How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of political science 2018-06, Vol.19 (2), p.222-249
Hauptverfasser: SHIN, DOH CHULL, KIM, HANNAH JUNE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 2
container_start_page 222
container_title Japanese journal of political science
container_volume 19
creator SHIN, DOH CHULL
KIM, HANNAH JUNE
description Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1468109918000063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2042167137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1468109918000063</cupid><sourcerecordid>2042167137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0B3hY8R3e6STbxVmpthUKlreew2Uzstulu3U2U-utNaMGDOJd5MO-DeYTcArsHBuJhCWGcAEtTSFg7MT8jPQhFGLSYnXc4ToLufkmuvN8wBpylvEe2U_tFJ5XNZUVHutbfaJxGT1drbbZU5rap6RPurHJSHR7p0NDxp6waWWtrqDQFXR5MvUavPbUlXaBCU9PXJq-0ovO9Nh1tgR6lU-trclHKyuPNaffJ2_N4NZoGs_nkZTScBSrkUAcqUlEiUsAyLVEpjPKkkCgKySMWlyoHEQ-EYDBIpQhFkrAUI65YVCCLlWxf75O7o-_e2Y8GfZ1tbONMG5kNWDiAWAAXLQuOLOWs9w7LbO_0TrpDBizrOs3-dNpq-Ekjd7nTxTv-Wv-v-gH3Mnif</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042167137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>SHIN, DOH CHULL ; KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creator><creatorcontrib>SHIN, DOH CHULL ; KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creatorcontrib><description>Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-1099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1468109918000063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Asian people ; Authoritarianism ; Autocracy ; Berlin Wall ; Citizens ; Confucianism ; Culture ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Institutes ; Intellectuals ; Political parties ; Political science ; Political scientists ; Political systems ; Politics ; Public opinion research ; Public opinion surveys ; Research methodology</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of political science, 2018-06, Vol.19 (2), p.222-249</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1468109918000063/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,12826,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHIN, DOH CHULL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creatorcontrib><title>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</title><title>Japanese journal of political science</title><addtitle>Japanese Journal of Political Science</addtitle><description>Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.</description><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Berlin Wall</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Institutes</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public opinion research</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><issn>1468-1099</issn><issn>1474-0060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0B3hY8R3e6STbxVmpthUKlreew2Uzstulu3U2U-utNaMGDOJd5MO-DeYTcArsHBuJhCWGcAEtTSFg7MT8jPQhFGLSYnXc4ToLufkmuvN8wBpylvEe2U_tFJ5XNZUVHutbfaJxGT1drbbZU5rap6RPurHJSHR7p0NDxp6waWWtrqDQFXR5MvUavPbUlXaBCU9PXJq-0ovO9Nh1tgR6lU-trclHKyuPNaffJ2_N4NZoGs_nkZTScBSrkUAcqUlEiUsAyLVEpjPKkkCgKySMWlyoHEQ-EYDBIpQhFkrAUI65YVCCLlWxf75O7o-_e2Y8GfZ1tbONMG5kNWDiAWAAXLQuOLOWs9w7LbO_0TrpDBizrOs3-dNpq-Ekjd7nTxTv-Wv-v-gH3Mnif</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>SHIN, DOH CHULL</creator><creator>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</title><author>SHIN, DOH CHULL ; KIM, HANNAH JUNE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Berlin Wall</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Institutes</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public opinion research</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHIN, DOH CHULL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHIN, DOH CHULL</au><au>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of political science</jtitle><addtitle>Japanese Journal of Political Science</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>222-249</pages><issn>1468-1099</issn><eissn>1474-0060</eissn><abstract>Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1468109918000063</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1468-1099
ispartof Japanese journal of political science, 2018-06, Vol.19 (2), p.222-249
issn 1468-1099
1474-0060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2042167137
source Cambridge Journals Online; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Asian people
Authoritarianism
Autocracy
Berlin Wall
Citizens
Confucianism
Culture
Democracy
Democratization
Institutes
Intellectuals
Political parties
Political science
Political scientists
Political systems
Politics
Public opinion research
Public opinion surveys
Research methodology
title How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Global%20Citizenries%20Think%20about%20Democracy:%20An%20Evaluation%20and%20Synthesis%20of%20Recent%20Public%20Opinion%20Research&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=SHIN,%20DOH%20CHULL&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=222-249&rft.issn=1468-1099&rft.eissn=1474-0060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1468109918000063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2042167137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042167137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1468109918000063&rfr_iscdi=true