Workload balancing and loop layout in the design of a flexible manufacturing system

This paper considers combined scheduling and machine layout problems in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). All machines have the capability of performing several different types of operation. However, each operation type is to be assigned to only one of the machines, which are to be positioned a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of operational research 2001-03, Vol.129 (2), p.326-336
Hauptverfasser: Potts, C.N., Whitehead, J.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 2
container_start_page 326
container_title European journal of operational research
container_volume 129
creator Potts, C.N.
Whitehead, J.D.
description This paper considers combined scheduling and machine layout problems in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). All machines have the capability of performing several different types of operation. However, each operation type is to be assigned to only one of the machines, which are to be positioned around a unidirectional conveyor belt loop. For a known set of products, the primary objective is to maximise the throughput and the secondary objective is to minimise the movement of work between machines. Throughput is maximised by balancing workload, which indicates that the primary objective is equivalent to minimising the bottleneck workload. A three-phase integer programming model is derived. The first phase balances the machine workload by assigning operations to machines. The second phase minimises inter-machine travel, while respecting the workload balance attained in the first phase. In the third phase, machines are assigned to positions in the loop layout so that the total number of circuits made by the products is minimised. It is shown that this phase can be modelled as a linear ordering problem. The three-phase method is applied to a case study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00230-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204151008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377221700002307</els_id><sourcerecordid>69628154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-db07a0123e7dde23ecec7015046a65f934f9783b841b7177787859b57758d92e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMFO3DAUtKpW6pbyCUgWJziEPttJXnJCCEGLitQDoB4tx34BL9k4tRPE_n29bMW1lsbjw8y852HsSMCZAFF_uwOFWEgp8ATgFEAqKPADW4kGZVE3NXxkq3fJZ_YlpTUAiEpUK3b3O8TnIRjHOzOY0frxkZvR8SGEiQ9mG5aZ-5HPT8QdJf848tBzw_uBXn03EN-YcemNnZe4c6ZtmmnzlX3qzZDo8B8fsIfrq_vLH8Xtr-83lxe3hS3Ldi5cB2hASEXoHGWyZDGvBWVt6qpvVdm32KiuKUWHAhEbbKq2qxCrxrWS1AE73udOMfxZKM16HZY45pFaQpn_B9BkUbUX2RhSitTrKfqNiVstQO_q02_16V03GkC_1acx-37ufZEmsu8mymcdIiX9opURss33NkPmQjP53TNjylCy1krV-mne5LTzfRrlPl48RZ2sp9GS85HsrF3w_9nnL4tgj1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204151008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Workload balancing and loop layout in the design of a flexible manufacturing system</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>RePEc</source><creator>Potts, C.N. ; Whitehead, J.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Potts, C.N. ; Whitehead, J.D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper considers combined scheduling and machine layout problems in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). All machines have the capability of performing several different types of operation. However, each operation type is to be assigned to only one of the machines, which are to be positioned around a unidirectional conveyor belt loop. For a known set of products, the primary objective is to maximise the throughput and the secondary objective is to minimise the movement of work between machines. Throughput is maximised by balancing workload, which indicates that the primary objective is equivalent to minimising the bottleneck workload. A three-phase integer programming model is derived. The first phase balances the machine workload by assigning operations to machines. The second phase minimises inter-machine travel, while respecting the workload balance attained in the first phase. In the third phase, machines are assigned to positions in the loop layout so that the total number of circuits made by the products is minimised. It is shown that this phase can be modelled as a linear ordering problem. The three-phase method is applied to a case study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-2217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6860</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00230-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJORDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Flexible manufacturing system ; Flexible manufacturing systems ; Integer programming ; Layout ; Production scheduling ; Scheduling ; Studies ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>European journal of operational research, 2001-03, Vol.129 (2), p.326-336</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Mar 1, 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-db07a0123e7dde23ecec7015046a65f934f9783b841b7177787859b57758d92e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-db07a0123e7dde23ecec7015046a65f934f9783b841b7177787859b57758d92e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00230-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4005,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeejores/v_3a129_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a326-336.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potts, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, J.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Workload balancing and loop layout in the design of a flexible manufacturing system</title><title>European journal of operational research</title><description>This paper considers combined scheduling and machine layout problems in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). All machines have the capability of performing several different types of operation. However, each operation type is to be assigned to only one of the machines, which are to be positioned around a unidirectional conveyor belt loop. For a known set of products, the primary objective is to maximise the throughput and the secondary objective is to minimise the movement of work between machines. Throughput is maximised by balancing workload, which indicates that the primary objective is equivalent to minimising the bottleneck workload. A three-phase integer programming model is derived. The first phase balances the machine workload by assigning operations to machines. The second phase minimises inter-machine travel, while respecting the workload balance attained in the first phase. In the third phase, machines are assigned to positions in the loop layout so that the total number of circuits made by the products is minimised. It is shown that this phase can be modelled as a linear ordering problem. The three-phase method is applied to a case study.</description><subject>Flexible manufacturing system</subject><subject>Flexible manufacturing systems</subject><subject>Integer programming</subject><subject>Layout</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0377-2217</issn><issn>1872-6860</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMFO3DAUtKpW6pbyCUgWJziEPttJXnJCCEGLitQDoB4tx34BL9k4tRPE_n29bMW1lsbjw8y852HsSMCZAFF_uwOFWEgp8ATgFEAqKPADW4kGZVE3NXxkq3fJZ_YlpTUAiEpUK3b3O8TnIRjHOzOY0frxkZvR8SGEiQ9mG5aZ-5HPT8QdJf848tBzw_uBXn03EN-YcemNnZe4c6ZtmmnzlX3qzZDo8B8fsIfrq_vLH8Xtr-83lxe3hS3Ldi5cB2hASEXoHGWyZDGvBWVt6qpvVdm32KiuKUWHAhEbbKq2qxCrxrWS1AE73udOMfxZKM16HZY45pFaQpn_B9BkUbUX2RhSitTrKfqNiVstQO_q02_16V03GkC_1acx-37ufZEmsu8mymcdIiX9opURss33NkPmQjP53TNjylCy1krV-mne5LTzfRrlPl48RZ2sp9GS85HsrF3w_9nnL4tgj1g</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Potts, C.N.</creator><creator>Whitehead, J.D.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Workload balancing and loop layout in the design of a flexible manufacturing system</title><author>Potts, C.N. ; Whitehead, J.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-db07a0123e7dde23ecec7015046a65f934f9783b841b7177787859b57758d92e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Flexible manufacturing system</topic><topic>Flexible manufacturing systems</topic><topic>Integer programming</topic><topic>Layout</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potts, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, J.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>European journal of operational research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potts, C.N.</au><au>Whitehead, J.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Workload balancing and loop layout in the design of a flexible manufacturing system</atitle><jtitle>European journal of operational research</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>326-336</pages><issn>0377-2217</issn><eissn>1872-6860</eissn><coden>EJORDT</coden><abstract>This paper considers combined scheduling and machine layout problems in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). All machines have the capability of performing several different types of operation. However, each operation type is to be assigned to only one of the machines, which are to be positioned around a unidirectional conveyor belt loop. For a known set of products, the primary objective is to maximise the throughput and the secondary objective is to minimise the movement of work between machines. Throughput is maximised by balancing workload, which indicates that the primary objective is equivalent to minimising the bottleneck workload. A three-phase integer programming model is derived. The first phase balances the machine workload by assigning operations to machines. The second phase minimises inter-machine travel, while respecting the workload balance attained in the first phase. In the third phase, machines are assigned to positions in the loop layout so that the total number of circuits made by the products is minimised. It is shown that this phase can be modelled as a linear ordering problem. The three-phase method is applied to a case study.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00230-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0377-2217
ispartof European journal of operational research, 2001-03, Vol.129 (2), p.326-336
issn 0377-2217
1872-6860
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_204151008
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; RePEc
subjects Flexible manufacturing system
Flexible manufacturing systems
Integer programming
Layout
Production scheduling
Scheduling
Studies
Workloads
title Workload balancing and loop layout in the design of a flexible manufacturing system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A47%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Workload%20balancing%20and%20loop%20layout%20in%20the%20design%20of%20a%20flexible%20manufacturing%20system&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20operational%20research&rft.au=Potts,%20C.N.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=326-336&rft.issn=0377-2217&rft.eissn=1872-6860&rft.coden=EJORDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00230-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69628154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204151008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377221700002307&rfr_iscdi=true