PWE-086 Prevalence of dual pathology in routine liver biopsies

Introduction The indications for liver biopsy are changing with their role in diagnosis becoming less, and alternative assessments being increasingly used for staging purposes. There is an emerging impression that more biopsies are being taken for an element of clinical uncertainty, particularly whe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2015-06, Vol.64 (Suppl 1), p.A249-A250
Hauptverfasser: Paterson, AL, Brais, R, Davies, SE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A250
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A249
container_title Gut
container_volume 64
creator Paterson, AL
Brais, R
Davies, SE
description Introduction The indications for liver biopsy are changing with their role in diagnosis becoming less, and alternative assessments being increasingly used for staging purposes. There is an emerging impression that more biopsies are being taken for an element of clinical uncertainty, particularly when multiple risk factors are present. This study aimed to determine (a) the number of medical liver biopsies in which a primary and secondary diagnosis were identified; (b) whether this had changed over time; and (c) the most prevalent co-existing pathologies. Method All liver biopsies reported at our centre, a tertiary referral liver unit and transplant centre, in 2003 and 2013 were identified from the electronic record. Biopsies from liver transplant grafts and of focal lesions were excluded. The histopathology report for each case was reviewed, the number of different pathologies present recorded and then correlated with the clinical information provided. Results In total, 1421 liver biopsies met the inclusion criteria. In 2013, 189/941 (21%) had more than one pathology present, a proportion comparable to 2003, 85/480 (18%), p = 0.32. Three co-existing disease processes were present in 1% (13/1421) of cases. Based on the clinical details provided at the time of biopsy, in 213 (78%) cases overall, the additional pathology (s) was not suspected. In 2003, the most prevalent reported pathology as a primary or dual diagnosis was chronic viral hepatitis, present in 182/480 (38%) biopsies, with fatty liver disease second, 157/480 (33%). By 2013 this had reversed with significant fatty liver disease reported in 409/941 (43%) biopsies and chronic viral hepatitis in 260/941 (28%). In both years, in over a third of cases of fatty liver disease, and a quarter with chronic viral hepatitis, a dual pathology was present; most commonly these two aetiologies co-existing. When present, significant siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation were usually part of a dual diagnosis, 58/70 (83%) and 27/35 (77%) respectively. In 2013, compared to 2003, there was a 50% increase in the prevalence of cholangiopathies, siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation reported as part of a dual diagnosis; whilst autoimmune hepatitis was more likely to be a single diagnosis, 30% in 2013 compared to 57% in 2003. Conclusion The proportion of dual diagnoses has not significantly changed in the decade studied and remains dominated by fatty liver disease. The disease combinations identified ha
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.535
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2043374645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2043374645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c755-32912e3ce52355cd56656b5eaa337abe167e1d3de900de4a8d229b29764b7b483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVV5AB16Nzv6xESr1AwS4KLodJclpTYibOJIW-jc_ik5kSV2fz8_-HD6FbRu8ZE_phN_T7tiGcMkUEdVazeyXUGZoxqS0R3NpzNKOUGaKMdJfoKuc9pdRax2bocf2xJNTq3591gkNooC0Bxy2uhtDgLvSfsYm7I65bnOLQ1y3gpj5AwkUdu1xDvkYX29BkuPm_c7R5Xm4Wr2T1_vK2eFqR0qjxLe4YB1GC4kKpslJaK10oCEEIEwpg2gCrRAWO0gpksBXnruDOaFmYQloxR3dTbZfi9wC59_s4pHZc9JzKsURqqcaUnlJlijkn2Pou1V8hHT2j_mTlJyt_svKTlR-txB_KDF4L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043374645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PWE-086 Prevalence of dual pathology in routine liver biopsies</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Paterson, AL ; Brais, R ; Davies, SE</creator><creatorcontrib>Paterson, AL ; Brais, R ; Davies, SE</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The indications for liver biopsy are changing with their role in diagnosis becoming less, and alternative assessments being increasingly used for staging purposes. There is an emerging impression that more biopsies are being taken for an element of clinical uncertainty, particularly when multiple risk factors are present. This study aimed to determine (a) the number of medical liver biopsies in which a primary and secondary diagnosis were identified; (b) whether this had changed over time; and (c) the most prevalent co-existing pathologies. Method All liver biopsies reported at our centre, a tertiary referral liver unit and transplant centre, in 2003 and 2013 were identified from the electronic record. Biopsies from liver transplant grafts and of focal lesions were excluded. The histopathology report for each case was reviewed, the number of different pathologies present recorded and then correlated with the clinical information provided. Results In total, 1421 liver biopsies met the inclusion criteria. In 2013, 189/941 (21%) had more than one pathology present, a proportion comparable to 2003, 85/480 (18%), p = 0.32. Three co-existing disease processes were present in 1% (13/1421) of cases. Based on the clinical details provided at the time of biopsy, in 213 (78%) cases overall, the additional pathology (s) was not suspected. In 2003, the most prevalent reported pathology as a primary or dual diagnosis was chronic viral hepatitis, present in 182/480 (38%) biopsies, with fatty liver disease second, 157/480 (33%). By 2013 this had reversed with significant fatty liver disease reported in 409/941 (43%) biopsies and chronic viral hepatitis in 260/941 (28%). In both years, in over a third of cases of fatty liver disease, and a quarter with chronic viral hepatitis, a dual pathology was present; most commonly these two aetiologies co-existing. When present, significant siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation were usually part of a dual diagnosis, 58/70 (83%) and 27/35 (77%) respectively. In 2013, compared to 2003, there was a 50% increase in the prevalence of cholangiopathies, siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation reported as part of a dual diagnosis; whilst autoimmune hepatitis was more likely to be a single diagnosis, 30% in 2013 compared to 57% in 2003. Conclusion The proportion of dual diagnoses has not significantly changed in the decade studied and remains dominated by fatty liver disease. The disease combinations identified have however altered; this may reflect a better understanding of the pathological processes and clearer guidelines for diagnosis. Pathologists should be aware of the frequent occurrence of dual pathology as it has the potential to impact on clinical management and, based on the clinical details provided, a second diagnosis was not suggested in over three-quarters of cases identified in this study. Disclosure of interest None Declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Diagnosis ; Fatty liver ; Hepatitis ; Liver diseases ; Liver transplantation ; Pathology ; Risk factors ; Siderosis</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2015-06, Vol.64 (Suppl 1), p.A249-A250</ispartof><rights>Copyright: 2015 © 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3183,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paterson, AL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brais, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, SE</creatorcontrib><title>PWE-086 Prevalence of dual pathology in routine liver biopsies</title><title>Gut</title><description>Introduction The indications for liver biopsy are changing with their role in diagnosis becoming less, and alternative assessments being increasingly used for staging purposes. There is an emerging impression that more biopsies are being taken for an element of clinical uncertainty, particularly when multiple risk factors are present. This study aimed to determine (a) the number of medical liver biopsies in which a primary and secondary diagnosis were identified; (b) whether this had changed over time; and (c) the most prevalent co-existing pathologies. Method All liver biopsies reported at our centre, a tertiary referral liver unit and transplant centre, in 2003 and 2013 were identified from the electronic record. Biopsies from liver transplant grafts and of focal lesions were excluded. The histopathology report for each case was reviewed, the number of different pathologies present recorded and then correlated with the clinical information provided. Results In total, 1421 liver biopsies met the inclusion criteria. In 2013, 189/941 (21%) had more than one pathology present, a proportion comparable to 2003, 85/480 (18%), p = 0.32. Three co-existing disease processes were present in 1% (13/1421) of cases. Based on the clinical details provided at the time of biopsy, in 213 (78%) cases overall, the additional pathology (s) was not suspected. In 2003, the most prevalent reported pathology as a primary or dual diagnosis was chronic viral hepatitis, present in 182/480 (38%) biopsies, with fatty liver disease second, 157/480 (33%). By 2013 this had reversed with significant fatty liver disease reported in 409/941 (43%) biopsies and chronic viral hepatitis in 260/941 (28%). In both years, in over a third of cases of fatty liver disease, and a quarter with chronic viral hepatitis, a dual pathology was present; most commonly these two aetiologies co-existing. When present, significant siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation were usually part of a dual diagnosis, 58/70 (83%) and 27/35 (77%) respectively. In 2013, compared to 2003, there was a 50% increase in the prevalence of cholangiopathies, siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation reported as part of a dual diagnosis; whilst autoimmune hepatitis was more likely to be a single diagnosis, 30% in 2013 compared to 57% in 2003. Conclusion The proportion of dual diagnoses has not significantly changed in the decade studied and remains dominated by fatty liver disease. The disease combinations identified have however altered; this may reflect a better understanding of the pathological processes and clearer guidelines for diagnosis. Pathologists should be aware of the frequent occurrence of dual pathology as it has the potential to impact on clinical management and, based on the clinical details provided, a second diagnosis was not suggested in over three-quarters of cases identified in this study. Disclosure of interest None Declared.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Fatty liver</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Siderosis</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNot0MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVV5AB16Nzv6xESr1AwS4KLodJclpTYibOJIW-jc_ik5kSV2fz8_-HD6FbRu8ZE_phN_T7tiGcMkUEdVazeyXUGZoxqS0R3NpzNKOUGaKMdJfoKuc9pdRax2bocf2xJNTq3591gkNooC0Bxy2uhtDgLvSfsYm7I65bnOLQ1y3gpj5AwkUdu1xDvkYX29BkuPm_c7R5Xm4Wr2T1_vK2eFqR0qjxLe4YB1GC4kKpslJaK10oCEEIEwpg2gCrRAWO0gpksBXnruDOaFmYQloxR3dTbZfi9wC59_s4pHZc9JzKsURqqcaUnlJlijkn2Pou1V8hHT2j_mTlJyt_svKTlR-txB_KDF4L</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Paterson, AL</creator><creator>Brais, R</creator><creator>Davies, SE</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>PWE-086 Prevalence of dual pathology in routine liver biopsies</title><author>Paterson, AL ; Brais, R ; Davies, SE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c755-32912e3ce52355cd56656b5eaa337abe167e1d3de900de4a8d229b29764b7b483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Fatty liver</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Siderosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paterson, AL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brais, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, SE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paterson, AL</au><au>Brais, R</au><au>Davies, SE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PWE-086 Prevalence of dual pathology in routine liver biopsies</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A249</spage><epage>A250</epage><pages>A249-A250</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>Introduction The indications for liver biopsy are changing with their role in diagnosis becoming less, and alternative assessments being increasingly used for staging purposes. There is an emerging impression that more biopsies are being taken for an element of clinical uncertainty, particularly when multiple risk factors are present. This study aimed to determine (a) the number of medical liver biopsies in which a primary and secondary diagnosis were identified; (b) whether this had changed over time; and (c) the most prevalent co-existing pathologies. Method All liver biopsies reported at our centre, a tertiary referral liver unit and transplant centre, in 2003 and 2013 were identified from the electronic record. Biopsies from liver transplant grafts and of focal lesions were excluded. The histopathology report for each case was reviewed, the number of different pathologies present recorded and then correlated with the clinical information provided. Results In total, 1421 liver biopsies met the inclusion criteria. In 2013, 189/941 (21%) had more than one pathology present, a proportion comparable to 2003, 85/480 (18%), p = 0.32. Three co-existing disease processes were present in 1% (13/1421) of cases. Based on the clinical details provided at the time of biopsy, in 213 (78%) cases overall, the additional pathology (s) was not suspected. In 2003, the most prevalent reported pathology as a primary or dual diagnosis was chronic viral hepatitis, present in 182/480 (38%) biopsies, with fatty liver disease second, 157/480 (33%). By 2013 this had reversed with significant fatty liver disease reported in 409/941 (43%) biopsies and chronic viral hepatitis in 260/941 (28%). In both years, in over a third of cases of fatty liver disease, and a quarter with chronic viral hepatitis, a dual pathology was present; most commonly these two aetiologies co-existing. When present, significant siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation were usually part of a dual diagnosis, 58/70 (83%) and 27/35 (77%) respectively. In 2013, compared to 2003, there was a 50% increase in the prevalence of cholangiopathies, siderosis and alpha-1-antitrypsin accumulation reported as part of a dual diagnosis; whilst autoimmune hepatitis was more likely to be a single diagnosis, 30% in 2013 compared to 57% in 2003. Conclusion The proportion of dual diagnoses has not significantly changed in the decade studied and remains dominated by fatty liver disease. The disease combinations identified have however altered; this may reflect a better understanding of the pathological processes and clearer guidelines for diagnosis. Pathologists should be aware of the frequent occurrence of dual pathology as it has the potential to impact on clinical management and, based on the clinical details provided, a second diagnosis was not suggested in over three-quarters of cases identified in this study. Disclosure of interest None Declared.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.535</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2015-06, Vol.64 (Suppl 1), p.A249-A250
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2043374645
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central
subjects Biopsy
Diagnosis
Fatty liver
Hepatitis
Liver diseases
Liver transplantation
Pathology
Risk factors
Siderosis
title PWE-086 Prevalence of dual pathology in routine liver biopsies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T04%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PWE-086%C2%A0Prevalence%20of%20dual%20pathology%20in%20routine%20liver%20biopsies&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Paterson,%20AL&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A249&rft.epage=A250&rft.pages=A249-A250&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.535&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2043374645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043374645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true