How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research
Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of political science 2018-06, Vol.19 (2), p.222-249 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 249 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 222 |
container_title | Japanese journal of political science |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | SHIN, DOH CHULL KIM, HANNAH JUNE |
description | Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1468109918000063 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2042167137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1468109918000063</cupid><sourcerecordid>2042167137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0B3hY8R3e6STbxVmpthUKlreew2Uzstulu3U2U-utNaMGDOJd5MO-DeYTcArsHBuJhCWGcAEtTSFg7MT8jPQhFGLSYnXc4ToLufkmuvN8wBpylvEe2U_tFJ5XNZUVHutbfaJxGT1drbbZU5rap6RPurHJSHR7p0NDxp6waWWtrqDQFXR5MvUavPbUlXaBCU9PXJq-0ovO9Nh1tgR6lU-trclHKyuPNaffJ2_N4NZoGs_nkZTScBSrkUAcqUlEiUsAyLVEpjPKkkCgKySMWlyoHEQ-EYDBIpQhFkrAUI65YVCCLlWxf75O7o-_e2Y8GfZ1tbONMG5kNWDiAWAAXLQuOLOWs9w7LbO_0TrpDBizrOs3-dNpq-Ekjd7nTxTv-Wv-v-gH3Mnif</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042167137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>SHIN, DOH CHULL ; KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creator><creatorcontrib>SHIN, DOH CHULL ; KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creatorcontrib><description>Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-1099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1468109918000063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Asian people ; Authoritarianism ; Autocracy ; Berlin Wall ; Citizens ; Confucianism ; Culture ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Institutes ; Intellectuals ; Political parties ; Political science ; Political scientists ; Political systems ; Politics ; Public opinion research ; Public opinion surveys ; Research methodology</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of political science, 2018-06, Vol.19 (2), p.222-249</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1468109918000063/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,12826,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHIN, DOH CHULL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creatorcontrib><title>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</title><title>Japanese journal of political science</title><addtitle>Japanese Journal of Political Science</addtitle><description>Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.</description><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Berlin Wall</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Institutes</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public opinion research</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><issn>1468-1099</issn><issn>1474-0060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0B3hY8R3e6STbxVmpthUKlreew2Uzstulu3U2U-utNaMGDOJd5MO-DeYTcArsHBuJhCWGcAEtTSFg7MT8jPQhFGLSYnXc4ToLufkmuvN8wBpylvEe2U_tFJ5XNZUVHutbfaJxGT1drbbZU5rap6RPurHJSHR7p0NDxp6waWWtrqDQFXR5MvUavPbUlXaBCU9PXJq-0ovO9Nh1tgR6lU-trclHKyuPNaffJ2_N4NZoGs_nkZTScBSrkUAcqUlEiUsAyLVEpjPKkkCgKySMWlyoHEQ-EYDBIpQhFkrAUI65YVCCLlWxf75O7o-_e2Y8GfZ1tbONMG5kNWDiAWAAXLQuOLOWs9w7LbO_0TrpDBizrOs3-dNpq-Ekjd7nTxTv-Wv-v-gH3Mnif</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>SHIN, DOH CHULL</creator><creator>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</title><author>SHIN, DOH CHULL ; KIM, HANNAH JUNE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c5c58791ef9fecce5b8dae7da3506fcb1762770129a7478809e53c05de06ca063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Berlin Wall</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Institutes</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public opinion research</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHIN, DOH CHULL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHIN, DOH CHULL</au><au>KIM, HANNAH JUNE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of political science</jtitle><addtitle>Japanese Journal of Political Science</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>222-249</pages><issn>1468-1099</issn><eissn>1474-0060</eissn><abstract>Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, individual scholars and research institutes have conducted numerous public opinion surveys to monitor how global citizenries react to the process of democratization taking place in their own countries and elsewhere. This article reviews the various issues surrounding the divergent conceptions of democracy among political scientists and ordinary citizens, and synthesizes significant findings of the conceptual and empirical research based on these surveys. It also raises a set of new questions that future surveys should address to broaden and deepen our knowledge about citizen conceptions of democracy.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1468109918000063</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1468-1099 |
ispartof | Japanese journal of political science, 2018-06, Vol.19 (2), p.222-249 |
issn | 1468-1099 1474-0060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2042167137 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Asian people Authoritarianism Autocracy Berlin Wall Citizens Confucianism Culture Democracy Democratization Institutes Intellectuals Political parties Political science Political scientists Political systems Politics Public opinion research Public opinion surveys Research methodology |
title | How Global Citizenries Think about Democracy: An Evaluation and Synthesis of Recent Public Opinion Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Global%20Citizenries%20Think%20about%20Democracy:%20An%20Evaluation%20and%20Synthesis%20of%20Recent%20Public%20Opinion%20Research&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=SHIN,%20DOH%20CHULL&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=222-249&rft.issn=1468-1099&rft.eissn=1474-0060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1468109918000063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2042167137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042167137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1468109918000063&rfr_iscdi=true |