How oniscophagous spiders overcome woodlouse armour
Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscoidea) are well defended by a heavy armour and many species have noxious secretions. Oniscophagy (feeding on woodlice) may be an important part of the biology of at least some members of the spider genus Dysdera (Dysderidae). Yet there little is known about the diet and possi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of zoology (1987) 2008-05, Vol.275 (1), p.64-71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 71 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | Journal of zoology (1987) |
container_volume | 275 |
creator | Řezáč, M Pekár, S Lubin, Y |
description | Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscoidea) are well defended by a heavy armour and many species have noxious secretions. Oniscophagy (feeding on woodlice) may be an important part of the biology of at least some members of the spider genus Dysdera (Dysderidae). Yet there little is known about the diet and possible specializations for feeding on woodlice in these spiders. Dysdera has unusual variability in mouthpart morphology, which may be related to the diet. Here, we investigate five species of Dysdera and consider the relationship between mouthpart morphology, capture frequency and prey-capture behaviour. We show that species with unmodified chelicerae readily capture a variety of arthropods, but refuse woodlice as prey, whereas species with modified chelicerae feed on woodlice and reject most of the other prey. Among the oniscophagic species, the grasping methods used during the capture of woodlice varied. Species with elongate chelicerae inserted one chelicera into the soft ventral side of the woodlouse and placed the other chelicera on the dorsal side of the woodlouse. Species with dorsally concave chelicerae quickly tucked their chelicerae under the woodlouse and bit the ventral side of the woodlouse's body. Species with flattened chelicerae inserted their chelicerae between the sclerites into the armour of the woodlouse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00408.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204110793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1470783821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4018-ec472c5266f0c4c09825d6c91f4bc1f75ebc04300e2129e8d6f28ea8a08364b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEuPjN1Bxb3HStEkkLoCAMQ12gAmJi5VlKbRspCQb2_49GUWcycWR_D629RCSUMhofGdNRnmpUqGUzBiAyAA4yGy9Q3p_jV3SA1WwVOal2icHITQAjHJR9Ejed6vEfdTBuPZNv7plSEJbT60Pifuy3ri5TVbOTWexYxPt527pj8hepWfBHv_WQzK-uX666qfD0e3d1cUwNRyoTK3hgpmClWUFhhtQkhXT0iha8YmhlSjsxADPASyjTFk5LSsmrZYa4p18wvNDctrNbb37XNqwwCZu_4grkQGnFITKY0h2IeNdCN5W2Pp6rv0GKeDWEDa4FYFbEbg1hD-GcB3R8w5d1TO7-TeHg5dR_EQ87fA6LOz6D9f-HUuRiwKfH27xcnA5VHQ4wPuYP-nylXaoX30dcPzIgEYDUkohyvwbmVKD-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204110793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How oniscophagous spiders overcome woodlouse armour</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Řezáč, M ; Pekár, S ; Lubin, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Řezáč, M ; Pekár, S ; Lubin, Y</creatorcontrib><description>Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscoidea) are well defended by a heavy armour and many species have noxious secretions. Oniscophagy (feeding on woodlice) may be an important part of the biology of at least some members of the spider genus Dysdera (Dysderidae). Yet there little is known about the diet and possible specializations for feeding on woodlice in these spiders. Dysdera has unusual variability in mouthpart morphology, which may be related to the diet. Here, we investigate five species of Dysdera and consider the relationship between mouthpart morphology, capture frequency and prey-capture behaviour. We show that species with unmodified chelicerae readily capture a variety of arthropods, but refuse woodlice as prey, whereas species with modified chelicerae feed on woodlice and reject most of the other prey. Among the oniscophagic species, the grasping methods used during the capture of woodlice varied. Species with elongate chelicerae inserted one chelicera into the soft ventral side of the woodlouse and placed the other chelicera on the dorsal side of the woodlouse. Species with dorsally concave chelicerae quickly tucked their chelicerae under the woodlouse and bit the ventral side of the woodlouse's body. Species with flattened chelicerae inserted their chelicerae between the sclerites into the armour of the woodlouse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00408.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOZOEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>anti-predator defence ; chelicerae ; diet specialization ; Dysdera ; Food chains ; Isopoda ; mouthparts ; Predation ; predatory behaviour ; Spiders ; woodlice ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of zoology (1987), 2008-05, Vol.275 (1), p.64-71</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 The Zoological Society of London</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press May 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4018-ec472c5266f0c4c09825d6c91f4bc1f75ebc04300e2129e8d6f28ea8a08364b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4018-ec472c5266f0c4c09825d6c91f4bc1f75ebc04300e2129e8d6f28ea8a08364b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-7998.2007.00408.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-7998.2007.00408.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Řezáč, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekár, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubin, Y</creatorcontrib><title>How oniscophagous spiders overcome woodlouse armour</title><title>Journal of zoology (1987)</title><description>Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscoidea) are well defended by a heavy armour and many species have noxious secretions. Oniscophagy (feeding on woodlice) may be an important part of the biology of at least some members of the spider genus Dysdera (Dysderidae). Yet there little is known about the diet and possible specializations for feeding on woodlice in these spiders. Dysdera has unusual variability in mouthpart morphology, which may be related to the diet. Here, we investigate five species of Dysdera and consider the relationship between mouthpart morphology, capture frequency and prey-capture behaviour. We show that species with unmodified chelicerae readily capture a variety of arthropods, but refuse woodlice as prey, whereas species with modified chelicerae feed on woodlice and reject most of the other prey. Among the oniscophagic species, the grasping methods used during the capture of woodlice varied. Species with elongate chelicerae inserted one chelicera into the soft ventral side of the woodlouse and placed the other chelicera on the dorsal side of the woodlouse. Species with dorsally concave chelicerae quickly tucked their chelicerae under the woodlouse and bit the ventral side of the woodlouse's body. Species with flattened chelicerae inserted their chelicerae between the sclerites into the armour of the woodlouse.</description><subject>anti-predator defence</subject><subject>chelicerae</subject><subject>diet specialization</subject><subject>Dysdera</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Isopoda</subject><subject>mouthparts</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>predatory behaviour</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><subject>woodlice</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0952-8369</issn><issn>1469-7998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEuPjN1Bxb3HStEkkLoCAMQ12gAmJi5VlKbRspCQb2_49GUWcycWR_D629RCSUMhofGdNRnmpUqGUzBiAyAA4yGy9Q3p_jV3SA1WwVOal2icHITQAjHJR9Ejed6vEfdTBuPZNv7plSEJbT60Pifuy3ri5TVbOTWexYxPt527pj8hepWfBHv_WQzK-uX666qfD0e3d1cUwNRyoTK3hgpmClWUFhhtQkhXT0iha8YmhlSjsxADPASyjTFk5LSsmrZYa4p18wvNDctrNbb37XNqwwCZu_4grkQGnFITKY0h2IeNdCN5W2Pp6rv0GKeDWEDa4FYFbEbg1hD-GcB3R8w5d1TO7-TeHg5dR_EQ87fA6LOz6D9f-HUuRiwKfH27xcnA5VHQ4wPuYP-nylXaoX30dcPzIgEYDUkohyvwbmVKD-A</recordid><startdate>200805</startdate><enddate>200805</enddate><creator>Řezáč, M</creator><creator>Pekár, S</creator><creator>Lubin, Y</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200805</creationdate><title>How oniscophagous spiders overcome woodlouse armour</title><author>Řezáč, M ; Pekár, S ; Lubin, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4018-ec472c5266f0c4c09825d6c91f4bc1f75ebc04300e2129e8d6f28ea8a08364b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>anti-predator defence</topic><topic>chelicerae</topic><topic>diet specialization</topic><topic>Dysdera</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Isopoda</topic><topic>mouthparts</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>predatory behaviour</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><topic>woodlice</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Řezáč, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekár, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubin, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of zoology (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Řezáč, M</au><au>Pekár, S</au><au>Lubin, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How oniscophagous spiders overcome woodlouse armour</atitle><jtitle>Journal of zoology (1987)</jtitle><date>2008-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>275</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>64-71</pages><issn>0952-8369</issn><eissn>1469-7998</eissn><coden>JOZOEU</coden><abstract>Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscoidea) are well defended by a heavy armour and many species have noxious secretions. Oniscophagy (feeding on woodlice) may be an important part of the biology of at least some members of the spider genus Dysdera (Dysderidae). Yet there little is known about the diet and possible specializations for feeding on woodlice in these spiders. Dysdera has unusual variability in mouthpart morphology, which may be related to the diet. Here, we investigate five species of Dysdera and consider the relationship between mouthpart morphology, capture frequency and prey-capture behaviour. We show that species with unmodified chelicerae readily capture a variety of arthropods, but refuse woodlice as prey, whereas species with modified chelicerae feed on woodlice and reject most of the other prey. Among the oniscophagic species, the grasping methods used during the capture of woodlice varied. Species with elongate chelicerae inserted one chelicera into the soft ventral side of the woodlouse and placed the other chelicera on the dorsal side of the woodlouse. Species with dorsally concave chelicerae quickly tucked their chelicerae under the woodlouse and bit the ventral side of the woodlouse's body. Species with flattened chelicerae inserted their chelicerae between the sclerites into the armour of the woodlouse.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00408.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-8369 |
ispartof | Journal of zoology (1987), 2008-05, Vol.275 (1), p.64-71 |
issn | 0952-8369 1469-7998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204110793 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | anti-predator defence chelicerae diet specialization Dysdera Food chains Isopoda mouthparts Predation predatory behaviour Spiders woodlice Zoology |
title | How oniscophagous spiders overcome woodlouse armour |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A42%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20oniscophagous%20spiders%20overcome%20woodlouse%20armour&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20zoology%20(1987)&rft.au=%C5%98ez%C3%A1%C4%8D,%20M&rft.date=2008-05&rft.volume=275&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=64-71&rft.issn=0952-8369&rft.eissn=1469-7998&rft.coden=JOZOEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00408.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1470783821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204110793&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |