Confrontation between techniques of time measurement
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a precise comparison between a pre-determined time rules and the evaluation performed with the help of a manual chronometer using data from a line assembly in an automotive industry besieged in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Nowadays, it is possible to v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manufacturing technology management 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.789-810 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 810 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 789 |
container_title | Journal of manufacturing technology management |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Assef, Fernanda Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu Steiner, Maria Teresinha |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a precise comparison between a pre-determined time rules and the evaluation performed with the help of a manual chronometer using data from a line assembly in an automotive industry besieged in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Nowadays, it is possible to verify several tools of measurement of task times, some taking less time and causing less wear of the evaluator than others, but not being in accordance with the real conditions of the workers of a certain industry.
Design/methodology/approach
The developed paper has its methodology based on two methods of time analysis, one of them being an adaptation of the MODular Arrangement of Predeterminated Time Standard (MODAPTS) method – called MODAPTS 2. This method is used by the industry in analyzed in this work and the other through the use of simple manual timing, through the digital timer, of the stages developed in a workstation.
Findings
The study shows that for each operation analyzed, thus presenting a situation of minimum waste, it becomes possible to judge which reasons exist for the operator during manual timekeeping not to reach the optimum times generated by the system of pre-determined times and movements (PMTSs) questioned.
Research limitations/implications
This study is conducted on an automotive enterprise in a period of confidentiality, which means that only a single workstation is able to be studied. This means that the comparison obtained between the time measurements methods used, and the evaluation of the MODAPTS is carried out with the best possible movements and gestures, disregarding then that the wastes can still be postulated to the whole assembly line.
Originality/value
With the automation in industry, where assemble tasks are usually developed manually, it is believed possible to discard the option of measuring task times in its classic and manual form, using a timer, yet during this process, there will be variables that may not be considered by pre-determined measurements methodologies. The work developed by this paper presents different variables that are not examined by the methods of PMTS, not frequently seen in the literature, as well as the difference that occurs between the measurement of times with stopwatch and the use of PMTS, which, in its original form, disregards the wastes that the operator has in their movements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2042765203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2042765203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1c395dd104baab773418f589b8f8ead4623cac38011b294e3811b38e0a2b09313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxA7hF4mzYtZ3aOaKKp1pxKRI3y0k2IlVjF9sV4t-TqFyQOO0cZnZ3PsauEG4Qwdy-rNYrjoILQM1BlPKIzVCXhmtt5seTVshBmvdTdpbSBkBUBsWMqUXwXQw-u9wHX9SUv4h8kan58P3nnlIRuiL3AxUDubSPNJDPF-ykc9tEl7_znL093K8XT3z5-vi8uFvyRpY6c2xkVbYtgqqdq7WWCk1Xmqo2nSHXqrmQjWukAcRaVIqkGYU0BE7UUEmU5-z6sHcXw_RLtpuwj348aQUooeelADm68OBqYkgpUmd3sR9c_LYIdoJjJzgWhZ3g2AnOmIFDZuwT3bb9N_KHp_wB0hJlFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042765203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confrontation between techniques of time measurement</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Assef, Fernanda ; Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu ; Steiner, Maria Teresinha</creator><creatorcontrib>Assef, Fernanda ; Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu ; Steiner, Maria Teresinha</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a precise comparison between a pre-determined time rules and the evaluation performed with the help of a manual chronometer using data from a line assembly in an automotive industry besieged in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Nowadays, it is possible to verify several tools of measurement of task times, some taking less time and causing less wear of the evaluator than others, but not being in accordance with the real conditions of the workers of a certain industry.
Design/methodology/approach
The developed paper has its methodology based on two methods of time analysis, one of them being an adaptation of the MODular Arrangement of Predeterminated Time Standard (MODAPTS) method – called MODAPTS 2. This method is used by the industry in analyzed in this work and the other through the use of simple manual timing, through the digital timer, of the stages developed in a workstation.
Findings
The study shows that for each operation analyzed, thus presenting a situation of minimum waste, it becomes possible to judge which reasons exist for the operator during manual timekeeping not to reach the optimum times generated by the system of pre-determined times and movements (PMTSs) questioned.
Research limitations/implications
This study is conducted on an automotive enterprise in a period of confidentiality, which means that only a single workstation is able to be studied. This means that the comparison obtained between the time measurements methods used, and the evaluation of the MODAPTS is carried out with the best possible movements and gestures, disregarding then that the wastes can still be postulated to the whole assembly line.
Originality/value
With the automation in industry, where assemble tasks are usually developed manually, it is believed possible to discard the option of measuring task times in its classic and manual form, using a timer, yet during this process, there will be variables that may not be considered by pre-determined measurements methodologies. The work developed by this paper presents different variables that are not examined by the methods of PMTS, not frequently seen in the literature, as well as the difference that occurs between the measurement of times with stopwatch and the use of PMTS, which, in its original form, disregards the wastes that the operator has in their movements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-038X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Advanced manufacturing technologies ; Assembly ; Assembly lines ; Automobile industry ; Automobiles ; Automotive engineering ; Measurement methods ; Measurement techniques ; Measuring instruments ; Productivity ; Simulation ; Studies ; Time measurement ; Vehicles ; Work stations ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Journal of manufacturing technology management, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.789-810</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1c395dd104baab773418f589b8f8ead4623cac38011b294e3811b38e0a2b09313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1c395dd104baab773418f589b8f8ead4623cac38011b294e3811b38e0a2b09313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0253/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27901,27902,52664,53219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Assef, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Maria Teresinha</creatorcontrib><title>Confrontation between techniques of time measurement</title><title>Journal of manufacturing technology management</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a precise comparison between a pre-determined time rules and the evaluation performed with the help of a manual chronometer using data from a line assembly in an automotive industry besieged in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Nowadays, it is possible to verify several tools of measurement of task times, some taking less time and causing less wear of the evaluator than others, but not being in accordance with the real conditions of the workers of a certain industry.
Design/methodology/approach
The developed paper has its methodology based on two methods of time analysis, one of them being an adaptation of the MODular Arrangement of Predeterminated Time Standard (MODAPTS) method – called MODAPTS 2. This method is used by the industry in analyzed in this work and the other through the use of simple manual timing, through the digital timer, of the stages developed in a workstation.
Findings
The study shows that for each operation analyzed, thus presenting a situation of minimum waste, it becomes possible to judge which reasons exist for the operator during manual timekeeping not to reach the optimum times generated by the system of pre-determined times and movements (PMTSs) questioned.
Research limitations/implications
This study is conducted on an automotive enterprise in a period of confidentiality, which means that only a single workstation is able to be studied. This means that the comparison obtained between the time measurements methods used, and the evaluation of the MODAPTS is carried out with the best possible movements and gestures, disregarding then that the wastes can still be postulated to the whole assembly line.
Originality/value
With the automation in industry, where assemble tasks are usually developed manually, it is believed possible to discard the option of measuring task times in its classic and manual form, using a timer, yet during this process, there will be variables that may not be considered by pre-determined measurements methodologies. The work developed by this paper presents different variables that are not examined by the methods of PMTS, not frequently seen in the literature, as well as the difference that occurs between the measurement of times with stopwatch and the use of PMTS, which, in its original form, disregards the wastes that the operator has in their movements.</description><subject>Advanced manufacturing technologies</subject><subject>Assembly</subject><subject>Assembly lines</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1741-038X</issn><issn>1758-7786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxA7hF4mzYtZ3aOaKKp1pxKRI3y0k2IlVjF9sV4t-TqFyQOO0cZnZ3PsauEG4Qwdy-rNYrjoILQM1BlPKIzVCXhmtt5seTVshBmvdTdpbSBkBUBsWMqUXwXQw-u9wHX9SUv4h8kan58P3nnlIRuiL3AxUDubSPNJDPF-ykc9tEl7_znL093K8XT3z5-vi8uFvyRpY6c2xkVbYtgqqdq7WWCk1Xmqo2nSHXqrmQjWukAcRaVIqkGYU0BE7UUEmU5-z6sHcXw_RLtpuwj348aQUooeelADm68OBqYkgpUmd3sR9c_LYIdoJjJzgWhZ3g2AnOmIFDZuwT3bb9N_KHp_wB0hJlFw</recordid><startdate>20180523</startdate><enddate>20180523</enddate><creator>Assef, Fernanda</creator><creator>Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu</creator><creator>Steiner, Maria Teresinha</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180523</creationdate><title>Confrontation between techniques of time measurement</title><author>Assef, Fernanda ; Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu ; Steiner, Maria Teresinha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1c395dd104baab773418f589b8f8ead4623cac38011b294e3811b38e0a2b09313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advanced manufacturing technologies</topic><topic>Assembly</topic><topic>Assembly lines</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Assef, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Maria Teresinha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing technology management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Assef, Fernanda</au><au>Scarpin, Cassius Tadeu</au><au>Steiner, Maria Teresinha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confrontation between techniques of time measurement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing technology management</jtitle><date>2018-05-23</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>789</spage><epage>810</epage><pages>789-810</pages><issn>1741-038X</issn><eissn>1758-7786</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a precise comparison between a pre-determined time rules and the evaluation performed with the help of a manual chronometer using data from a line assembly in an automotive industry besieged in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Nowadays, it is possible to verify several tools of measurement of task times, some taking less time and causing less wear of the evaluator than others, but not being in accordance with the real conditions of the workers of a certain industry.
Design/methodology/approach
The developed paper has its methodology based on two methods of time analysis, one of them being an adaptation of the MODular Arrangement of Predeterminated Time Standard (MODAPTS) method – called MODAPTS 2. This method is used by the industry in analyzed in this work and the other through the use of simple manual timing, through the digital timer, of the stages developed in a workstation.
Findings
The study shows that for each operation analyzed, thus presenting a situation of minimum waste, it becomes possible to judge which reasons exist for the operator during manual timekeeping not to reach the optimum times generated by the system of pre-determined times and movements (PMTSs) questioned.
Research limitations/implications
This study is conducted on an automotive enterprise in a period of confidentiality, which means that only a single workstation is able to be studied. This means that the comparison obtained between the time measurements methods used, and the evaluation of the MODAPTS is carried out with the best possible movements and gestures, disregarding then that the wastes can still be postulated to the whole assembly line.
Originality/value
With the automation in industry, where assemble tasks are usually developed manually, it is believed possible to discard the option of measuring task times in its classic and manual form, using a timer, yet during this process, there will be variables that may not be considered by pre-determined measurements methodologies. The work developed by this paper presents different variables that are not examined by the methods of PMTS, not frequently seen in the literature, as well as the difference that occurs between the measurement of times with stopwatch and the use of PMTS, which, in its original form, disregards the wastes that the operator has in their movements.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0253</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-038X |
ispartof | Journal of manufacturing technology management, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.789-810 |
issn | 1741-038X 1758-7786 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2042765203 |
source | Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Advanced manufacturing technologies Assembly Assembly lines Automobile industry Automobiles Automotive engineering Measurement methods Measurement techniques Measuring instruments Productivity Simulation Studies Time measurement Vehicles Work stations Workloads |
title | Confrontation between techniques of time measurement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A51%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confrontation%20between%20techniques%20of%20time%20measurement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manufacturing%20technology%20management&rft.au=Assef,%20Fernanda&rft.date=2018-05-23&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=789&rft.epage=810&rft.pages=789-810&rft.issn=1741-038X&rft.eissn=1758-7786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2042765203%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042765203&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |