under consideration as therapy for Crohn's disease and hookworm treatment is marketed for this purpose, despite a lack of controlled evidence. We therefore conducted a study of the effects of the hookworm Necator americanus on patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's.MethodsFifty-six patients with a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) of 220–450 were randomised to receive 10 hookworm larvae or placebo (histamine) under a plaster patch on the forearm. Clinical activity and immunological changes were monitored over 12 weeks before hookworm was eradicated by treatment with mebendazole, and there was a final visit at 24 weeks. The primary analysis of effect was of the change from baseline at 12 weeks in the CDAI assessed by a generalised linear model (analysis of covariance) with change from baseline as response with terms for treatment arm and baseline CDAI as explanatory variables. Assuming a standard deviation of the change in the Crohn's disease activity index of 110 this study of 56 patients had 80% power to detect a difference of 85 in the CDAI with hookworm treatment compared to control (α=0.05).ResultsClean file was declared and the treatment code broken at 5 p, on 30 November 2009. Groups were well matched for age (mean 38.2±11.7 (SD) years for hookworm treatment, 42.2±13.2 for placebo), sex (50% vs 54% female), smoking, drug use and disease location. Preliminary analysis of the primary endpoint appeared to show a strong trend against any evidence of therapeutic benefit with hookworm. Patients treated with hookworm had a 64 point increase in CDAI (95% CIs ranging from a 15-point benefit to a 143-point deterioration). There was no obvious difference in advers events in each group.ConclusionOur preliminary analysis appears to exclude any significant overall benefit from treatment with 10 Necator americanus larvae in active Crohn's Disease and raises the possibility that such treatment may even be harmful. Further analysis will be needed to determine whether apparent deteriorations in CDAI may reflect gastrointestinal symptoms induced by hookworm infection and whether there might be benefit in subgroups. Further work could explore whether different dosing regimens would be more successful. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gut.2009.208934d |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2043377449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2043377449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1529-d7404f41f1383d71be585e0328695ce83dd3bf2414c69f8aea35e9fa1ba517e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD9PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiYEAp59iO7QmhqPyRKnWB2XKSM20hcbFTEBsLX5RPgqt2Z7mTnt67e_oRck5hQikrr182w6QA0GkozXh7QEaUlypnhVKHZARAZS4k18fkJMYVACil6YjczKscgP9-_0ydw2bIvMsW3r9--tBlQ0A7dNgntc9sMyw_MKuCX_SXMWuXEW3EU3Lk7FvEs_0ek-e76VP1kM_m94_V7SyvqSh03koO3HHqKFOslbRGoQRCKldq0WDSWla7glPelNopi5YJ1M7S2goqsWRjcrG7uw7-fYNxMCu_CX16aQrgjEnJuU4u2Lma4GMM6Mw6LDsbvgwFs8VkEiazxWT2mFLkahepu9X_7j8LUWfu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043377449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OC-004 Effect of hookworm treatment on active Crohn's disease</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fortun, P ; Shepherd, V ; Moroz, V ; Pritchard, D ; Hawkey, C J</creator><creatorcontrib>Fortun, P ; Shepherd, V ; Moroz, V ; Pritchard, D ; Hawkey, C J</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionParasites are under consideration as therapy for Crohn's disease and hookworm treatment is marketed for this purpose, despite a lack of controlled evidence. We therefore conducted a study of the effects of the hookworm Necator americanus on patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's.MethodsFifty-six patients with a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) of 220–450 were randomised to receive 10 hookworm larvae or placebo (histamine) under a plaster patch on the forearm. Clinical activity and immunological changes were monitored over 12 weeks before hookworm was eradicated by treatment with mebendazole, and there was a final visit at 24 weeks. The primary analysis of effect was of the change from baseline at 12 weeks in the CDAI assessed by a generalised linear model (analysis of covariance) with change from baseline as response with terms for treatment arm and baseline CDAI as explanatory variables. Assuming a standard deviation of the change in the Crohn's disease activity index of 110 this study of 56 patients had 80% power to detect a difference of 85 in the CDAI with hookworm treatment compared to control (α=0.05).ResultsClean file was declared and the treatment code broken at 5 p, on 30 November 2009. Groups were well matched for age (mean 38.2±11.7 (SD) years for hookworm treatment, 42.2±13.2 for placebo), sex (50% vs 54% female), smoking, drug use and disease location. Preliminary analysis of the primary endpoint appeared to show a strong trend against any evidence of therapeutic benefit with hookworm. Patients treated with hookworm had a 64 point increase in CDAI (95% CIs ranging from a 15-point benefit to a 143-point deterioration). There was no obvious difference in advers events in each group.ConclusionOur preliminary analysis appears to exclude any significant overall benefit from treatment with 10 Necator americanus larvae in active Crohn's Disease and raises the possibility that such treatment may even be harmful. Further analysis will be needed to determine whether apparent deteriorations in CDAI may reflect gastrointestinal symptoms induced by hookworm infection and whether there might be benefit in subgroups. Further work could explore whether different dosing regimens would be more successful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.208934d</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Crohn's disease ; Forearm ; Histamine ; Larvae ; Mebendazole ; Necator americanus ; Parasites ; Patients ; Smoking ; Substance abuse treatment</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2010-04, Vol.59 (Suppl 1), p.A2-A2</ispartof><rights>2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2010 © 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1529-d7404f41f1383d71be585e0328695ce83dd3bf2414c69f8aea35e9fa1ba517e63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/59/Suppl_1/A2.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/59/Suppl_1/A2.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fortun, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moroz, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkey, C J</creatorcontrib><title>OC-004 Effect of hookworm treatment on active Crohn's disease</title><title>Gut</title><description>IntroductionParasites are under consideration as therapy for Crohn's disease and hookworm treatment is marketed for this purpose, despite a lack of controlled evidence. We therefore conducted a study of the effects of the hookworm Necator americanus on patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's.MethodsFifty-six patients with a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) of 220–450 were randomised to receive 10 hookworm larvae or placebo (histamine) under a plaster patch on the forearm. Clinical activity and immunological changes were monitored over 12 weeks before hookworm was eradicated by treatment with mebendazole, and there was a final visit at 24 weeks. The primary analysis of effect was of the change from baseline at 12 weeks in the CDAI assessed by a generalised linear model (analysis of covariance) with change from baseline as response with terms for treatment arm and baseline CDAI as explanatory variables. Assuming a standard deviation of the change in the Crohn's disease activity index of 110 this study of 56 patients had 80% power to detect a difference of 85 in the CDAI with hookworm treatment compared to control (α=0.05).ResultsClean file was declared and the treatment code broken at 5 p, on 30 November 2009. Groups were well matched for age (mean 38.2±11.7 (SD) years for hookworm treatment, 42.2±13.2 for placebo), sex (50% vs 54% female), smoking, drug use and disease location. Preliminary analysis of the primary endpoint appeared to show a strong trend against any evidence of therapeutic benefit with hookworm. Patients treated with hookworm had a 64 point increase in CDAI (95% CIs ranging from a 15-point benefit to a 143-point deterioration). There was no obvious difference in advers events in each group.ConclusionOur preliminary analysis appears to exclude any significant overall benefit from treatment with 10 Necator americanus larvae in active Crohn's Disease and raises the possibility that such treatment may even be harmful. Further analysis will be needed to determine whether apparent deteriorations in CDAI may reflect gastrointestinal symptoms induced by hookworm infection and whether there might be benefit in subgroups. Further work could explore whether different dosing regimens would be more successful.</description><subject>Crohn's disease</subject><subject>Forearm</subject><subject>Histamine</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Mebendazole</subject><subject>Necator americanus</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD9PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiYEAp59iO7QmhqPyRKnWB2XKSM20hcbFTEBsLX5RPgqt2Z7mTnt67e_oRck5hQikrr182w6QA0GkozXh7QEaUlypnhVKHZARAZS4k18fkJMYVACil6YjczKscgP9-_0ydw2bIvMsW3r9--tBlQ0A7dNgntc9sMyw_MKuCX_SXMWuXEW3EU3Lk7FvEs_0ek-e76VP1kM_m94_V7SyvqSh03koO3HHqKFOslbRGoQRCKldq0WDSWla7glPelNopi5YJ1M7S2goqsWRjcrG7uw7-fYNxMCu_CX16aQrgjEnJuU4u2Lma4GMM6Mw6LDsbvgwFs8VkEiazxWT2mFLkahepu9X_7j8LUWfu</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Fortun, P</creator><creator>Shepherd, V</creator><creator>Moroz, V</creator><creator>Pritchard, D</creator><creator>Hawkey, C J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>OC-004 Effect of hookworm treatment on active Crohn's disease</title><author>Fortun, P ; Shepherd, V ; Moroz, V ; Pritchard, D ; Hawkey, C J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1529-d7404f41f1383d71be585e0328695ce83dd3bf2414c69f8aea35e9fa1ba517e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Crohn's disease</topic><topic>Forearm</topic><topic>Histamine</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Mebendazole</topic><topic>Necator americanus</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fortun, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moroz, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkey, C J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fortun, P</au><au>Shepherd, V</au><au>Moroz, V</au><au>Pritchard, D</au><au>Hawkey, C J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OC-004 Effect of hookworm treatment on active Crohn's disease</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A2</spage><epage>A2</epage><pages>A2-A2</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionParasites are under consideration as therapy for Crohn's disease and hookworm treatment is marketed for this purpose, despite a lack of controlled evidence. We therefore conducted a study of the effects of the hookworm Necator americanus on patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's.MethodsFifty-six patients with a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) of 220–450 were randomised to receive 10 hookworm larvae or placebo (histamine) under a plaster patch on the forearm. Clinical activity and immunological changes were monitored over 12 weeks before hookworm was eradicated by treatment with mebendazole, and there was a final visit at 24 weeks. The primary analysis of effect was of the change from baseline at 12 weeks in the CDAI assessed by a generalised linear model (analysis of covariance) with change from baseline as response with terms for treatment arm and baseline CDAI as explanatory variables. Assuming a standard deviation of the change in the Crohn's disease activity index of 110 this study of 56 patients had 80% power to detect a difference of 85 in the CDAI with hookworm treatment compared to control (α=0.05).ResultsClean file was declared and the treatment code broken at 5 p, on 30 November 2009. Groups were well matched for age (mean 38.2±11.7 (SD) years for hookworm treatment, 42.2±13.2 for placebo), sex (50% vs 54% female), smoking, drug use and disease location. Preliminary analysis of the primary endpoint appeared to show a strong trend against any evidence of therapeutic benefit with hookworm. Patients treated with hookworm had a 64 point increase in CDAI (95% CIs ranging from a 15-point benefit to a 143-point deterioration). There was no obvious difference in advers events in each group.ConclusionOur preliminary analysis appears to exclude any significant overall benefit from treatment with 10 Necator americanus larvae in active Crohn's Disease and raises the possibility that such treatment may even be harmful. Further analysis will be needed to determine whether apparent deteriorations in CDAI may reflect gastrointestinal symptoms induced by hookworm infection and whether there might be benefit in subgroups. Further work could explore whether different dosing regimens would be more successful.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/gut.2009.208934d</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2010-04, Vol.59 (Suppl 1), p.A2-A2 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2043377449 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Crohn's disease Forearm Histamine Larvae Mebendazole Necator americanus Parasites Patients Smoking Substance abuse treatment |
title | OC-004 Effect of hookworm treatment on active Crohn's disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A36%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OC-004%E2%80%85Effect%20of%20hookworm%20treatment%20on%20active%20Crohn's%20disease&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Fortun,%20P&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A2&rft.epage=A2&rft.pages=A2-A2&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.2009.208934d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2043377449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043377449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |