SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
•The consistency of the quantified SSPs and their narratives is evaluated.•SSP3 has higher climate mitigation costs, which is consistent with its narrative.•SSP3 has unique characteristics for air pollutant emissions and land use change.•SSP3 shows high challenges to the adaptation in terms of incom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global environmental change 2017-01, Vol.42, p.268-283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 283 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 268 |
container_title | Global environmental change |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Fujimori, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Tomoko Masui, Toshihiko Takahashi, Kiyoshi Herran, Diego Silva Dai, Hancheng Hijioka, Yasuaki Kainuma, Mikiko |
description | •The consistency of the quantified SSPs and their narratives is evaluated.•SSP3 has higher climate mitigation costs, which is consistent with its narrative.•SSP3 has unique characteristics for air pollutant emissions and land use change.•SSP3 shows high challenges to the adaptation in terms of income and trade features.
This study quantifies the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) using AIM/CGE (Asia-Pacific Integrated Assessment/Computable General Equilibrium). SSP3 (regional rivalry) forms the main focus of the study, which is supposed to face high challenges both in mitigation and adaptation. The AIM model has been selected as the model to quantify the SSP3 marker scenario, a representative case illustrating a particular narrative. Multiple parameter assumptions in AIM/CGE were differentiated across the SSPs for quantification. We confirm that SSP3 quantitative scenarios outcomes are consistent with its narrative. Moreover, four key features of SSP3 are observed. First, as SSP3 was originally designed to contain a high level of challenges to mitigation, mitigation costs in SSP3 were relatively high. This results from the combination of high greenhouse gas emissions in the baseline (no climate mitigation policy) scenario and low mitigative capacity. Second, the climate forcing level in 2100 for the baseline scenarios of SSP3 was similar to that of SSP2, whereas CO2 emissions in SSP3 are higher than those in SSP2. This is mainly due to high aerosol emissions in SSP3. A third feature was the high air pollutant emissions associated with weak implementation of air quality legislation and a high level of coal dependency. Fourth, forest area steadily decreases with a large expansion of cropland and pasture land. These characteristics indicate at least four potential uses for SSP3. First, SSP3 is useful for both IAM and impact, adaptation, vulnerability (IAV) analyses to present the worst-case scenario. Second, by comparing SSP2 and SSP3, IAV analyses can clarify the influences of socioeconomic elements under similar climatic conditions. Third, the high air pollutant emissions would be of interest to atmospheric chemistry climate modelers. Finally, in addition to climate change studies, many other environmental studies could benefit from the meaningful insights available from the large-scale land use change resulting in SSP3. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2043315670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959378016300838</els_id><sourcerecordid>2043315670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-fff99953fc5225a7d45171e1b0fb4bd35e9cfd49b94aecec84dc585ffb3ccd6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkG9LwzAQxoMoOKefwYKvW5OmWRvfjeGfwcRB9XVILxeXsjUz7Sb79mZMfOvxwMHx3HPcj5BbRjNG2eS-zT7XHrs9rHSWx0FGo6g8IyNWlXkqCynOyYhKIVNeVvSSXPV9S2NJzkdE1vWSPyTT-WviNts1brAb9OB8l3ib1Csd0CS1B-cRfOc3DpKlHlbf-tBfkwur1z3e_PYx-Xh6fJ-9pIu35_lsukiBy3xIrbVSSsEtiDwXujSFYCVD1lDbFI3hAiVYU8hGFhoBoSoMiEpY23AAMzF8TO5Oudvgv3bYD6r1u9DFkyqnBedMTEoaXeXJBcH3fUCrtsFtdDgoRtWRk2rVHyd15KRoVIQwJtPTJsYn9g6D6sFhB2hcQBiU8e7fjB-YSHWa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043315670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Fujimori, Shinichiro ; Hasegawa, Tomoko ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Takahashi, Kiyoshi ; Herran, Diego Silva ; Dai, Hancheng ; Hijioka, Yasuaki ; Kainuma, Mikiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujimori, Shinichiro ; Hasegawa, Tomoko ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Takahashi, Kiyoshi ; Herran, Diego Silva ; Dai, Hancheng ; Hijioka, Yasuaki ; Kainuma, Mikiko</creatorcontrib><description>•The consistency of the quantified SSPs and their narratives is evaluated.•SSP3 has higher climate mitigation costs, which is consistent with its narrative.•SSP3 has unique characteristics for air pollutant emissions and land use change.•SSP3 shows high challenges to the adaptation in terms of income and trade features.
This study quantifies the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) using AIM/CGE (Asia-Pacific Integrated Assessment/Computable General Equilibrium). SSP3 (regional rivalry) forms the main focus of the study, which is supposed to face high challenges both in mitigation and adaptation. The AIM model has been selected as the model to quantify the SSP3 marker scenario, a representative case illustrating a particular narrative. Multiple parameter assumptions in AIM/CGE were differentiated across the SSPs for quantification. We confirm that SSP3 quantitative scenarios outcomes are consistent with its narrative. Moreover, four key features of SSP3 are observed. First, as SSP3 was originally designed to contain a high level of challenges to mitigation, mitigation costs in SSP3 were relatively high. This results from the combination of high greenhouse gas emissions in the baseline (no climate mitigation policy) scenario and low mitigative capacity. Second, the climate forcing level in 2100 for the baseline scenarios of SSP3 was similar to that of SSP2, whereas CO2 emissions in SSP3 are higher than those in SSP2. This is mainly due to high aerosol emissions in SSP3. A third feature was the high air pollutant emissions associated with weak implementation of air quality legislation and a high level of coal dependency. Fourth, forest area steadily decreases with a large expansion of cropland and pasture land. These characteristics indicate at least four potential uses for SSP3. First, SSP3 is useful for both IAM and impact, adaptation, vulnerability (IAV) analyses to present the worst-case scenario. Second, by comparing SSP2 and SSP3, IAV analyses can clarify the influences of socioeconomic elements under similar climatic conditions. Third, the high air pollutant emissions would be of interest to atmospheric chemistry climate modelers. Finally, in addition to climate change studies, many other environmental studies could benefit from the meaningful insights available from the large-scale land use change resulting in SSP3.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Agricultural land ; AIM ; Air pollution ; Air quality ; Atmospheric chemistry ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate mitigation ; Climate policy ; Climate studies ; Climatic conditions ; Coal ; Computable general equilibrium model ; Dependence ; Dependency ; Environmental studies ; Extenuating circumstances ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Impact analysis ; Integrated assessment model ; Land use ; Legislation ; Levels ; Measurement ; Mitigation ; Mitigation costs ; Narratives ; Pasture ; Pollutants ; Regional analysis ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic scenarios ; Socioeconomics ; SSPs ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Global environmental change, 2017-01, Vol.42, p.268-283</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-fff99953fc5225a7d45171e1b0fb4bd35e9cfd49b94aecec84dc585ffb3ccd6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-fff99953fc5225a7d45171e1b0fb4bd35e9cfd49b94aecec84dc585ffb3ccd6d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7897-1796</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujimori, Shinichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masui, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herran, Diego Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Hancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijioka, Yasuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kainuma, Mikiko</creatorcontrib><title>SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways</title><title>Global environmental change</title><description>•The consistency of the quantified SSPs and their narratives is evaluated.•SSP3 has higher climate mitigation costs, which is consistent with its narrative.•SSP3 has unique characteristics for air pollutant emissions and land use change.•SSP3 shows high challenges to the adaptation in terms of income and trade features.
This study quantifies the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) using AIM/CGE (Asia-Pacific Integrated Assessment/Computable General Equilibrium). SSP3 (regional rivalry) forms the main focus of the study, which is supposed to face high challenges both in mitigation and adaptation. The AIM model has been selected as the model to quantify the SSP3 marker scenario, a representative case illustrating a particular narrative. Multiple parameter assumptions in AIM/CGE were differentiated across the SSPs for quantification. We confirm that SSP3 quantitative scenarios outcomes are consistent with its narrative. Moreover, four key features of SSP3 are observed. First, as SSP3 was originally designed to contain a high level of challenges to mitigation, mitigation costs in SSP3 were relatively high. This results from the combination of high greenhouse gas emissions in the baseline (no climate mitigation policy) scenario and low mitigative capacity. Second, the climate forcing level in 2100 for the baseline scenarios of SSP3 was similar to that of SSP2, whereas CO2 emissions in SSP3 are higher than those in SSP2. This is mainly due to high aerosol emissions in SSP3. A third feature was the high air pollutant emissions associated with weak implementation of air quality legislation and a high level of coal dependency. Fourth, forest area steadily decreases with a large expansion of cropland and pasture land. These characteristics indicate at least four potential uses for SSP3. First, SSP3 is useful for both IAM and impact, adaptation, vulnerability (IAV) analyses to present the worst-case scenario. Second, by comparing SSP2 and SSP3, IAV analyses can clarify the influences of socioeconomic elements under similar climatic conditions. Third, the high air pollutant emissions would be of interest to atmospheric chemistry climate modelers. Finally, in addition to climate change studies, many other environmental studies could benefit from the meaningful insights available from the large-scale land use change resulting in SSP3.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>AIM</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate mitigation</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Climate studies</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Computable general equilibrium model</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Dependency</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Extenuating circumstances</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Integrated assessment model</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Mitigation costs</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Regional analysis</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic scenarios</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>SSPs</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0959-3780</issn><issn>1872-9495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkG9LwzAQxoMoOKefwYKvW5OmWRvfjeGfwcRB9XVILxeXsjUz7Sb79mZMfOvxwMHx3HPcj5BbRjNG2eS-zT7XHrs9rHSWx0FGo6g8IyNWlXkqCynOyYhKIVNeVvSSXPV9S2NJzkdE1vWSPyTT-WviNts1brAb9OB8l3ib1Csd0CS1B-cRfOc3DpKlHlbf-tBfkwur1z3e_PYx-Xh6fJ-9pIu35_lsukiBy3xIrbVSSsEtiDwXujSFYCVD1lDbFI3hAiVYU8hGFhoBoSoMiEpY23AAMzF8TO5Oudvgv3bYD6r1u9DFkyqnBedMTEoaXeXJBcH3fUCrtsFtdDgoRtWRk2rVHyd15KRoVIQwJtPTJsYn9g6D6sFhB2hcQBiU8e7fjB-YSHWa</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Fujimori, Shinichiro</creator><creator>Hasegawa, Tomoko</creator><creator>Masui, Toshihiko</creator><creator>Takahashi, Kiyoshi</creator><creator>Herran, Diego Silva</creator><creator>Dai, Hancheng</creator><creator>Hijioka, Yasuaki</creator><creator>Kainuma, Mikiko</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-1796</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways</title><author>Fujimori, Shinichiro ; Hasegawa, Tomoko ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Takahashi, Kiyoshi ; Herran, Diego Silva ; Dai, Hancheng ; Hijioka, Yasuaki ; Kainuma, Mikiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-fff99953fc5225a7d45171e1b0fb4bd35e9cfd49b94aecec84dc585ffb3ccd6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>AIM</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate mitigation</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Climate studies</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Computable general equilibrium model</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Dependency</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Extenuating circumstances</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Integrated assessment model</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Mitigation costs</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Regional analysis</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic scenarios</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>SSPs</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujimori, Shinichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Tomoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masui, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herran, Diego Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Hancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijioka, Yasuaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kainuma, Mikiko</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujimori, Shinichiro</au><au>Hasegawa, Tomoko</au><au>Masui, Toshihiko</au><au>Takahashi, Kiyoshi</au><au>Herran, Diego Silva</au><au>Dai, Hancheng</au><au>Hijioka, Yasuaki</au><au>Kainuma, Mikiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways</atitle><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>268</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>268-283</pages><issn>0959-3780</issn><eissn>1872-9495</eissn><abstract>•The consistency of the quantified SSPs and their narratives is evaluated.•SSP3 has higher climate mitigation costs, which is consistent with its narrative.•SSP3 has unique characteristics for air pollutant emissions and land use change.•SSP3 shows high challenges to the adaptation in terms of income and trade features.
This study quantifies the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) using AIM/CGE (Asia-Pacific Integrated Assessment/Computable General Equilibrium). SSP3 (regional rivalry) forms the main focus of the study, which is supposed to face high challenges both in mitigation and adaptation. The AIM model has been selected as the model to quantify the SSP3 marker scenario, a representative case illustrating a particular narrative. Multiple parameter assumptions in AIM/CGE were differentiated across the SSPs for quantification. We confirm that SSP3 quantitative scenarios outcomes are consistent with its narrative. Moreover, four key features of SSP3 are observed. First, as SSP3 was originally designed to contain a high level of challenges to mitigation, mitigation costs in SSP3 were relatively high. This results from the combination of high greenhouse gas emissions in the baseline (no climate mitigation policy) scenario and low mitigative capacity. Second, the climate forcing level in 2100 for the baseline scenarios of SSP3 was similar to that of SSP2, whereas CO2 emissions in SSP3 are higher than those in SSP2. This is mainly due to high aerosol emissions in SSP3. A third feature was the high air pollutant emissions associated with weak implementation of air quality legislation and a high level of coal dependency. Fourth, forest area steadily decreases with a large expansion of cropland and pasture land. These characteristics indicate at least four potential uses for SSP3. First, SSP3 is useful for both IAM and impact, adaptation, vulnerability (IAV) analyses to present the worst-case scenario. Second, by comparing SSP2 and SSP3, IAV analyses can clarify the influences of socioeconomic elements under similar climatic conditions. Third, the high air pollutant emissions would be of interest to atmospheric chemistry climate modelers. Finally, in addition to climate change studies, many other environmental studies could benefit from the meaningful insights available from the large-scale land use change resulting in SSP3.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-1796</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-3780 |
ispartof | Global environmental change, 2017-01, Vol.42, p.268-283 |
issn | 0959-3780 1872-9495 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2043315670 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adaptation Agricultural land AIM Air pollution Air quality Atmospheric chemistry Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Climate Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate mitigation Climate policy Climate studies Climatic conditions Coal Computable general equilibrium model Dependence Dependency Environmental studies Extenuating circumstances Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Impact analysis Integrated assessment model Land use Legislation Levels Measurement Mitigation Mitigation costs Narratives Pasture Pollutants Regional analysis Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomic scenarios Socioeconomics SSPs Vulnerability |
title | SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SSP3:%20AIM%20implementation%20of%20Shared%20Socioeconomic%20Pathways&rft.jtitle=Global%20environmental%20change&rft.au=Fujimori,%20Shinichiro&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=268-283&rft.issn=0959-3780&rft.eissn=1872-9495&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2043315670%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043315670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959378016300838&rfr_iscdi=true |