Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead
Literature on business process compliance (BPC) has predominantly focused on the alignment of the regulatory rules with the design, verification and validation of business processes. Previously, surveys on BPC have been conducted with specific context in mind; however, the literature on BPC manageme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Knowledge and information systems 2018-10, Vol.57 (1), p.79-133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 133 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Knowledge and information systems |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Hashmi, Mustafa Governatori, Guido Lam, Ho-Pun Wynn, Moe Thandar |
description | Literature on business process compliance (BPC) has predominantly focused on the alignment of the regulatory rules with the design, verification and validation of business processes. Previously, surveys on BPC have been conducted with specific context in mind; however, the literature on BPC management research is largely sparse and does not accumulate a detailed understanding on existing literature and related issues faced by the domain. This survey provides a holistic view of the literature on existing BPC management approaches and categorises them based on different compliance management strategies in the context of formulated research questions. A systematic literature approach is used where search terms pertaining keywords were used to identify literature related to the research questions from scholarly databases. From initially 183 papers, we selected 79 papers related to the themes of this survey published between 2000 and 2015. The survey results reveal that mostly compliance management approaches centre around three distinct categories, namely design-time (
28
%
), run-time (
32
%
) and auditing (
10
%
). Also, organisational and internal control-based compliance management frameworks (
21
%
) and hybrid approaches make (
9
%
) of the surveyed approaches. Furthermore, open research challenges and gaps are identified and discussed with respect to the compliance problem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10115-017-1142-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204300666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1249828021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-a0e0a58c062c8838bad77b6ccbeff68b600474cce18508e8951a020a126e95973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ3AO7edgOt6riJVXiAJwtx9mQVGlSbEeIf4-rVOLEafbwzezuMHaNcIsA8s4jIBYJoEwQ8zTBE7aAFMskQxSnxxkzKc_ZhfdbiKBAXLC3lSP-Tbweh6hdaHk1-W4g7_nejfagdtzt-84Mlu65DyYQHxseWuLGBW6GmtvW9D0Nn-S5acnUl-ysMb2nq6Mu2cfjw_v6Odm8Pr2sV5vEZliExACBKZQFkVqlMlWZWspKWFtR0whVCYBc5tYSqgIUqbJAAykYTAWVRSmzJbuZc-OlXxP5oLfj5Ia4UqeQZwBCiAjhDFk3eu-o0XvX7Yz70Qj6UJ2eq9OxEX2oTmP0pLPHRzb-5f6C_zf9Ag7xcBI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204300666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hashmi, Mustafa ; Governatori, Guido ; Lam, Ho-Pun ; Wynn, Moe Thandar</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashmi, Mustafa ; Governatori, Guido ; Lam, Ho-Pun ; Wynn, Moe Thandar</creatorcontrib><description>Literature on business process compliance (BPC) has predominantly focused on the alignment of the regulatory rules with the design, verification and validation of business processes. Previously, surveys on BPC have been conducted with specific context in mind; however, the literature on BPC management research is largely sparse and does not accumulate a detailed understanding on existing literature and related issues faced by the domain. This survey provides a holistic view of the literature on existing BPC management approaches and categorises them based on different compliance management strategies in the context of formulated research questions. A systematic literature approach is used where search terms pertaining keywords were used to identify literature related to the research questions from scholarly databases. From initially 183 papers, we selected 79 papers related to the themes of this survey published between 2000 and 2015. The survey results reveal that mostly compliance management approaches centre around three distinct categories, namely design-time (
28
%
), run-time (
32
%
) and auditing (
10
%
). Also, organisational and internal control-based compliance management frameworks (
21
%
) and hybrid approaches make (
9
%
) of the surveyed approaches. Furthermore, open research challenges and gaps are identified and discussed with respect to the compliance problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0219-1377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0219-3116</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10115-017-1142-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Business ; Business process reengineering ; Compliance ; Computer Science ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Database Management ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information systems ; Information Systems and Communication Service ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; IT in Business ; Literature ; Management ; Regular Paper</subject><ispartof>Knowledge and information systems, 2018-10, Vol.57 (1), p.79-133</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Knowledge and Information Systems is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-a0e0a58c062c8838bad77b6ccbeff68b600474cce18508e8951a020a126e95973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-a0e0a58c062c8838bad77b6ccbeff68b600474cce18508e8951a020a126e95973</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6376-082X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10115-017-1142-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10115-017-1142-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashmi, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Governatori, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Ho-Pun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wynn, Moe Thandar</creatorcontrib><title>Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead</title><title>Knowledge and information systems</title><addtitle>Knowl Inf Syst</addtitle><description>Literature on business process compliance (BPC) has predominantly focused on the alignment of the regulatory rules with the design, verification and validation of business processes. Previously, surveys on BPC have been conducted with specific context in mind; however, the literature on BPC management research is largely sparse and does not accumulate a detailed understanding on existing literature and related issues faced by the domain. This survey provides a holistic view of the literature on existing BPC management approaches and categorises them based on different compliance management strategies in the context of formulated research questions. A systematic literature approach is used where search terms pertaining keywords were used to identify literature related to the research questions from scholarly databases. From initially 183 papers, we selected 79 papers related to the themes of this survey published between 2000 and 2015. The survey results reveal that mostly compliance management approaches centre around three distinct categories, namely design-time (
28
%
), run-time (
32
%
) and auditing (
10
%
). Also, organisational and internal control-based compliance management frameworks (
21
%
) and hybrid approaches make (
9
%
) of the surveyed approaches. Furthermore, open research challenges and gaps are identified and discussed with respect to the compliance problem.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business process reengineering</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Database Management</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Information Systems and Communication Service</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Regular Paper</subject><issn>0219-1377</issn><issn>0219-3116</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ3AO7edgOt6riJVXiAJwtx9mQVGlSbEeIf4-rVOLEafbwzezuMHaNcIsA8s4jIBYJoEwQ8zTBE7aAFMskQxSnxxkzKc_ZhfdbiKBAXLC3lSP-Tbweh6hdaHk1-W4g7_nejfagdtzt-84Mlu65DyYQHxseWuLGBW6GmtvW9D0Nn-S5acnUl-ysMb2nq6Mu2cfjw_v6Odm8Pr2sV5vEZliExACBKZQFkVqlMlWZWspKWFtR0whVCYBc5tYSqgIUqbJAAykYTAWVRSmzJbuZc-OlXxP5oLfj5Ia4UqeQZwBCiAjhDFk3eu-o0XvX7Yz70Qj6UJ2eq9OxEX2oTmP0pLPHRzb-5f6C_zf9Ag7xcBI</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Hashmi, Mustafa</creator><creator>Governatori, Guido</creator><creator>Lam, Ho-Pun</creator><creator>Wynn, Moe Thandar</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-082X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead</title><author>Hashmi, Mustafa ; Governatori, Guido ; Lam, Ho-Pun ; Wynn, Moe Thandar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-a0e0a58c062c8838bad77b6ccbeff68b600474cce18508e8951a020a126e95973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business process reengineering</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Database Management</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Information Systems and Communication Service</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Regular Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashmi, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Governatori, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Ho-Pun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wynn, Moe Thandar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Knowledge and information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashmi, Mustafa</au><au>Governatori, Guido</au><au>Lam, Ho-Pun</au><au>Wynn, Moe Thandar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge and information systems</jtitle><stitle>Knowl Inf Syst</stitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>79-133</pages><issn>0219-1377</issn><eissn>0219-3116</eissn><abstract>Literature on business process compliance (BPC) has predominantly focused on the alignment of the regulatory rules with the design, verification and validation of business processes. Previously, surveys on BPC have been conducted with specific context in mind; however, the literature on BPC management research is largely sparse and does not accumulate a detailed understanding on existing literature and related issues faced by the domain. This survey provides a holistic view of the literature on existing BPC management approaches and categorises them based on different compliance management strategies in the context of formulated research questions. A systematic literature approach is used where search terms pertaining keywords were used to identify literature related to the research questions from scholarly databases. From initially 183 papers, we selected 79 papers related to the themes of this survey published between 2000 and 2015. The survey results reveal that mostly compliance management approaches centre around three distinct categories, namely design-time (
28
%
), run-time (
32
%
) and auditing (
10
%
). Also, organisational and internal control-based compliance management frameworks (
21
%
) and hybrid approaches make (
9
%
) of the surveyed approaches. Furthermore, open research challenges and gaps are identified and discussed with respect to the compliance problem.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s10115-017-1142-1</doi><tpages>55</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-082X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0219-1377 |
ispartof | Knowledge and information systems, 2018-10, Vol.57 (1), p.79-133 |
issn | 0219-1377 0219-3116 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204300666 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Business Business process reengineering Compliance Computer Science Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Database Management Information Storage and Retrieval Information systems Information Systems and Communication Service Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) IT in Business Literature Management Regular Paper |
title | Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A09%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20we%20done%20with%20business%20process%20compliance:%20state%20of%20the%20art%20and%20challenges%20ahead&rft.jtitle=Knowledge%20and%20information%20systems&rft.au=Hashmi,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=79-133&rft.issn=0219-1377&rft.eissn=0219-3116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10115-017-1142-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1249828021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204300666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |