Psychophysical influences on the validity of anomaloscopic assessments of color vision

Anomaloscopes are used in clinical and research applications involving the assessment of color vision. Output data include the matching range (MR), the midpoint, and the anomaly quotient (AQ). The latter is commonly used to compare data obtained using different instruments. However, the midpoint and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2008-10, Vol.70 (7), p.1243
1. Verfasser: Stillman, Jennifer A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1243
container_title Attention, perception & psychophysics
container_volume 70
creator Stillman, Jennifer A
description Anomaloscopes are used in clinical and research applications involving the assessment of color vision. Output data include the matching range (MR), the midpoint, and the anomaly quotient (AQ). The latter is commonly used to compare data obtained using different instruments. However, the midpoint and AQ ultimately depend on the MR, for which there is no universal operational definition. In this study, 5 volunteers with normal color vision each completed 510 trials in a rating task with an anomaloscope employing the Moreland equation. The aim was to investigate the nature of the perceptual transition into, and out of, a metameric match. This was found to be less than abrupt, providing ample opportunity for the influence of individual response biases. Consequently, an agreed-upon definition of the MR, associated with an appropriate psychophysical technique, would facilitate the identification and tracking over time of acquired color vision deficits and would improve the validity of interstudy comparisons. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204206006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1575350301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2042060063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjr0KwjAURoMoWH_e4eIupE2pdBbF0UHErYR4S1PS3NqbFvr2WhBnp_PB-YYzE1Gcp2qvcvWY_3YSL8WKuZYyU9lBRuJ-5dFU1FYjW6MdWF-6Hr1BBvIQKoRBO_u0YQQqQXtqtCM21FoDmhmZG_SBJ2nIUQeDZUt-IxaldozbL9didz7djpd929GrRw5FTX3nP6pIZJrIbAr66_QGZO1DVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204206006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychophysical influences on the validity of anomaloscopic assessments of color vision</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Stillman, Jennifer A</creator><creatorcontrib>Stillman, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><description>Anomaloscopes are used in clinical and research applications involving the assessment of color vision. Output data include the matching range (MR), the midpoint, and the anomaly quotient (AQ). The latter is commonly used to compare data obtained using different instruments. However, the midpoint and AQ ultimately depend on the MR, for which there is no universal operational definition. In this study, 5 volunteers with normal color vision each completed 510 trials in a rating task with an anomaloscope employing the Moreland equation. The aim was to investigate the nature of the perceptual transition into, and out of, a metameric match. This was found to be less than abrupt, providing ample opportunity for the influence of individual response biases. Consequently, an agreed-upon definition of the MR, associated with an appropriate psychophysical technique, would facilitate the identification and tracking over time of acquired color vision deficits and would improve the validity of interstudy comparisons. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Congenital Impairments ; Definitions ; Feedback (Response) ; Psychometrics ; Stimuli ; Studies ; Validity ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics, 2008-10, Vol.70 (7), p.1243</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stillman, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><title>Psychophysical influences on the validity of anomaloscopic assessments of color vision</title><title>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</title><description>Anomaloscopes are used in clinical and research applications involving the assessment of color vision. Output data include the matching range (MR), the midpoint, and the anomaly quotient (AQ). The latter is commonly used to compare data obtained using different instruments. However, the midpoint and AQ ultimately depend on the MR, for which there is no universal operational definition. In this study, 5 volunteers with normal color vision each completed 510 trials in a rating task with an anomaloscope employing the Moreland equation. The aim was to investigate the nature of the perceptual transition into, and out of, a metameric match. This was found to be less than abrupt, providing ample opportunity for the influence of individual response biases. Consequently, an agreed-upon definition of the MR, associated with an appropriate psychophysical technique, would facilitate the identification and tracking over time of acquired color vision deficits and would improve the validity of interstudy comparisons. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Congenital Impairments</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjr0KwjAURoMoWH_e4eIupE2pdBbF0UHErYR4S1PS3NqbFvr2WhBnp_PB-YYzE1Gcp2qvcvWY_3YSL8WKuZYyU9lBRuJ-5dFU1FYjW6MdWF-6Hr1BBvIQKoRBO_u0YQQqQXtqtCM21FoDmhmZG_SBJ2nIUQeDZUt-IxaldozbL9didz7djpd929GrRw5FTX3nP6pIZJrIbAr66_QGZO1DVA</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Stillman, Jennifer A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Psychophysical influences on the validity of anomaloscopic assessments of color vision</title><author>Stillman, Jennifer A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2042060063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Congenital Impairments</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stillman, Jennifer A</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stillman, Jennifer A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychophysical influences on the validity of anomaloscopic assessments of color vision</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1243</spage><pages>1243-</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>Anomaloscopes are used in clinical and research applications involving the assessment of color vision. Output data include the matching range (MR), the midpoint, and the anomaly quotient (AQ). The latter is commonly used to compare data obtained using different instruments. However, the midpoint and AQ ultimately depend on the MR, for which there is no universal operational definition. In this study, 5 volunteers with normal color vision each completed 510 trials in a rating task with an anomaloscope employing the Moreland equation. The aim was to investigate the nature of the perceptual transition into, and out of, a metameric match. This was found to be less than abrupt, providing ample opportunity for the influence of individual response biases. Consequently, an agreed-upon definition of the MR, associated with an appropriate psychophysical technique, would facilitate the identification and tracking over time of acquired color vision deficits and would improve the validity of interstudy comparisons. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-3921
ispartof Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2008-10, Vol.70 (7), p.1243
issn 1943-3921
1943-393X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_204206006
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Congenital Impairments
Definitions
Feedback (Response)
Psychometrics
Stimuli
Studies
Validity
Vision
title Psychophysical influences on the validity of anomaloscopic assessments of color vision
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A59%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychophysical%20influences%20on%20the%20validity%20of%20anomaloscopic%20assessments%20of%20color%20vision&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Stillman,%20Jennifer%20A&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1243&rft.pages=1243-&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1575350301%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204206006&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true